Quantifying KRAS G12C Covalent Drug Inhibitor Activity in Mouse Tumors Using Mass Spectrometry.

The growing opportunities recognized for covalent drug inhibitors, like KRAS G12C inhibitors, are driving the need for mass spectrometry methods that can quickly and robustly measure therapeutic drug activity in vivo for drug discovery research and development. Effective front-end sample preparation is critical for proteins extracted from tumors but is generally labor intensive and impractical for large sample numbers typical in pharmacodynamic (PD) studies. Herein, we describe an automated and integrated sample preparation method for the measurement of activity levels of KRAS G12C drug inhibitor alkylation from complex tumor samples involving high throughput detergent removal and preconcentration followed by quantitation using mass spectrometry. We introduce a robust assay with an average intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) of 4% and an interassay CV of 6% obtained from seven studies, enabling us to understand the relationship between KRAS G12C target occupancy and the therapeutic PD effect from mouse tumor samples. Further, the data demonstrated that the drug candidate GDC-6036, a KRAS G12C covalent inhibitor, shows dose-dependent target inhibition (KRAS G12C alkylation) and MAPK pathway inhibition, which correlate with high antitumor potency in the MIA PaCa-2 pancreatic xenograft model.

Antibody targeting tumor-derived soluble NKG2D ligand sMIC provides dual co-stimulation of CD8 T cells and enables sMIC+ tumors respond to PD1/PD-L1 blockade therapy.

BACKGROUND: Insufficient co-stimulation accounts for a great deal of the suboptimal activation of cytotoxic CD8 T cells (CTLs) and presumably unsatisfactory clinical expectation of PD1/PD-L1 therapy. Tumor-derived soluble NKG2D ligands are associated with poor clinical response to PD1/PD-L1 blockade therapy in cancer patients. One of the mostly occurring tumor-derived soluble NKG2D ligands, the soluble MHC I chain related molecule (sMIC) can impair co-stimulation to CD8 T cells. We investigated whether co-targeting sMIC can provide optimal co-stimulation to CTLs and enhance the therapeutic effect of PD1/PD-L1 blockades. METHODS: Single agent therapy of a PD1/PD-L1 blockade antibody or a sMIC-targeting non-blocking antibody or a combination therapy of the two antibodies were implied to well-characterized pre-clinical MIC/sMIC+ tumor models that closely resemble the NKG2D-mediated oncoimmune dynamics of MIC+ cancer patients. Therapeutic efficacy and associated effector mechanisms were evaluated. RESULTS: We show that antibody co-targeting sMIC enables or enhances the response of sMIC+ tumors to PD1/PD-L1 blockade therapy. The therapy response of the combination therapy was associated with enhanced antigen-specific CD8 T cell enrichment and function in tumors. We show that co-targeting sMIC with a nonblocking antibody provides antigen-specific CD8 T cells with NKG2D and CD28 dual co-stimulation, in addition to elimination of inhibitory signals, and thus amplifies antigen-specific CD8 T cell anti-tumor responses. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide the proof-of-concept rationale and previously undiscovered mechanisms for co-targeting sMIC to enable and enhance the response to PD1/PD-L1 blockade therapy in sMIC+ cancer patients.