Discussion of alcohol consequences during a brief motivational intervention session: Comparing those who do and do not increase readiness to change.

The present study was designed to take an inductive, qualitative approach to understanding how discussion of alcohol-related consequences during brief motivational interventions (BMI) relate to readiness to change (RTC) prior to versus at the end of a session. Participants were thirty-four adults (35% female) recruited from the emergency room and enrolled in a randomized clinical trial of a BMI for risky alcohol use and risky sex. Seventeen participants both began and remained low on RTC over the course of the session. We selected 17 additional participants, matched on demographics, but who increased RTC over the session. Transcripts were qualitatively coded and analyzed separately within groups. Among participants who increased their RTC relative to participants who remained low on RTC by BMI end, evaluation of alcohol consequences as negative was more typical. In both groups, several consequences were neutrally evaluated. Many who remained low on RTC attributed consequences to something other than alcohol and/or minimized consequence severity. Study findings highlight the value for clinicians in eliciting and maximizing the importance of subjectively negative recent consequences to perhaps increase heavy drinkers' readiness to decrease heavy alcohol use.

Changes in Nursing Home Populations Challenge Practice and Policy.

U.S. nursing homes (NH) have a growing prevalence of individuals with severe mental illness (SMI) and substance use disorders (SUD), and an associated increasing proportion of people under 65. We explored how Directors of Nursing (DONs) perceive challenges and strategies in caring for these populations. We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with 32 DONs from diverse facilities around the U.S. Participants reported that people with SUD and SMI often present behavioral challenges requiring resource intensive responses, while regulations constrain optimal medication treatment. Younger individuals are considered more demanding of staff and impatient with traditional NH activities designed for older people. Some NHs report they screen out people with behavioral health disorders; they tend to be concentrated in NHs in economically disadvantaged communities. Individuals may remain in NHs because suitable settings for discharge are unavailable. These developments constitute a back door "re-institutionalization" of people with behavioral health disorders, and a growing crisis.

The role of therapist MI skill and client change talk class membership predicting dual alcohol and sex risk outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the technical model of motivational interviewing (MI) in a dual-outcome intervention (i.e., alcohol, sexual risk; N = 164; 57% female). METHOD: We identified latent classes of client change statements, based on the proportion of change talk (CT) over the session. We then examined whether outcomes were related to CT class, and whether the relations between MI skill and outcomes varied by CT class. RESULTS: We found three classes of alcohol-CT and two classes of sexual risk-CT. While CT class membership did not predict outcomes directly, greater therapist MI-consistent skill was associated with fewer heavy drinking days in the increasing alcohol-CT class. For sexual risk outcomes, therapist MI-consistent skill was associated with reduced odds of condomless sex for the low sexual risk-CT class. CONCLUSIONS: The relation of therapist MI consistency to outcomes appears to be a function of client CT during the session.

Effects of Minimal Versus Intensive Intervention to Enhance Motivational Interviewing in HIV Care.

We conducted a randomized trial comparing the effect of two different levels of motivational interviewing training on clinician communication behaviors and patient experiences. We enrolled 12 HIV clinicians who attended a one-day MI workshop focusing on behavior change counseling skills. We then randomized clinicians to receive (or not) 3-5 rounds of personalized feedback from the MI trainer. We compared outcomes before and after the interventions and between the intervention groups. We tested time-by-study arm interactions to determine if one group improved more than the other. For all analyses, we used generalized estimating equations to account for clustering of patients within clinicians, with Gaussian or negative binomial distributions as appropriate. Patients of clinicians in both intervention groups rated their visits as more MI consistent (6.86 vs. 6.65, p = 0.005) and audio-recording analysis revealed that visits were more patient-centered (1.34 vs. 0.96, p = 0.003) with a more positive patient affect (22.36 vs. 20.84, p < 0.001) after versus before the intervention, without differences between intervention arms. Several specific clinician behaviors such as empathic statements, asking patient opinions and open-ended questions improved more in the workshop+feedback versus the workshop-only intervention arm. A few specific communication behaviors increased (total and complex reflections) after versus before the intervention, without differences between intervention arms. The workshop alone was as effective as the workshop plus feedback in improving patient experiences and overall communication measures. Certain communication behaviors improved more with the more intensive intervention, but these additional benefits may not warrant the extra financial and logistical resources required.

Explanatory Models and Illness Experience of People Living with HIV.

Research into explanatory models of disease and illness typically explores people's conceptual understanding, and emphasizes differences between patient and provider models. However, the explanatory models framework of etiology, time and mode of onset of symptoms, pathophysiology, course of sickness, and treatment is built on categories characteristic of biomedical understanding. It is unclear how well these map onto people's lived experience of illness, and to the extent they do, how they translate. Scholars have previously studied the experience of people living with HIV through the lenses of stigma and identity theory. Here, through in-depth qualitative interviews with 32 people living with HIV in the northeast United States, we explored the experience and meanings of living with HIV more broadly using the explanatory models framework. We found that identity reformation is a major challenge for most people following the HIV diagnosis, and can be understood as a central component of the concept of course of illness. Salient etiological explanations are not biological, but rather social, such as betrayal, or living in a specific cultural milieu, and often self-evaluative. Given that symptoms can now largely be avoided through adherence to treatment, they are most frequently described in terms of observation of others who have not been adherent, or the resolution of symptoms following treatment. The category of pathophysiology is not ordinarily very relevant to the illness experience, as few respondents have any understanding of the mechanism of pathogenesis in HIV, nor much interest in it. Treatment has various personal meanings, both positive and negative, often profound. For people to engage successfully in treatment and live successfully with HIV, mechanistic explanation is of little significance. Rather, positive psychological integration of health promoting behaviors is of central importance.

Health literacy in HIV treatment: accurate understanding of key biological treatment principles is not required for good ART adherence.

Findings on the relationship between health literacy and outcomes in HIV have been inconsistent. Health literacy has previously been operationalized as general functional literacy, but has not included content knowledge about HIV disease and treatment. Semi-structured interviews with people living with HIV in 2 U.S. cities, including questions about the etiology, pathophysiology and treatment of HIV. We compared responses to biomedical conceptions. The 32 respondents were demographically diverse. Although most understood that HIV degrades the immune system, none could explain the nature of a virus, or the mechanism of antiretroviral (ARV) drug action. Fewer than half accurately reported that it is desirable to have a high CD4+ cell count and low viral load. A minority understood the concept of drug resistance. While most believed that strict adherence to ARV regimens was important to maintain health, three believed that periodic treatment interruption was beneficial, and three believed they should not take ARVs when they used alcohol or illicit drugs. Respondents generally had very limited, and often inaccurate biomedical understanding of HIV disease. Most reported good regimen adherence but did not have any mechanistic rationale for it. The failure to find a consistent relationship between health literacy and ARV adherence may be largely because most people simply follow their doctors' instructions, without the need for deep understanding.

Gender, Ethnicity and Environmental Risk Perception Revisited: The Importance of Residential Location.

Studies in the U.S. have found that white men are less concerned about pollution than are women or people of other ethnicity. These studies have not assessed respondents' proximity to localized sources of pollution. Our objective was to assess lay perceptions of risk from air pollution in an ethnically diverse sample in which proximity to a major perceptible source of pollution is known. Cross sectional interview study of combined area probability and convenience sample of individuals 40 and older in the Boston area, selected according to proximity to high traffic controlled access highways. Of 697 respondents 46% were white, 37% Asian (mostly Chinese), 6.3% African-American, 6.3% Latino, and 7.6% other ethnicity. While white respondents, and particularly white men, were less concerned about air pollution than others, this effect disappeared when controlling for distance from the highway. White men were slightly less supportive than others of government policy to control pollution. The "white male" effect may in part be accounted for by the greater likelihood of minority respondents to live near perceptible localized sources of pollution.

Provider-patient communication about adherence to anti-retroviral regimens differs by patient race and ethnicity.

Disparities in HIV care and outcomes negatively affect Black and Hispanic patients. Features of clinical communication may be a factor. This study is based on coding transcripts of 404 routine outpatient visits by people with HIV at four sites, using a validated system. In models adjusting for site and patient characteristics, with provider as a random effect, providers were more "verbally dominant" with Black patients than with others. There was more discussion about ARV adherence with both Black and Hispanic patients, but no more discussion about strategies to improve adherence. Providers made more directive utterances discussing ARV treatment with Hispanic patients. Possible interpretations of these findings are that providers are less confident in Black and Hispanic patients to be adherent; that they place too much confidence in their White, non-Hispanic patients; or that patients differentially want such discussion. The lack of specific problem solving and high provider directiveness suggests areas for improvement.

Provider-patient adherence dialogue in HIV care: results of a multisite study.

Few studies have analyzed physician-patient adherence dialogue about ARV treatment in detail. We comprehensively describe physician-patient visits in HIV care, focusing on ARV-related dialogue, using a system that assigns each utterance both a topic code and a speech act code. Observational study using audio recordings of routine outpatient visits by people with HIV at specialty clinics. Providers were 34 physicians and 11 non-M.D. practitioners. Of 415 patients, 66% were male, 59% African-American. 78% reported currently taking ARVs. About 10% of utterances concerned ARV treatment. Among those using ARVs, 15% had any adherence problem solving dialogue. ARV problem solving talk included significantly more directives and control parameter utterances by providers than other topics. Providers were verbally dominant, asked five times as many questions as patients, and made 21 times as many directive utterances. Providers asked few open questions, and rarely checked patients' understanding. Physicians respond to the challenges of caring for patients with HIV by adopting a somewhat physician-centered approach which is particularly evident in discussions about ARV adherence.

A community participatory study of cardiovascular health and exposure to near-highway air pollution: study design and methods.

Current literature is insufficient to make causal inferences or establish dose-response relationships for traffic-related ultrafine particles (UFPs) and cardiovascular (CV) health. The Community Assessment of Freeway Exposure and Health (CAFEH) is a cross-sectional study of the relationship between UFP and biomarkers of CV risk. CAFEH uses a community-based participatory research framework that partners university researchers with community groups and residents. Our central hypothesis is that chronic exposure to UFP is associated with changes in biomarkers. The study enrolled more than 700 residents from three near-highway neighborhoods in the Boston metropolitan area in Massachusetts, USA. All participants completed an in-home questionnaire and a subset (440+) completed an additional supplemental questionnaire and provided biomarkers. Air pollution monitoring was conducted by a mobile laboratory equipped with fast-response instruments, at fixed sites, and inside the homes of selected study participants. We seek to develop improved estimates of UFP exposure by combining spatiotemporal models of ambient UFP with data on participant time-activity and housing characteristics. Exposure estimates will then be compared with biomarker levels to ascertain associations. This article describes our study design and methods and presents preliminary findings from east Somerville, one of the three study communities.

Change talk subtypes as predictors of alcohol use following brief motivational intervention.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relative importance of client change language subtypes as predictors of alcohol use following motivational interviewing (MI). METHOD: Participants were 164 heavy drinkers (57.3% female, Mage = 28.5 years, 13.4% Hispanic/Latinx, 82.9% White) recruited during an emergency department visit who received MI for alcohol and human immunodeficiency virus/sexual risk in a randomized-controlled trial. MI sessions were coded with the motivational interviewing skill code (MISC) and the generalized behavioral intervention analysis system (GBIAS). Variable importance analyses used targeted maximum likelihood estimation to rank order change language subtypes defined by these systems as predictors of alcohol use over 9 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Among GBIAS change language subtypes, higher sustain talk (ST) around change planning was ranked the most important predictor of drinks per week (b = -5.57, 95% CI [-8.11, -3.02]) and heavy drinking days (b = -2.07, 95% CI [-3.17, -0.98]); this talk reflected (a) rejection of alcohol abstinence as a desired change goal, (b) rejection of specific change strategies, or (c) discussion of anticipated challenges in changing drinking. Among MISC change language subtypes, higher ST around taking steps-reflecting recent escalations in drinking described by a small minority of participants-was ranked the most important predictor of drinks per week (b = 22.71, 95% CI [20.29, 25.13]) and heavy drinking days (b = -2.45, 95% CI [1.68, 3.21]). CONCLUSIONS: Results challenge the assumption that all ST during MI is a negative prognostic indicator and highlight the importance of the context in which change language emerges. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Discussion of sexual risk behavior in HIV care is infrequent and appears ineffectual: a mixed methods study.

Consensus guidelines in HIV care call for clinicians to provide a brief sexual risk behavioral intervention in each visit. Studies based on participant reports find this occurs infrequently, but studies based on direct observation of clinical encounters are lacking. We conducted a mixed method study that used audio recordings of 116 routine outpatient visits by 58 different patients with HIV, in five different practice sites. Transcripts of the visits were coded and analyzed using a quantitative system. In addition, we conducted a qualitative analysis of the dialogue segments in which sexual risk behaviors arose as a topic. Discussion of sexual risk behavior occurred in 10 visits, and was generally quite brief. Two visits featured substantial counseling about sexual risk reduction; two others included substantial discussion which was not evidently directed at the patient's changing behavior. Cues suggesting a need or opportunity for such discussion that physicians did not follow up on occurred in seven additional visits. Interactions about sexual risk had less patient engagement than interactions about other health behaviors. Physicians seldom provide sexual risk reduction counseling in HIV care, even where specific indications are present.

Evaluating the impact of integrated behavioral health intervention: Evidence from Rhode Island.

ABSTRACT: There has been a historic separation between systems that address behavioral health problems and the medical care system that addresses other health issues. Integration of the 2 has the potential to improve care.The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of Integrated Behavioral Health program on health care utilization and costs.Claims data between 2015 and 2018 from Rhode Island's All Payers Claims Database representing 42,936 continuously enrolled unique patients.Retrospective study based on propensity score-matched difference-in-differences framework.Utilization (emergency department visits, office visits, and hospitalizations) and costs (total, inpatient, outpatient, professional, and pharmacy).Integrated Behavioral Health intervention in Rhode Island was associated with reduction in healthcare utilization. Emergency department visits reduced by 6.4 per 1000 people per month and office visits reduced by 29.8 per 1000 people per month, corresponding to a reduction of 7% and 6%, respectively. No statistically significant association was observed between the intervention and hospitalizations. The evidence was mixed for cost outcomes, with negative association recorded between the intervention and the likelihood of incurring non-zero cost but no significant association was observed between the intervention and the level of costs. This relationship held true for most of the cost measures considered.Integrated Behavioral Health intervention in Rhode Island was associated with significant reductions in emergency department visits and office visits, with no effects on hospitalizations. In terms of the cost outcomes, we found evidence that the intervention negatively affected the likelihood of incurring any non-zero costs but did not affect the level of costs.

Medication adherence behavior and priorities among older adults with CKD: a semistructured interview study.

BACKGROUND: Older adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD) typically use more than 5 medications and have multiple prescribing physicians. However, little is known about how they prioritize their medical conditions or decide which medications to take. METHODS: Semistructured interviews (average length, 40 minutes) with 20 community-dwelling adults with CKD stages 3-5D receiving nephrology care at a tertiary referral center. Respondents were asked about medications, prescribing physicians, and medication-taking behaviors. We performed thematic analysis to explain patients' decisions regarding medication prioritization, understanding, and adherence decisions. RESULTS: Participants (age range, 55-84 years; mean, 72 years) used 5-14 prescribed medications, had 2-9 physicians, and had 5-11 comorbid conditions. All had assigned implicit priorities to their medications. Although most expressed the intention to be adherent, many regularly skipped medications they considered less important. Most identified the prescribing physician and indication for each medication, but there often was substantial discordance between beliefs about medications and conventional medical opinion. Respondents prioritized medications based on the salience of the particular condition, perceived effects of the treatment, and barriers (physical, logistic, or financial) to using the prescribed drug. Side effects of medications were common and anxiety provoking, but discussions with the prescribing physician often were delayed or unfulfilling for the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Polypharmacy in patients with CKD leads to complex medication choices and adherence behaviors in this population. Most patients we interviewed had beliefs or priorities that were nonconcordant with conventional medical opinion; however, patients rarely discussed these beliefs and priorities or the resultant poor medication adherence with their physicians. Further study is needed to provide quantitative data about the magnitude of adherence barriers. It is likely that more effective communication about medication use could improve patients' health outcomes and reduce potential adverse drug events.

An Evaluation of Connect for Health: A Social Referral Program in RI.

BACKGROUND: Connect for Health is a social referral program based at Hasbro Children's Hospital and the Center for Primary Care in Providence, RI, that aims to address basic needs in order to improve the health and well-being of patients. METHODS: A qualitative program evaluation was conducted by interviewing providers and patients, assessing perceptions of effectiveness and barriers to success. RESULTS: Providers felt their workload was alleviated and believed the program was addressing the social determinants of health. Patients similarly felt that their needs were met but acknowledged some barriers to accessing resources such as transportation, business hours, and language barriers. Ultimately, patients and providers viewed the program as effective but both groups perceived structural barriers such as housing and limited resources. DISCUSSION: A structured program of referral for social services and benefits can alleviate some patient needs and provider workloads, but fundamental socio-economic disparities and inadequate resources limit effectiveness.

An instrument to assess HIV-related knowledge and adjustment to HIV+ status, and their association with anti-retroviral adherence.

BACKGROUND: Findings on the association between health literacy and anti-retroviral (ARV) adherence are inconsistent. Health literacy is usually operationalized with simple tests of basic literacy, but more complex conceptions of health literacy include content knowledge. People living with chronic illness also conceptualize and experience illness in ways other than biomedical or mechanistic models of disease. OBJECTIVE: There are no instruments that comprehensively assess knowledge of people living with HIV concerning HIV disease and treatment; or psychological adjustment to being HIV+. Little is known about the relationship between factual knowledge, or positive identification as HIV+, and anti-retroviral (ARV) adherence. METHODS: Formative work with in-depth semi-structured interviews, and cognitive testing, to develop a structured instrument assessing HIV-related knowledge, and personal meanings of living with HIV. Pilot administration of the instrument to a convenience sample of 101 respondents. KEY RESULTS: Respondents varied considerably in their expressed need for in-depth knowledge, the accuracy of their understanding of relevant scientific concepts and facts about ARV treatment, and psychological adjustment and acceptance of HIV+ status. Most knowledge domains were not significantly related to self-reported ARV adherence, but accurate knowledge specifically about ARV treatment was (r = 0.25, p = .02), as was an adapted version of the Need for Cognition scale (r = .256, p = .012). Negative feelings about living with HIV (r = .33, p = .0012), and medication taking (r = .276, p = .008) were significantly associated with non-adherence. CONCLUSION: The instrument may be useful in diagnosing addressable reasons for non-adherence, as a component of psychoeducational interventions, and for evaluation of such interventions.

Beyond literacy and numeracy in patient provider communication: focus groups suggest roles for empowerment, provider attitude and language.

BACKGROUND: Although the number of people living in the United States with limited English proficiency (LEP) is substantial, the impact of language on patients' experience of provider-patient communication has been little explored. METHODS: We conducted a series of 12 exploratory focus groups in English, Spanish and Cantonese to elicit discussion about patient-provider communication, particularly with respect to the concerns of the health literacy framework, i.e. ability to accurately understand, interpret and apply information given by providers. Within each language, 2 groups had high education and 2 had low education participants to partially account for literacy levels, which cannot be assessed consistently across three languages. Eighty-five (85) adults enrolled in the focus groups. The resulting video tapes were transcribed, translated and analyzed via content analysis. RESULTS: We identified 5 themes: 1) language discordant communication; 2) language concordant communication; 3) empowerment; 4) providers' attitudes; 5) issues with the health care system. Despite efforts by facilitators to elicit responses related to cognitive understanding, issues of interpersonal process were more salient, and respondents did not readily separate issues of accurate understanding from their overall narratives of experience with health care and illness. Thematic codes often appeared to be associated with education level, language and/or culture. CONCLUSION: Our most salient finding was that for most of our participants there was no clear demarcation between literacy and numeracy, language interpretation, health communication, interpersonal relations with their provider and the rest of their experience with the health care system.

Factors associated with patient recall of key information in ambulatory specialty care visits: Results of an innovative methodology.

While some studies have assessed patient recall of important information from ambulatory care visits, none has done so recently. Furthermore, little is known about features of clinical interactions which are associated with patient understanding and recall, without which shared decision making, a widely shared ideal for patient care, cannot occur. Our objective was to evaluate characteristics of patients and outpatient encounters associated with patient recall of information after one week, along with observation of elements of shared decision making. This was an observational study based on coded transcripts of 189 outpatient encounters, and post-visit interviews with patients 1 week later. Coding used three previously validated systems, adopted for this study. Forty-nine percent of decisions and recommendations were recalled accurately without prompting; 36% recalled with a prompt; 15% recalled erroneously or not at all. Provider behaviors hypothesized to be associated with patient recall, such as open-questioning and "teach back," were rare. Patients with less than high school education recalled 38% of items freely and accurately, while patients with a college degree recalled 65% (p < .0001). In a multivariate model, the total number of items to be recalled per visit, and percentage of utterances in decision-making processes by the provider ("verbal dominance"), were significant predictors of poorer recall. The item count was associated with poorer recall for lower, but not higher, educated patients.