Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer remains fatal despite recent advances. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is highly expressed in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Lutetium-177 (177Lu)-PSMA-617 is a radioligand therapy that delivers beta-particle radiation to PSMA-expressing cells and the surrounding microenvironment. METHODS: We conducted an international, open-label, phase 3 trial evaluating 177Lu-PSMA-617 in patients who had metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with at least one androgen-receptor-pathway inhibitor and one or two taxane regimens and who had PSMA-positive gallium-68 (68Ga)-labeled PSMA-11 positron-emission tomographic-computed tomographic scans. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either 177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq every 6 weeks for four to six cycles) plus protocol-permitted standard care or standard care alone. Protocol-permitted standard care excluded chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radium-223 (223Ra), and investigational drugs. The alternate primary end points were imaging-based progression-free survival and overall survival, which were powered for hazard ratios of 0.67 and 0.73, respectively. Key secondary end points were objective response, disease control, and time to symptomatic skeletal events. Adverse events during treatment were those occurring no more than 30 days after the last dose and before subsequent anticancer treatment. RESULTS: From June 2018 to mid-October 2019, a total of 831 of 1179 screened patients underwent randomization. The baseline characteristics of the patients were balanced between the groups. The median follow-up was 20.9 months. 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus standard care significantly prolonged, as compared with standard care, both imaging-based progression-free survival (median, 8.7 vs. 3.4 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.40; 99.2% confidence interval [CI], 0.29 to 0.57; P<0.001) and overall survival (median, 15.3 vs. 11.3 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.74; P<0.001). All the key secondary end points significantly favored 177Lu-PSMA-617. The incidence of adverse events of grade 3 or above was higher with 177Lu-PSMA-617 than without (52.7% vs. 38.0%), but quality of life was not adversely affected. CONCLUSIONS: Radioligand therapy with 177Lu-PSMA-617 prolonged imaging-based progression-free survival and overall survival when added to standard care in patients with advanced PSMA-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. (Funded by Endocyte, a Novartis company; VISION ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03511664.).

A VISION Substudy of Reader Agreement on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Scan Interpretation to Determine Patient Eligibility for 177Lu-PSMA-617 Radioligand Therapy.

[ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 ( 68Ga-PSMA-11) is used to identify prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive tumors on PET scans. In the VISION study, 68Ga-PSMA-11 was used to determine the eligibility of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer for treatment with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (177Lu-PSMA-617), based on predefined read criteria. This substudy aimed to investigate the interreader variability and intrareader reproducibility of visual assessments of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scans using the VISION read criteria and evaluate the agreement between read results for this and the VISION study. Methods: In VISION, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scans were centrally read as inclusion cases if they had at least 1 PSMA-positive lesion and no PSMA-negative lesions that fulfilled the exclusion criteria. In this substudy, 125 PET/CT scans (75 inclusion and 50 exclusion cases) were randomly selected from VISION and retrospectively assessed by 3 independent central readers. A random subset of 20 cases (12 inclusion and 8 exclusion cases) was recoded for assessment of intrareader reproducibility. Classification of cases as inclusion or exclusion cases was based on the VISION read criteria. Overall interreader variability was assessed by Fleiss κ-statistics, and pairwise variability and intrareader reproducibility were assessed by Cohen κ-statistics. Results: For interreader variability, the readers agreed on 77% of cases (overall average agreement rate, 0.85; Fleiss κ, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.50-0.70]). The pairwise agreement rate was 0.82, 0.88, and 0.84, and the corresponding Cohen κ was 0.54 (95% CI, 0.38-0.71), 0.67 (95% CI, 0.52-0.83), and 0.59 (95% CI, 0.43-0.75), respectively. For intrareader reproducibility, the agreement rate was 0.90, 0.90, and 0.95, and the corresponding Cohen κ was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.49-0.99), 0.76 (95% CI, 0.46-0.99), and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.67-0.99), respectively. The number of actual VISION inclusion cases out of the total number of cases scored as inclusion in this substudy was 71 of 93 (agreement rate, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.66-0.85) for reader 1, 70 of 88 (0.80; 0.70-0.87) for reader 2, and 73 of 96 (0.76; 0.66-0.84) for reader 3. All readers agreed on 66 of 75 VISION inclusion cases. Conclusion: Moderate-to-substantial interreader agreement and substantial-to-almost perfect intrareader reproducibility for 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scan assessment using the VISION read criteria were observed. The read rules applied in VISION can be readily learned and demonstrate good reproducibility.

Linear growth and bone maturation are unaffected by 1 year of therapy with inhaled flunisolide hydrofluoroalkane in prepubescent children with mild persistent asthma: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the preferred long-term therapy for subjects with persistent asthma. However, concerns remain about potential effects of long-term ICS use on growth in children. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of 1 year of inhalation therapy with flunisolide hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) on growth velocity and bone maturation in children with mild persistent asthma. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 218 prepubescent (Tanner Stage 1) children with mild persistent asthma ranging in age from 4 to 10 years were evaluated. After a 2-week run-in period, subjects were randomized (1:1) to 2 puffs flunisolide HFA twice daily (85 µg/puff) or placebo for 52 weeks. Height was assessed by stadiometry at each visit. Growth velocity (cm/52 weeks) was estimated by the slope of the linear regression of height over time. An independent assessor scored hand and wrist radiographs for bone development pretreatment and at week 52. Analysis of covariance was used for all efficacy endpoints. RESULTS: The 2 treatment groups were similar at baseline for sex, race, age, weight, and height. At the end of double-blind treatment, mean growth velocity was 6.01 ± 1.84 cm/52 weeks for flunisolide HFA (n = 106) and 6.19 ± 1.30 cm/52 weeks for placebo (n = 112) (P = .425). Mean advancement in bone age during the 1-year study was similar for the 2 groups: 0.93 ± 0.46 years for flunisolide HFA (n = 70) and 1.01 ± 0.41 years for placebo (n = 75) (P = .128). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, flunisolide HFA did not suppress growth or bone maturation at the highest approved dose for children with persistent asthma.

Noninfectious pneumonitis after everolimus therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma.

RATIONALE: Noninfectious pneumonitis is a known class effect of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors. OBJECTIVES: To assess the incidence, radiographic patterns, management, and outcome of pneumonitis in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving everolimus. METHODS: Clinical study data from 416 patients, randomized to receive everolimus versus placebo, were analyzed for adverse events of pneumonitis. Radiographic studies performed every 8 weeks were subject to a prospective, independent, blinded central review for the presence of findings indicative of pneumonitis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 274 patients receiving everolimus, clinical pneumonitis was suspected for 37 patients (13.5%) (none with placebo). Nine cases (3.3%) were grade 1 (asymptomatic), 18 (6.6%) were grade 2 (not interfering with daily living), and 10 (3.6%) were grade 3 (interfering with daily living or oxygen indicated). No grade 4 (life-threatening) pneumonitis was observed. Of the 10 patients with grade 3 pneumonitis, 5 had baseline radiological evidence of pneumonitis before everolimus therapy. Twenty of the 37 cases (54.0%) were reversible within the follow-up period; resolution followed dose reduction for 20 patients and treatment discontinuation in 10 patients. Corticosteroid therapy was initiated in 16 cases. Dedicated radiological review of available serial radiographic studies (245 patients receiving everolimus and 132 receiving placebo) found a higher percentage of new radiographic findings even in patients without a diagnosis of clinical pneumonitis who were receiving everolimus versus placebo (38.9 vs. 15.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Early recognition, prompt intervention, and a conservative approach are important in managing the risk associated with noninfectious pneumonitis in association with everolimus. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 00410124).

Optimisation of the tumour response threshold in patients treated with everolimus for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: analysis of response and progression-free survival in the RECORD-1 study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Objective response as determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) is low among patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with targeted agents, despite significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS). A modified response threshold may be more clinically meaningful than RECIST for identifying patients who may derive a PFS benefit from targeted therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of data from the phase III RECORD-1 trial of everolimus versus placebo in patients with mRCC who had failed sunitinib or sorafenib (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00410124). A series of tumour response thresholds, defined by the best change in the sum of the longest tumour diameters (ΔSLD) of target lesions, was evaluated to distinguish 'responders' from 'non-responders' with respect to significant improvement in PFS. RESULTS: The optimal threshold for determining a response to everolimus was -5% ΔSLD. At this threshold, median PFS was 8.4 months in responders and 5.0 months in non-responders (hazard ratio [HR] 2.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-3.7). CONCLUSION: In patients who have failed vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFr-TKI) therapy, everolimus affords superior PFS to placebo, regardless of change in tumour burden. However, a ≥ 5% reduction in SLD is a better predictor of PFS benefit than the classical ≥ 30% reduction used with RECIST.