Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
N Engl J Med ; 346(14): 1054-9, 2002 Apr 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11932472

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Familial adenomatous polyposis is caused by a germ-line mutation in the adenomatous polyposis coli gene and is characterized by the development of hundreds of colorectal adenomas and, eventually, colorectal cancer. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs can cause regression of adenomas, but whether they can prevent adenomas is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 41 young subjects (age range, 8 to 25 years) who were genotypically affected with familial adenomatous polyposis but phenotypically unaffected. The subjects received either 75 or 150 mg of sulindac orally twice a day or identical-appearing placebo tablets for 48 months. The number and size of new adenomas and side effects of therapy were evaluated every four months for four years, and the levels of five major prostaglandins were serially measured in biopsy specimens of normal-appearing colorectal mucosa. RESULTS: After four years of treatment, the average rate of compliance exceeded 76 percent in the sulindac group, and mucosal prostaglandin levels were lower in this group than in the placebo group. During the course of the study, adenomas developed in 9 of 21 subjects (43 percent) in the sulindac group and 11 of 20 subjects in the placebo group (55 percent) (P=0.54). There were no significant differences in the mean number (P=0.69) or size (P=0.17) of polyps between the groups. Sulindac did not slow the development of adenomas, according to an evaluation involving linear longitudinal methods. CONCLUSIONS: Standard doses of sulindac did not prevent the development of adenomas in subjects with familial adenomatous polyposis.


Assuntos
Polipose Adenomatosa do Colo/prevenção & controle , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Sulindaco/uso terapêutico , Polipose Adenomatosa do Colo/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Genes APC , Humanos , Masculino , Mutação , Cooperação do Paciente , Prostaglandinas/análise , Reto/química , Reto/patologia , Análise de Regressão , Sulindaco/efeitos adversos , Tromboxano B2/análise
2.
JAMA ; 294(17): 2195-202, 2005 Nov 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16264161

RESUMO

CONTEXT: In 1895, Aldred Scott Warthin, MD, PhD, initiated one of the most thoroughly documented and longest cancer family histories ever recorded. The unusually high incidence and segregation of cancers of the colon, rectum, stomach, and endometrium in Dr Warthin's family G was later followed up by his colleagues, most recently by Henry Lynch, MD. Described today as a Lynch syndrome family, family G was last documented in 1971, prior to the modern era of molecular diagnostics. OBJECTIVE: To update family G. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Historical prospective cohort study of family G members from 1895 to 2000. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were the frequencies and types of cancers, ages at diagnosis, and presence of the T to G transversion at the splice acceptor site of exon 4 of the mutS homolog 2, colon cancer, nonpolyposis type 1 (E coli) (MSH2) gene in family G members. A secondary analysis compared cancer-specific incidence rates in family G with published national and regional cancer incidence rates through the standardized incidence ratio (SIR). RESULTS: Family G now has 929 known descendants of the original progenitor first reported in 1913. Cancers of the colon and rectum (SIR, 3.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.39-4.19) and endometrium (SIR, 3.51; 95% CI, 1.92-5.89) continue to predominate in family G. Five of 40 tested members of family G carry the MSH2 T to G mutation; as a result, 15 of their living relatives are at increased risk of developing 1 or more colorectal or Lynch syndrome-associated cancers. In contrast, 97 living members of family G can now be excluded as mutation carriers. CONCLUSION: Within the last decade, molecular diagnostic testing has transformed the care of family G and other Lynch syndrome families in which a pathogenic mutation has been identified.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose/história , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose/genética , Análise Mutacional de DNA , Proteínas de Ligação a DNA/genética , Neoplasias do Endométrio/genética , Feminino , História do Século XIX , História do Século XX , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Proteína 2 Homóloga a MutS , Linhagem , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas/genética
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA