Shared genetics between breast cancer and predisposing diseases identifies novel breast cancer treatment candidates.

Background Current effective breast cancer treatment options have severe side effects, highlighting a need for new therapies. Drug repurposing can accelerate improvements to care, as FDA-approved drugs have known safety and pharmacological profiles. Some drugs for other conditions, such as metformin, an antidiabetic, have been tested in clinical trials for repurposing for breast cancer. Here, we exploit the genetics of breast cancer and linked predisposing diseases to propose novel drug repurposing. We hypothesize that if a predisposing disease contributes to breast cancer pathology, identifying the pleiotropic genes related to the risk of cancer could prioritize drug targets, among all drugs treating a predisposing disease. We aim to develop a method to not only prioritize drug repurposing, but also to highlight shared etiology explaining repurposing. Methods We compile breast cancer's predisposing diseases from literature. For each predisposing disease, we use GWAS summary statistics to identify genes in loci showing genetic correlation with breast cancer. Then, we use a network approach to link these shared genes to canonical pathways, and similarly for all drugs treating the predisposing disease, we link their targets to pathways. In this manner, we are able to prioritize a list of drugs based on each predisposing disease, with each drug linked to a set of implicating pathways. Finally, we evaluate our recommendations against drugs currently under investigation for breast cancer. Results We identify 84 loci harboring mutations with positively correlated effects between breast cancer and its predisposing diseases; these contain 194 identified shared genes. Out of the 112 drugs indicated for the predisposing diseases, 76 drugs can be linked to shared genes via pathways (candidate drugs for repurposing). Fifteen out of these candidate drugs are already in advanced clinical trial phases or approved for breast cancer (OR = 9.28, p = 7.99e-03, one-sided Fisher's exact test), highlighting the ability of our approach to identify likely successful candidate drugs for repurposing. Conclusions Our novel approach accelerates drug repurposing for breast cancer by leveraging shared genetics with its known risk factors. The result provides 59 novel candidate drugs alongside biological insights supporting each recommendation.

Shared etiology of Mendelian and complex disease supports drug discovery.

Background: Drugs targeting disease causal genes are more likely to succeed for that disease. However, complex disease causal genes are not always clear. In contrast, Mendelian disease causal genes are well-known and druggable. Here, we seek an approach to exploit the well characterized biology of Mendelian diseases for complex disease drug discovery, by exploiting evidence of pathogenic processes shared between monogenic and complex disease. One way to find shared disease etiology is clinical association: some Mendelian diseases are known to predispose patients to specific complex diseases (comorbidity). Previous studies link this comorbidity to pleiotropic effects of the Mendelian disease causal genes on the complex disease. Methods: In previous work studying incidence of 90 Mendelian and 65 complex diseases, we found 2,908 pairs of clinically associated (comorbid) diseases. Using this clinical signal, we can match each complex disease to a set of Mendelian disease causal genes. We hypothesize that the drugs targeting these genes are potential candidate drugs for the complex disease. We evaluate our candidate drugs using information of current drug indications or investigations. Results: Our analysis shows that the candidate drugs are enriched among currently investigated or indicated drugs for the relevant complex diseases (odds ratio = 1.84, p = 5.98e-22). Additionally, the candidate drugs are more likely to be in advanced stages of the drug development pipeline. We also present an approach to prioritize Mendelian diseases with particular promise for drug repurposing. Finally, we find that the combination of comorbidity and genetic similarity for a Mendelian disease and cancer pair leads to recommendation of candidate drugs that are enriched for those investigated or indicated. Conclusions: Our findings suggest a novel way to take advantage of the rich knowledge about Mendelian disease biology to improve treatment of complex diseases.