Preseptal transconjunctival approach in orbital floor fracture repairs to prevent postoperative lower eyelid malposition.

PURPOSE: Lower eyelid malposition can be a complication following orbital floor fracture surgeries. We present our incidence of lower eyelid malposition from a large case series of orbital floor fracture repairs using the 'swinging eyelid' approach and 'hang back' technique. METHODS: A retrospective review of all orbital fracture surgeries at our institution from November 2011 to March 2021 was performed. Primary outcomes included the incidence of lower eyelid malposition by category, the average time to presentation after primary surgery, and reoperation rates among cases with lower eyelid complications. RESULTS: A total of 438 cases that involved repair of the fractured orbital floor were identified. Six patients (1.37 %) developed lower eyelid malposition following primary orbital floor repair. Two patients (0.46 %) developed reverse ptosis of the lower eyelid. Two patients (0.46 %) returned with lower lid cicatricial ectropion. One patient (0.23 %) had postoperative lower eyelid retraction. One patient (0.23 %) had postoperative lower eyelid cicatricial entropion. No cases of lower lid flattening, lower eyelid fat flattening, or eyelid notch was noted. All patients with lower eyelid malposition underwent additional surgeries except one patient with reverse ptosis (83.3 %). The average time to the presentation of postoperative complications from the surgery date was 292.8 days (range = 49 days to 3.5 years). CONCLUSION: Lower eyelid malposition after orbital floor repair is a known complication that can be decreased by employing the 'swinging eyelid' with a preseptal approach and closure by the 'hang back' technique.

Outcome Comparison of Transconjunctival Müller's Muscle Recession With Levator Disinsertion (TMRLD) to Gold Weight Implantation in the Treatment of Paralytic Lagophthalmos.

PURPOSE: To compare clinical outcomes of transconjunctival Müller's muscle recession with levator disinsertion (TMRLD) to the traditional gold weight implantation in patients with paralytic lagophthalmos. METHODS: A retrospective nonrandomized comparative review of patients who had gold weight implantation and TMRLD surgeries for paralytic lagophthalmos from January 2016 to January 2023 was performed. The main outcome comparisons were measurement changes in lagophthalmos, marginal reflex distance 1, visual acuity, and corneal examination. Complication and reoperation rates were also compared. RESULTS: Twenty-six cases of gold weight implantation and 20 cases of TMRLD surgeries were identified. The changes in logMAR visual acuity between gold weight implantation and TMRLD groups were not statistically significant (-0.10 ± 0.48 vs. +0.05 ± 0.14, p > 0.05). The percent improvement in lagophthalmos (62.2% ± 51.8% vs. 58.4% ± 21.1%) and final marginal reflex distance 1 (2.22 ± 1.42 vs. 2.25 ± 1.41 mm) were also comparable between groups ( p > 0.05). Both groups showed similar changes in marginal reflex distance 1 (1.75 ± 1.31 vs. 2.83 ± 1.37 mm) and lagophthalmos (3.77 ± 3.92 vs. 3.36 ± 1.36 mm) ( p > 0.05). The overall complication (15.4% vs. 15.0%) and reoperation rates (15.4% vs. 15.0%) were comparable over the follow-up duration (291.6 ± 437.3 vs. 121.0 ± 177.8 days) ( p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: TMRLD is as safe and effective as the gold weight implantation in addressing paralytic lagophthalmos in patients with facial nerve palsy.