An international Delphi exercise to identify items of importance for measuring response to treatment in ANCA-associated vasculitis.

OBJECTIVE: ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) is characterized by fluctuating levels of disease activity, but no formal criteria exist to measure response to treatment. This Delphi exercise aimed to reach consensus about which measures are considered by patients and physicians to be most important when assessing response to treatment in clinical trials of AAV. METHODS: An international 3-round online Delphi exercise was conducted. Survey participants included patients with AAV and physicians with expertise in AAV. Survey participants were asked to rate (on a scale of 1-9) the importance of each item when assessing response to treatment in AAV. Items scored 7-9 by ≥70% participants were considered highly important. RESULTS: 89 patients and 176 physicians completed three rounds of the Delphi exercise. The most highly rated items of response involved disease activity [extent of organ involvement, physician global assessment], mortality [survival], and patient-reported outcomes [patient global assessment and health-related quality of life measures]. Achievement of specific BVAS scores were highly rated only by physicians. Items highly rated only by patients included laboratory measures [changes on urinalysis and acute phase reactants], pain, and fatigue. Additional items related to damage and adverse events were highly rated by both groups. CONCLUSION: There is consensus between patients and physicians on many items considered important to measure when assessing response to treatment in AAV. There are some items considered important by only patients or only physicians. These data will inform the next steps in the development criteria of response to treatment in AAV.

Developing a composite outcome tool to measure response to treatment in ANCA-associated vasculitis: A mixed methods study from OMERACT 2020.

OBJECTIVE: The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Vasculitis Working Group aims to develop composite response criteria for ANCA-Associated Vasculitis (AAV). METHODS: The project follows the OMERACT approach for composite measures: (i) choose relevant domains; (ii) define high-quality instruments; (iii) decide on a scoring system approach; (iv) put through the OMERACT Filter 2.1 for validation. RESULTS: A systematic literature review of outcome measures used in clinical trials in AAV and an international Delphi exercise among patients with AAV and clinician-investigators with expertise in AAV have been completed to inform the candidate domains/instruments for the composite response criteria, which are the first two steps in the OMERACT approach for developing composite measures. Results of the systematic literature review and Delphi were presented at the OMERACT 2020 virtual workshop, and feedback was received on the next steps of the project, including the development of a scoring system approach. CONCLUSION: The ultimate goal of this project is to develop validated composite response criteria for use in clinical trials of AAV.

Use and reporting of outcome measures in randomized trials for anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis: a systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: A comprehensive review of outcome measures used in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) could advance trial conductance for this disease. METHODS: A systematic literature review of outcome measures (as specified in methods section as primary and/or secondary outcomes) in RCTs of AAV was conducted. Medline, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception until April 30, 2019 for RCTs enrolling patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis and/or microscopic polyangiitis. Outcome measures were organized according to domains (e.g. disease activity) and instruments [e.g. Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS)]. RESULTS: Out of 1101 identified records, 68 RCTs were eligible. Disease activity was an outcome domain collected in 67 (98%) of the RCTs. The BVAS was the most widely used instrument for disease assessment but definitions for remissions and relapse varied for the purpose of primary endpoint definitions. Damage, most often assessed by the Vasculitis Damage Index, was an outcome in 30 (44%) of the RCTs. Mortality was specified as an outcome in 26 (38%) studies. The following outcome domains were assessed: patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in 28 (41%), drug exposure/safety in 58 (85%), and biomarkers [acute phase reactants, ANCA levels] in 24 (35%). Timing for outcome assessment differed substantially, with 3, 6, or 12 months being the most frequent time points. CONCLUSION: Outcome measures used in trials in AAV commonly included vasculitis-specific tools for disease assessment, but with heterogeneity in endpoint-definitions and timing of assessments. Other core outcomes in AAV, including PROs, and damage measures, are often omitted in AAV trials.