RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: There is limited evidence on the outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN) in obese patients (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). In this study, we aimed to compare perioperative and oncological outcomes of RPN and OPN. METHODS: We relied on data from patients who underwent PN from 2009 to 2017 at 16 departments of urology participating in the UroCCR network, which were collected prospectively. In an effort to adjust for potential confounders, a propensity-score matching was performed. Perioperative outcomes were compared between OPN and RPN patients. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Overall, 1277 obese patients (932 robotic and 345 open were included. After propensity score matching, 166 OPN and 166 RPN individuals were considered for the study purposes; no statistically significant difference among baseline demographic or tumor-specific characteristics was present. A higher overall complication rate and major complications rate were recorded in the OPN group (37 vs. 25%, p = 0.01 and 21 vs. 10%, p = 0.007; respectively). The length of stay was also significantly longer in the OPN group, before and after propensity-score matching (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in Warm ischemia time (p = 0.66), absolute change in eGFR (p = 0.45) and positive surgical margins (p = 0.12). At a median postoperative follow-up period of 24 (8-40) months, DFS and OS were similar in the two groups (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, RPN was associated with better perioperative outcomes (improvement of major complications rate and LOS) than OPN. The oncological outcomes were found to be similar between the two approaches.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Renais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/complicações , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Pontuação de Propensão , Nefrectomia/métodos , Obesidade/complicações , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic value of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and programmed death-1 (PD-1) expression in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective multicentre study was conducted in 283 patients with UTUC treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) between 2000 and 2015 at 10 French hospitals. Immunohistochemistry analyses were performed using 2 mm-core tissue microarrays with NAT105® and 28.8® antibodies at a 5% cut-off for positivity on tumour cells and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes to evaluate PD-L1 and PD-1 expression, respectively. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to determine the independent predictors of recurrence-free (RFS), cancer-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Overall, 63 (22.3%) and 220 (77.7%) patients with UTUC had PD-L1-positive and -negative disease, respectively, while 91 (32.2%) and 192 (67.8%) had PD-1-positive and -negative disease, respectively. Patients who expressed PD-L1 or PD-1 were more likely to have pathological tumour stage ≥pT2 (68.3% vs 49.5%, P = 0.009; and 69.2% vs 46.4%, P < 0.001, respectively) and high-grade (90.5% vs 70.0%, P = 0.001; and 91.2% vs 66.7%, P < 0.001, respectively) disease with lymphovascular invasion (52.4% vs 17.3%, P < 0.001; and 39.6% vs 18.2%, P < 0.001, respectively) as compared to those who did not. In multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusting for each other, PD-L1 and PD-1 expression were significantly associated with decreased RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-3.08, P = 0.023; and HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.01-2.54, P = 0.049; respectively), CSS (HR 2.73, 95% CI 1.48-5.04, P = 0.001; and HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.12-3.45, P = 0.019; respectively) and OS (HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.23-3.53, P = 0.006; and HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.05-2.78, P = 0.031; respectively). In addition, multivariable Cox regression analyses evaluating the four-tier combination of PD-L1 and PD-1 expression showed that only PD-L1/PD-1-positive patients (n = 38 [13.4%]) had significantly decreased RFS (HR 3.07, 95% CI 1.70-5.52; P < 0.001), CSS (HR 5.23, 95% CI 2.62-10.43; P < 0.001) and OS (HR 3.82, 95% CI 2.13-6.85; P < 0.001) as compared to those with PD-L1/PD-1-negative disease (n = 167 [59.0%]). CONCLUSIONS: We observed that PD-L1 and PD-1 expression were both associated with adverse pathological features that translated into an independent and cumulative adverse prognostic value in UTUC patients treated with RNU.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of pathological upstaging from clinically localized to locally advanced pT3a on survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as well as the oncological safety of various surgical approaches in this setting, and to develop a machine-learning-based, contemporary, clinically relevant model for individual preoperative prediction of pT3a upstaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical data from patients treated with either partial nephrectomy (PN) or radical nephrectomy (RN) for cT1/cT2a RCC from 2000 to 2019, included in the French multi-institutional kidney cancer database UroCCR, were retrospectively analysed. Seven machine-learning algorithms were applied to the cohort after a training/testing split to develop a predictive model for upstaging to pT3a. Survival curves for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were compared between PN and RN after G-computation for pT3a tumours. RESULTS: A total of 4395 patients were included, among whom 667 patients (15%, 337 PN and 330 RN) had a pT3a-upstaged RCC. The UroCCR-15 predictive model presented an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.77. Survival analysis after adjustment for confounders showed no difference in DFS or OS for PN vs RN in pT3a tumours (DFS: hazard ratio [HR] 1.08, P = 0.7; OS: HR 1.03, P > 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that machine-learning technology can play a useful role in the evaluation and prognosis of upstaged RCC. In the context of incidental upstaging, PN does not compromise oncological outcomes, even for large tumour sizes.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Rim/patologia , NefrectomiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To assess the oncological outcomes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) associated with tumor thrombus and identify predictive factors of recurrence. METHODS: Multi-institutional study that included patients with cT3-4N0-1M0 RCC with tumoral thrombus identified in the prospective UroCCR database (CNIL DR 2013-206; NCT03293563). pT3a without involvement of the renal vein were excluded. All patients underwent radical nephrectomy and a thrombectomy of the renal vein ± inferior vena cava ± right atrium. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Thirty-two patients who had adjuvant therapies (tyrosine kinase inhibitors or mTOR inhibitor) were compared to control group (surveillance) in a propensity score-matched 1:1 sub-analysis RESULTS: A total of 432 patients were included: 70.4% pT3a, 20.1% pT3b, 4.2% pT3c and 5.3% pT4. Tumor characteristics were: 90.7% clear cell RCC, 13.9% pN1, and 87.1% high Fuhrman grade. 173 patients (40%) had disease recurrence, and median RFS was 37.3 months (95% CI, 26.4-46.7). In a multivariate analysis (Cox model), predictive factors of recurrence were: pT4 (HR 2.66; 95% CI, 1.42-4.99; p = 0.002), pN1 (HR 2.53; 95% CI, 1.46-4.39; p < 0.001), tumor necrosis (HR 2.92; 95% CI, 1.85-4.62; p < 0.001), tumor size > 10 cm (HR 1.56; 95% CI, 1.08-2.24; p = 0.018). Adjuvant therapy was a protective factor of cancer recurrence (HR 0.33; 95% CI, 0.17-0.66; p = 0.002). Propensity score-matched sub-analysis of adjuvant vs control (surveillance) confirmed adjuvant treatment as a protective factor of cancer recurrence (Log rank p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary multi-institutional cohort of RCC + tumor thrombus, we reported higher recurrence rate shortly after surgical excision and demonstrated an oncological benefit of adjuvant treatment.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Trombose , Trombose Venosa , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Trombose Venosa/etiologia , Prognóstico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Veia Cava Inferior/patologia , Veia Cava Inferior/cirurgia , Nefrectomia , Trombectomia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: The management of solitary kidney tumors is a surgical challenge, requiring irreproachable results on both oncological and functional outcomes. The goal of our study was to compare the perioperative results of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) to open surgery in this indication. METHODS: We led a multicentric study based on the prospectively maintained French national database UroCCR. Patients who underwent partial nephrectomy on a solitary kidney between 1988 and 2020 were included. Clinical and pathological data were retrospectively analyzed. The main outcome of the study was the analysis of the variation of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated according to MDRD at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months depending on the chosen surgical approach. The secondary outcomes were the comparison of Trifecta success, perioperative complications, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: In total, 150 patients were included; 68 (45%) in the RAPN group and 82 (55%) in the open surgery group. The two groups were comparable for all data. The variation of eGFR at 3, 6, 12, or 24 months was comparable without any significant difference between the 2 groups (p = 0.45). Trifecta was achieved in 40% of the patients in the RAPN group and 33% in the open group (p = 0.42). A significant difference was observed for the length of stay, 5 days for the robot group versus 9 days for the open surgery group (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In our study, the surgical approach did not modify functional results and we noted a significant decrease in hospital stay and complications in the RAPN group. RAPN is a safe and efficient method for management of kidney tumors in solitary kidneys.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Renais , Laparoscopia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Rim Único , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Nefrectomia/métodos , Rim/patologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To describe the practice of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in France and prospectively assess the late complications and long-term outcomes. METHODS: Prospective, multicenter (n = 16), observational study including all patients diagnosed with a renal tumor who underwent RAPN. Preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative, and follow-up data were collected and stored in the French research network for kidney cancer database (UroCCR). Patients were included over a period of 12 months, then followed for 5 years. RESULTS: In total, 466 patients were included, representing 472 RAPN. The mean tumor size was 3.4 ± 1.7 cm, most of moderate complexity (median PADUA and RENAL scores of 8 [7-10] and 7 [5-9]). Indication for nephron-sparing surgery was relative in 7.1% of cases and imperative in 11.8%. Intraoperative complications occurred in 6.8% of patients and 4.2% of RAPN had to be converted to open surgery. Severe postoperative complications were experienced in 2.3% of patients and late complications in 48 patients (10.3%), mostly within the first 3 months and mainly comprising vascular, infectious, or parietal complications. At 5 years, 29 patients (6.2%) had chronic kidney disease upstaging, 21 (4.5%) were diagnosed with local recurrence, eight (1.7%) with contralateral recurrence, 25 (5.4%) with metastatic progression, and 10 (2.1%) died of the disease. CONCLUSION: Our results reflect the contemporary practice of French expert centers and is, to our knowledge, the first to provide prospective data on late complications associated with RAPN. We have shown that RAPN provides good functional and oncologic outcomes while limiting short- and long-term morbidity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03292549.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Renais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Nefrectomia/efeitos adversos , Nefrectomia/métodos , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , França/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To describe clinical features of patients with oncocytoma on renal biopsy (RMB), correlation with final histology on surgically treated patients, and predictive factors of discrepancy between RMB and final histology. METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted in the framework of the UroCCR project (NCT03293563). All tumors with oncocytoma on RMB were selected and all pathological reports were reviewed. Patients with the RMB simultaneously performed with a focal treatment, synchronous bilateral tumors and ambiguous RMB report were excluded. Discrepancy between RMB and definitive histology was evaluated using a uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses model. RESULTS: Overall, 119 tumors with oncocytoma on RMB, from 15 centers, were included. Of those, 54 (45.4%) had upfront surgery and 65 (54.6%) had active surveillance (AS). In renal masses with initial active surveillance, with a median follow-up of 28 months, 23 (19.3%) underwent surgery, 4 (3.4%) received focal treatment and 38 (31.9%) remained on AS. On final pathology, only 51 of the 75 surgically treated tumors (68.0%) had oncocytoma, while 24 presented malignant tumors (mainly chromophobe carcinoma (19.2%), and hybrid oncocytic/chromophobe tumor (HOCT) (6.8%)) leading to a discrepancy of 32.0% between RMB and final pathology. The only predictive factor of a discrepancy between RMB and definitive histology was a biopsy done outside of the center (Odds ratio: 3.22 [95%-confidence interval: 1.08-9.61], p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Despite the increase of RMB in more and more centers, histologic discrepancy between RMB and definitive histology remains significant. This information should be discussed with patients and taken into consideration before treatment decision.
Assuntos
Adenoma Oxífilo , Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Neoplasias Primárias Múltiplas , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adenoma Oxífilo/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Biópsia , Nefrectomia , Neoplasias Primárias Múltiplas/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The prognostic impact of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) morphotype remains unclear in patients who undergo partial nephrectomy (PN). Our objective was to determine the risk factors for recurrence after PN, including RCC morphotype. METHODS: Patients with RCC who had undergone PN were extracted from the prospective, national French database, UroCCR. Patients with genetic predisposition, bilateral or multiple tumours, and those who had undergone secondary totalization were excluded. Primary endpoint was 5-year, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Risk factors for recurrence were assessed by multivariable Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 2,767 patients were included (70% male; median age: 61 years [interquartile range (IQR) 51-69]). Most (71.5%) of the PN procedures were robot-assisted. Overall, 2,573 (93.0%) patients were recurrence free, and 74 died (2.7%). Five-year RFS was 84.9% (IQR 82.4-87.4). A significant difference in RFS was observed between RCC morphotypes (p < 0.001). Surgical margins (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.0 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3-3.2], p < 0.01), pT stage >1 (HR = 2.6 [95% CI: 1.8-3.7], p < 0.01]) and Fuhrmann grade >2 (HR = 1.9 [95% CI: 1.4-2.6], p < 0.001) were risk factors for recurrence, whereas chromophobe subtype was a protective factor (HR = 0.08 [95% CI: 0.01-0.6], p = 0.02). Five-year OS was 94.0% [92.4-95.7], and there were no significant differences between RCC subgroups (p = 0.06). The main study limitation was its design (multicentre national database), which may be responsible for declarative bias. CONCLUSIONS: Chromophobe morphotype was significantly associated with better RFS in RCC patients who underwent PN. Conversely, pT stage, Fuhrman group and positive surgical margins were risk factors for recurrence.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Masculino , Margens de Excisão , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrectomia , Prognóstico , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: New follow-up models of care are needed to ensure long-term comprehensive care for cancer survivors. We investigated the impact of a general practitioner (GP)-led follow-up program for prostate cancer (PCa) and renal cell cancer (RCC) survivors. METHODS: This retrospective monocentric study compared standard urologist-led follow-up to experimental GP-led follow-up within a nurse-led network for PCa and RCC survivors. To assess the safe continuity of follow-up, the number of patients lost to follow-up (LFU) was collected. A microcosting analysis from the French national health system perspective was conducted to describe incremental costs associated with experimental follow-up. A satisfaction survey was conducted to determine participating patient's and GP's satisfaction scores, ranging from 0 to 4 and 0 to 5, respectively. RESULTS: Among the 1274 patients included, 92/753 (12.2%) were LFU during standard follow-up vs 0/521 (0%) during experimental follow-up (p < 0.001). In the latter, the median management delay of suspected recurrence for PCa and RCC survivors was 20 [12-27] and 16 [10.5-31.25] days, and the mean incremental cost on a per-patient basis was 34.68 ± 105.87 and 64.24 ± 93.55, respectively. Patient and GP mean satisfaction scores were 3.6/4 and 3.9/5, respectively. CONCLUSION: The GP-led follow-up of PCa and RCC survivors within a nurse-led network seems to provide safe continuity of follow-up and seems not to be associated with major incremental costs. The surveys indicated high level of patient's satisfaction and encouraging results regarding GP's satisfaction. Randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings and promote larger implementation of this type of follow-up care.
Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer , Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Assistência ao Convalescente , Seguimentos , Humanos , Rim , Neoplasias Renais/terapia , Masculino , Próstata , Estudos Retrospectivos , SobreviventesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remain a cornerstone of metastatic kidney cancer (mRCC). Adverse events (AEs) may lead to dose downregulation, and optimal management of AEs is needed to maintain an efficient dose intensity (DI). The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of an app-based and nurse-led supportive-care program on DI in mRCC patients. METHOD: This multicenter (n = 3), retrospective study evaluated all consecutive mRCC patients who participated in the AKO@dom program, which consisted of an app-based and nurse-led weekly patient evaluation at home during the first 3 months of TKI intake. Treatment patterns and modifications were described, and the mean DI (mDI) was calculated at the end of AKO@dom. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were included: 12 had sunitinib, 18 pazopanib, 12 axitinib, and 47 cabozantinib. Median age was 69 years (60-76). TKIs were mainly initiated at standard doses except for cabozantinib (53% started at 40 mg/day); 71% had prior systemic treatment. Nine patients discontinued permanent treatment during the program. Thirty-two patients required ≥ 1 dose interruption, and 29% experienced ≥ 1 grade 3 AE of any type. The mDI (in mg/day) at 3 months was 34.4 ± 17.7 for sunitinib, 672.8 ± 144 for pazopanib, 8.6 ± 2.6 for axitinib, and 40 (36-48) for cabozantinib. Fifty-five patients [68.75% (95% CI: 57-78%)] had a mDI ≥ than reported in the literature. Overall survival at 12 months was 64.2% (CI 95%: 55-75%). CONCLUSION: The AKO@dom program allowed 68.75% of patients to maintain a high dose intensity after 3 months of TKI treatment. The impact on survival outcomes needs to be evaluated in randomized clinical trials.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Aplicativos Móveis , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Axitinibe/efeitos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Papel do Profissional de Enfermagem , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sunitinibe/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive nephrectomy has been the standard of care in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma for 20 years, supported by randomized trials and large, retrospective studies. However, the efficacy of targeted therapies has challenged this standard. We assessed the role of nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma who were receiving targeted therapies. METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients with confirmed metastatic clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma at presentation who were suitable candidates for nephrectomy to undergo nephrectomy and then receive sunitinib (standard therapy) or to receive sunitinib alone. Randomization was stratified according to prognostic risk (intermediate or poor) in the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center prognostic model. Patients received sunitinib at a dose of 50 mg daily in cycles of 28 days on and 14 days off every 6 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 450 patients were enrolled from September 2009 to September 2017. At this planned interim analysis, the median follow-up was 50.9 months, with 326 deaths observed. The results in the sunitinib-alone group were noninferior to those in the nephrectomy-sunitinib group with regard to overall survival (stratified hazard ratio for death, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.71 to 1.10; upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval for noninferiority, ≤1.20). The median overall survival was 18.4 months in the sunitinib-alone group and 13.9 months in the nephrectomy-sunitinib group. No significant differences in response rate or progression-free survival were observed. Adverse events were as anticipated in each group. CONCLUSIONS: Sunitinib alone was not inferior to nephrectomy followed by sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma who were classified as having intermediate-risk or poor-risk disease. (Funded by Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris and others; CARMENA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00930033 .).
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Indóis/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Nefrectomia , Pirróis/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Renais/secundário , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Indóis/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Renais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Nefrectomia/efeitos adversos , Seleção de Pacientes , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Prognóstico , Pirróis/efeitos adversos , Medição de Risco , Sunitinibe , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively evaluate diagnostic accuracy and complications of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy of radiologically indeterminate solid renal masses (RM). METHODS: Electronic records of all consecutive patients undergoing MRI-guided biopsy of solid RM (using free-breathing T2-BLADE and BEAT-IRTTT sequences) between April 2014 and October 2018 were reviewed; 101 patients (69 men, 32 women; median age 68 years; range 32-76) were included. Patient and RM characteristics, procedural details/complications, pathologic diagnosis, and clinical management were recorded. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated on an intention-to-diagnose basis. Diagnostic yield was also evaluated. Multi-variable analysis was performed for variables with p < .20, including patient age/sex; RM size/location/contact with vascular pedicle, RENAL score, number and total length of biopsy samples, and biopsy tract embolization, to determine factors associated with diagnostic samples, diagnostic accuracy, and complications. RESULTS: Median RM size was 2.4 cm (range 1-8.4 cm). There were 86 (85%; 95%CI 77-91%) diagnostic and 15 (15%; 95%CI 9-23%) non-diagnostic samples; 6/15 (40%) non-diagnostic biopsies were repeated with 50% malignancy rate. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were 96% (95%CI 89-99%), 100% (95%CI 77-100%), 100% (95%CI 95-100%), 82% (95%CI 57-96%), and 97% (95%CI 90-99%), respectively. Primary and secondary diagnostic yields were 85% (95%CI 77-91%) and 91% (95%CI 84-96%), respectively. Seven (7%; 95%CI 1-10%) complications were observed. No tested variables were associated with diagnostic samples, diagnostic accuracy, or complications. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-guided biopsy of solid RM is associated with high diagnostic accuracy and low complication rate. The technique might be helpful for inaccessible tumors. KEY POINTS: ⢠MRI-guided biopsy of radiologically indeterminate solid renal masses (RM) appears safe, with a low rate of minor self-limiting hemorrhagic complications. ⢠Diagnostic accuracy and primary/secondary diagnostic yield are high and appear similar to reported estimates for US- and CT-guided RM biopsy. ⢠MRI guidance may be particularly useful for RM with poor conspicuity on US and CT, for relatively inaccessible tumors (e.g., tumors requiring double-oblique steep-angled approaches), and for young patients or those with renal failure.
Assuntos
Biópsia Guiada por Imagem , Neoplasias Renais , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Rim/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of neoadjuvant axitinib to reduce the size of T2 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) for shifting from a radical nephrectomy (RN) to a partial nephrectomy (PN) indication, offering preservation of renal function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with cT2aN0NxM0 clear-cell RCC, considered not suitable for PN, were enrolled in a prospective, multicentre, phase II trial (AXIPAN). Axitinib 5 mg, and up to 7-10 mg, was administered twice daily, for 2-6 months before surgery, depending on the radiological response. The primary outcome was the number of patients receiving PN for a tumour <7 cm in size after neoadjuvant axitinib. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were enrolled. The median (range) tumour size and RENAL nephrometry score were 76.5 (70-98) mm and 11 (7-11), respectively. After axitinib neoadjuvant treatment, 16 tumours decreased in diameter, with a median size reduction of 17% (64.0 vs 76.5 mm; P < 0.001). The primary outcome was considered achieved in 12 patients who underwent PN for tumours <7 cm. Sixteen patients underwent PN. Axitinib was tolerated in the present study, as has been previously shown in the metastatic setting. Five patients had grade 3 adverse events. Five patients experienced Clavien III-V post-surgery complications. At 2-year follow-up, six patients had metastatic progression, and two had a recurrence. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant axitinib in cT2 ccRCC is feasible and, even with a modest decrease in size, allowed a tumour shrinkage <7 cm in 12 cases; however, PN procedures remained complex, requiring surgical expertise with possible morbidity.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Axitinibe/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Nefrectomia/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células Renais/terapia , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/métodos , Preservação de Órgãos , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
AIMS: Pudendal neuralgia (PN) due to pudendal nerve entrapment is a well-known disease in medical community but both diagnostic and treatment may be delayed for patients. The goal of this study was to achieve a systematic review of the published treatments of PN in order to help physician to take their decision to treat PN. METHODS: A Systematic review based on MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed to identify articles related to PN. Studies involving ≥ 10 patients presenting PN according to Nantes's criteria who were managed with an intervention for their pain were reviewed. Data were extracted manually for qualitative analysis. RESULTS: Fifteen studies involving 672 patients (mean age 53.2 +/-5.1, SD 95%) were included. Nine different types of treatments were evaluated. Effectiveness of the treatments was heterogeneously assessed. Pain improvement was achieved in 41% to 100%, 13.4% to 100%, 60% to 100%, 12.2% to 100% in immediate, 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year post procedure, respectively. Complications reported were all grade ≤ II of Dindo-Clavien classification's. Given the heterogeneity of the outcomes measures and the lack of homogeneous prospective studies, no recommendation could be established to choose in between treatments. Methodological quality of the studies was heterogeneous. CONCLUSION: Many treatments seems available for drug-resistant PN. Given the heterogeneity of the outcomes measures and the lack of homogeneous prospective studies, no recommendation could be established to determine the best management strategy. Further studies about PN management are needed and should have common endpoint and follow-up.
Assuntos
Neuralgia do Pudendo/terapia , Resistência a Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neuralgia do Pudendo/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare pathological characteristics of renal cysts Bosniak IIF, III and IV in light of recent histological classification. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The French research network for kidney cancer UroCCR conducted a multicentre study on patients treated surgically for a renal cyst between 2007 and 2016. Independent radiological and centralized pathological reviews were performed for every patient. Pathological characteristics were compared to the Bosniak classification. RESULTS: Of a total 216 patients included, 175 (81.0%) tumours (90.9% of Bosniak IV, 69.8% of Bosniak III) were malignant or had a low malignant potential, with 60% of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC), 24% of papillary RCC (PRCC) and 6.9% of multilocular cystic renal tumour of low malignant potential (MCRTLMP). Malignancies were mostly of low pT stage (86.4% of pT1-2), and low ISUP grade (68.0% of 1-2). Bosniak III cysts had a lower rate of CCRCC (46.7 vs. 67.3%), higher rate of PRCC (30 vs. 20.9%) and MCRTLMP (18.3 vs. 0.9%) compared to Bosniak IV (p < 0.001). Low-malignant potential lesions were less likely Bosniak IV and pT3-4 stage was more frequent in Bosniak IV vs. III (15.7 vs. 3.5%; p = 0.04). There were two recurrences (1.1%) and no cancer-related death occurred during follow-up. CONCLUSION: These results confirmed that cystic renal malignancies have excellent prognosis. Bosniak III cysts had a low malignant potential, which suggests surveillance could be an option for these lesions.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais/classificação , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Doenças Renais Císticas/classificação , Doenças Renais Císticas/patologia , Neoplasias Renais/classificação , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Idoso , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Cistos/classificação , Cistos/patologia , Cistos/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Doenças Renais Císticas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of high-field DWI in distinguishing benign from malignant lesions of the upper urinary tract (UUT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-eight patients who underwent 3-T DWI (b = 1000 s/mm(2)) for assessment of a UUT lesion were retrospectively included in the study. Data on the size, location, and mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of the lesions were collected and correlated with the final diagnosis. ROC curve analysis was used to determine the best threshold value of the mean ADC for characterization of the lesions. RESULTS: A total of 66 carcinomas and 33 benign lesions were identified. The mean (± SD) ADC value was statistically significantly lower for the malignant lesions than for the benign lesions (0.984 ± 0.048 vs 1.536 ± 0.067 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s; p = 0.000007). For characterization of malignant lesions, the best cutoff ADC value on the ROC curve was found to be less than or equal to 0.996 10(-3) mm(2)/s. On the basis of this value, the sensitivity and specificity of 3-T DWI for the identification of malignant UUT lesions were 78.3% and 95.5%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 94.7% and a negative predictive value of 80.8% (p = 0.0001). The thickness of the smallest lesion was 3 mm. The mean ADC value of high-grade tumors was not statistically significantly lower than that of low-grade tumors. The best cutoff value for predicting benignancy was greater than or equal to 1.100 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s with sensitivity of 90.9%, specificity of 82.6%, positive predictive value of 83.3%, and negative predictive value of 90.5%. CONCLUSION: The ADC measurement is a useful additional parameter in the differentiation of benign from malignant UUT lesions.
Assuntos
Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Doenças Urológicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Doenças Urológicas/patologiaRESUMO
Human conventional renal cell carcinoma (CCC) remains resistant to current therapies. Focal Adhesion Kinase (FAK) is upregulated in many epithelial tumors and clearly implicated in nearly all facets of cancer. However, only few reports have assessed whether FAK may be associated with renal tumorigenesis. In this study, we investigated the potential role of FAK in the growth of human CCC using a panel of CCC cell lines expressing or not the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) tumor suppressor gene as well as normal/tumoral renal tissue pairs. FAK was found constitutively expressed in human CCC both in culture cells and freshly harvested tumors obtained from patients. We showed that CCC cell growth was dramatically reduced in FAK-depleted cells or after FAK inhibition with various inhibitors and this effect was obtained through inhibition of cell proliferation and induction of cell apoptosis. Additionally, our results indicated that FAK knockdown decreased CCC cell migration and invasion. More importantly, depletion or pharmacological inhibition of FAK substantially inhibited tumor growth in vivo. Interestingly, investigations of the molecular mechanism revealed loss of FAK phosphorylation during renal tumorigenesis impacting multiple signaling pathways. Taken together, our findings reveal a previously uncharacterized role of FAK in CCC whereby FAK exerts oncogenic properties through a non canonical signaling pathway involving its scaffolding kinase-independent properties. Therefore, targeting the FAK scaffold may represent a promising approach for developing innovative and highly specific therapies in human CCC.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais/terapia , Quinase 1 de Adesão Focal/antagonistas & inibidores , Quinase 1 de Adesão Focal/deficiência , Neoplasias Renais/terapia , Animais , Carcinogênese/metabolismo , Carcinogênese/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/enzimologia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Quinase 1 de Adesão Focal/genética , Quinase 1 de Adesão Focal/metabolismo , Xenoenxertos , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/enzimologia , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Camundongos , Fosforilação , RNA Interferente Pequeno/administração & dosagem , RNA Interferente Pequeno/genética , Proteína Supressora de Tumor Von Hippel-Lindau/biossíntese , Proteína Supressora de Tumor Von Hippel-Lindau/genéticaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Despite benefits in functional renal outcome and favorable oncological efficacy, previous studies show marked underuse of partial nephrectomy (PN). We investigated national utilization of partial and radical nephrectomy (RN) using a contemporary, prospective population-based cohort. METHODS: Between June and December 2010, 1,237 patients were treated by PN or RN for renal cell carcinoma in 56 French centers. Data were prospectively collected, and statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 667 (53.9 %) and 570 patients (46.1 %) underwent RN and PN, respectively. In case of PN, surgical approach was an open PN in 63.3 % of cases, a laparoscopic PN in 21.0 % of cases and a robot-assisted PN in 15.7 % of cases. PN was used in T1a, T1b, T2 and T3 tumors in 395 (76.7 %), 131 (38.2 %), 29 (14.7 %) and 7 (4.6 %), respectively. Median ischemia time was 16 min [0-60], and mean blood loss was 280.4 ml (±339.9). Tumor characteristics and operative features were significantly different according to the surgical approach. Warm ischemia time was significantly higher in case of laparoscopic or robot-assisted procedure (p < 0.001). There was no statistical significant difference in blood loss and transfusion rate according to surgical approach. Postoperative medical and surgical complications occurred in 8.2 and 10.0 % of PN, respectively, with no significant difference according to surgical approach. CONCLUSIONS: Partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma is commonly used in this French centers sample. Mini-invasive approaches represent also a significant part of all partial nephrectomies with no difference in terms of complication rates.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Nefrectomia/métodos , Nefrectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , França , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrectomia/efeitos adversos , Duração da Cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Isquemia Quente , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of local haemostatic agents (HAs) in a prospective multicentre large series of partial nephrectomies (PNs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective National Observational Registry on the Practices of Haemostasis in Partial Nephrectomy (NEPHRON): the study was conducted in 54 French urological centres from 1 June to 31 December 2010. In all, 570 consecutive patients undergoing a PN were enrolled in this study in a prospective manner. The data was collected prospectively via an electronic case-report form: five different sheets were included for preoperative, perioperative, postoperative and follow-up data respectively. Information related to haemostasis was analysed. RESULTS: The median patient age was 60 years and the mean (range) tumour size was 3.68 (0.19-15) cm. An HA was primarily used in 71.4% of patients, with a statistically significant difference among surgical approaches (P = 0.024). In 91.8% of cases, a single use of a HA was sufficient for achieving haemostasis. The HA was used either alone (13.9%) or in association with sutures (80.3%). One or more additional haemostatic action(s) was needed in 12.3% of the cases. When comparing patients who received a HA with those who did not receive a HA, there was no statistical difference between the groups for tumour size (P = 0.542), collecting system drainage (P = 0.538), hospital stay (P = 0.508), operation time (P = 0.169), blood loss (P = 0.387) or transfusion rate (P = 0.713). CONCLUSION: HAs are widely used by urologists during PN. Progress is needed for standardising HA application, especially for the timing of application. For the time being, the role of the HA in nephron-sparing surgery is still to be evaluated.