Notification System for Overdue Radiology Recommendations Improves Rates of Follow-Up and Diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to quantify improved rates of follow-up and additional important diagnoses made after notification for overdue workups recommended by radiologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Standard reports from imaging studies performed at our institution from October through November 2016 were searched for the words "recommend" or "advised," yielding 9784 studies. Of these, 5245 were excluded, yielding 4539 studies; reports for 1599 of these 4539 consecutive studies were reviewed to identify firm or soft recommendations or findings requiring immediate management. If recommended follow-ups were incomplete within 1 month of the advised time, providers were notified. Compliance was calculated before and after notification and was compared using a one-sample test of proportion. RESULTS. Of 1599 patients, 92 were excluded because they had findings requiring immediate management, and 684 were excluded because of soft recommendations, yielding 823 patients. Of these patients, 125 were not yet overdue for follow-up and were excluded, and 18 were excluded because of death or transfer to another institution. Of the remaining 680 patients, follow-up was completed for 503 (74.0%). A total of 177 (26.0%) of the 680 patients were overdue for follow-up, and providers were notified. Of these 177 patients, 36 (20.3%) completed their follow-ups after notification, 34 (19.2%) had follow-up designated by the provider as nonindicated, and 107 (60.5%) were lost to follow-up, yielding four clinically important diagnoses: one biopsy-proven malignancy, one growing mass, and two thyroid nodules requiring biopsy. The rate of incomplete follow-ups after communication decreased from 26.0% (177/680) to 20.7% (141/680) (95% CI, 17.7-23.9%; p = .002), with a 20.4% reduction in relative risk of noncompliance, and 39.5% (70/177) of overdue cases were resolved when nonindicated studies were included. CONCLUSION. Notification of overdue imaging recommendations reduces incomplete follow-ups and yields clinically important diagnoses.

Surveillance of probably benign (BI-RADS 3) lesions in mammography: what is the right follow-up protocol?

BI-RADS-3 is a category in mammography for probably benign lesions and for which periodic follow-up with repeat imaging is recommended. At our institution repeated mammograms are performed at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The purpose of this study was to assess the significance of 18-month mammogram for evaluation of BI-RADS-3 lesions. Following IRB approval, electronic medical records and picture archiving and communications system were used to review 121,862 consecutive mammograms between February, 2002-May, 2009. A total of 8,400 patients with BI-RADS-3 mammograms were identified. Of these, 7,632 patients were followed until completion of 24 month mammogram or biopsy following an upgrade in their BI-RADS status. Over the follow-up, 197 patients received an upgrade in their BI-RADS status of which 179 were biopsied. Histopathologic results were reviewed. The majority of the BI-RADS-3 lesions were upgraded at 6-month mammogram (n = 150, 76.1%) followed by 32 (16.2%), 11 (5.6%), and 4 (2.0%) at 12, 18, and 24 month mammograms respectively. Thirty-four of 179 upgraded and biopsied lesions were found to be malignant. From these 27 (79.4%), 3 (8.8%), 3 (8.8%), and 1 (2.9%) lesions were identified at 6, 12, 18, and 24 month mammograms respectively. At the 18-month mammogram 3/7,632 lesions (0.04%) were found to be malignant. The vast majority of malignant lesions (88.2%) were detected within the first 12-months of follow-up. Only three of 179 biopsies (1.7%) were malignant at 18-month follow-up. Based on those results a 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up protocol for BI-RADS-3 lesions is sufficient.