Tailoring the wrap: intraoperative functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) during hiatal hernia repair.

INTRODUCTION: The introduction of the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) has provided objective, real-time feedback on the geometric variations with each component of a hiatal hernia repair (HHR). The utility of this technology in altering intraoperative decision-making has been scarcely reported. Herein, we report a single-center series of intraoperative FLIP during HHR. METHODS: A retrospective review of electronic medical records between 2020 and 2022 was conducted and all patients undergoing non-recurrent HHR with FLIP were queried. Patient and hernia characteristics, intraoperative FLIP values and changes in decision-making, as well as early post-operative outcomes were reported. Both diameter and distensibility index (DI) were measured at 40 ml and 50 ml balloon inflation after hiatal dissection, after hiatal closure, and after fundoplication when indicated. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 62 ± 14 years and mean BMI was 28 ± 6 kg/m2. The majority (53%) were type I hiatal hernias. The largest drop in DI occurred after hiatal closure, with minimal change seen after fundoplication (mean DI of 4.3 ± 2. after completion of HH dissection, vs 2.7 ± 1.2 after hiatal closure and 2.3 ± 1 after fundoplication when performed). In 13 (39%) of cases, FLIP values directly impacted intraoperative decision-making. Fundoplication was deferred in 4/13 (31%) patients, the wrap was loosened in 2/13 (15%); the type of fundoplication was altered to achieve adequate anti-reflux values in 2/13 (15%) patients, and in 1/13 (3%) the wrap was tightened. CONCLUSION: FLIP measurements can be used intraoperatively to guide decision-making and alter management plan based on objective values. Long-term outcomes and further prospective studies are required to better delineate the value of this technology.

Re-Admission in Patients with Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections: Continuity of Care Matters.

Background: Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are rapidly progressive infections with high mortality and complication rates. The incidence of NSTIs has been increasing steadily whereas mortality has decreased; survivors have a high risk of re-hospitalization. We hypothesized that re-admission to the index hospital where the first admission occurred would be associated with better clinical outcomes compared with re-admission to a non-index hospital. Patients and Methods: We identified patients from the 2017 Nationwide Readmissions Database with an index admission for NSTIs and examined all-cause re-admissions within 90 days of discharge. We noted whether re-admission occurred at the index or a non-index hospital. Survey-weighted logistic regression identified factors associated with death at the first re-admission and re-admission to index hospital. We also compared patient outcomes between patients admitted to index versus non-index hospitals. Results: We identified 27,051 NSTI survivors, of whom 6,954 (25.7%) had an unplanned re-admission within 90 days. A large proportion of re-admission occurred at non-index hospitals (28.3%; n = 1,966). Factors associated with non-index re-admission included prolonged index length of stay, discharge to short-term hospital, and leaving against medical advice. Patients re-admitted to index hospitals had a lower mortality rate (4.7% vs. 6.7%; p = 0.003), lower admission costs (in $1000; 45 [23-88] vs. 50 [24-104]; p = 0.004) and higher discharge rate to home (55.7% vs. 48.6%; p < 0.001). Conclusions: More than one-quarter of re-admissions among NSTI survivors were to non-index hospitals. Continuity of care is important because re-admission to the index hospital was associated with better patient outcomes.