Usefulness of electron beam computed tomography scanning for distinguishing ischemic from nonischemic cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to evaluate the ability of electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) to distinguish ischemic from nonischemic causes of cardiomyopathy by evaluating heart failure patients for coronary calcification (CC). BACKGROUND: The etiology of heart failure, whether coronary-induced or nonischemic, may be difficult to discern clinically. Differentiation of ischemic from nonischemic etiology is clinically important for both therapeutic and prognostic implications. With its ability to noninvasively discern and quantitate coronary artery calcification, EBCT correlates well with angiographic stenosis and thus may be useful in distinguishing ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-five patients with cardiomyopathy (ejection fraction <0.40) and known coronary anatomy underwent EBCT coronary scanning to evaluate for CCs within 3 months of coronary angiography. RESULTS: Of the 72 patients who were found to have ischemic cardiomyopathy, 71 patients had CC by EBCT (sensitivity 99%, p < 0.001), mean score 798+/-899. In comparison, among the 53 patients without significant coronary artery disease (CAD) (nonischemic cardiomyopathy), the mean score was significantly lower (17+/-51; p < 0.0001), and 44 patients had a CC score of 0 (no CC present). The specificity of EBCT to exclude CAD in patients with cardiomyopathy was 83%, using a threshold CC score of 0, and 92% for scores <80 (p < 0.001). Overall accuracy for determining the etiology of cardiomyopathy (differentiating ischemic from nonischemic) was 92% for this technique. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective, blinded study indicates that EBCT detected CC accurately and can noninvasively distinguish between cardiomyopathy because of CAD and nonischemic causes of left ventricular dysfunction.

Exercise testing and electron beam computed tomography in the evaluation of coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVES: This study compared coronary artery calcium (CC) as detected by electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) with conventional stress testing in the evaluation of patients with symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease (CAD). BACKGROUND: Exercise electrocardiogram treadmill stress testing (treadmill-ECG) is limited by its requirement of a normal resting ECG and the ability of the patient to exercise adequately. The addition of myocardial imaging agents such as technetium improves the sensitivity and specificity but substantially increases the cost and prolongs the testing time. The use of EBCT provides a noninvasive and rapid method for identifying the presence and amount of CC, which has been shown to be related to atherosclerosis, and may provide additional information in combination with more traditional noninvasive testing methods. METHODS: A total of 97 patients underwent technetium stress testing (technetium-stress), treadmill-ECG, and EBCT coronary scanning within three months of coronary angiography for the evaluation of chest pain. RESULTS: The relative risk (RR) of obstructive angiographic CAD for an abnormal test was higher for EBCT (4.53) than either treadmill-ECG (1.72) or technetium-stress (1.96). The low specificity of EBCT (47%) was improved by the addition of treadmill-ECG (83%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Electron beam computed tomography has a higher diagnostic ability than either treadmill-ECG or technetium-stress for the detection of obstructive angiographic CAD. Electron beam computed tomography is an accurate and noninvasive alternative to traditional stress testing for the detection of obstructive CAD in symptomatic patients.