Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Addiction ; 119(10): 1813-1825, 2024 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38946548

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Young people accessing alcohol and other drug (AOD) treatment experience high rates of treatment disengagement, contributing to poorer outcomes. To improve outcomes, it is important to identify factors associated with treatment retention. This study measured the relationships between client characteristics, treatment characteristics, clinical severity measures and completion of treatment among young people. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This study was a retrospective analysis of routinely collected data set in residential- and community-based AOD services in New South Wales, Australia. Routinely collected data from the Network of Alcohol and Other Drug Agencies' (NADA) database were used. Included individuals were aged 10-24 years and accessed treatment between 2012 and 2023 (n = 17 474). MEASUREMENTS: Variables included client-related characteristics, service characteristics and baseline measures of clinical severity [Kessler-10 (K10), EUROHIS-QoL, severity of dependence scale (SDS)]. Multivariable binary logistic regression models assessed the relationships between these characteristics and treatment completion. FINDINGS: Rates of treatment completion were highest among adolescents in community-based treatment (57%) and lowest among young adults in residential treatment (35%). Polysubstance use was negatively associated with treatment completion among adolescents [adjusted odds ratio (adjOR) = 0.71, P < 0.001] and adults (adjOR = 0.70, P < 0.001) in community-based treatment, and adolescents in residential treatment (adjOR = 0.62, P = 0.006), as was housing insecurity (adolescents in community treatment, adjOR = 0.61, P = 0.001; adults in community treatment, adjOR = 0.77, P = 0.002; adolescents in residential treatment, adjOR = 0.42, P = 0.005). Attending youth-specific services was associated with higher treatment completion rates among adults in community-based (adjOR = 1.81, P < 0.001) and residential treatment (adjOR = 1.72, P < 0.001). Varying correlates of treatment completion were identified throughout treatment groups, reflecting the differences in population and/or needs across contexts. CONCLUSIONS: In New South Wales, Australia, fewer than half of young people accessing alcohol and other drug treatment between 2012 and 2023 completed treatment, and completion rates were lower among those facing barriers such as polysubstance use and housing insecurity.


Assuntos
Tratamento Domiciliar , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Humanos , Adolescente , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/terapia , Adulto Jovem , Criança , New South Wales/epidemiologia , Centros de Tratamento de Abuso de Substâncias/estatística & dados numéricos , Alcoolismo/epidemiologia , Alcoolismo/terapia , Modelos Logísticos , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
Drug Alcohol Rev ; 39(3): 223-231, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31984591

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Few smokers use smoking cessation pharmacotherapies during pregnancy. It is hypothesised that health-care providers' reluctance due to safety concerns contributes to their low use. This study examined the extent of providers' concern regarding smoking cessation pharmacotherapies, relative to other medications in the same and other pregnancy risk categories. Calls made to a teratology information service (MotherSafe, Australia) were taken as a proxy indicator of concern regarding safety during pregnancy. DESIGN AND METHODS: The primary exposure discussed in 66 687 calls made to MotherSafe between 2001 and 2016 was categorised as nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), bupropion, varenicline or category A (low risk), B1, B2, B3, C, D or X (teratogenic). Separate logistic regression models estimated the odds that calls regarding pharmacotherapies were from providers, relative to medications in the same and other risk categories. Models adjusted for caller remoteness and socio-economic status. RESULTS: Calls regarding bupropion were more likely to be made by providers than calls regarding other medications in its corresponding risk category [B2, adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17, 6.59]. Calls about varenicline were also more likely to be from providers than calls regarding other category B3 medications (aOR 95% CI 2.33:1.30, 4.17). Calls regarding NRT were not more or less likely to be from providers than calls regarding other category D medications. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Providers were more concerned about bupropion and varenicline than other medications within the same pregnancy risk categories. As this overestimation of risk may limit cessation pharmacotherapy use during pregnancy, research investigating strategies for correcting this imbalance is warranted.


Assuntos
Call Centers , Pessoal de Saúde/ética , Gravidez , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Fumar/tratamento farmacológico , Austrália , Terapia Comportamental , Bupropiona , Feminino , Humanos , Serviços de Informação , Nicotina , Teratologia , Dispositivos para o Abandono do Uso de Tabaco , Vareniclina
4.
Res Social Adm Pharm ; 9(4): 405-18, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22835711

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Treatment default among the smokers hinders the effectiveness of the delivery of cessation services. While many studies have predicted the defaulters' characteristics, the reasons why these smokers dropped out and continued smoking are seldom explored. OBJECTIVES: This study examined the barriers encountered by such smokers and their respective health care providers (HCPs) in relation to the discontinuation of cessation treatment. METHODS: From May 2010 to March 2011, 15 current adult smokers and 9 HCPs from 2 Quit Smoking Clinics (QSCs) in the Melaka Tengah District, Malacca, Malaysia were interviewed on smoking, cessation, and the QSC. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. The transcripts were subsequently translated into English and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: The barriers encountered were categorized as Individual- and Clinic-level. Both smokers and HCPs acknowledged that the smokers' low intrinsic motivation was the individual-level barrier. The clinic-level barriers were the mismatched perceptions of smokers and HCPs regarding the HCPs' roles, skills, and attitudes, as well as the availability and efficacy of smoking cessation aids (SCAs). While the smokers viewed the program as not helpful, the HCPs cited the lack of organizational support as their main barrier. CONCLUSIONS: The reasons for treatment default centered on the overall dissatisfaction with the treatment (due to the program, HCP, and SCA factors) combined with the smokers' low intrinsic motivation. Optimizing the interplay of the extrinsic motivational cues, such as the HCP and SCA factors, would complement the smoker's low intrinsic motivation and thus encourage treatment retention. However, it is necessary to strike a balance between the individual smoker's needs and the availability of organizational support.


Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Cooperação do Paciente , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Adulto , Idoso , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/organização & administração , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Malásia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Motivação , Objetivos Organizacionais , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Satisfação do Paciente , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA