Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Br J Nutr ; 122(2): 172-185, 2019 07 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31182169

RESUMO

The contribution of milk and dairy products to daily iodine intake is high but variable in many industrialised countries. Factors that affect iodine concentrations in milk and dairy products are only poorly understood. Our aim was to: (1) assess the effect of feed iodine concentration on milk iodine by supplementing five groups of five cows each with one of five dosages from 0-2 mg iodine/kg DM; (2) quantify iodine losses during manufacturing of cheese and yogurt from milk with varying iodine concentrations and assess the effect of cellar-ripening; and (3) systematically measure iodine partitioning during heat treatment and skimming of milk. Milk iodine reached a near-steady state after 3 weeks of feeding. Median milk iodine (17-302 µg/l for 0-2 mg iodine/kg DM) increased linearly with feed iodine (R2 0·96; P < 0·001). At curd separation, 75-84 % of iodine was lost in whey. Dairy iodine increased linearly with milk iodine (semi-hard cheese: R2 0·95; P < 0·001; fresh cheese and yogurt: R2 1·00; P < 0·001), and cellar-ripening had no effect. Heat treatment had no significant effect, whereas skimming increased (P < 0·001) milk iodine concentration by only 1-2 µg/l. Mean daily intake of dairy products by Swiss adults is estimated at 213 g, which would contribute 13-52 % of the adults' RDA for iodine if cow feed is supplemented with 0·5-2 mg iodine/kg DM. Thus, modulation of feed iodine levels can help achieve desirable iodine concentrations in milk and dairy products, and thereby optimise their contribution to human iodine nutrition to avoid both deficiency and excess.


Assuntos
Ração Animal/análise , Bovinos , Laticínios/análise , Manipulação de Alimentos/métodos , Iodo/administração & dosagem , Leite/química , Adulto , Animais , Dieta , Feminino , Temperatura Alta , Humanos , Iodo/análise , Iodo/farmacocinética , Recomendações Nutricionais , Suíça
2.
Br J Nutr ; 119(5): 559-569, 2018 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29508687

RESUMO

Milk and dairy products are important iodine sources and contribute about 30-40 % of total iodine in the Swiss diet. Information about variation in milk iodine concentration (MIC) in Switzerland is limited. We examined MIC and its potential determinants in milk from organic and conventional farms. We collected bulk milk samples at 3-month intervals over 1 year from thirty-two farms throughout Switzerland and Aosta valley, North-West Italy. We sampled all feed components including tap water, collected information on farm characteristics, feeding and teat disinfection practices by questionnaire and estimated the cows' winter and summer iodine intake. Iodine in milk and feed components was measured using inductively coupled plasma MS. The overall median MIC was 87 (range 5-371) µg/l. In multivariate analysis, predictors of MIC were as follows: (1) farm type: median MIC from organic and conventional farms was 55 and 93 µg/l (P=0·022); (2) season: 53, 97 and 101 µg/l in September, December and March (P<0·002); and (3) teat dipping: 97 µg/l with v. 56 µg/l without (P=0·028). In conclusion, MIC varied widely between farms because of diverse farming practices that result in large differences in dairy cow exposure to iodine via ingestion or skin application. Standardisation of MIC is potentially achievable by controlling these iodine exposures. In order for milk to be a stable iodine source all year round, dietary iodine could be added at a set level to one feed component whose intake is regular and controllable, such as the mineral supplement, and by limiting the use of iodine-containing teat disinfectants.


Assuntos
Ração Animal/análise , Indústria de Laticínios/métodos , Fazendas , Iodo/análise , Glândulas Mamárias Animais , Leite/química , Estações do Ano , Criação de Animais Domésticos/métodos , Animais , Bovinos , Dieta , Desinfetantes , Feminino , Itália , Estado Nutricional , Inquéritos e Questionários , Suíça
3.
Am J Clin Nutr ; 116(4): 1135-1145, 2022 10 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36100966

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Edible insects have a low ecological footprint and could serve as an alternative dietary iron source. However, chitin, a major component of insects, avidly binds iron and might inhibit iron absorption. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to measure fractional iron absorption (FIA) from Tenebrio molitor-based test meals with and without dechitinization, and to assess the effect of native and low chitin T. molitor on FIA from iron-fortified maize porridge. METHODS: We measured iron absorption in young females with low iron stores (n = 21) from 1) labeled (54FeSO4) fortified maize porridge (maize alone); 2) intrinsically labeled (57Fe added during rearing) T. molitor larvae with native chitin content (NC) added to maize alone; and 3) dechitinized intrinsically labeled (57Fe) T. molitor larvae with low chitin content (LC) added to maize alone. We determined FIA using erythrocyte isotope incorporation and measured in vitro iron dialyzability from the 3 meals. RESULTS: NC and LC T. molitor had similar mean ± SD iron content (12.0 ± 0.1 mg/100 g). Geometric mean (95% CI) FIAs from the 3 test meals were 1) maize alone: 5.8% (3.2%, 10.8%); 2) maize + NC T. molitor: 5.3% (2.5%, 11.3%) and 4.1% (1.9%, 8.7%); and 3) maize + LC T. molitor: 4.6% (2.0%, 10.3%) and 4.0% (1.8%, 9.2%), for extrinsic and intrinsic labels, respectively. FIA from NC and LC T. molitor did not significantly differ, and both were lower (P < 0.005) than FIA from the labeled maize porridge in the 3 meals, which did not significantly differ. The slopes of the relations between FIA and serum ferritin in the different meals and from the intrinsic and extrinsic labels did not significantly differ. CONCLUSIONS: T. molitor biomass does not strongly affect iron absorption when added to maize porridge. Our data suggest T. molitor iron is absorbed from the common nonheme iron pool. Native T. molitor is high in iron which is moderately well absorbed, suggesting it could be a valuable dietary iron source.This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04510831.


Assuntos
Ferro da Dieta , Tenebrio , Animais , Quitina/metabolismo , Feminino , Ferritinas , Farinha , Humanos , Ferro , Ferro da Dieta/metabolismo , Isótopos/metabolismo , Larva/metabolismo , Refeições , Zea mays/metabolismo
4.
Front Microbiol ; 12: 656895, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33936013

RESUMO

The high neuroactive potential of metabolites produced by gut microbes has gained traction over the last few years, with metagenomic-based studies suggesting an important role of microbiota-derived γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in modulating mental health. Emerging evidence has revealed the presence of the glutamate decarboxylase (GAD)-encoding gene, a key enzyme to produce GABA, in the prominent human intestinal genus Bacteroides. Here, we investigated GABA production by Bacteroides in culture and metabolic assays combined with comparative genomics and phylogenetics. A total of 961 Bacteroides genomes were analyzed in silico and 17 metabolically and genetically diverse human intestinal isolates representing 11 species were screened in vitro. Using the model organism Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron DSM 2079, we determined GABA production kinetics, its impact on milieu pH, and we assessed its role in mitigating acid-induced cellular damage. We showed that the GAD-system consists of at least four highly conserved genes encoding a GAD, a glutaminase, a glutamate/GABA antiporter, and a potassium channel. We demonstrated a high prevalence of the GAD-system among Bacteroides with 90% of all Bacteroides genomes (96% in human gut isolates only) harboring all genes of the GAD-system and 16 intestinal Bacteroides strains producing GABA in vitro (ranging from 0.09 to 60.84 mM). We identified glutamate and glutamine as precursors of GABA production, showed that the production is regulated by pH, and that the GAD-system acts as a protective mechanism against acid stress in Bacteroides, mitigating cell death and preserving metabolic activity. Our data also indicate that the GAD-system might represent the only amino acid-dependent acid tolerance system in Bacteroides. Altogether, our results suggest an important contribution of Bacteroides in the regulation of the GABAergic system in the human gut.

5.
Am J Clin Nutr ; 110(1): 102-110, 2019 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31788697

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Milk and dairy products are considered important dietary sources of iodine in many countries. However, to our knowledge, iodine bioavailability from milk has not been directly measured in humans. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare iodine bioavailability in iodine-replete adults from: 1) cow milk containing a high concentration of native iodine; 2) milk containing a low concentration of native iodine, with the addition of potassium iodide (KI) to assess a potential matrix effect; and 3) an aqueous solution of KI as a comparator; with all 3 containing equal amounts of total iodine (263 µg/250 mL). We also speciated iodine in milk. DESIGN: We conducted a 3-wk, randomized, crossover balance study in adults (n = 12) consuming directly analyzed, standardized diets. During the 3 test conditions - high intrinsic iodine milk (IIM), extrinsically added iodine in milk (EIM), and aqueous iodine solution (AIS) - subjects collected 24-h urine over 3 d and consumed the test drink on the second day, with 3- or 4-d wash-out periods prior to each treatment. Iodine absorption was calculated as the ratio of urinary iodine excretion (UIE) to total iodine intake. Milk iodine speciation was performed using ion chromatography-mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Iodine intake from the standardized diet was 195 ± 6 µg/d for males and 107 ± 6 µg/d for females; the test drinks provided an additional 263 µg. Eleven subjects completed the protocol. There was a linear relation between iodine intake and UIE (ß = 0.89, SE = 0.04, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in UIE among the 3 conditions (P = 0.24). Median (range) fractional iodine absorption across the 3 conditions was 91 (51-145), 72 (48-95), and 98 (51-143)% on days 1, 2, and 3, respectively, with day 2 significantly lower compared with days 1 and 3 (P < 0.001). In milk, 80-93% of the total iodine was inorganic iodide. CONCLUSION: Nearly all of the iodine in cow milk is iodide and although fractional iodine absorption from milk decreases with increasing dose, its bioavailability is high. The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03590431.


Assuntos
Iodo/farmacocinética , Leite/química , Adulto , Animais , Disponibilidade Biológica , Índice de Massa Corporal , Bovinos , Estudos Cross-Over , Dieta , Feminino , Humanos , Iodo/administração & dosagem , Iodo/urina , Masculino , Estado Nutricional , Iodeto de Potássio/administração & dosagem
6.
Thyroid ; 26(2): 287-95, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26563466

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Breast milk iodine concentration (BMIC) may be an indicator of iodine status during lactation, but there are few data comparing different analytical methods or timing of sampling. The aims of this study were: (i) to optimize a new inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) method; and (ii) to evaluate the effect of analytical method and timing of within-feed sample collection on BMIC. METHODS: The colorimetric Sandell-Kolthoff method was evaluated with (a) or without (b) alkaline ashing, and ICP-MS was evaluated using a new (129)I isotope ratio approach including Tellurium (Te) for mass bias correction (c) or external standard curve (d). From iodine-sufficient lactating women (n = 97), three samples were collected within one breast-feeding session (fore-, mid-, and hind-feed samples) and BMIC was analyzed using (c) and (d). RESULTS: Iodine recovery from NIST SRM1549a whole milk powder for methods (a)-(d) was 67%, 24%, 105%, and 102%, respectively. Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation for ICP-MS comparing (c) and (d) were 1.3% versus 5.6% (p = 0.04) and 1.1% versus 2.4% (p = 0.33). The limit of detection (LOD) was lower for (c) (0.26 µg/kg) than it was for (d) (2.54 µg/kg; p = 0.02). Using (c), the median [95% confidence interval (CI) obtained by bootstrap] BMIC (µg/kg) in foremilk (179 [CI 161-206]) and in mid-feed milk (184 [CI 160-220]) were not significantly different (p = 0.017), but were higher than in hindmilk (175 [CI 153-216]; p < 0.001). In foremilk using (d), BMIC was 199 ([CI 182-257]; p < 0.001 vs. (c)). The variation in BMIC comparing (c) and (d) (13%) was greater than variation within feeding (5%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Because of poor recoveries, (a) and (b) should not be used to measure BMIC. Compared with (d), (c) has the advantages of higher precision and a lower LOD. In iodine-sufficient women, BMIC shows low variation within a breast-feeding session, so timing of sampling is not a major determinant of BMIC.


Assuntos
Iodo/análise , Espectrometria de Massas/métodos , Leite Humano/química , Aleitamento Materno , Colorimetria , Feminino , Humanos , Radioisótopos do Iodo/análise , Lactação , Pós , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Telúrio/química , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA