Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 43
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 1, 2024 Jan 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38166696

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: As the population acquires immunity through vaccination and natural infection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), understanding the intrinsic severity of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is becoming challenging. We aimed to evaluate the intrinsic severity regarding circulating variants of SARS-CoV-2 and to compare this between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. METHODS: With unvaccinated and initially infected confirmed cases of COVID-19, we estimated the case severity rate (CSR); case fatality rate (CFR); and mortality rate (MR), including severe/critical cases and deaths, stratified by age and compared by vaccination status according to the period regarding the variants of COVID-19 and vaccination. The overall rate was directly standardized with age. RESULTS: The age-standardized CSRs (aCSRs) of the unvaccinated group were 2.12%, 5.51%, and 0.94% in the pre-delta, delta, and omicron period, respectively, and the age-standardized CFRs (aCFRs) were 0.60%, 2.49%, and 0.63% in each period, respectively. The complete vaccination group had lower severity than the unvaccinated group over the entire period showing under 1% for the aCSR and 0.5% for the aCFR. The age-standardized MR of the unvaccinated group was 448 per million people per month people in the omicron period, which was 11 times higher than that of the vaccinated group. In terms of age groups, the CSR and CFR sharply increased with age from the 60 s and showed lower risk reduction in the 80 s when the period changed to the omicron period. CONCLUSIONS: The intrinsic severity of COVID-19 was the highest in the delta period, with over 5% for the aCSR, whereas the completely vaccinated group maintained below 1%. This implies that when the population is vaccinated, the impact of COVID-19 will be limited, even if a new mutation appears. Moreover, considering the decreasing intrinsic severity, the response to COVID-19 should prioritize older individuals at a higher risk of severe disease.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Mutação , Comportamento de Redução do Risco , Vacinação
2.
J Korean Med Sci ; 38(27): e214, 2023 Jul 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37431542

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We aimed to analyze the risk factors for sudden death after diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in South Korea and to provide evidence for informing prevention and control interventions for patients at risk of sudden death. METHODS: We included 30,302 COVID-19 related deaths registered in the patient management information system (Central Disease Control Headquarters) between January 1, 2021, and December 15, 2022. We collected their epidemiological data recorded by the reporting city, province, or country. We performed multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for sudden death after diagnosis of COVID-19. RESULTS: Among the 30,302 deaths, there were 7,258 (24.0%) and 23,044 (76.0%) sudden and non-sudden deaths, respectively. Sudden death means a person who died within 2 days of diagnosis and who did not receive inpatient treatment. Underlying condition, vaccination status, and place of death were significantly associated with the survival period in all age groups. Moreover, region, sex, and prescription were significantly associated with the survival period only in certain age groups. However, reinfection was not significantly associated with the survival period in any age group. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study on the risk factors for sudden death after a diagnosis of COVID-19, which included age, underlying condition, vaccination status, and place of death. Additionally, individuals aged < 60 years without an underlying condition were at high risk for sudden death. However, this group has relatively low interest in health, as can be seen from the high non-vaccination rate (16.1% of the general population vs. 61.6% of the corresponding group). Therefore, there is a possibility for the presence of an uncontrolled underlying disease in this population. In addition, many sudden deaths occurred due to delayed hospital visits to continue economic activities even after the onset of COVID-19 symptoms (7 days overall vs. 10 days average for the group). In conclusion, 'continued interest in health' is a key factor in avoiding sudden death in the economically active group (under 60 years of age).


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , COVID-19/epidemiologia , República da Coreia/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Morte Súbita/epidemiologia , Morte Súbita/etiologia , Hospitalização , Teste para COVID-19
3.
J Korean Med Sci ; 38(3): e21, 2023 Jan 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36647219

RESUMO

As of September 3, 2022, 5,388,338 coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases and 46 deaths (3 in 2021 and 43 in 2022) were reported in children ≤ 18 years in Korea. Cumulative confirmed cases accounted for 67.3% of the population aged ≤ 18 years and case fatality rate was 0.85/100,000. Among 46 fatal cases, 58.7% were male and median age was 7 years. Underlying diseases were present in 47.8%; neurologic diseases (63.6%) and malignancy (13.6%) most common. Only four had history of COVID-19 immunization. COVID-19 associated deaths occurred at median 2 days from diagnosis (range: -1 to 21). Among COVID-19 deaths, 41.3% occurred before admission; 2 before hospital arrival and 17 in the emergency department. Among children whose cause was documented, myocarditis, respiratory and multiorgan failure were most common. COVID-19 associated death was seen early after diagnosis in children and public health policies to provide access to medical care for children with COVID-19 are essential during the pandemic.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Criança , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , SARS-CoV-2 , Hospitalização , República da Coreia/epidemiologia
4.
J Korean Med Sci ; 38(46): e396, 2023 Nov 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38013649

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This retrospective observational matched-cohort study of 2,151,216 individuals from the Korean coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine effectiveness cohort aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of the COVID-19 bivalent versus monovalent vaccines in providing additional protection against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, critical infection, and death in Korea. METHODS: Among individuals, those vaccinated with COVID-19 bivalent vaccines were matched in a 1:1 ratio with those who were vaccinated with monovalent vaccines (bivalent vaccines non-recipients) during the observation period. We fitted a time-dependent Cox proportional-hazards model to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) of COVID-19 outcomes for infection, critical infection, and death, and we defined vaccine effectiveness (VE) as 1-HR. RESULTS: Compared with the bivalent vaccination group, the incidence proportions in the monovalent vaccination group were approximately three times higher for infection, nine times higher for critical infection, and 11 times higher for death. In the early stage of bivalent vaccination, relative VE of bivalent vaccine against monovalent vaccine was 42.4% against SARS-CoV-2 infection, 81.3% against critical infection, and 85.3% against death. In addition, VE against critical infection and death according to the elapsed period after bivalent vaccination was maintained at > 70%. CONCLUSION: The bivalent booster dose provided additional protection against SARS-CoV-2 infections, critical infections, and deaths during the omicron variant phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudos de Coortes , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vacinação , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Vacinas Combinadas , República da Coreia/epidemiologia
5.
Med Sci Monit ; 28: e934926, 2022 May 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35505583

RESUMO

BACKGROUND Understanding the seroprevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can be a useful tool when studying spread of the disease. This study aimed to compare the prevalence of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in 9954 recruits in the Korean Army Training Center with the general Korean population age <30 years between September and November, 2020. MATERIAL AND METHODS At the Korean Army Training Center, samples were taken from 9954 men from September to November, 2020. Participants were randomly enlisted healthy adult men. The data were compared with 4,205,265 samples from the Korean general population. Men age <30 years were used, as this is similar to the age range of the military recruits. RESULTS Among military recruits, 31 subjects (0.31%) were positive for the antibody, while the Korean male population had 3757 (0.09%) positive individuals. Among these 31 men, 13 were previously diagnosed by PCR, while 18 (58.06%) had no history related to the disease. Positive military recruits were mostly from 2 regional clusters. The first cluster was Daegu and Gyeongbuk areas (1.97% and 0.80%, respectively), which had an outbreak in March, 2020. The second cluster was Gyeonggi and Seoul, or capital areas (0.23% and 0.20%, respectively), which currently has high PCR positivity. Overall, seroprevalence was 3.49 times higher in study subjects. CONCLUSIONS The high seroprevalence of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 between September and November 2020 in a densely populated military academy in Korea may have been an indicator for the resulting outbreak of COVID-19 in winter 2020-21, which highlights the importance of asymptomatic spread from the young and healthy to the general population.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Militares , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G , Masculino , Prevalência , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos
6.
J Korean Med Sci ; 37(26): e209, 2022 Jul 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35790210

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The most recent variant of concern, omicron (B.1.1.529), has caused numerous cases worldwide including the Republic of Korea due to its fast transmission and reduced vaccine effectiveness. METHODS: A mathematical model considering age-structure, vaccine, antiviral drugs, and influx of the omicron variant was developed. We estimated transmission rates among age groups using maximum likelihood estimation for the age-structured model. The impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs; in community and border), quantified by a parameter µ in the force of infection, and vaccination were examined through a multi-faceted analysis. A theory-based endemic equilibrium study was performed to find the manageable number of cases according to omicron- and healthcare-related factors. RESULTS: By fitting the model to the available data, the estimated values of µ ranged from 0.31 to 0.73, representing the intensity of NPIs such as social distancing level. If µ < 0.55 and 300,000 booster shots were administered daily from February 3, 2022, the number of severe cases was forecasted to exceed the severe bed capacity. Moreover, the number of daily cases is reduced as the timing of screening measures is delayed. If screening measure was intensified as early as November 24, 2021 and the number of overseas entrant cases was contained to 1 case per 10 days, simulations showed that the daily incidence by February 3, 2022 could have been reduced by 87%. Furthermore, we found that the incidence number in mid-December 2021 exceeded the theory-driven manageable number of daily cases. CONCLUSION: NPIs, vaccination, and antiviral drugs influence the spread of omicron and number of severe cases in the Republic of Korea. Intensive and early screening measures during the emergence of a new variant is key in controlling the epidemic size. Using the endemic equilibrium of the model, a formula for the manageable daily cases depending on the severity rate and average length of hospital stay was derived so that the number of severe cases does not surpass the severe bed capacity.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Modelos Teóricos , SARS-CoV-2
8.
Clin Infect Dis ; 64(5): 551-557, 2017 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27940937

RESUMO

Background: Transmission heterogeneity was observed during the 2015 South Korean outbreak of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infection. Only 22 of 186 cases transmitted the infection, and 5 super-spreading events caused 150 transmissions. We investigated the risk factors for MERS-CoV transmission. Methods: Epidemiological reports were used to classify patients as non-spreaders, spreaders (1-4 transmission), or those associated with super-spreading event (≥4 transmissions). Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the factors that influenced MERS-CoV transmission. Results: Compared to non-spreaders, spreaders exhibited a longer interval from symptom onset to isolation (7 days vs. 3 days) and more frequent pre-isolation pneumonia diagnoses (68.2% vs. 17.1%). Spreaders also exhibited higher values for pre-isolation contacts (149 vs. 17.5), pre-isolation hospitalization (68.2% vs. 16.5%), and emergency room visits (50% vs. 7.3%). Spreaders exhibited lower cycle thresholds for the upE and ORF1a genes (22.7 vs. 27.2 and 23.7 vs. 27.9, respectively). Transmission was independently associated with the cycle threshold (odds ratio [OR]: 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75-0.96) and pre-isolation hospitalization or emergency room visits (OR: 6.82, 95% CI: 2.06-22.84). The spreaders with ≥4 transmissions exhibited higher values for pre-isolation contacts (777 vs. 78), pre-isolation emergency room visits (100% vs. 35.3%), and doctor-shopping (100% vs. 47.1%), compared to other spreaders. Conclusions: These findings indicate that transmission is determined by host infectivity and the number of contacts, whereas super-spreading events were determined by the number of contacts and hospital visits. These relationships highlight the importance of rapidly enforcing infection control measures to prevent outbreaks.

9.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 21(10): 1704-10, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26402575

RESUMO

In South Korea, nationwide surveillance for severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS) began during 2013. Among 301 surveillance cases, 35 hospitalized case-patients in 25 areas were confirmed by using virologic testing, and 16 (46%) case-patients subsequently died. The SFTS cases occurred during May-November and peaked during June (9 cases, 26%). The incidence of SFTS was higher in the southern regions of South Korea. Age and neurologic symptoms, including decreased level of consciousness and slurred speech, were heavily associated with death; neurologic symptoms during the first week after disease onset were also associated with death. Although melena was common among patients who died, no other hemorrhagic manifestations were substantively more common among those who died. No effective treatments, including ribavirin, were identified. Expansion of SFTS surveillance to include the outpatient sector and development of an antibody test would enhance completeness of SFTS detection in South Korea.


Assuntos
Infecções por Bunyaviridae/virologia , Febre por Flebótomos/virologia , Vigilância da População/métodos , Trombocitopenia/virologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Animais , Infecções por Bunyaviridae/epidemiologia , Infecções por Bunyaviridae/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Febre por Flebótomos/epidemiologia , República da Coreia/epidemiologia , Trombocitopenia/mortalidade , Trombocitopenia/patologia , Doenças Transmitidas por Carrapatos , Carrapatos
10.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 2024 Jul 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38985994

RESUMO

This retrospective matched cohort study evaluated the efficacy of 2 doses of NVX-CoV2373 compared with that of BNT162b2 vaccines in preventing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection in adolescents. We analyzed 13-week risk differences and ratios between these 2 vaccines. The study included 465 NVX-CoV2373 and 465 BNT162b2 recipients. Throughout the follow-up period, 4.1% of NVX-CoV2373 recipients and 2.8% of BNT162b2 recipients contracted the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. The incidence risk ratio for NVX-CoV2373 compared with that for BNT162b2 was calculated at 1.46 (95% CI 0.68-3.22; P = 0.296). While our findings suggest noninferiority between the 2 vaccines, further research is needed to comprehensively assess their effectiveness in real-world settings. Our study highlights the critical need for vigilant vaccine surveillance and monitoring efforts to ensure informed decision-making and public health protection.

11.
Asia Pac J Public Health ; 36(4): 378-386, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38600733

RESUMO

This study aimed to identify factors influencing compliance with social distancing, a key nonpharmaceutical intervention during the early stages of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. The study population comprised 182 758 Koreans who participated in the 2020 Community Health Survey. Personal characteristics were classified into sociodemographic, health behavioral, and psychosocial factors, and factors associated with social distancing compliance were identified. Health behaviors and psychosocial factors were highly related to compliance with social distancing. Approximately 13% of smokers were less likely to practice physical distancing and 50% of high-risk drinkers were less likely to limit going out or attending gatherings and events. Higher concern about COVID-19 and a more positive perception of the government's response policy were associated with a higher compliance with social distancing. Strategic public health policies considering the characteristics of the public are needed to enhance compliance with nonpharmaceutical interventions during disease outbreaks lacking effective treatments and vaccines.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Distanciamento Físico , Humanos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/epidemiologia , República da Coreia/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Adulto Jovem , Idoso , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Adolescente , Pandemias/prevenção & controle
12.
Vaccine ; 42(7): 1440-1444, 2024 Mar 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38365479

RESUMO

South Korea experienced a low prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 until the emergence of the omicron in early 2022, triggering a major community epidemic. To evaluate effectiveness of NVX-CoV2373 and BNT162b2 vaccines in Korean population, we conducted an observational study utilizing individual-level case data on laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, along with vaccination record. A total of 47,078 recipients of NVX-CoV2373 vaccine and 7,561 recipients of BNT162b2 vaccine were eligible for the study. Thirty days post-second doses, COVID-19 rates were 7.9% (595 out of 7561) of NVX-CoV2373 recipients and 8.6 % (647 out of 7561) of BNT162b2 recipients experienced COVID-19. NVX-CoV2373 rates increased to 9.8 % and 11.2 % at 60 and 90 days, while BNT162b2 rates were 10.5 % and 11.3 % at the same intervals. The 22-weeks risk ratios for recipients of the NVX-CoV2373 vaccine as compared with recipients of the BNT162b2 vaccine were 1.11 (95 % CI, 0.99 to 1.25) for laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Continued monitoring is essential to evaluate the duration of protection across different vaccine platforms and schedules.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Adulto , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacina BNT162 , SARS-CoV-2 , Infecções Irruptivas , Vacinação , República da Coreia/epidemiologia
13.
J Med Virol ; 85(4): 709-15, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23417618

RESUMO

During the influenza pandemic of 2009-2010, rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDTs) were used to detect influenza viral infections because they are quick and simple to use. However, retrospective studies showed that RIDTs performed poorly when used to diagnose pandemic viral infections. Determining how amino acid sequence changes in pandemic or epidemic influenza viral antigens impact clinical value of RIDTs has not been possible, because the viral epitopes recognized by RIDTs have been not mapped. In this study, the effect of escape-variations or mutations in influenza viral antigens upon the sensitivity and specificity of an RIDT was investigated by characterizing the immunological properties of the antibodies used in the RIDT. Escape-mutants were generated by cultivating A/Korea/01/2009 in the presence of an excess of the same antibodies used in the RIDT. Escape-mutants not recognized by the RIDT were selected. Epitopes recognized by the RIDT were mapped by comparing the sequence and immunological analysis of the escape-variants and wild-type isolates. The RIDT antibodies recognized epitopes on the Sa antigenic site and in the F subdomain in hemagglutinin. Variants bearing mutations in these epitopes were not detected by the RIDT. The frequency of escape-variants emerging since the 2009-2010 pandemic was calculated as 1.27% using in silico surveillance of influenza sequence databases. These results suggest that mapping the relevant epitopes of RIDTs and making such information available to clinics would be helpful for determining whether RIDTs match newly emergent strains and subtypes prior to retrospective re-evaluation of the RIDTs using clinical specimens.


Assuntos
Antígenos Virais/análise , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/métodos , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/métodos , Influenza Humana/diagnóstico , Mutação , Orthomyxoviridae/isolamento & purificação , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Antígenos Virais/genética , Antígenos Virais/imunologia , Erros de Diagnóstico , Mapeamento de Epitopos , Humanos , Imunoensaio/métodos , Influenza Humana/virologia , Orthomyxoviridae/genética , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
14.
Osong Public Health Res Perspect ; 14(3): 224-231, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37415440

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The incidence of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) changed significantly during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Emerging reports suggest that viral vector-based vaccines may be associated with an elevated risk of GBS. METHODS: In this nationwide time-series correlation study, we examined the age-specific incidence of GBS from January 2011 to August 2022, as well as data on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccinations and infections from February 2021 to August 2022. We compared the forecasted estimates of age-specific GBS incidence, using the pre-SARS-CoV-2 period as a benchmark, with the actual incidence observed during the post-vaccination period of the pandemic. Furthermore, we assessed the temporal association between GBS, SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations, and COVID-19 for different age groups. RESULTS: In the age group of 60 and older, the rate ratio was significantly elevated during June-August and November 2021. A significant, strong positive association was observed between viral vector-based vaccines and GBS incidence trends in this age group (r=0.52, p=0.022). For the 30 to 59 years age group, the rate ratio was notably high in September 2021. A statistically significant, strong positive association was found between mRNA-based vaccines and GBS incidence in this age group (r=0.61, p=0.006). CONCLUSION: Viral vector-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were found to be temporally associated with an increased risk of GBS, particularly in older adults. To minimize age-specific and biological mechanism-specific adverse events, future vaccination campaigns should adopt a more personalized approach, such as recommending homologous mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines for older adults to reduce the heightened risk of GBS.

15.
Osong Public Health Res Perspect ; 14(3): 188-196, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37415436

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Healthcare facilities are high-risk sites for infection. This study analyzed the epidemiological characteristics of a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in a tertiary hospital after COVID-19 vaccination had been introduced in Republic of Korea. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) and shared anti-infection strategies are also assessed. METHODS: The risk levels for 4,074 contacts were evaluated. The epidemiological characteristics of confirmed cases were evaluated using the chi-square test. The "1 minus relative risk" method was used to determine VE in preventing infection, progression to severe disease, and death. In the largest affected area (the 8th floor), a separate relative risk analysis was conducted. A multivariate logistic regression analysis (with 95% confidence interval [CIs]) was used to identify transmission risk factors with a significance level <10% via the backward elimination method. RESULTS: In total, 181 cases of COVID-19 were confirmed, with an attack rate of 4.4%. Of those cases, 12.7% progressed to severe disease, and 8.3% died. In the cohort isolation area on the 8th floor, where 79.0% of the confirmed cases occurred, the adjusted odds ratio was 6.55 (95% CI, 2.99-14.33) and 2.19 (95% CI, 1.24-3.88) for caregivers and the unvaccinated group, respectively. VE analysis revealed that 85.8% of the cases that progressed to severe disease and 78.6% of the deaths could be prevented by administering a second vaccine. CONCLUSION: Caregiver training for infection prevention and control is necessary to reduce infection risk. Vaccination is an important intervention to reduce the risk of progression to severe disease and death.

16.
Trop Med Infect Dis ; 8(6)2023 Jun 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37368726

RESUMO

Healthcare personnel (HCP) are vulnerable to COVID-19 infection due to their higher risk of contact with infected persons. The numbers of cases and deaths among HCP in Korea were divided into four periods associated with different major variants of SARS-CoV-2: GH clade, Alpha, Delta, and Omicron. To evaluate the implication of HCP infection in Korea, we overviewed the pandemic status in Korea and in other countries: the cases, deaths, excess mortality, and vaccination rates in Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States. In about two years, there were 10,670 HCP cases among all COVID-19 cases (1.15% of 925,975 cases). HCP cases had a lower death rate (%) compared to that for all cases (0.14 versus 0.75). Nurses were the most infected (55.3%), followed by HCP of other categories (28.8%) and doctors (15.9%), while deaths were mostly reported among doctors (9 out of 15, 60%). Cases among HCP gradually increased, but the death rate decreased as the pandemic progressed. Compared to five of the other countries examined, Korea had a higher incidence of cases but a lower mortality, lower excess mortality, and a higher vaccination rate.

17.
Osong Public Health Res Perspect ; 14(2): 89-99, 2023 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37183329

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to classify coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related deaths according to whether COVID-19 was listed as the cause of death, and to investigate the differences in demographic characteristics and risk factors for COVID-19 death classifications. METHODS: A total of 5,625 deaths in South Korea among patients with confirmed COVID-19 from January 20, 2020 to December 31, 2021 were selected. Excluding false reports and unnatural deaths, 5,597 deaths were analyzed. Based on death report data, deaths were classified according to whether the cause of death was listed as COVID-19 (CD) or not (NCD). The epidemiological characteristics and causes of deaths were investigated using descriptive, univariate, and multivariate statistical analyses. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to analyze the risk factors. RESULTS: The case fatality ratio was 0.89% and increased with age. Additionally, 96.4% of the subjects had an underlying disease, and 53.4% died in winter. The proportion of NCDs was 9.3%, of whom 19.1% died at home and 39.0% were confirmed to have COVID-19 after death. Malignant neoplasms (102/416 vs. 637/4,442; OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.36-2.16; p<0.001) were significantly associated with NCD. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to analyze risk factors by cause of death using COVID-19 death report data in South Korea. These results are expected to be used as evidence for establishing a death monitoring system that can collect timely information in a new infectious disease pandemic.

18.
Int J Infect Dis ; 135: 95-100, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37572956

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of bivalent and monovalent COVID-19 vaccines throughout the 2022-2023 winter season based on real-world data. METHODS: This retrospective observational matched cohort study used the national vaccination program and a surveillance dataset from the Republic of Korea, and included adults aged >18 years who received bivalent or monovalent COVID-19 vaccines between October 11, 2022, and December 17, 2022. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the hazard ratio for COVID-19 infection between the groups. RESULTS: We included 29,245 matched individuals in the bivalent and monovalent vaccine groups, respectively. The bivalent vaccine recipients showed 12.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.5-17.7%) additional protection against COVID-19 infection compared with the monovalent vaccine recipients. The additional protection provided by bivalent vaccines was significantly higher among residents of long-term care facilities (39.4%, 95% CI 21.6-53.1%). Maximum additional protection was observed 3 to 4 months after completing the vaccination (17.6%, 95% CI 6.6-27.3%). CONCLUSION: Bivalent COVID-19 vaccines showed significantly better protection against infection than monovalent vaccines among adults during the 2022-2023 winter season. Our results highlight that immunization programs with bivalent vaccines comprising recent variants can be an effective measure to prepare for seasonal COVID-19 circulation.

19.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 18(6): 986-8, 2012 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22607722

RESUMO

Transmission of influenza (H5N1) virus from birds to humans is a serious public health threat. In South Korea, serologic investigation among 2,512 poultry workers exposed during December 2003-March 2004 to poultry with confirmed or suspected influenza (H5N1) virus infection found antibodies in 9. Frequency of bird-to-human transmission was low.


Assuntos
Doenças dos Trabalhadores Agrícolas/epidemiologia , Surtos de Doenças , Virus da Influenza A Subtipo H5N1/imunologia , Influenza Aviária/transmissão , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Adulto , Doenças dos Trabalhadores Agrícolas/sangue , Doenças dos Trabalhadores Agrícolas/virologia , Animais , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Galinhas , Patos , Humanos , Influenza Aviária/virologia , Influenza Humana/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , República da Coreia/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem , Zoonoses
20.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 9364, 2022 06 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35672439

RESUMO

The first case of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in South Korea was confirmed on January 20, 2020, approximately three weeks after the report of the first COVID-19 case in Wuhan, China. By September 15, 2021, the number of cases in South Korea had increased to 277,989. Thus, it is important to better understand geographical transmission and design effective local-level pandemic plans across the country over the long term. We conducted a spatiotemporal analysis of weekly COVID-19 cases in South Korea from February 1, 2020, to May 30, 2021, in each administrative region. For the spatial domain, we first covered the entire country and then focused on metropolitan areas, including Seoul, Gyeonggi-do, and Incheon. Moran's I and spatial scan statistics were used for spatial analysis. The temporal variation and dynamics of COVID-19 cases were investigated with various statistical visualization methods. We found time-varying clusters of COVID-19 in South Korea using a range of statistical methods. In the early stage, the spatial hotspots were focused in Daegu and Gyeongsangbuk-do. Then, metropolitan areas were detected as hotspots in December 2020. In our study, we conducted a time-varying spatial analysis of COVID-19 across the entirety of South Korea over a long-term period and found a powerful approach to demonstrating the current dynamics of spatial clustering and understanding the dynamic effects of policies on COVID-19 across South Korea. Additionally, the proposed spatiotemporal methods are very useful for understanding the spatial dynamics of COVID-19 in South Korea.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Humanos , Pandemias , República da Coreia/epidemiologia , Análise Espacial , Análise Espaço-Temporal
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA