Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 120
Filtrar
Mais filtros

País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur Heart J ; 44(46): 4847-4858, 2023 Dec 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37832512

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Intra-pocket ultrasound-guided axillary vein puncture (IPUS-AVP) for venous access in implantation of transvenous cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) is uncommon due to the lack of clinical evidence supporting this technique. This study investigated the efficacy and early complications of IPUS-AVP compared to the standard method using cephalic vein cutdown (CVC) for CIED implantation. METHODS: ACCESS was an investigator-led, interventional, randomized (1:1 ratio), monocentric, controlled superiority trial. A total of 200 patients undergoing CIED implantation were randomized to IPUS-AVP (n = 101) or CVC (n = 99) as a first assigned route. The primary endpoint was the success rate of insertion of all leads using the first assigned venous access technique. The secondary endpoints were time to venous access, total procedure duration, fluoroscopy time, X-ray exposure, and complications. Complications were monitored during a follow-up period of three months after procedure. RESULTS: IPUS-AVP was significantly superior to CVC for the primary endpoint with 100 (99.0%) vs. 86 (86.9%) procedural successes (P = .001). Cephalic vein cutdown followed by subclavian vein puncture was successful in a total of 95 (96.0%) patients, P = .21 vs. IPUS-AVP. All secondary endpoints were also significantly improved in the IPUS-AVP group with reduction in time to venous access [3.4 vs. 10.6 min, geometric mean ratio (GMR) 0.32 (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.28-0.36), P < .001], total procedure duration [33.8 vs. 46.9 min, GMR 0.72 (95% CI 0.67-0.78), P < .001], fluoroscopy time [2.4 vs. 3.3 min, GMR 0.74 (95% CI 0.63-0.86), P < .001], and X-ray exposure [1083 vs. 1423 mGy.cm², GMR 0.76 (95% CI 0.62-0.93), P = .009]. There was no significant difference in complication rates between groups (P = .68). CONCLUSIONS: IPUS-AVP is superior to CVC in terms of success rate, time to venous access, procedure duration, and radiation exposure. Complication rates were similar between the two groups. Intra-pocket ultrasound-guided axillary vein puncture should be a recommended venous access technique for CIED implantation.


Assuntos
Marca-Passo Artificial , Venostomia , Humanos , Venostomia/métodos , Veia Axilar/cirurgia , Veia Axilar/diagnóstico por imagem , Punções , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos
2.
Lancet ; 397(10293): 2476-2486, 2021 06 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34010611

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Endovascular renal denervation reduces blood pressure in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension, but its efficacy in patients with true resistant hypertension has not been shown. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of endovascular ultrasound renal denervation in patients with hypertension resistant to three or more antihypertensive medications. METHODS: In a randomised, international, multicentre, single-blind, sham-controlled trial done at 28 tertiary centres in the USA and 25 in Europe, we included patients aged 18-75 years with office blood pressure of at least 140/90 mm Hg despite three or more antihypertensive medications including a diuretic. Eligible patients were switched to a once daily, fixed-dose, single-pill combination of a calcium channel blocker, an angiotensin receptor blocker, and a thiazide diuretic. After 4 weeks of standardised therapy, patients with daytime ambulatory blood pressure of at least 135/85 mm Hg were randomly assigned (1:1) by computer (stratified by centres) to ultrasound renal denervation or a sham procedure. Patients and outcome assessors were masked to randomisation. Addition of antihypertensive medications was allowed if specified blood pressure thresholds were exceeded. The primary endpoint was the change in daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure at 2 months in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was also assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02649426. FINDINGS: Between March 11, 2016, and March 13, 2020, 989 participants were enrolled and 136 were randomly assigned to renal denervation (n=69) or a sham procedure (n=67). Full adherence to the combination medications at 2 months among patients with urine samples was similar in both groups (42 [82%] of 51 in the renal denervation group vs 47 [82%] of 57 in the sham procedure group; p=0·99). Renal denervation reduced daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure more than the sham procedure (-8·0 mm Hg [IQR -16·4 to 0·0] vs -3·0 mm Hg [-10·3 to 1·8]; median between-group difference -4·5 mm Hg [95% CI -8·5 to -0·3]; adjusted p=0·022); the median between-group difference was -5·8 mm Hg (95% CI -9·7 to -1·6; adjusted p=0·0051) among patients with complete ambulatory blood pressure data. There were no differences in safety outcomes between the two groups. INTERPRETATION: Compared with a sham procedure, ultrasound renal denervation reduced blood pressure at 2 months in patients with hypertension resistant to a standardised triple combination pill. If the blood pressure lowering effect and safety of renal denervation are maintained in the long term, renal denervation might be an alternative to the addition of further antihypertensive medications in patients with resistant hypertension. FUNDING: ReCor Medical.


Assuntos
Denervação/métodos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Hipertensão/terapia , Artéria Renal/inervação , Artéria Renal/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ultrassônicos/métodos , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Monitorização Ambulatorial da Pressão Arterial , Bloqueadores dos Canais de Cálcio/uso terapêutico , Resistência a Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Rim/irrigação sanguínea , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Método Simples-Cego , Inibidores de Simportadores de Cloreto de Sódio/uso terapêutico
3.
Curr Oncol Rep ; 24(3): 265-271, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35102484

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The identification of BRAF mutation prompted the development of new class of targeted therapy for treating melanoma: BRAF inhibitors and MEK inhibitors. Cardiovascular events have been reported with these treatments and could counterbalance their long-term maintenance. RECENT FINDINGS: LVEF decrease due to BRAF and MEK inhibitors appears fairly common (10%) but usually not severe, without impact on patient outcomes. To date, no treatment options have been tested to prevent or to treat a decrease of LVEF associated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors. QTc prolongation was observed in 3% and arterial hypertension in 20% during treatment but only one-third of cases required a therapeutic change. BRAF and MEK inhibitors have revolutionized the management and the prognosis of melanoma patients. Cardio-oncology units may be useful for a better care of potential cardiac toxicity and particularly to inappropriately avoid discontinuing BRAF and MEK inhibitors.


Assuntos
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Humanos , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Melanoma/genética , Quinases de Proteína Quinase Ativadas por Mitógeno/genética , Quinases de Proteína Quinase Ativadas por Mitógeno/uso terapêutico , Mutação , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas B-raf/genética , Neoplasias Cutâneas/genética
4.
Int Heart J ; 62(1): 193-196, 2021 Jan 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33455988
5.
Eur Radiol ; 28(8): 3355-3361, 2018 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29468341

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Endovascular renal denervation (RDN) using catheter-based radiofrequency (RF) ablation has emerged as a potential treatment option for drug-resistant hypertension. Its efficacy is currently under debate. We aimed to evaluate the capability of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess the effects of RDN on the renal arterial wall in patients presenting with drug-resistant hypertension. METHODS: Patients were included prospectively following institutional review board approval and written informed consent. Renal arteries were imaged using a two-dimensional T1-weighted TSE sequence pre- and post-administration of a gadolinium-based contrast agent, before (D0), 2 days (D2) and 6 months (M6) after RDN. Mean enhancement of the wall (mENH) and mean wall thickness (mWT) were compared across time using an ANOVA with repeated measures and post-hoc paired t-test. RESULTS: Follow-up was completed for 23 patients (median age, 57 years; 16 men). The mENH at D2 (96.3 ± 36.0 %) was significantly higher than at D0 (61.1 ± 26.3%, p < 0.001) and M6 (66.1±22.7%, p < 0.001). Similarly, mWT was significantly higher at D2 (3.1 ± 0.4 m) than at D0 (2.7 ± 0.4mm, p < 0.001) and M6 (2.9 ± 0. 5 mm, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: MRI demonstrated abnormalities of the arterial wall 2 days after RDN that had resolved at 6 months. KEY POINTS: • Contrast-enhanced MRI provides anatomic evidence of renal artery RF ablation • Temperature increase related to RF ablation induces transient arterial wall inflammation • Morphological effects observed 2 days post RF ablation are not visible after 6 months.


