RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia is a frequent complication after abdominal surgery. A risk factor for incisional hernia, related to body composition, is obesity. Poor skeletal muscle mass might also be a risk factor, as it may result in weakness of the abdominal wall. However, it remains unknown if sarcopenia (i.e. low skeletal muscle mass) is a risk factor for incisional hernia. Therefore, this study aims to investigate whether a relation between sarcopenia and incisional hernia exists. METHODS: Patients from the STITCH trial, who underwent elective midline laparotomy, were included. Computed tomography examinations performed within 3 months preoperatively were used to measure the skeletal muscle index (SMI; cm2/m2). Primarily, SMI measured continuously, sarcopenia based on previously described cut-off values for the SMI, and sarcopenia as the lowest gender-specific SMI quartile were assessed as measures to predict incisional hernia occurrence. Secondary, the association between these three measures and post-operative complications was investigated. RESULTS: In total, 283 patients (45.2% male; mean age 63.7 years; mean BMI 25.36 kg/m2) were included, of whom 52 (18%) developed an incisional hernia. Mean SMI was 44.23 cm2/m2 (SD 7.77). The Nagelkerke value for the three measures of sarcopenia was about 0.020 (2.0%) for incisional hernia development. Logistic regressions with the three measures of sarcopenia did not show any predictive value of the model (area under the curve (AUC) of 0.67 for incisional hernia; 0.69 for post-operative complications). DISCUSSION: In this study, sarcopenia does not seem to be a risk factor for the development of an incisional hernia.
Assuntos
Hérnia Incisional/epidemiologia , Músculo Esquelético/diagnóstico por imagem , Sarcopenia/diagnóstico por imagem , Sarcopenia/epidemiologia , Parede Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Hérnia Incisional/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Período Pré-Operatório , Fatores de Risco , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate anxiety and pain following perioperative music interventions compared with control conditions in adult patients. METHODS: Eleven electronic databases were searched for full-text publications of RCTs investigating the effect of music interventions on anxiety and pain during invasive surgery published between 1 January 1980 and 20 October 2016. Results and data were double-screened and extracted independently. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate effect sizes as standardized mean differences (MDs). Heterogeneity was investigated in subgroup analyses and metaregression analyses. The review was registered in the PROSPERO database as CRD42016024921. RESULTS: Ninety-two RCTs (7385 patients) were included in the systematic review, of which 81 were included in the meta-analysis. Music interventions significantly decreased anxiety (MD -0·69, 95 per cent c.i. -0·88 to -0·50; P < 0·001) and pain (MD -0·50, -0·66 to -0·34; P < 0·001) compared with controls, equivalent to a decrease of 21 mm for anxiety and 10 mm for pain on a 100-mm visual analogue scale. Changes in outcome corrected for baseline were even larger: MD -1·41 (-1·89 to -0·94; P < 0·001) for anxiety and -0·54 (-0·93 to -0·15; P = 0·006) for pain. Music interventions provided during general anaesthesia significantly decreased pain compared with that in controls (MD -0·41, -0·64 to -0·18; P < 0·001). Metaregression analysis found no significant association between the effect of music interventions and age, sex, choice and timing of music, and type of anaesthesia. Risk of bias in the studies was moderate to high. CONCLUSION: Music interventions significantly reduce anxiety and pain in adult surgical patients.
Assuntos
Ansiedade/terapia , Musicoterapia , Dor Pós-Operatória/terapia , Adulto , Ansiedade/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Musicoterapia/métodos , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controleRESUMO
AIM: Stoma reversal might lead to a stoma site incisional hernia. Recently, prophylactic mesh reinforcement of the stoma site has gained increased attention, supporting the need for accurate data on the incidence of and risk factors for stoma site incisional hernia and to identify high-risk patients. The aim of this study was to assess incidence, risk factors and prevention of stoma site incisional hernias. METHOD: Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases were searched. Studies reporting the incidence of stoma site incisional hernia after stoma reversal were included. Study quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane risk of bias tool. Data on incidence, risk factors and prophylactic mesh reinforcement were extracted. RESULTS: Of 1440 articles found, 33 studies comprising 4679 reversals were included. The overall incidence of incisional hernia was 6.5% [range 0%-38%, median follow-up 27.5 (17.54-36) months]. Eleven studies assessed stoma site incisional hernia as the primary end-point, showing an incidence of 17.7% [range 1.7%-36.1%, median follow-up 28 (15.25-51.70) months]. Body mass index, diabetes and surgery for malignant disease were found to be independent risk factors, as derived from eight studies. Two retrospective comparative cohort studies showed significantly lower rates of stoma site incisional hernia with prophylactic mesh reinforcement compared with nonmesh controls [6.4% vs 36.1% (P = 0.001); 3% vs 19% (P = 0.04)]. CONCLUSION: Stoma site incisional hernia should not be underestimated as a long-term problem. Body mass index, diabetes and malignancy seem to be potential risk factors. Currently, limited data are available on the outcomes of prophylactic mesh reinforcement to prevent stoma site incisional hernia.
Assuntos
Hérnia Incisional/epidemiologia , Telas Cirúrgicas , Estomas Cirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Hérnia Incisional/etiologia , Hérnia Incisional/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
AIM: Parastomal hernia is the most common complication following stoma construction. Surgical treatment is usually chosen over non-operative treatment, but a clear rationale for the choice of management is often lacking. This study aims to investigate the reasons for non-operative treatment, cross-over rates and postoperative complications. METHOD: A multicentre, retrospective cohort study was conducted. Patients diagnosed with a parastomal hernia between January 2007 and December 2012 were included. Data on baseline characteristics, primary surgery and hernias were collected. For non-operative treatment, reasons for this treatment and cross-over rates were evaluated. For all patients undergoing surgery (surgical treatment and cross-overs), complication and recurrence rates were analysed. RESULTS: Of the 80 patients included, 42 (53%) were in the surgical treatment group and 38 (48%) in the non-operative treatment group. Median follow-up was 46 months (interquartile range 24-72). The reasons for non-operative treatment were absence of symptoms in 12 patients (32%), comorbidities in nine (24%) and patient preference in three (7.9%). In 14 patients (37%) reasons were not documented. Eight patients (21%) crossed over from non-operative treatment to surgical treatment, of whom one needed emergency surgery. In 23 patients (55%), parastomal hernia recurred after the original surgical treatment, of whom 21 (91%) underwent additional repair. CONCLUSION: Parastomal hernia repair is associated with high recurrence and additional repair rates. Non-operative treatment has a relatively low cross-over and emergency surgery rate. Given these data, non-operative treatment might be a better choice for patients without complaints or with comorbidities.
Assuntos
Hérnia Abdominal/terapia , Herniorrafia , Hérnia Incisional/terapia , Estomia , Estomas Cirúrgicos , Adulto , Idoso , Doenças Assintomáticas , Estudos de Coortes , Colostomia , Comorbidade , Tratamento Conservador , Feminino , Humanos , Ileostomia , Íleus/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Preferência do Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Telas Cirúrgicas , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Técnicas de Sutura , Derivação UrináriaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Incisional heia is a frequent complication of midline laparotomy. The use of mesh in hernia repair has been reported to lead to fewer recurrences compared to primary repair. However, in Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) Grade 3 hernia patients, whose hernia is potentially contaminated, synthetic mesh is prone to infection. There is a strong preference for resorbable biological mesh in contaminated fields, since it is more able to resist infection, and because it is fully resorbed, the chance of a foreign body reaction is reduced. However, when not crosslinked, biological resorbable mesh products tend to degrade too quickly to facilitate native cellular ingrowth. Phasix™ Mesh is a biosynthetic mesh with both the biocompatibility and resorbability of a biological mesh and the mechanical strength of a synthetic mesh. This multi-center single-arm study aims to collect data on safety and performance of Phasix™ Mesh in Grade 3 hernia patients. METHODS: A total of 85 VHWG Grade 3 hernia patients will be treated with Phasix™ Mesh in 15 sites across Europe. The primary outcome is Surgical Site Occurrence (SSO) including hematoma, seroma, infection, dehiscence and fistula formation (requiring intervention) through 3 months. Secondary outcomes include recurrence, infection and quality of life related outcomes after 24 months. Follow-up visits will be at drain removal (if drains were not placed, then on discharge or staple removal instead) and in the 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th, 18th and 24th month after surgery. CONCLUSION: Based on evidence from this clinical study Depending on the results this clinical study will yield, Phasix™ Mesh may become a preferred treatment option in VHWG Grade 3 patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered on March 25, 2016 on clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02720042 .
Assuntos
Herniorrafia/métodos , Hérnia Incisional/cirurgia , Laparotomia/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Hérnia Ventral/cirurgia , Humanos , Hérnia Incisional/etiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Recidiva , Telas CirúrgicasRESUMO
PURPOSE: Hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) has been found to improve the healing of poorly oxygenated tissues. This study aimed to investigate the influence of HBOT on the healing in ischemic colorectal anastomosis. METHODS: Forty Wistar rats were randomly divided into a treatment group that received HBOT for 10 consecutive days (7 days before and 3 days after surgery), or in a control group, which did not receive the therapy. Colectomy with an ischemic anastomosis was performed in all rats. In each group, the rats were followed for 3 or 7 days after surgery to determine the influence of HBOT on anastomotic healing. RESULTS: Five rats from each group died during follow-up. No anastomotic dehiscence was seen in the HBOT group, compared to 37.5 % and 28.6 % dehiscence in the control group on postoperative day (POD) 3 and 7, respectively. The HBOT group had a significantly higher bursting pressure (130.9 ± 17.0 mmHg) than the control group (88.4 ± 46.7 mmHg; p = 0.03) on POD 3. On POD 3 and POD 7, the adhesion severity was significantly higher in the control groups than in the HBOT groups (p < 0.005). Kidney function (creatinine level) of the HBOT group was significantly better than of the control group on POD 7 (p = 0.001). Interestingly, a significantly higher number of CD206+ cells (marker for type 2 macrophages) was observed in the HBOT group at the anastomotic area on POD 3. CONCLUSION: Hyperbaric oxygen enhanced the healing of ischemic anastomoses in rats and improved the postoperative kidney function.
Assuntos
Colo/cirurgia , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica , Reto/cirurgia , Cicatrização , Abscesso Abdominal/sangue , Abscesso Abdominal/complicações , Abscesso Abdominal/etiologia , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Fístula Anastomótica/sangue , Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Animais , Contagem de Células , Creatinina/sangue , Macrófagos/patologia , Masculino , Ratos Wistar , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/sangue , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/complicações , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/etiologia , Aderências Teciduais/sangue , Aderências Teciduais/complicações , Aderências Teciduais/patologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Technical failure of sutured or stapled anastomoses may lead to anastomotic leakage, which is one of the most important complications after colorectal surgery. Cyanoacrylate glue (CA) provides strong mechanical attachment, making it a good candidate for suture reinforcement. This study aimed to demonstrate that CA is the most important factor in the strength of a sealed colorectal anastomosis, in both normal and insufficient anastomoses. METHODS: Ex vivo porcine colorectal segments were resected. A 1-layer continuous anastomosis or an insufficient 6-interrupted-suture anastomosis was created, and the baseline anastomotic bursting pressure (ABP) was measured. The primary anastomosis was then reinforced either by CA or with 4 additional interrupted sutures, further inverting the anastomosis. After reinforcement a second ABP test was performed. RESULTS: Thirty-two segments were used. Reinforcing the anastomosis by CA significantly increased ABP in both normal and insufficient anastomoses when compared to the primary anastomosis (p < 0.05 for all groups); no significant difference in ABP was found between normal and insufficient anastomosis groups after CA reinforcement. Anastomotic reinforcement with CA was not inferior to the reinforcement with sutures in both normal and insufficient anastomoses, and had significantly fewer ABP variances in normal anastomosis groups (p = 0.042). CONCLUSION: Reinforcing a colorectal anastomosis with CA increases its mechanical strength in both normal and technically insufficient situations, which may contribute to the reduction of anastomotic leakage. CA is promising for anastomotic reinforcement based on mechanical improvement of the anastomosis, and in vivo studies are needed to evaluate its biological effects.
Assuntos
Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Fístula Anastomótica/prevenção & controle , Colo/cirurgia , Cianoacrilatos/uso terapêutico , Reto/cirurgia , Adesivos Teciduais/uso terapêutico , Fístula Anastomótica/fisiopatologia , Animais , Colo/fisiologia , Masculino , Modelos Animais , Pressão , Reto/fisiologia , Estresse Mecânico , Sus scrofa , SuturasRESUMO
PURPOSE: Data on primary (PH) and incisional hernias (IH) are often pooled, even though several studies have illustrated that these are different entities with worse outcomes for IHs. The aim of this study is to validate previous research comparing PHs and IHs and to examine whether hernia width is an important contributor to the differences between these hernia types. METHODS: A registry-based, prospective cohort study was performed, utilizing the French Hernia Club database. All patients undergoing PH or IH repair between September 8th 2011 and May 22nd 2019 were included. Baseline, hernia and surgical characteristics, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Outcomes were analyzed per width category (≤ 2 cm, 3-4 cm, 5-10 cm and > 10 cm). RESULTS: A total of 9159 patients were included, of whom 4965 (54%) had PH and 4194 (46%) had IH. PHs and IHs differed significantly in 12/15 baseline characteristics, 9/10 hernia and surgical characteristics, and all outcomes. Overall, complications and re-interventions were more common in patients with IH. After correcting for width, the differences between PH and IH were no longer significant, except for medical complications, which were more common after IH repair compared to PH. CONCLUSION: After correcting for hernia width, most outcomes do not significantly differ between PH and IH, indicating that not hernia type, but hernia width is an important factor contributing to the differences between PH and IH.
Assuntos
Hérnia Ventral , Hérnia Incisional , Hérnia Ventral/cirurgia , Herniorrafia , Humanos , Hérnia Incisional/epidemiologia , Hérnia Incisional/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos Prospectivos , Telas CirúrgicasRESUMO
PURPOSE: Incisional hernia (IH) is the most frequent complication after abdominal surgery. The diagnostic modality, observer, definition, and diagnostic protocol used for the diagnosis of IH potentially influence the reported prevalence. The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of different modalities used to identify IH. METHODS: Embase, MEDLINE OvidSP, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify studies diagnosing IH. Studies comparing the IH detection rate of two different diagnostic modalities or inter-observer variability of one modality were included. Quality assessment of studies was done by Cochrane Collaboration's tool. Article selection and data collection were performed independently by two researchers. PROSPERO registration: CRD42017062307. RESULTS: Fifteen studies representing a total of 2986 patients were included. Inter-observer variation for CT-scan ranged from 11.2 to 69% (n = 678). Disagreement between ultrasound and CT-scan ranged between 6.6 and 17% (n = 221). Ten studies compared physical examination to CT-scan or ultrasound. Disagreement between physical examination and imaging ranged between 7.6 and 39% (n = 1602). Between 15 and 58% of IHs were solely detected by imaging (n = 483). Relative increase in IH prevalence for imaging compared to physical examination ranged from 0.92 to 2.4 (n = 1922). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound or CT-scan will result in substantial additional IH diagnosis. Lack of consensus regarding the definition of IH might contribute to the disagreement rates. Both the observer and diagnostic modality used could be additional factors explaining variability in IH prevalence and should be reported in IH research.
Assuntos
Hérnia Incisional/diagnóstico , Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade , Humanos , Hérnia Incisional/epidemiologia , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Prevalência , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/estatística & dados numéricos , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Ultrassonografia/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Ventral hernia repair is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures, though recurrences are common. Recurrence can be caused by impaired collagen formation or maturation; hence, patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) are potentially at increased risk for hernia recurrence. EDS causes altered collagen metabolism, though little is known about the influence of EDS on ventral hernioplasty outcomes. This study aims to analyze these patients to report complication rates, recurrence rates, and, if possible, to give recommendations for surgical intervention. METHODS: A retrospective analysis between January 2000 and January 2017 was performed in a university hospital Belgium (UZ Ghent). Data on baseline characteristics, primary surgery, and hernias were extracted from patients' medical charts. Noted endpoints were postoperative complications and recurrences. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (50% males) were included. Ten (71%) had an incisional hernia and four (29%) had a primary ventral hernia. Median age was 45 years (IQR 37.75-52.75), median BMI was 24.82 (IQR 22.43-26.87). Four patients (29%) smoked, one patient (7.1%) had diabetes mellitus, and five patients (36%) had an aneurysm of the abdominal aorta. All patients underwent elective open hernioplasty with mesh reinforcement. Three patients (21%) had a postoperative complication (two infections, one seroma). Recurrence rate was 7.1% (one patient). CONCLUSIONS: This series describes 14 patients with a median follow-up of 50 months and a recurrence rate of 7.1%. The low recurrence rate could be explained by the use of large meshes that reinforce the entire midline to compensate for the reduced collagen strength in EDS patients.
Assuntos
Síndrome de Ehlers-Danlos/complicações , Hérnia Ventral/cirurgia , Herniorrafia/efeitos adversos , Hérnia Incisional/cirurgia , Telas Cirúrgicas , Adulto , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/métodos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hérnia Ventral/etiologia , Herniorrafia/métodos , Humanos , Hérnia Incisional/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: International guidelines on the prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias are lacking. The European Hernia Society therefore implemented a Clinical Practice Guideline development project. METHODS: The guidelines development group consisted of general, hernia and colorectal surgeons, a biostatistician and a biologist, from 14 European countries. These guidelines conformed to the AGREE II standards and the GRADE methodology. The databases of MEDLINE, CINAHL, CENTRAL and the gray literature through OpenGrey were searched. Quality assessment was performed using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network checklists. The guidelines were presented at the 38th European Hernia Society Congress and each key question was evaluated in a consensus voting of congress participants. RESULTS: End colostomy is associated with a higher incidence of parastomal hernia, compared to other types of stomas. Clinical examination is necessary for the diagnosis of parastomal hernia, whereas computed tomography scan or ultrasonography may be performed in cases of diagnostic uncertainty. Currently available classifications are not validated; however, we suggest the use of the European Hernia Society classification for uniform research reporting. There is insufficient evidence on the policy of watchful waiting, the route and location of stoma construction, and the size of the aperture. The use of a prophylactic synthetic non-absorbable mesh upon construction of an end colostomy is strongly recommended. No such recommendation can be made for other types of stomas at present. It is strongly recommended to avoid performing a suture repair for elective parastomal hernia. So far, there is no sufficient comparative evidence on specific techniques, open or laparoscopic surgery and specific mesh types. However, a mesh without a hole is suggested in preference to a keyhole mesh when laparoscopic repair is performed. CONCLUSION: An evidence-based approach to the diagnosis and management of parastomal hernias reveals the lack of evidence on several topics, which need to be addressed by multicenter trials. Parastomal hernia prevention using a prophylactic mesh for end colostomies reduces parastomal herniation. Clinical outcomes should be audited and adverse events must be reported.
Assuntos
Hérnia Ventral/terapia , Herniorrafia/métodos , Estomia/efeitos adversos , Estomas Cirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Hérnia Ventral/diagnóstico , Hérnia Ventral/etiologia , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Telas CirúrgicasRESUMO
PURPOSE: Incisional hernia remains a frequent complication after abdominal surgery associated with significant morbidity and high costs. Animal and clinical studies have exhibited some limitations. The purpose of this study was to develop an artificial human abdominal wall (AW) simulator in order to enable investigations on closure modalities. We hypothesized that a physical model of the human AW would give new insight into commonly used suture techniques representing a substantial complement or alternative to clinical and animal studies. METHODS: The 'AbdoMAN' was developed to simulate human AW biomechanics. The 'AbdoMAN' capacities include measurement and regulation of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), generation of IAP peaks as a result of muscle contraction and measurements of AW strain patterns analyzed with 3D image stereo correlation software. Intact synthetic samples were used to test repeatability. A laparotomy closure was then performed on five samples to analyze strain patterns. RESULTS: The 'AbdoMAN' was capable of simulating physiological conditions. AbdoMAN lateral muscles contract at 660 N, leading the IAP to increase up to 74.9 mmHg (range 65.3-88.3). Two strain criteria were used to assess test repeatability. A test with laparotomy closure demonstrated closure testing repeatability. CONCLUSIONS: The 'AbdoMAN' reveals as a promising enabling tool for investigating AW surgery-related biomechanics and could become an alternative to animal and clinical studies. 3D image correlation analysis should bring new insights on laparotomy closure research. The next step will consist in evaluating different closure modalities on synthetic, porcine and human AW.