Rusfertide, a Hepcidin Mimetic, for Control of Erythrocytosis in Polycythemia Vera.

BACKGROUND: Polycythemia vera is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by erythrocytosis. Rusfertide, an injectable peptide mimetic of the master iron regulatory hormone hepcidin, restricts the availability of iron for erythropoiesis. The safety and efficacy of rusfertide in patients with phlebotomy-dependent polycythemia vera are unknown. METHODS: In part 1 of the international, phase 2 REVIVE trial, we enrolled patients in a 28-week dose-finding assessment of rusfertide. Part 2 was a double-blind, randomized withdrawal period in which we assigned patients, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive rusfertide or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was a response, defined by hematocrit control, absence of phlebotomy, and completion of the trial regimen during part 2. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed by means of the modified Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF) patient diary (scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms). RESULTS: Seventy patients were enrolled in part 1 of the trial, and 59 were assigned to receive rusfertide (30 patients) or placebo (29 patients) in part 2. The estimated mean (±SD) number of phlebotomies per year was 8.7±2.9 during the 28 weeks before the first dose of rusfertide and 0.6±1.0 during part 1 (estimated difference, 8.1 phlebotomies per year). The mean maximum hematocrit was 44.5±2.2% during part 1 as compared with 50.0±5.8% during the 28 weeks before the first dose of rusfertide. During part 2, a response was observed in 60% of the patients who received rusfertide as compared with 17% of those who received placebo (P = 0.002). Between baseline and the end of part 1, rusfertide treatment was associated with a decrease in individual symptom scores on the MPN-SAF in patients with moderate or severe symptoms at baseline. During parts 1 and 2, grade 3 adverse events occurred in 13% of the patients, and none of the patients had a grade 4 or 5 event. Injection-site reactions of grade 1 or 2 in severity were common. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with polycythemia vera, rusfertide treatment was associated with a mean hematocrit of less than 45% during the 28-week dose-finding period, and the percentage of patients with a response during the 12-week randomized withdrawal period was greater with rusfertide than with placebo. (Funded by Protagonist Therapeutics; REVIVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04057040.).

Proposals for revised International Working Group-European LeukemiaNet criteria for anemia response in myelofibrosis.

ABSTRACT: With emerging new drugs in myelofibrosis (MF), a robust and harmonized framework for defining the severity of anemia and response to treatment will enhance clinical investigation and facilitate interstudy comparisons. Accordingly, the lead authors on the 2013 edition of the International Working Group-European LeukemiaNet (IWG-ELN) response criteria in MF were summoned to revise their document with the intent to (1) account for gender-specific differences in determining hemoglobin levels for eligibility criteria; (2) revise the definition of transfusion-dependent anemia (TDA) based on current restrictive transfusion practices; and (3) provide a structurally simple and easy to apply response criteria that are sensitive enough to detect efficacy signals (minor response) and also account for major responses. The initial draft of the 2024 IWG-ELN proposed criteria was subsequently circulated around a wider group of international experts and their feedback incorporated. The proposed articles include new definitions for TDA (≥3 units in the 12 weeks before study enrollment) and hemoglobin thresholds for eligibility criteria (<10 g/dL for women and <11 g/dL for men). The revised document also provides separate (TDA vs non-TDA) and graded (major vs minor response) response criteria while preserving the requirement for a 12-week period of screening and observation on treatment.

Momelotinib versus danazol in symptomatic patients with anaemia and myelofibrosis (MOMENTUM): results from an international, double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors approved for myelofibrosis provide spleen and symptom improvements but do not meaningfully improve anaemia. Momelotinib, a first-in-class inhibitor of activin A receptor type 1 as well as JAK1 and JAK2, has shown symptom, spleen, and anaemia benefits in myelofibrosis. We aimed to confirm the differentiated clinical benefits of momelotinib versus the active comparator danazol in JAK-inhibitor-exposed, symptomatic patients with anaemia and intermediate-risk or high-risk myelofibrosis. METHODS: MOMENTUM is an international, double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study that enrolled patients at 107 sites across 21 countries worldwide. Eligible patients were 18 years or older with a confirmed diagnosis of primary myelofibrosis or post-polycythaemia vera or post-essential thrombocythaemia myelofibrosis. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive momelotinib (200 mg orally once per day) plus danazol placebo (ie, the momelotinib group) or danazol (300 mg orally twice per day) plus momelotinib placebo (ie, the danazol group), stratified by total symptom score (TSS; <22 vs ≥22), spleen size (<12 cm vs ≥12 cm), red blood cell or whole blood units transfused in the 8 weeks before randomisation (0 units vs 1-4 units vs ≥5 units), and study site. The primary endpoint was the Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) TSS response rate at week 24 (defined as ≥50% reduction in mean MFSAF TSS over the 28 days immediately before the end of week 24 compared with baseline). MOMENTUM is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04173494, and is active but not recruiting. FINDINGS: 195 patients were randomly assigned to either the momelotinib group (130 [67%]) or danazol group (65 [33%]) and received study treatment in the 24-week randomised treatment period between April 24, 2020, and Dec 3, 2021. A significantly greater proportion of patients in the momelotinib group reported a 50% or more reduction in TSS than in the danazol group (32 [25%] of 130 vs six [9%] of 65; proportion difference 16% [95% CI 6-26], p=0·0095). The most frequent grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events with momelotinib and danazol were haematological abnormalities by laboratory values: anaemia (79 [61%] of 130 vs 49 [75%] of 65) and thrombocytopenia (36 [28%] vs 17 [26%]). The most frequent non-haematological grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events with momelotinib and danazol were acute kidney injury (four [3%] of 130 vs six [9%] of 65) and pneumonia (three [2%] vs six [9%]). INTERPRETATION: Treatment with momelotinib, compared with danazol, resulted in clinically significant improvements in myelofibrosis-associated symptoms, anaemia measures, and spleen response, with favourable safety. These findings support the future use of momelotinib as an effective treatment in patients with myelofibrosis, especially in those with anaemia. FUNDING: Sierra Oncology.

Young patients with myelofibrosis have distinct clinicomolecular features, favorable prognosis, and commonly exhibit inflammatory comorbidities.

Myelofibrosis (MF) is commonly diagnosed in older individuals and has not been extensively studied in young patients. Given the infrequent diagnosis in young patients, analyzing this cohort may identify factors that predict for disease development/progression. We retrospectively analyzed clinical/genomic characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of patients with MF aged 18-50 years (YOUNG) at diagnosis. Sixty-three YOUNG patients were compared to 663 patients diagnosed at 51 or older (OLDER). YOUNG patients were more likely to be female, harbor driving CALR mutations, lack splicing gene mutations, and have low-risk disease by dynamic international prognostic scoring system (DIPSS) at presentation. Thirty-six patients (60%) presented with incidental lab findings and 19 (32%) with symptomatic disease. Median time to first treatment was 9.4 months (mo). Fourteen (22%) YOUNG patients underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (median 57.4 mo post-diagnosis). Five (8%) developed blast-phase disease (median 99 mo post-diagnosis). Median overall survival (OS) for YOUNG patients was not reached compared to 62.8 mo in OLDER cohort (p < 0.001). The survival advantage for YOUNG patients lost significance when compared to OLDER patients lacking splicing mutations (p = 0.11). Thirty-one (49%) had comorbidities predating MF diagnosis. Presence of a comorbidity correlated with increased disease risk as measured by serial DIPSS (p=0.02). Increased disease risk correlated with decreased OS (p = 0.05). MF is rare in young adults, has distinct clinical/molecular correlates, and a favorable prognosis. The high frequency of inflammatory comorbidities and their correlation with progression of disease risk clinically highlights the role of inflammation in MF pathogenesis.

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Systemic Mastocytosis, Version 3.2024.

Mastocytosis is a heterogeneous group of disorders comprising cutaneous mastocytosis, systemic mastocytosis, and mast cell sarcoma. It is associated with a variety of symptoms related to the release of mast cell mediators and mast cell tissue infiltration. Referral to specialized centers with expertise in the management of mastocytosis and multidisciplinary collaboration with subspecialists (eg, allergists for the management of anaphylaxis and drug hypersensitivities, anesthesiologists for invasive procedures or surgery, high-risk obstetrician for pregnancy) is recommended. The NCCN Guidelines for Systemic Mastocytosis provide evidence- and consensus-based recommendations for the diagnosis and comprehensive care of patients with systemic mastocytosis. The multidisciplinary panel of experts convenes at least once a year to review requested changes to the guidelines from both internal and external entities as well as to discuss data on existing and new therapies. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on some of the recent updates to the guidelines.

SHP2 inhibition displays efficacy as a monotherapy and in combination with JAK2 inhibition in preclinical models of myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), including polycythemia vera, essential thrombocytosis, and primary myelofibrosis, are clonal hematopoietic neoplasms driven by mutationally activated signaling by the JAK2 tyrosine kinase. Although JAK2 inhibitors can improve MPN patients' quality of life, they do not induce complete remission as disease-driving cells persistently survive therapy. ERK activation has been highlighted as contributing to JAK2 inhibitor persistent cell survival. As ERK is a component of signaling by activated RAS proteins and by JAK2 activation, we sought to inhibit RAS activation to enhance responses to JAK2 inhibition in preclinical MPN models. We found the SHP2 inhibitor RMC-4550 significantly enhanced growth inhibition of MPN cell lines in combination with the JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib, effectively preventing ruxolitinib persistent growth, and the growth and viability of established ruxolitinib persistent cells remained sensitive to SHP2 inhibition. Both SHP2 and JAK2 inhibition diminished cellular RAS-GTP levels, and their concomitant inhibition enhanced ERK inactivation and increased apoptosis. Inhibition of SHP2 inhibited the neoplastic growth of MPN patient hematopoietic progenitor cells and exhibited synergy with ruxolitinib. RMC-4550 antagonized MPN phenotypes and increased survival of an MPN mouse model driven by MPL-W515L. The combination of RMC-4550 and ruxolitinib, which was safe and tolerated in healthy mice, further inhibited disease compared to ruxolitinib monotherapy, including extending survival. Given SHP2 inhibitors are undergoing clinical evaluation in patients with solid tumors, our preclinical findings suggest that SHP2 is a candidate therapeutic target with potential for rapid translation to clinical assessment to improve current targeted therapies for MPN patients.

Treatment of hydroxyurea-resistant/intolerant polycythemia vera: a discussion of best practices.

Polycythemia vera (PV) is a burdensome, chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by activating mutations in Janus kinase 2, erythrocytosis, and bone marrow hypercellularity. The goals of treatment are to achieve hematocrit and blood count control to ultimately reduce the risk of thrombohemorrhagic events and improve PV-related symptoms. Treatment is risk-stratified and typically includes cytoreduction with hydroxyurea or interferon formulations in first line for high-risk disease. However, inadequate response, resistance, or intolerance to first-line cytoreductive therapies may warrant introduction of second-line treatments, such as ruxolitinib. In this review, I detail preferred treatment and patient management approaches following inadequate response to or intolerance of first-line treatment for PV.

Disease-related thrombocytopenia in myelofibrosis is defined by distinct genetic etiologies and is associated with unique prognostic correlates.

BACKGROUND: Thrombocytopenia in patients with myelofibrosis (MF) is prognostically detrimental and poses a therapeutic challenge. MF patients with thrombocytopenia are considered high-risk by most prognostic models and their distinct phenotype has given rise to the emerging concept of cytopenic MF. Yet, the mechanisms underlying thrombocytopenia in MF are poorly understood. METHODS: This study aimed to highlight the genetic mechanisms driving low platelet counts in treatment-naive MF patients, establish their phenotypic correlates, and assess prognostic factors specific to this group of patients. RESULTS: The authors found that most patients presenting with low platelets had a clear thrombocytopenia-specific genetic abnormality involving a U2AF1 Q157 mutation, deletion 20q, molecular complexity (three or more mutations), or high-risk karyotype. Etiologic clustering did not correlate with prognosis; however, thrombocytopenic patients were found to have unique prognostic variables including low serum albumin and mutations of SRSF2 and TP53. This led to the proposal of a prognostic model (SRSF2, albumin, TP53 score) that stratifies thrombocytopenic patients as low, intermediate, or high-risk with corresponding median survivals of 93.5, 29.5, and 7.2 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that thrombocytopenia in MF is driven by different genetic mechanisms and is not uniformly high-risk. As novel agents with improved hematologic safety profiles enter the treatment landscape, thoughtful, risk-adapted therapeutic decisions will be required for MF patients with thrombocytopenia. LAY SUMMARY: A significant minority of patients with myelofibrosis (MF) present with low platelets. Historically, these patients have been viewed as having "high-risk" disease, but this may not be uniformly true. Our study shows that there are various different causes for low platelets in MF, some of which represent high-risk disease whereas others do not. Additionally, our study shows that genetic mutations affecting the genes SRSF2 and TP53 are uniquely problematic in this group, as is a low serum albumin level. This study helps to risk-stratify MF patients with thrombocytopenia, thereby providing more information to guide informed and individualized treatment decisions.

Molecular annotation of extramedullary acute myeloid leukemia identifies high prevalence of targetable mutations.

BACKGROUND: Genomic landscape of extramedullary acute myeloid leukemia (EM-AML), including myeloid sarcoma (MS) and leukemia cutis (LC), is not well characterized. The potential utility of next-generation sequencing (NGS) using EM tissue is not established. METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective study, clinical and NGS data were collected on patients with EM-AML. All statistical analyses were performed in SPSS Statistics (v 26). RESULTS: Our study included 58 patients with EM-AML. The median age at diagnosis was 62 years; 59% of patients had MS and 33% had LC. EM-AML was isolated (i.e., without blood or marrow involvement) in 31% and was first noted at relapse in 60% of patients. Median overall survival in our cohort was 18.2 months overall, with 19.1 months and 11.6 months in the newly diagnosed and the relapsed/refractory patients, respectively. At least one targetable or potentially targetable alteration was present in 52% of patients with EM-site NGS, with 26% IDH1, 21% NPM1, 11% IDH2, 6% FLT3, and 13% KMT2A-PTD. Mutations in IDH1 were significantly more prevalent on NGS from EM tissue than non-EM (blood or marrow) samples (26% vs. 3%; p = .030). Three of four patients treated with IDH inhibitors based on EM-site NGS experienced a complete response. CONCLUSIONS: Targetable mutations are frequent in EM-AML and EM-site NGS is warranted for selecting potential targeted therapies for patients with EM-AML.

Persistent leukocytosis in polycythemia vera is associated with disease evolution but not thrombosis.

There are unresolved questions regarding the association between persistent leukocytosis and risk of thrombosis and disease evolution in polycythemia vera (PV), as much of the published literature on the topic does not appropriately use repeated-measures data or time-dependent modeling to answer these questions. To address this knowledge gap, we analyzed a retrospective database of 520 PV patients seen at 10 academic institutions across the United States. Taking hematologic laboratory data at ∼3-month intervals (or as available) for all patients for duration of follow-up, we used group-based trajectory modeling to identify latent clusters of patients who follow distinct trajectories with regard to their leukocyte, hematocrit, and platelet counts over time. We then tested the association between trajectory membership and hazard of 2 major outcomes: thrombosis and disease evolution to myelofibrosis, myelodysplastic syndrome, or acute myeloid leukemia. Controlling for relevant covariates, we found that persistently elevated leukocyte trajectories were not associated with the hazard of a thrombotic event (P = .4163), but were significantly associated with increased hazard of disease evolution in an ascending stepwise manner (overall P = .0002). In addition, we found that neither hematocrit nor platelet count was significantly associated with the hazard of thrombosis or disease evolution.

Favorable overall survival with imetelstat in relapsed/refractory myelofibrosis patients compared with real-world data.

In the MYF2001 trial, treatment of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor-relapsed/refractory intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis (MF) with imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg every 3 weeks demonstrated encouraging median overall survival of 29.9 months. To provide historical context, external real-world data (RWD) were collected from a study of 96 patients who had discontinued ruxolitinib and were subsequently treated with best available therapy (BAT) at Moffitt Cancer Center. A closely matched cohort was identified using the MYF2001 eligibility criteria, including patients with MF who had discontinued ruxolitinib due to lack or loss of response. Overall survival was measured from time of JAK inhibitor discontinuation to death or censored at last follow-up. To improve comparability, propensity score weighting approaches using average treatment effect for overlap population (ATO) and stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting (sIPTW) were used for 10 critical baseline covariates. Fifty-seven patients treated with imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg from MYF2001 and 38 patients treated with BAT from RWD were analyzed with improved balanced baseline covariates after propensity score adjustment, showing significantly lower risk of death with imetelstat compared with BAT (hazard ratio: 0.35; p = 0.0019). With sIPTW, results were similar. Results of sensitivity analyses were consistent with the primary analysis. In conclusion, treatment with imetelstat was associated with longer overall survival compared to BAT (30 vs 12 months, respectively) in closely matched patients with MF after JAK inhibitor failure, warranting further evaluation of imetelstat in this poor-prognosis patient population.

Myeloproliferative Neoplasms, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

The classic Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) consist of myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera, and essential thrombocythemia and are a heterogeneous group of clonal blood disorders characterized by an overproduction of blood cells. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for MPN were developed as a result of meetings convened by a multidisciplinary panel with expertise in MPN, with the goal of providing recommendations for the management of MPN in adults. The Guidelines include recommendations for the diagnostic workup, risk stratification, treatment, and supportive care strategies for the management of myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera, and essential thrombocythemia. Assessment of symptoms at baseline and monitoring of symptom status during the course of treatment is recommended for all patients. This article focuses on the recommendations as outlined in the NCCN Guidelines for the diagnosis of MPN and the risk stratification, management, and supportive care relevant to MF.

Phase III MANIFEST-2: pelabresib + ruxolitinib vs placebo + ruxolitinib in JAK inhibitor treatment-naive myelofibrosis.

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal myeloproliferative neoplasm, typically associated with disease-related symptoms, splenomegaly, cytopenias and bone marrow fibrosis. Patients experience a significant symptom burden and a reduced life expectancy. Patients with MF receive ruxolitinib as the current standard of care, but the depth and durability of responses and the percentage of patients achieving clinical outcome measures are limited; thus, a significant unmet medical need exists. Pelabresib is an investigational small-molecule bromodomain and extraterminal domain inhibitor currently in clinical development for MF. The aim of this article is to describe the design of the ongoing, global, phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled MANIFEST-2 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of pelabresib and ruxolitinib versus placebo and ruxolitinib in patients with JAKi treatment-naive MF. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04603495 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a rare type of blood cancer that interferes with the process of blood cell production by the bone marrow. In patients with MF, the bone marrow becomes overactive, leading to scarring and subsequently a lack of healthy blood cells being produced. The main symptoms of MF include anemia, fatigue, weakness and pain or discomfort in the abdomen. MF is associated with a shortened life expectancy. The current go-to treatment for MF is ruxolitinib. However, ruxolitinib has shown limited efficacy in improving clinical symptoms long term; so, new safe and effective treatments are needed. Pelabresib is a novel drug currently in clinical development for treating MF. The aim of this article is to describe the design of the ongoing, global phase III MANIFEST-2 study. MANIFEST-2 is evaluating the efficacy and safety of pelabresib and ruxolitinib versus placebo and ruxolitinib in patients with MF.

Stepping out of antiquity: An update on emerging drugs for the treatment of polycythemia vera.

Introduction: Polycythemia vera is a chronic hematologic malignancy frequently presented with constitutional symptoms and associated with an increased risk of thrombosis, hemorrhage, and progression to myelofibrosis or acute myeloid leukemia. Current treatment strategies reduce thrombohemorrhagic risk by controlling blood counts and inhibiting platelets, but often fail to address disease-related symptoms or biologically modify the disease.Areas covered: We review the current paradigm for treating polycythemia vera, highlight areas of unmet need, review therapeutic agents in late stage clinical development, and provide an overarching view of how these emerging agent may fit into the future armamentarium of polycythemia vera treatments.Expert opinion: The shift from focusing solely on secondary prevention of thrombohemorrhagic events to a comprehensive treatment strategy that additionally aims to improve quality of life and prevent disease progression has resulted in a rapidly evolving therapeutic landscape that promises to move the treatment of polycythemia vera out of antiquity into the modern age.

What's in a Number? Examining the Prognostic and Predictive Importance of Platelet Count in Patients With Essential Thrombocythemia.

Essential thrombocythemia (ET) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by clonal overproduction of platelets and an increased risk of thrombohemorrhagic complications. Patients are risk stratified by driver mutation, age, and thrombotic history and treated to reduce the risk of thrombotic and hemorrhagic events. The significance of platelet number as a risk factor or treatment goal is unclear. Despite the preponderance of data failing to demonstrate an association, there exists a pervasive belief that higher platelet counts correlate with an increased thrombotic risk. In fact, the association between thrombocytosis and bleeding is more clearly supported. Variability in regional consensus guidelines contributes to the uncertainty. This article reviews the data that shed light on the importance of platelet count in patients with ET.

Myeloid/Lymphoid Neoplasms with Eosinophilia and TK Fusion Genes, Version 3.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Eosinophilic disorders and related syndromes represent a heterogeneous group of neoplastic and nonneoplastic conditions, characterized by more eosinophils in the peripheral blood, and may involve eosinophil-induced organ damage. In the WHO classification of myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms, eosinophilic disorders characterized by dysregulated tyrosine kinase (TK) fusion genes are recognized as a new category termed, myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and rearrangement of PDGFRA, PDGFRB or FGFR1 or with PCM1-JAK2. In addition to these aforementioned TK fusion genes, rearrangements involving FLT3 and ABL1 genes have also been described. These new NCCN Guidelines include recommendations for the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of any one of the myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia (MLN-Eo) and a TK fusion gene included in the 2017 WHO Classification, as well as MLN-Eo and a FLT3 or ABL1 rearrangement.

Genetically inspired prognostic scoring system (GIPSS) outperforms dynamic international prognostic scoring system (DIPSS) in myelofibrosis patients.

A genetically inspired prognostic scoring system (GIPSS) that stratifies primary myelofibrosis (PMF) patients by genetic variants alone was recently proposed. While non-inferior to the dynamic international prognostic scoring system (DIPSS), the lack of overlapping prognostic variables between the models leads to increased risk for disagreement between two valid prognostic models and presents a challenging clinical situation. In an external cohort of 266 molecularly annotated myelofibrosis (MF) patients, we demonstrated that the GIPSS model significantly differentiated between four risk groups (low, int-1, int-2, high) with median OS that was not reached, not reached, 60.5 and 28.9 months, respectively. High-risk patients had significantly inferior leukemia-free survival (LFS) (P < 0.0001). We identified a cohort of prognostically ambiguous patients (n = 39) in which GIPSS and DIPSS models differed by ≥2 risk groups. Among these patients, a similar proportion were up-staged by DIPSS (n = 19) and GIPSS (n = 20). Patients upstaged by GIPSS (genetically high-risk) had a trend toward inferior OS compared with patients upstaged by DIPSS (clinically high-risk) (P = .08) and significantly worse LFS (P = .04). Patients deemed intermediate-2 and high-risk by GIPSS who underwent allogeneic transplant had improved OS compared with those that did not (P = .04). GIPSS is a valid disease-specific prognostic system and outperforms DIPSS in patients where the two models disagree. Additionally, while GIPSS was developed for PMF; the current study shows, however, that the contemporary genetic model performs equally well for both primary and secondary myelofibrosis.

Between a rux and a hard place: evaluating salvage treatment and outcomes in myelofibrosis after ruxolitinib discontinuation.

Ruxolitinib is a JAK1/2 inhibitor that is effective in managing symptoms and splenomegaly related to myelofibrosis (MF). Unfortunately, many patients must discontinue ruxolitinib, at which time treatment options are not well defined. In this study, we investigated salvage treatment options and clinical outcomes among MF patients who received and discontinued ruxolitinib outside the context of a clinical trial. Among 145 patients who received ruxolitinib, 23 died while on treatment, 58 remained on treatment at time of analysis, leaving 64 people available for analysis. Development of cytopenias was the most common reason for discontinuation (38%) after median treatment time of 3.8 months (mo). The majority of patients received some form of salvage therapy after ruxolitinib discontinuation (n = 42; 66%), with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT) (n = 17), being most commonly employed. Lenalidomide, thalidomide, hydroxyurea, interferon, and danazol were used with similar frequency. The response rate to salvage treatment was 26% (8 responses) and responses were most often seen with lenalidomide or thalidomide. Improved outcomes were observed in patients who underwent alloHSCT or received salvage therapy compared to those who did not receive additional therapy. Median overall survival (OS) after ruxolitinib discontinuation was 13 months. These findings show that salvage therapy can provide clinical responses after ruxolitinib discontinuation; however, these responses are rare and outcomes in this patient population are poor. This represents an area of unmet clinical need in MF.