Ascorbic acid PEG-2L is superior for early morning colonoscopies in colorectal cancer screening programs: a prospective non-randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The quality of colon cleansing and the tolerability of anterograde preparation are essential to the success of colorectal cancer screening. AIM: To compare the tolerability and efficacy of low-volume preparations vs the standard regimen in individuals scheduled for an early morning colonoscopy. STUDY: Participants in a population-based colorectal cancer screening program using the fecal immunochemical test who were scheduled for a colonoscopy from 09:00 a.m. to 10:20 a.m. were prospectively included and assigned to: (1) control group (PEG-ELS 4L): PEG 4L and electrolytes; (2) group AscPEG-2L: a combination of PEG and ascorbic acid 2L; and (3) group PiMg: sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate 500 mL plus 2L of clear fluids. Tolerability was evaluated with a questionnaire and the quality of bowel preparation with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. RESULTS: A total of 292 participants were included: 98 in the PEG-ELS 4L control group, 96 in the AscPEG-2L study group and 98 in the PiMg study group. Low-volume treatments were better tolerated than the standard solution (AscPEG-2L 94.8% and PiMg 93.9% vs PEG-ELS 4L 75.5%; p < 0.0001). The effectiveness of AscPEG-2L was superior to that of PEG-ELS 4L and PiMg (p = 0.011 and p = 0.032, respectively). Patient acceptance was higher for single-dose than for split-dose administration but efficacy was higher with the split dose than with other doses. CONCLUSIONS: In early morning colonoscopies, ascPEG-2L appears to be the best option, especially when administered in a split-dose.

Biology and diagnosis of aberrant crypt foci.

AIM: Aberrant crypt foci (ACFs) are clusters of colonic crypts that can be identified after staining and that have a different behaviour than the surrounding crypts. They have been hypothesized to be the potential precursors of colonic neoplastic lesions. Since they are detectable in vivo with endoscopic stains, they have been proposed as early biomarkers for colonic carcinogenesis. Our aim was to examine the literature regarding the role of ACFs in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC). METHOD: An intensive PubMed search was performed with the following terms: aberrant crypt foci, colorectal cancer, biomarker, carcinogenesis. RESULTS: Aberrant crypt foci have a variable prevalence and little is known about their natural history. They can be classified as hyperplastic or dysplastic. There is evidence that supports their role as preneoplastic lesions and features detectable by chromoendoscopy have been related to CRC risk. Moreover, ACFs have been shown to harbour genetic and epigenetic alterations common in adenomas and CRC. However, contradictory results have been obtained and difficulties in endoscopic detection and characterization have been described in large-scale studies. CONCLUSION: Despite the inconsistencies in ACF detection and characterization, several genetic and epigenetic changes common in both ACFs and CRC have been verified throughout the studies. This evidence is increasingly strong and it grows along with progress in the knowledge of carcinogenesis molecular pathways. Clinical application of ACFs as an intermediate endpoint for colorectal carcinogenesis is under development and a deeper knowledge of cancer mechanisms is needed before it can be applied or discarded.

Ascorbic acid PEG-2L is superior for early morning colonoscopies in colorectal cancer screening programs: A prospective non-randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The quality of colon cleansing and the tolerability of anterograde preparation are essential to the success of colorectal cancer screening. AIM: To compare the tolerability and efficacy of low-volume preparations vs the standard regimen in individuals scheduled for an early morning colonoscopy. Study: Participants in a population-based colorectal cancer screening program using the fecal immunochemical test who were scheduled for a colonoscopy from 09:00 a.m. to 10:20 a.m. were prospectively included and assigned to: (1) control group (PEG-ELS 4L): PEG 4L and electrolytes; (2) group AscPEG-2L: a combination of PEG and ascorbic acid 2L; and (3) group PiMg: sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate 500 mL plus 2 L of clear fluids. Tolerability was evaluated with a questionnaire and the quality of bowel preparation with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. RESULTS: A total of 292 participants were included: 98 in the PEG-ELS 4L control group, 96 in the AscPEG-2L study group and 98 in the PiMg study group. Low-volume treatments were better tolerated than the standard solution (AscPEG-2L 94.8% and PiMg 93.9% vs PEG-ELS 4L 75.5%; p < 0.0001). The effectiveness of AscPEG-2L was superior to that of PEG-ELS 4L and PiMg (p = 0.011 and p = 0.032, respectively). Patient acceptance was higher for single-dose than for split-dose administration but efficacy was higher with the split dose than with other doses. CONCLUSIONS: In early morning colonoscopies, ascPEG-2L appears to be the best option, especially when administered in a split-dose

ANTECEDENTES: La calidad de la limpieza del colon y la tolerancia a la preparación anterógrada son claves para el éxito de un programa de cribado de cáncer colorrectal. OBJETIVO: Comparar la tolerancia y eficacia de las preparaciones de volumen reducido frente a la preparación estándar en pacientes programados para colonoscopia a primera hora de la mañana. Estudio: Individuos del programa de cribado poblacional con test de sangre oculta en heces programados para colonoscopia entre las 09:00 y 10:20 a.m fueron prospectivamente asignados a: 1) Grupo Control (PEG-ELS 4L): PEG con electrolitos 4 litros; 2) Grupo AscPEG-2L: PEG más ácido ascórbico 2 litros; y 3) Groupo PiMg: picosulfato sódico más citrato de magnesio 500 ml seguido de 2 litros de líquidos claros. Se evaluó la tolerancia mediante cuestionario y la calidad mediante la Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 292 sujetos: 98 en el grupo control PEG-ELS 4L, 96 en el grupo a estudio AscPEG-2L y 98 en el grupo a estudio PiMg. Las soluciones de volumen reducido fueron mejor toleradas que la solución estándar (AscPEG-2L 94.8% y PiMg 93.9% vs PEG-ELS 4L 75.5%; p < 0.0001). La calidad de la preparación fue superior en el grupo AscPEG-2L que en el grupo control PEG-ELS 4L y grupo PiMg (p = 0.011 and p = 0.032, respectivamente). Las dosis partidas fueron peor aceptadas por los sujetos pero resultaron en una mayor calidad de la preparación. CONCLUSIONES: AscPEG-2L es la mejor opción para las colonoscopias programadas a primera hora de la mañana, especialmente cuando se administra en dosis partida

Peritonitis neumocócica espontánea en un cirrótico sin foco respiratorio / Spontaneous pneumococcal peritonitis in a cirrhotic patient without respiratory focus

No disponible