Assuntos
Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Hipertensão/cirurgia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/diagnóstico , Artéria Renal/lesões , Simpatectomia/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Análise de Variância , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Resistência a Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão/fisiopatologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Simpatectomia/métodos
6.
Circulation ; 134(12): 847-57, 2016 Sep 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27576780

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The DENERHTN trial (Renal Denervation for Hypertension) confirmed the blood pressure-lowering efficacy of renal denervation added to a standardized stepped-care antihypertensive treatment for resistant hypertension at 6 months. We report the influence of adherence to antihypertensive treatment on blood pressure control. METHODS: One hundred six patients with hypertension resistant to 4 weeks of treatment with indapamide 1.5 mg/d, ramipril 10 mg/d (or irbesartan 300 mg/d), and amlodipine 10 mg/d were randomly assigned to renal denervation plus standardized stepped-care antihypertensive treatment, or the same antihypertensive treatment alone. For standardized stepped-care antihypertensive treatment, spironolactone 25 mg/d, bisoprolol 10 mg/d, prazosin 5 mg/d, and rilmenidine 1 mg/d were sequentially added at monthly visits if home blood pressure was ≥135/85 mm Hg after randomization. We assessed adherence to antihypertensive treatment at 6 months by drug screening in urine/plasma samples from 85 patients. RESULTS: The numbers of fully adherent (20/40 versus 21/45), partially nonadherent (13/40 versus 20/45), or completely nonadherent patients (7/40 versus 4/45) to antihypertensive treatment were not different in the renal denervation and the control groups, respectively (P=0.3605). The difference in the change in daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure from baseline to 6 months between the 2 groups was -6.7 mm Hg (P=0.0461) in fully adherent and -7.8 mm Hg (P=0.0996) in nonadherent (partially nonadherent plus completely nonadherent) patients. The between-patient variability of daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure was greater for nonadherent than for fully adherent patients. CONCLUSIONS: In the DENERHTN trial, the prevalence of nonadherence to antihypertensive drugs at 6 months was high (≈50%) but not different in the renal denervation and control groups. Regardless of adherence to treatment, renal denervation plus standardized stepped-care antihypertensive treatment resulted in a greater decrease in blood pressure than standardized stepped-care antihypertensive treatment alone. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01570777.


Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Rim/efeitos dos fármacos , Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Determinação da Pressão Arterial/métodos , Monitorização Ambulatorial da Pressão Arterial/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Adesão à Medicação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Lancet ; 385(9981): 1957-65, 2015 May 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25631070

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Conflicting blood pressure-lowering effects of catheter-based renal artery denervation have been reported in patients with resistant hypertension. We compared the ambulatory blood pressure-lowering efficacy and safety of radiofrequency-based renal denervation added to a standardised stepped-care antihypertensive treatment (SSAHT) with the same SSAHT alone in patients with resistant hypertension. METHODS: The Renal Denervation for Hypertension (DENERHTN) trial was a prospective, open-label randomised controlled trial with blinded endpoint evaluation in patients with resistant hypertension, done in 15 French tertiary care centres specialised in hypertension management. Eligible patients aged 18-75 years received indapamide 1·5 mg, ramipril 10 mg (or irbesartan 300 mg), and amlodipine 10 mg daily for 4 weeks to confirm treatment resistance by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring before randomisation. Patients were then randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either renal denervation plus an SSAHT regimen (renal denervation group) or the same SSAHT alone (control group). The randomisation sequence was generated by computer, and stratified by centres. For SSAHT, after randomisation, spironolactone 25 mg per day, bisoprolol 10 mg per day, prazosin 5 mg per day, and rilmenidine 1 mg per day were sequentially added from months two to five in both groups if home blood pressure was more than or equal to 135/85 mm Hg. The primary endpoint was the mean change in daytime systolic blood pressure from baseline to 6 months as assessed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. The primary endpoint was analysed blindly. The safety outcomes were the incidence of acute adverse events of the renal denervation procedure and the change in estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline to 6 months. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01570777. FINDINGS: Between May 22, 2012, and Oct 14, 2013, 1416 patients were screened for eligibility, 106 of those were randomly assigned to treatment (53 patients in each group, intention-to-treat population) and 101 analysed because of patients with missing endpoints (48 in the renal denervation group, 53 in the control group, modified intention-to-treat population). The mean change in daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure at 6 months was -15·8 mm Hg (95% CI -19·7 to -11·9) in the renal denervation group and -9·9 mm Hg (-13·6 to -6·2) in the group receiving SSAHT alone, a baseline-adjusted difference of -5·9 mm Hg (-11·3 to -0·5; p=0·0329). The number of antihypertensive drugs and drug-adherence at 6 months were similar between the two groups. Three minor renal denervation-related adverse events were noted (lumbar pain in two patients and mild groin haematoma in one patient). A mild and similar decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline to 6 months was observed in both groups. INTERPRETATION: In patients with well defined resistant hypertension, renal denervation plus an SSAHT decreases ambulatory blood pressure more than the same SSAHT alone at 6 months. This additional blood pressure lowering effect may contribute to a reduction in cardiovascular morbidity if maintained in the long term after renal denervation. FUNDING: French Ministry of Health.


Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Denervação/métodos , Hipertensão/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Resistência a Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Adesão à Medicação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Artéria Renal/inervação , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
9.
Rev Prat ; 65(6): 822-6, 2015 Jun.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26298908

RESUMO

Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is found in 1 to 2% of all hypertensive patients. Its diagnosis involves as a first step Doppler ultrasound and as a confirmatory test, CT scan or MRI. When the diagnosis isconfirmed, three questions should be addressed by the clinician: 1) the anatomical orm that is, fibromuscular dysplasia (FD) or atherosclerotic RAS (ARAS); 2) the potential relation between RAS and hypertension with major differences according to the two main etiologies; in the presence of FD hypertension is a priorir elated to the stenosis while it is not the case with ARAS; 3) is there an indication for revascularization with again two opposite situations. Renal angioplasty may cure up to one third of patients with FD and improve blood pressure control in some others and has thus to be discussed in this clinical context. On the contrary, several randomized trials have shown that the blood pressure benefit of renal revascularization is limited if any in ARAS and, above all, not associated with an improvement of cardiovascular and renal outcomes. Renal angioplasty should thus be restricted to highly selected patients while in all cases, cardiovascular prevention should be intensified, based on renin angiotensin system blockers, statins, and aspirin use. Whatever the management, these patients should be followed both on the renal side to detect restenosis or renal impairment, and on other cardiovascular complications particularly in the presence of ARAS.


Assuntos
Obstrução da Artéria Renal/diagnóstico , Obstrução da Artéria Renal/terapia , Angioplastia com Balão , Aterosclerose/fisiopatologia , Aterosclerose/terapia , Diagnóstico por Imagem , Displasia Fibromuscular/fisiopatologia , Displasia Fibromuscular/terapia , Humanos , Hipertensão/fisiopatologia , Obstrução da Artéria Renal/fisiopatologia
10.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 17(14): 1680-1690, 2024 Jul 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39048255

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Thromboembolic events, particularly strokes, remain a major complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Embolic protection devices have failed to show significant clinical benefit in large randomized clinical trials. Aortic wall thrombus (AWT) is often observed on multidetector computed tomography during TAVR work-up, but its prognostic significance is uncertain. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the association between the presence of AWT and the incidence of thromboembolic outcomes in patients undergoing transfemoral (TF) TAVR for severe aortic stenosis. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent TF TAVR for severe aortic stenosis between January 2011 and April 2022. A dedicated scale (range: 0-10) was qualitatively used to assess AWT. The primary outcome was a composite of procedural thromboembolic events defined as ischemic stroke, blue toe syndrome, bowel ischemia, or other solid organ infarction. The secondary endpoints were ischemic strokes and procedural death. RESULTS: Of the 641 patients included, severe AWT (score ≥8) was identified in 73 (11.4%). The presence of severe AWT was strongly associated with an increase in the primary outcome (OR: 8.48; 95% CI: 3.36-21.40; P < 0.001). This relationship persisted following multivariable analysis, which adjusted for comorbidities and procedural characteristics. The presence of severe AWT was also found to be associated with an increased incidence of stroke and procedural death (OR: 5.66; 95% CI: 2.00-15.30; P = 0.002 and OR: 4.66; 95% CI: 1.80-11.30; P = 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of severe AWT on preprocedural multidetector computed tomography is strongly associated with thromboembolic complications including stroke and mortality after TF TAVR.


Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica , Artéria Femoral , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Tromboembolia , Trombose , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Humanos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/efeitos adversos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/mortalidade , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/instrumentação , Feminino , Masculino , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/mortalidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Idoso , Artéria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Trombose/diagnóstico por imagem , Trombose/etiologia , Trombose/mortalidade , Trombose/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Tromboembolia/etiologia , Tromboembolia/diagnóstico por imagem , Tromboembolia/mortalidade , Tromboembolia/prevenção & controle , Incidência , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Valva Aórtica/fisiopatologia , Tomografia Computadorizada Multidetectores , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/mortalidade , Doenças da Aorta/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças da Aorta/mortalidade , Punções
11.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 117(10): 601-611, 2024 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39332916

RESUMO

Several high-quality, randomized, sham-controlled trials have provided evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency, ultrasound and alcohol catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) for reducing blood pressure (BP). A French clinical consensus document has therefore been developed to propose guidance for the appropriate use of RDN in the management of hypertension along with a dedicated care pathway and management strategy. The French experts group concluded that RDN can serve as an adjunct therapy for patients with confirmed uncontrolled, resistant essential hypertension despite treatment with≥3 antihypertensive drugs, including a long-acting calcium channel blocker, a renin-angiotensin system blocker and a thiazide/thiazide-like diuretic at maximally tolerated doses. Patients should have (1) an estimated glomerular filtration rate of≥40mL/min/1.73m2; (2) an eligible renal artery anatomy on pre-RDN scans and (3) exclusion of secondary forms of hypertension. Additional indications might be considered for patients with difficult-to-control hypertension. Any indication of RDN should be validated by multidisciplinary hypertension teams consisting of both hypertension specialists and endovascular interventionalists in European Society of Hypertension (ESH) Excellence Centres or ESH-BP clinics. Patients should be informed about the benefit/risk ratio of RDN. Expertise in renal artery interventions and training in RDN techniques are needed for endovascular interventionalists conducting RDN procedures while centres offering RDN should have the necessary resources to manage potential complications effectively. Lastly, all patients undergoing RDN should have their data collected in a nationwide French registry to facilitate monitoring and evaluation of RDN outcomes, contributing to ongoing research and quality improvement efforts.


Assuntos
Consenso , Hipertensão , Rim , Simpatectomia , Humanos , Hipertensão/fisiopatologia , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Hipertensão/cirurgia , Hipertensão/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento , Simpatectomia/efeitos adversos , Rim/inervação , Rim/irrigação sanguínea , Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Ablação por Cateter/normas , Pressão Arterial , Artéria Renal/inervação , Artéria Renal/diagnóstico por imagem , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Fatores de Risco
14.
Nephron Clin Pract ; 122(3-4): 80-5, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23594792

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Urinary albumin excretion is subject to intra-individual variability. Thus, for research purposes, it is recommended to test three urine samples collected over a short period of time. The objective of our analysis was to check the usefulness of triplicate samples to determine the albuminuric status of diabetic patients. METHODS: We present the results of the non-planned retrospective analysis of 246 triplicate morning urine samples obtained from 95 type 2 diabetics included in three multinational, randomized, double-blind studies. Albuminuria was determined by immunoturbidimetry on fresh samples in the same central laboratory. Microalbuminuria was defined by a urine albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) between 2.5 and 25 mg/mmol in males and between 3.5 and 35 mg/mmol in females. Concordance was obtained when the second and/or third sample (UACR2 and UACR3) confirmed the albuminuric status obtained from the first sample (UACR1). RESULTS: Considering the first samples, 9% were within the normal range, 35% showed microalbuminuria and 56% showed macroalbuminuria. The overall concordance rate was 95%. The log of UACR was highly correlated between samples. Bland-Altman plots expressed in percent variations between two samples confirmed that the mean variation was low (around 8%) but revealed the scattering of values, 95% being between -60 and +77% of variation between samples. CONCLUSIONS: There is no benefit in repeating morning UACR determination in diabetic patients to accurately categorize a subject as having normo-, micro- or macroalbuminuria. However, in order to accurately quantify albuminuria, repeated determinations are required.


Assuntos
Albuminúria/diagnóstico , Albuminúria/urina , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/urina , Urinálise/métodos , Urinálise/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Albuminúria/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Internacionalidade , Masculino , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
15.
J Geriatr Cardiol ; 19(11): 791-801, 2022 Nov 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36561063

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Secondary forms and hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD) may differ between younger and older hypertensive patients. The aim of the present study was to explore the specificity of HMOD and secondary forms in patients ≥ 65 years in comparison to younger ones in a contemporary cohort. METHODS: We analysed 938 patients recruited between 2004 and 2014 (Cardiology department, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon) who had at baseline HMOD and secondary forms screening among them 190 were ≥ 65 years. RESULTS: The mean (2.1 ± 0.8 vs. 1.2 ± 0.9, P < 0.001) and frequency of HMOD (96.3% vs. 72.9%, P < 0.001) was higher in patients ≥ 65 years than younger ones. Carotid femoral pulse wave velocity > 10 m/s was the most frequent HMOD in patients ≥ 65 years (90.1%), while echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy was the most common in the younger patients (45.0%). Among ECG left ventricular indexes, only R wave in aVL lead was significantly more frequently observed in patients ≥ 65 years (32.6%) than in younger ones (19.0%, P < 0.001). The frequency of secondary hypertension was not significantly different between younger and older patients (respectively; 30.5% vs. 27.8%, P = 0.487). The most frequent aetiology was primary aldosteronism regardless of age, followed by renovascular hypertension (6.3% vs. 3.3%, P = 0.038). Among older patients, 3.2% were treated with adrenalectomy and 6.3% with percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty. CONCLUSION: Extensive screening of HMOD in older patients may be questionable as nearly all patients had one; aetiology must however be explored as a third of older patients had a secondary form.

16.
Eur J Prev Cardiol ; 29(1): 136-143, 2022 02 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33580796

RESUMO

AIMS: Current European guidelines recommend the SCORE to estimate 10-year cardiovascular mortality in patients with moderate/low cardiovascular risk. SCORE was derived from the general population. The objective of this study was to investigate the estimated 10-year cardiovascular mortality according to the SCORE in a historic and a contemporary cohort of hypertensive patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: After exclusion of secondary prevention and diabetes, 3086 patients were analysed in the OLD-HTA (1969-90) and 1081 in the NEW-HTA (1997-2014) Lyon cohorts. SCORE was calculated using the low and high cardiovascular risk equations and charts, and patients classified as being at low (0%), moderate (1-4%), high (5-9%), and very high (≥10%) risk. In the OLD-HTA cohort, 10-year cardiovascular mortality was higher (1.2%, 5.5%, 17.7%, and 27.0%) than that predicted by the low-risk equation (0%, 1.7%, 6.4%, and 14.8%). In the NEW-HTA cohort, similar results were observed (1.1%, 4.7%, 15.1%, and 15.2% vs. 0%, 1.9%, 6.2%, and 11.7%, respectively). Using the high-risk equation, mortality was underestimated in both cohorts, but the difference was smaller. The diagnostic performance of the high-risk equation was lower than the low-risk equation in both cohorts, considering the SCORE as a continuous or a categorical variable (Likelihood ratio test P < 0.05 for all comparisons in OLD-HTA). Similar results were obtained using SCORE charts. CONCLUSION: SCORE underestimates the 10-year cardiovascular mortality risk in hypertensive patients in a historic cohort and in a contemporary one. The algorithm to predict cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive patients needs an update given new information since its creation.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Hipertensão , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica
17.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging ; 23(4): 508-514, 2022 Mar 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33693609

RESUMO

AIMS: In low-gradient aortic stenosis (LGAS), the high valvulo-arterial impedance observed despite low valvular gradient suggests a high vascular load. Thoracic aortic calcifications (TACs) and valvular aortic calcifications (VACs) are, respectively, surrogates of aortic load and aortic valvular gradient. The aim of this study was to compare the respective contributions of TAC and VAC on 3-year cardiovascular (CV) mortality following TAVI in LGAS vs. high-gradient aortic stenosis (HGAS) patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 1396 consecutive patients were included. TAC and VAC were measured on the pre-TAVI CT-scan. About 435 (31.2%) patients had LGAS and 961 (68.8%) HGAS. LGAS patients were more prone to have diabetes, coronary artery disease (CAD), atrial fibrillation (AF), and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), P<0.05 for all. During the 3 years after TAVI, 245(17.8%) patients experienced CV mortality, 92(21.6%) in LGAS and 153(16.2%) in HGAS patients, P=0.018. Multivariate analysis adjusted for age, gender, diabetes, AF, CAD, LVEF, renal function, vascular access, and aortic regurgitation showed that TAC but not VAC was associated with CV mortality in LGAS, hazard ratio (HR) 1.085 confidence interval (CI) (1.019-1.156), P=0.011, and HR 0.713 CI (0.439-1.8), P=0.235; the opposite was observed in HGAS patients with VAC but not TAC being associated with CV mortality, HR 1.342 CI (1.034-1.742), P=0.027, and HR 1.015 CI (0.955-1.079), P=0.626. CONCLUSION: TAC plays a major prognostic role in LGAS while VAC remains the key in HGAS patients. This confirms that LGAS is a complex vascular and valvular disease.


Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica , Fibrilação Atrial , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Humanos , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Volume Sistólico , Resultado do Tratamento , Função Ventricular Esquerda
18.
Eur Heart J Open ; 2(3): oeac029, 2022 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35919341

RESUMO

Aims: After transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular comorbidities may offset the survival benefit from the procedure. We aimed to describe the relationships between that benefit and patient comorbidities. Methods and results: The study pooled two European cohorts of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS-pooled): one with patients who underwent (cohort of AS patients treated by TAVR, N = 233) and another with patients who did not undergo TAVR (cohort of AS patients treated medically; N = 291). The investigators collected the following: calcification prognostic impact (CAPRI) and Charlson scores for cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular comorbidities, activities of daily living (ADL)/instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scores for frailty as well as routine Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score and Logistic Euroscore. Unlike ADL/IADL scores, CAPRI and Charlson scores were found to be independent predictors of 1-year all-cause death in the AS-pooled cohort, with and without adjustment for STS score or Logistic Euroscore; they were thus retained to define a three-level prognostic scale (good, intermediate, and poor). The survival benefit from TAVR-vs. no TAVR-was stratified according to these three prognosis categories. The beneficial effect of TAVR on 1-year all-cause death was significant in patients with good and intermediate prognosis, hazard ratio (95% confidence interval): 0.36 (0.18; 0.72) and 0.32 (0.15; 0.67). That effect was reduced and not statistically significant in patient with poor prognosis [0.65 (0.22; 1.88)]. Conclusion: The study showed that, beyond a given comorbidity burden (as assessed by CAPRI and Charlson scores), the probability of death within a year was high and poorly reduced by TAVR. This indicates the futility of TAVR in patients in the poor prognosis category.

19.
Eur J Prev Cardiol ; 29(1): 169-177, 2022 Feb 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34269383

RESUMO

AIMS: This study determined whether the improvements in hypertension management over the last five decades have influenced subjects' prognosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study considered 5693 eligible subjects seen January 1969 to February 1991 (follow-up until December 2003) or January 1995 to October 2014 (follow-up until July 2016) in an all-grade hypertension reference centre. Missing data or incomplete follow-ups led to exclude 1036 subjects (18%). The outcome was all-cause death. An adjusted modelling of the excess mortality rate assessed subjects' net survival over five inclusion periods to allow for the increase in life expectancy of the general population during the same periods. The analysis of 4657 records (mean age: 47 years; 43.2% women) showed that the proportion of subjects with grade 3 hypertension decreased significantly from 43.3% (1142) to only 6.3% (22) over the five periods and that the net survival improved in men and women regardless of the hypertension grade; i.e. the gain in net survival at 15 years was estimated at 12.3% (95% confidence interval: 8.1-22.3). The 15-year restricted mean survival was estimated at 13 years over the first period and 14.8 years over the last period, which is nearly a 2-year gain in life expectancy at 15 years. CONCLUSION: Since the 70s and the advent of modern management, the excess mortality of hypertensive subjects (vs. the general population) was markedly reduced. Within a context of trivialization of blood pressure measurement and reluctance to long-term treatments, physicians should consider this advantage and use it to promote blood pressure control.


Assuntos
Hipertensão , Pressão Sanguínea , Determinação da Pressão Arterial , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Expectativa de Vida , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA