MOG antibody-associated encephalitis in adult: clinical phenotypes and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the clinical characteristics and outcomes of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody-associated autoimmune encephalitis (MOGAE) in adult patients. METHODS: From an institutional cohort, we analysed adult patients with MOGAE followed-up for more than 1 year. Disease severity was assessed using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) and Clinical Assessment Scale in Autoimmune Encephalitis scores. Immunotherapy profiles, outcomes and disease relapses were evaluated along with serial brain MRI data. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were enrolled and categorised into cortical encephalitis (18 patients), limbic encephalitis (LE, 5 patients) and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM, 17 patients). 80.0% of patients achieved good clinical outcomes (mRS 0‒2) and 40.0% relapsed. The LE subtype was associated with an older onset age (p=0.004) and poor clinical outcomes (p=0.014) than the other subtypes but with a low rate of relapse (0.0%). 21/25 (84.0%) relapse attacks were associated with an absence or short (≤6 months) immunotherapy maintenance. On MRI, the development of either diffuse cerebral or medial temporal atrophy within the first 6 month was correlated with poor outcomes. MOG-antibody (MOG-Ab) was copresent with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR)-antibody in 13 patients, in whom atypical clinical presentation (cortical encephalitis or ADEM, p<0.001) and disease relapse (46.2% vs 0.0%, p<0.001) were more frequent compared with conventional NMDAR encephalitis without MOG-Ab. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes are different according to the three phenotypes in MOGAE. Short immunotherapy maintenance is associated with relapse, and brain atrophy was associated with poor outcomes. Patients with dual antibodies of NMDAR and MOG have a high relapse rate.

Seronegative autoimmune encephalitis: clinical characteristics and factors associated with outcomes.

Seronegative autoimmune encephalitis is autoimmune encephalitis without any identifiable pathogenic antibody. Although it is a major subtype of autoimmune encephalitis, many unmet clinical needs exist in terms of clinical characteristics, treatments and prognosis. In this institutional cohort study, patients diagnosed with seronegative autoimmune encephalitis with available 2-year outcomes were analysed for the disease course, 2-year outcome prediction system, effect of immunotherapy, necessity of further immunotherapy at 6 or 12 months and pattern of brain atrophy. Seronegative autoimmune encephalitis was subcategorized into antibody-negative probable autoimmune encephalitis, autoimmune limbic encephalitis and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Poor 2-year outcome was defined by modified Rankin scale scores 3-6, and the 2-year serial data of Clinical Assessment Scales in Autoimmune Encephalitis score was used for longitudinal data analyses. A total of 147 patients were included. The frequency of achieving a good 2-year outcome (modified Rankin scale 0-2) was 56.5%. The antibody-negative probable autoimmune encephalitis subtype exhibited the poorest outcomes, although the baseline severity was similar among the subtypes. The RAPID score, consisting of five early usable clinical factors, refractory status epilepticus, age of onset ≥60 years, probable autoimmune encephalitis (antibody-negative probable autoimmune encephalitis subtype), infratentorial involvement and delay of immunotherapy ≥1 month, was associated with poorer 2-year outcomes. Any immunotherapy was associated with clinical improvement in the patients with low risk for poor 2-year outcomes (RAPID scores 0-1), and the combination immunotherapy of steroid, immunoglobulin, rituximab and tocilizumab was associated with better outcomes in the patients with high risk for poor 2-year outcomes (RAPID scores 2-5). In patients with persistent disease at 6 months, continuing immunotherapy was associated with more improvement, while the effect of continuing immunotherapy for more than 12 months was unclear. In the longitudinal analysis of MRI, the development of cerebellar atrophy indicated poor outcomes, while the absence of diffuse cerebral atrophy or medial temporal atrophy indicated the possibility of a good outcome. This study provides information about the clinical characteristics and courses, the effect of immunotherapy and its duration, and prognostic factors in seronegative autoimmune encephalitis.

CaV α2δ Autoimmune Encephalitis: A Novel Antibody and its Characteristics.

OBJECTIVE: Discovery of a novel antibody would enable diagnosis and early treatment of autoimmune encephalitis. The aim was to discover a novel antibody targeting a synaptic receptor and characterize the pathogenic mechanism. METHOD: We screened for unknown antibodies in serum and cerebrospinal fluid samples from autoimmune encephalitis patients. Samples with reactivity to rat brain sections and no reactivity to conventional antibody tests underwent further processing for antibody discovery, using immunoprecipitation to primary neuronal cells, mass-spectrometry analysis, an antigen-binding assay on an antigen-overexpressing cell line, and an electrophysiological assay with cultured hippocampal neurons. RESULTS: Two patients had a novel antibody against CaV α2δ (voltage-gated calcium channel alpha-2/delta subunit). The patient samples stained neuropils of the hippocampus, basal ganglia, and cortex in rat brain sections and bound to a CaV α2δ-overexpressing cell line. Knockdown of CaV α2δ expression in cultured neurons turned off the immunoreactivity of the antibody from the patients to the neurons. The patients were associated with preceding meningitis or neuroendocrine carcinoma and responded to immunotherapy. In cultured neurons, the antibody reduced neurotransmitter release from presynaptic nerve terminals by interfering with tight coupling of calcium channels and exocytosis. INTERPRETATION: Here, we discovered a novel autoimmune encephalitis associated with anti-CaV α2δ antibody. Further analysis of the antibody in autoimmune encephalitis might promote early diagnosis and treatment. ANN NEUROL 2021;89:740-752.

Effects of CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of lacosamide in Korean patients with epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Many pharmacokinetic studies of lacosamide (LCM) have been reported, but no large-scale clinical study has been conducted on genetic polymorphisms that affect the metabolism of LCM. Therefore, we designed a pharmacogenetic study of LCM to explore the effect of genetic polymorphisms on serum LCM concentration. We evaluated the pharmacodynamic characteristics of LCM, including clinical efficacy and toxicity. METHODS: Adult patients with epilepsy who received LCM at Seoul National University Hospital were enrolled. Blood samples were obtained from 115 patients taking LCM for more than 1 month with unchanged doses and were used to analyze the serum LCM concentration, the concentration/dose (C/D) ratio and the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the cytochrome P450 (CYP)2C9 and CYP2C19 genes. In addition, clinical information-including efficacy, toxicity, and concomitant drugs-was collected. RESULTS: The serum LCM concentration showed a linear correlation with the daily dose (r = .66, p < .001). In genetic analysis, 43 patients (38.7%) were extensive metabolizers (EMs), 51 (45.9%) were intermediate metabolizers (IMs), and 17 (15.3%) were poor metabolizers (PMs). In the group comparison, mean serum concentrations and the C/D ratio showed significant differences between the three groups (p = .01 and p < .001, respectively). The C/D ratios of IM (27.78) and PM (35.6) were 13% and 39% higher than those of EM (25.58), respectively. In the pharmacodynamic subgroup analysis, patients in the ineffective LCM group had significantly lower serum concentrations (6.39 ± 3.25 vs. 8.44 ± 3.68 µg/ml, p = .024), whereas patients with adverse events had higher serum concentrations than those without adverse events (11.03 ± 4.32 vs. 7.4 ± 3.1 µg/ml, p < .001). Based on this, we suggest a reference range for LCM in the Korean population (6-9 µg/ml). SIGNIFICANCE: Genetic polymorphisms of the CYP2C19 gene affect the serum LCM concentration. Because efficacy and toxicity are apparently related to serum LCM levels, the genetic phenotype of CYP2C19 should be considered when prescribing LCM for patients with epilepsy.

Evaluation of persistence and healthcare utilization in patients treated with anti-seizure medications as add-on therapy: A nationwide cohort study in South Korea.

OBJECTIVE: To compare medication adherence and healthcare utilization among patients who were treated with anti-seizure medications (ASMs) as first add-on to monotherapy for epilepsy using the national health insurance claims data. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted using the Korean National Health Insurance claims data. Patients who received ASM as first add-on to monotherapy during January 2017 to February 2018 were included. The selected patients were followed up for 12 months to evaluate persistence, adherence, and healthcare resource utilization. RESULTS: In total, 4277 patients who received ASM as first add-on to monotherapy for epilepsy were enrolled. The mean treatment duration of add-on ASM was 296.6 ±â€¯108.6 days during the 1-year follow-up period and 64.3% of the total population were persistent on the add-on ASM at 365 days from the index date. The mean medication possession ratio (MPR) was 90.3 ±â€¯23.7 and the proportion of adherent patients with ≥80% MPR was 79.3%. Lamotrigine (LTG), levetiracetam (LEV), oxcarbazepine (OXC), and perampanel (PER) groups showed significantly higher persistence and adherence than carbamazepine (CBZ), topiramate (TPM), and valproate (VAL) groups during the 1-year follow-up period. Significant differences in length of stays, total hospitalization cost, outpatient visit cost, and emergency cost were shown between ASM groups and LTG, LEV, OXC, and PER showed relatively low utilization and cost. CONCLUSIONS: Better adherence was observed in LTG, LEV, OXC, and PER groups than in CBZ, TPM, and VAL groups. Healthcare utilization and related costs showed significant difference between ASM groups.

Tofacitinib treatment for refractory autoimmune encephalitis.

To treat intractable cases of autoimmune encephalitis, the need for novel immunotherapy that penetrates the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is increasing. Tofacitinib is a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor used to treat refractory immune-mediated diseases that effectively penetrates the BBB. Accordingly, tofacitinib could be a new option for patients with refractory autoimmune encephalitis. Patients treated with tofacitinib were selected from Seoul National University Hospital cohort for autoimmune encephalitis from April 2019 until July 2020. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of tofacitinib in patients with autoimmune encephalitis who showed insufficient responses to multimodal conventional immunotherapies. Tofacitinib was administered orally at a dose of 5 mg twice daily. A total of eight patients were treated with tofacitinib; two had good responses (clinical global impression-improvement score [CGI-I] = 1 or 2), three had partial responses (CGI-I = 3), and three showed no significant improvements (CGI-I = 4) in response to tofacitinib. The two good responders showed the improvement of chronic autoimmune meningoencephalitis and the cessation of the new-onset refractory status epilepticus in anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-associated disorder, which was previously intractable to anesthetics and the other immunotherapies. No patients had serious side effects. Our findings suggest the potential of tofacitinib as a therapeutic option for central nervous system autoimmune diseases.

Long-term safety of adjunctive cenobamate in patients with uncontrolled focal seizures: Open-label extension of a randomized clinical study.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to examine long-term (up to 7.8 years) retention rate, safety, and tolerability of the antiseizure medication (ASM) cenobamate as adjunctive treatment in the open-label extension (OLE) of study YKP3089C013 (C013; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01397968). METHODS: Patients who completed the 12-week, multicenter, multinational, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled C013 study, which examined adjunctive cenobamate treatment of adults with uncontrolled focal seizures, were eligible to enroll in the OLE. During the OLE, dose adjustments of cenobamate and concomitant ASMs were allowed. Safety assessments included frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs, TEAE severity, and TEAEs leading to discontinuation. Probability of patient continuation in the OLE was examined using a Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: One hundred forty-nine patients entered the OLE (median duration of cenobamate treatment = 6.25 years). As of the data cutoff, 57% of patients (85/149) remained in the OLE (median treatment duration = 6.8 years, range = 6.4-7.8 years). The median modal daily cenobamate dose was 200 mg (range = 50-400 mg). The probability of treatment continuation at 1-6 years of cenobamate treatment was 73%, 67%, 63%, 61%, 60%, and 59%, respectively. Among patients who continued at 1 year (n = 107), the probability of continuing at Years 2-5 was 92%, 87%, 83%, and 82%. The most common discontinuation reasons were patient withdrawal (19.5%, 29/149), adverse event (10.1%, 15/149), and lack of efficacy (5.4%, 8/149). TEAEs leading to discontinuation in 1% or more of patients were fatigue (1.3%, 2/149), ataxia (1.3%, 2/149), and memory impairment or amnesia (1.3%, 2/149). Dizziness (32.9%, 49/149), headache (26.8%, 40/149), and somnolence (21.5%, 32/149) were the most frequently reported TEAEs and were primarily mild or moderate in severity. SIGNIFICANCE: Long-term retention in the C013 OLE study demonstrated sustained safety and tolerability of adjunctive cenobamate treatment up to 7.8 years in adults with treatment-resistant focal seizures taking one to three ASMs.

Long-term efficacy and safety of perampanel as a first add-on therapy in patients with focal epilepsy: Three-year extension study.

PURPOSE: We investigated the long-term efficacy and safety of perampanel as a first add-on therapy in patients with focal epilepsy. METHODS: This retrospective study represented the 3-year extension phase of a multicenter, open-label, phase 4, prospective study of perampanel as a first add-on therapy in patients with focal epilepsy. Seizure and safety outcomes were assessed annually from the start of the extension study, and the retention rate was calculated from the start of perampanel exposure in the original study. RESULTS: The 50% responder and seizure freedom rates were 84.8% and 58.7%, respectively, during the third year and 71.7% and 32.6%, respectively, during the entire 3-year period of the extension study. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year retention rates were 62.5%, 53.1%, and 52.1%, respectively. Efficacies were higher in patients that were aged >55 years, male, and receiving ≤4 mg of perampanel. Perampanel was generally well tolerated; 47.3% of patients experienced at least one adverse event during the 3 years of extension (46 adverse events (AEs) in 35 patients). The most common AEs were dizziness (33.8%), somnolence (5.4%), anger (4.1%), and irritability (4.1%). AEs were resolved with perampanel dose reduction or discontinuation in 10 (13.5%) and 12 (16.2%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Long-term treatment with perampanel as a first add-on therapy did not raise new safety signals in patients with focal epilepsy. Especially at low perampanel doses (≤4 mg/day), sustained improvement in seizure control was achieved, which could potentially avoid adverse drug reactions.

Effects of perampanel on cognition and quantitative electroencephalography in patients with epilepsy.

Antiepileptic drugs are well known for their effects on cognition and electrophysiologic changes. However, perampanel is yet to be evaluated for its effects on cognitive function and electroencephalography (EEG). The purpose of the present study was to identify the effect of perampanel on neuropsychological (NP) tests and quantitative EEG (QEEG) and their relationship with the level of the drug in blood. Seventeen patients with epilepsy were enrolled in the study. Electroencephalographic recordings were obtained, and NP tests were conducted before perampanel intake and 6 months after treatment. The relative frequency band power, peak alpha frequency, and NP test scores were compared before and after drug administration. The serum concentration of perampanel was correlated with the QEEG changes. Delayed recall of the Rey Complex Figure showed significant improvement (20.03 vs. 22.94; P = 0.004) following perampanel administration. Other cognitive function tests showed no significant differences before and after drug administration. Theta frequency band power increased in all brain regions (P = 0.001-0.01), and alpha frequency power decreased in all brain regions (P = 0.006-0.03). The theta/alpha ratio, which represents background EEG slowing, increased in all brain areas (P = 0.003-0.02). The peak frequency of the alpha rhythm decreased after perampanel intake (t = 2.45, P = 0.03). Difference of relative alpha power in the central region positively correlated with the blood level of perampanel (r = 0.53, P = 0.03). Perampanel induced electrophysiological slowing, but cognitive decline was not observed. Because the controls were not compared in the study, the results of cognitive function tests should be interpreted conservatively. Background EEG slowing correlated with the serum concentration of perampanel. Our results show the effect of perampanel on cognitive function and background EEG in adult patients with epilepsy.

Tolerability of lacosamide rapid dose titration: A randomized, multicenter, prospective, open-label study.

OBJECTIVE: Currently recommended dosing of lacosamide often necessitates long titration periods. However, the use of a regimen consisting of initial loading dose of 200 mg followed by a maintenance dose of 200 mg/day in practice suggests tolerability of more rapid titration schedules. We aimed to clarify whether the shortened titration schedule affects tolerability of lacosamide. METHODS: We evaluated the safety of two rapid titration protocols designed to reach the target dose of 400 mg/day within 1 week, and the conventional weekly titration protocol (reaching the target dose of 400 mg/day in three weeks). The ≥50% responder rate and steady-state plasma concentration of lacosamide were also analyzed. Adverse events were assessed at 1 week and 5 weeks after reaching the target dose. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients with epilepsy were enrolled and evenly distributed to three titration protocols, from which 5 patients were lost to follow-up and excluded from the safety analysis. Discontinuation of lacosamide or dose reductions due to adverse events occurred in 32 patients (46%), of whom a large majority (74%) had experienced adverse events after reaching 400 mg/day, demonstrating apparent dose-dependency. There was no difference in safety outcomes among the three titration groups. Concomitant use of sodium channel blockers significantly increased the risk of adverse events. CONCLUSION: Rapid titration protocols for lacosamide were not associated with an increased risk of adverse events compared to the conventional weekly titration protocol. Uptitration of lacosamide at shorter intervals to an effective target dosage may be feasible in appropriate clinical situations.

Development of the clinical assessment scale in autoimmune encephalitis.

OBJECTIVE: There is no scale for rating the severity of autoimmune encephalitis (AE). In this study, we aimed to develop a novel scale for rating severity in patients with diverse AE syndromes and to verify the reliability and validity of the developed scale. METHODS: The key items were generated by a panel of experts and selected according to content validity ratios. The developed scale was initially applied to 50 patients with AE (development cohort) to evaluate its acceptability, reproducibility, internal consistency, and construct validity. Then, the scale was applied to another independent cohort (validation cohort, n = 38). RESULTS: A new scale consisting of 9 items (seizure, memory dysfunction, psychiatric symptoms, consciousness, language problems, dyskinesia/dystonia, gait instability and ataxia, brainstem dysfunction, and weakness) was developed. Each item was assigned a value of up to 3 points. The total score could therefore range from 0 to 27. We named the scale the Clinical Assessment Scale in Autoimmune Encephalitis (CASE). The new scale showed excellent interobserver (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.97) and intraobserver (ICC = 0.96) reliability for total scores, was highly correlated with modified Rankin scale (r = 0.86, p < 0.001), and had acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.88). Additionally, in the validation cohort, the scale showed high interobserver reliability (ICC = 0.99) and internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.92). INTERPRETATION: CASE is a novel clinical scale for AE with a high level of clinimetric properties. It would be suitable for application in clinical practice and might help overcome the limitations of current outcome scales for AE. ANN NEUROL 2019;85:352-358.

First add-on perampanel for focal-onset seizures: An open-label, prospective study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of perampanel added to monotherapy in patients with focal-onset seizures, with or without secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures. MATERIALS & METHODS: In this multicentre, open-label trial, enrolled patients were treated with perampanel monotherapy. During a 12-week titration period, perampanel was incrementally increased by 2 mg/d over ≥2-week intervals. Patients then entered a 24-week maintenance period. The primary objective was to investigate the 50% responder rate in total seizure frequency, with 75% and 100% responder rates as secondary objectives. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and adverse drug reactions were recorded. A post hoc analysis was performed to investigate the effect of titration speed and different concomitant AEDs on the efficacy and safety of perampanel. RESULTS: Of the 85 patients analysed, seizure reductions of 50%, 75% and 100% were observed in 80.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 69.9-87.9), 71.8% (95% CI: 61.0-81.0) and 47.1% (95% CI: 36.1-58.2) during the maintenance period, respectively. The 50%, 75% and 100% response rates in patients with secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures were 87.5% (95% CI: 61.7-98.5), 87.5% (95% CI: 61.7-98.5) and 75.0% (95% CI: 47.6-92.7), respectively. The most common TEAEs were dizziness (50.0%), somnolence (9.8%) and headache (8.8%). The efficacy outcomes and safety profile of perampanel were more favourable with slow titration and relatively consistent when stratified by concomitant AEDs. CONCLUSIONS: Perampanel was effective and well tolerated as a first add-on to monotherapy in patients with focal-onset seizures, with or without secondarily generalized seizures.

Rapid diagnosis of bacterial meningitis by nanopore 16S amplicon sequencing: A pilot study.

Early administration of antibiotics is crucial in the management of bacterial meningitis. Rapid pathogen identification helps to make a definite diagnosis of bacterial meningitis and enables tailored antibiotic treatment. We investigated if the 16S amplicon sequencing performed by MinION, a nanopore sequencer, was capable of rapid pathogen identification in bacterial meningitis. Six retrospective cases of confirmed bacterial meningitis and two prospective cases were included. The initial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples of these patients were used for the experiments. DNA was extracted from the CSF, and PCR was performed on the 16S ribosomal DNA (16S rDNA). Sequencing libraries were prepared using the PCR products, and MinION sequencing was performed for up to 3 h. The reads were aligned to the bacterial database, and the results were compared to the conventional culture studies. Pathogenic bacteria were successfully detected from the CSF by 16S sequencing in all retrospective cases. 16S amplicon sequencing was more sensitive than conventional diagnostic tests and worked properly even in antibiotics-treated samples. MinION sequencing significantly reduced the turnaround time, and even 10 min of sequencing was sufficient for pathogen detection in certain cases. Protocol adjustment could further increase the sensitivity and reduce the turnaround time for MinION sequencing. Finally, the prospective application of MinION 16S sequencing was successful. Nanopore 16S amplicon sequencing is capable of rapid bacterial identification from the CSF of the bacterial meningitis patients. It may have many advantages over conventional diagnostic tests and should therefore be applied in a larger number of patients in the future.

Tocilizumab treatment for new onset refractory status epilepticus.

We investigated the therapeutic potential of the interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor tocilizumab in 7 patients with new onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) who remained refractory to conventional immunotherapy with rituximab (n = 5) or without rituximab (n = 2). Status epilepticus (SE) was terminated after 1 or 2 doses of tocilizumab in 6 patients with a median interval of 3 days from the initiation. They had no recurrence of SE during the observation. However, 2 patients experienced severe adverse events related to infection during the tocilizumab therapy. Further prospective controlled studies are warranted to validate the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in patients with NORSE. Ann Neurol 2018;84:940-945.

Efficacy and safety of perampanel in generalized and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures: A comparative study of Asian and non-Asian populations.

Perampanel is an approved adjunctive treatment for focal seizures with or without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic (FBTC) seizures and generalized tonic-clonic (GTC) seizures. We compared efficacy and safety of perampanel vs placebo in Asian and non-Asian populations in a post hoc analysis of pooled data from 5 randomized phase 3 studies. Patients (≥12 years old) with focal + FBTC seizures received perampanel 2, 4, 8, or 12 mg or placebo; patients with GTC seizures received perampanel 8 mg or placebo (titration: 4-6 weeks; maintenance: 13 weeks). Efficacy endpoints included median percentage change in FBTC or GTC seizure frequency per 28 days and 50% responder rate relative to baseline. Median percentage change in FBTC seizure frequency was significantly greater for perampanel 8 and 12 mg than placebo in the Asian population (median difference from placebo: -30.32%, P = 0.0017; -30.06%, P = 0.0008, respectively) and perampanel 4, 8, and 12 mg in the non-Asian population (-35.07%, P = 0.0001; -37.78%, P < 0.0001; -34.53%, P < 0.0001, respectively). In both populations, median percentage change in GTC seizure frequency was significantly greater for perampanel 8 mg than placebo (median difference from placebo: Asian, -37.37%, P = 0.0139; non-Asian, -27.04%, P = 0.0006). The 50% responder rates were significantly greater than placebo for perampanel 8 and 12 mg for FBTC seizures (Asian: 58.0%, P = 0.0017 and 58.6%, P = 0.0013, respectively; non-Asian: 59.3%, P < 0.0001 and 54.3%, P = 0.0050, respectively) and perampanel 8 mg for GTC seizures (Asian: 57.6%, P = 0.0209; non-Asian: 68.8%, P = 0.0329). Pooled FBTC/GTC seizure data showed generally similar patterns of response to perampanel in both populations. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were fatigue, irritability, dizziness, somnolence, and headache. Perampanel was effective, well tolerated, and can be considered a therapeutic option for FBTC/GTC seizures in Asian populations.

A randomized, open-label, multicenter comparative trial of levetiracetam and topiramate as adjunctive treatment for patients with focal epilepsy in Korea.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this trial was to compare the effectiveness of levetiracetam (LEV) and topiramate (TPM) as adjunctive treatment for patients with focal seizures in Korea. METHODS: In this Phase IV, open-label, multicenter trial (NCT01229735), adults were randomized to treatment with LEV (1000-3000 mg/day) or TPM (200-400 mg/day). Only patients achieving LEV ≥1000 mg/day or TPM ≥100 mg/day after a 4-week up-titration entered the 20-week dose-finding and subsequent 28-week maintenance periods. The primary outcome was the 52-week retention rate; others included safety and exploratory efficacy outcomes. RESULTS: Of 343 randomized patients (LEV 177; TPM 166), 211 (61.5%) completed the trial. In the full analysis set (FAS), retention rate was 59.1% with LEV vs 56.6% with TPM (p = 0.7007), while in the prespecified sensitivity analysis, based on data from patients who received drug doses in the recommended range (LEV 176; TPM 113), it was 59.1% with LEV vs 42.5% with TPM (p = 0.0086). In the FAS, median percent reduction in seizure frequency from baseline was 74.47% with LEV and 67.86% with TPM (p = 0.0665); ≥50% responder rate was 69.0% vs 64.8% (p = 0.4205), and the 6-month seizure-freedom rate was 35.8% vs 22.3% (p = 0.0061). In the sensitivity analysis, differences between groups were greater, favoring LEV. Incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were 70.6% with LEV vs 77.1% with TPM; most frequently somnolence (20.3%), dizziness (18.1%), and nasopharyngitis (13.6%) with LEV; and decreased appetite (15.7%), dizziness (14.5%), and headache (14.5%) with TPM. Discontinuations due to TEAEs were 7.9% with LEV and 12.7% with TPM. CONCLUSIONS: In this open-label trial, the 52-week retention rate was not significantly different between LEV and TPM. However, LEV was associated with a substantially higher seizure freedom rate and a more favorable safety profile than TPM in this population of Korean patients with focal seizures.

Diagnosis of Haemophilus influenzae Pneumonia by Nanopore 16S Amplicon Sequencing of Sputum.

We used deep sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene from sputum to identify Haemophilus influenza in a patient with community-acquired pneumonia. This method may be more effective than conventional diagnostic tests in pneumonia patients because of its speed and sensitivity.

LGI1 expression and human brain asymmetry: insights from patients with LGI1-antibody encephalitis.

BACKGROUND: While brain asymmetry has been a fascinating issue in neuroscience, the critical mechanism remains to be elucidated. Based on some index cases with asymmetric 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) uptake in leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (LGI1)-antibody encephalitis, we hypothesized LGI1 expression could be asymmetrically distributed in the human brain. METHODS: We enrolled 13 patients who were diagnosed with LGI1-antibody encephalitis between June 2012 and January 2018 at Seoul National University Hospital. Their pretreatment 18F-FDG-PET images were analyzed to find asymmetry between the left and right hemispheres. Guided by these observations, expression of LGI1 in the human hippocampus and the globus pallidus of both cerebral hemispheres was studied in nine post-mortem human brains. RESULTS: Eleven of the 13 LGI1-antibody encephalitis patients (84.6%) showed asymmetrical FDG high uptake in the hippocampus: nine (81.8%) on the left hippocampus and two (18.2%) on the right. In the basal ganglia, seven patients (53.8%) showed asymmetry: four (57.1%) on the left and three (42.9%) on the right. The asymmetry was not evident in the laterality of faciobrachial dystonic seizures, brain MRI, and EEG. When the expression of LGI1 protein was analyzed in nine post-mortem human brains by western blotting, LGI1 expression was higher on eight left globus pallidus samples (88.89%, P = 0.019) and on four left hippocampal samples (44.44%, P = 0.652), compared to their right hemisphere samples. CONCLUSIONS: Imaging parameters from patients with LGI1-antibody encephalitis and studies of LGI1 protein expression suggest that LGI1 is asymmetrically distributed in the human brain. These observations have implications for our understanding of human brain development.

Anti-LGI1 encephalitis is associated with unique HLA subtypes.

OBJECTIVE: Autoimmune encephalitis (AE), represented by anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (anti-LGI1) and anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (anti-NMDAR) encephalitis, has increasing clinical significance based on recent discoveries of neuronal autoantibodies. However, its immunopathogenesis is not fully understood. Here, we investigated whether AE is associated with the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) subtypes. METHODS: We compared the HLA genotypes of 11 anti-LGI1 and 17 anti-NMDAR encephalitis patients to the control groups, which consisted of 210 epilepsy patients and 485 healthy Koreans. RESULTS: Anti-LGI1 encephalitis was associated with the DRB1*07:01-DQB1*02:02 haplotype (10 patients; 91%) in HLA class II genes, as well as with B*44:03 (8 patients; 73%) and C*07:06 (7 patients; 64%) in the HLA class I region. The prevalence of these alleles in anti-LGI1 encephalitis was significantly higher than that in the epilepsy controls or healthy controls. By contrast, anti-NMDAR encephalitis was not associated with HLA genotypes. Additional analysis using HLA-peptide binding prediction algorithms and computational docking underpinned the close relationship. INTERPRETATION: This finding suggests that most anti-LGI1 encephalitis develops in a population with specific HLA subtypes, providing insight into a novel disease mechanism. Ann Neurol 2017;81:183-192.

Increased adverse events associated with antiepileptic drugs in anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated protein 1 encephalitis.

Anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated protein 1 (LGI1) encephalitis is a rare autoimmune condition presenting mainly as altered mental state, cognitive dysfunction, and seizure. Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are usually initiated to control seizures despite their limited efficacy; however, accumulating clinical experience suggests a high incidence of adverse reactions to AEDs in anti-LGI1 encephalitis. We reviewed the medical records of patients who were diagnosed with anti-LGI1 encephalitis to analyze the adverse effects of AEDs in these patients. Among the 20 patients who were treated with AEDs, 10 (50%) changed their AEDs due to adverse cutaneous drug reaction. Eight of them presented with maculopapular eruption, one with drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome, and one with eczema. Causative agents mostly consisted of aromatic AEDs. Oxcarbazepine was discontinued in two additional patients due to hyponatremia. Six patients (30%) discontinued their dose of levetiracetam because of psychiatric manifestations including irritability/aggressive behavior (four patients), insomnia (one patient), and depressive mood (one patient). Clinicians should consider adverse cutaneous drug reaction, psychiatric adverse events, and hyponatremia when selecting AEDs for the treatment of anti-LGI1 encephalitis.