Problems of elderly patients on inhalation therapy: Difference in problem recognition between patients and medical professionals.

BACKGROUND: There is no systematic analysis to identify problems involved with instruction on inhalation therapy for elderly patients. We conducted a nationwide questionnaire survey for patients and medical professionals. METHODS: A questionnaire survey was conducted of adult patients on inhaled drugs (ages 18-92 years, 820 individuals) and medical professionals (pharmacists or nurses) who provided instruction on inhalation therapy to these patients in 23 institutions in Japan to investigate the technique and the level of understanding (knowledge) of the inhalation therapy. Changes in the recognition of performance of inhalation technique and inhalation knowledge with increasing age were analyzed. RESULTS: According to patients' subjective assessment, there was no deterioration in the performance of the inhalation technique or loss of the knowledge with increasing age. On the other hand, medical professionals' objective assessment revealed a significant loss of both inhalation technique and knowledge with increasing age. Not many elderly patients noticed their own problems themselves, revealing a great perception gap between elderly patients and medical professionals. Thus, there was concern that patients would unconsciously practice the inhalation procedure improperly. On the other hand, in comparison with non-elderly patients, elderly patients were less resistant to continuation of therapy, suggesting that they would be more likely to accept instruction on inhalation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients are apt to assume that they "understand well", therefore, in order to recognize and close the perception gap between elderly patients and medical professionals, it is necessary to provide them with more aggressive (frequent) instructions on inhalation therapy.

Dry mouth as a novel indicator of hoarseness caused by inhalation therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of dry mouth on the incidence and severity of inhalation therapy-induced hoarseness. METHODS: The volume of saliva secreted without stimulation was measured in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who also answered a questionnaire on subjective ratings for hoarseness. The relationship between salivary secretion and hoarseness was analyzed by the Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression. The prediction accuracy of salivary secretion for the grade of hoarseness was evaluated using a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: A total of 232 patients participated in this study. The subjective rating score of hoarseness was negatively correlated with the volume of saliva secreted (r = -0.273, p < 0.001). A stepwise multiple linear regression analysis revealed that salivary secretion (p < 0.001) and the dose of fluticasone administered (p < 0.05) were significant variables for predicting hoarseness. The ROC analysis for predicting severe hoarseness by salivary secretion showed significant prediction accuracy (AUC = 0.690, 95% CI: 0.614-0.766, p < 0.001) and was higher in patients administered fluticasone (AUC = 0.732, 95% CI: 0.644-0.821, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Hyposalivation is a significant prediction factor of hoarseness induced by inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). The prediction accuracy was higher in patients administered fluticasone than in those administered another inhalation drug. Although the pharmaceutical efficacy of fluticasone is high, patients with hyposalivation should be prescribed other inhalation drugs.

Gastroesophageal reflux-like symptoms are associated with hyposalivation and oropharyngeal problems in patients with asthma.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested a significant relationship between hyposalivation and inhalation therapy-induced oropharyngeal problems. However, salivary secretion tests are not widely performed in daily clinical practice. In fact, xerostomia, the complaint of dry mouth, may not indicate hyposalivation. Therefore, we determined the clinical factors associated with hyposalivation in patients with asthma. METHODS: This study is a post-hoc analysis of our previous studies. Adult patients with asthma on maintenance inhalation therapy were enrolled. The participants completed questionnaires on oropharyngeal symptoms and underwent a salivary secretion test. Symptom severity was evaluated using a numerical rating scale (NRS), and salivary secretion was measured using the modified cotton roll method. Using logistic regression analysis, we identified the clinical factors associated with hyposalivation. RESULTS: In total, 531 patients completed the questionnaire (43.8 ± 16.9 years and male/female = 171/360), and 234 patients successfully performed a salivary secretion test, of which 126 (53.8%) were diagnosed with hyposalivation (<0.25 g/min). The patients with hyposalivation were significantly older (p < 0.0001) and had severe xerostomia and/or gastroesophageal reflux-like symptoms (GERLS) (p < 0.0001). Many of these patients had also used inhaled long-acting beta agonists (p = 0.012) and high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (p = 0.024). Multivariate analysis revealed that advanced age (odds ratio [OR] 1.05, p < 0.0001), severe xerostomia (OR 1.02, p = 0.0006) and severe GERLS (OR 1.02, p = 0.001) were independently and significantly associated with hyposalivation. CONCLUSIONS: Age, xerostomia, and GERLS were significantly related to hyposalivation in patients with asthma. To identify oropharyngeal problems in these patients, a careful assessment of the suspected symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux may be useful.

Assessment of inhalation flow patterns of soft mist inhaler co-prescribed with dry powder inhaler using inspiratory flow meter for multi inhalation devices.

The patients' inhalation flow pattern is one of the significant determinants for clinical performance of inhalation therapy. However, the development of inhalation flow meters for various inhalation devices has been unable to keep up with the increasing number of newly launched inhalation devices. In the present study, we developed simple attachment orifices for the inhalation flow pattern monitoring system, which are suitable for all commercial inhalers, and investigated the efficacy of the system on the clinical inhalation instruction for patients co-prescribed dry powder inhaler (DPI) and soft mist inhaler (SMI). First, we constructed simple attachment orifices that were adjusted for 13 commercial inhalers, and examined the correlation between orifice and inhalation device. Second, the inhalation flow patterns (peak inspiratory flow rate, PIFR; inhalation duration time, DT) of patients prescribed a combination of DPI and SMI were monitored before and after inhalation instruction. The inhalation resistance of commercial inhalers are listed in the following order; Twincaps® > Handihaler® > Swinghaler® = Clickhaler® > Twisthaler® > Turbuhaler® > Jenuair® > Diskus® = Ellipta® > Diskhaler® > Breezhaler® > Respimat® = pMDI. The pressure drop via orifice was significantly correlated with that via the commercial inhaler. For the confirmation, all participants achieved the DPI criterion of PIFR. On the other hand, 4 participants (6 clinical visits) of 10 experimented participants could not achieve the essential criterion of DT (> 1.5 sec) for SMI, but all participants improved their duration time after inhalation instruction by pharmacists (P<0.05). In the present study, we successfully developed simple attachment orifice suitable for 13 commercial inhalation devices. These data suggested that our simple attachment orifices for the inhalation flow pattern monitoring system can detect patients with inadequate inhalation patterns via SMI.