Endometriosis-associated Ovarian Cancer is a Subset With a More Favorable Outcome and Distinct Clinical-pathologic Characteristics.

There is a controversy about whether endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer (EAOC) might represent a different entity from the corresponding ovarian cancer occurring de novo, in the absence of endometriosis. This study investigated the clinical-pathologic characteristics and outcome of EAOC compared with other ovarian carcinomas that are not associated with endometriosis (non-EAOC) in a large cohort. Seven hundred two patients meeting the inclusion criteria were further subclassified as group I when patients had ovarian carcinoma associated with or arising within endometriosis (EAOC) and group II when patients had non-EAOC. Age, gross features, histologic type, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between the groups. One hundred sixty-eight (23.9%) patients had EAOC, whereas 534 (76.1%) patients had non-EAOC. EAOCs were mostly endometrioid and clear cell type. Patients with EAOC were younger, present early, and had a lower rate of recurrence when compared with patients with non-EAOC, P<0.001. Patients with EAOC had longer DFS time, 51.9 mo (95% confidence interval, 44.9-58.8) versus 30.5 mo (95% confidence interval, 27.7-33.3) in non-EAOC patients. The 5 yr Kaplan-Meier estimate of DFS rate was 70% in 166 patients of group I and was 39.3% in 532 patients of group II, P<0.001. On multivariate analysis, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging, histologic type, and treatment were the only significant factors affecting the hazards of recurrence. Patients with tumors associated with endometriosis are usually, younger, present early, have lower rate of recurrence, longer DFS, and their tumors are of lower grade and are more likely endometrioid or clear cell carcinoma.

A single-institution experience of salvage therapy for patients with early and locally advanced breast cancer who progress during neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Progression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAT) for early and locally advanced breast cancer is generally uncommon. However, these patients tend to do poorly, and salvage therapy (ST) use is variable and often not well defined. We aimed to establish the characteristics and outcomes of breast cancer (BC) patients progressing on NAT, report the patterns of institutional ST usage, and identify predictors of ST failure. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted using the "Biomatrix" institutional database. Fisher's exact test was used to study the association between baseline characteristics and progression after ST. Survival outcomes were estimated using Kaplan-Meier. Disease-Free Survival 1 (DFS1) and DFS2 represent the time between diagnosis and first progression, and the first and second progression, respectively. The log-rank test was used to compare survival outcomes between different ST types. RESULTS: Thirty patients out of 413 (7.2%) progressed on primary NAT, with a median follow-up of 28.52 months (13.77-46.97) and a mean age of 57 years (standard deviation: 12). The two most frequently used ST modalities were surgery (43%) and radiation with concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy (CT/RT) (40%). Eighty percent of the patients made it to subsequent surgery and among those, 11 (69%) were initially not operable and their tumors were rendered surgically removable after ST. The initial tumor stage and grade, and the presence of lymphovascular invasion predicted progression after ST (p = 0.02, p = 0.03 and p = 0.01, respectively). Median DFS1, DFS2, and overall survival were 4.4 months (95% CI 3.6-5.7), 14.8 months (95% CI 2.37-NR), and 39.5 months (95% CI 22.73-NR), respectively. No difference in survival outcomes based on ST type was seen. CONCLUSION: In this evaluated cohort and despite potential poorer outcomes, patients progressing on NAT responded well to ST, became operable, and had promising survival outcomes. Appropriate selection of ST is crucial, and can help improve outcomes in such patients.

The role of quantitative estrogen receptor status in predicting tumor response at surgery in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Estrogen receptor (ER) negative (-) breast cancer (BC) patients have better tumor response rates than ER-positive (+) patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT). We conducted a retrospective review using the institutional database "Biomatrix" to assess the value of quantitative ER status in predicting tumor response at surgery and to identify potential predictors of survival outcomes. METHODS: Univariate followed by multivariable regression analyses were conducted to assess the association between quantitative ER and tumor response assessed as tumor size reduction and pathologic complete response (pCR). Predictors of recurrence-free survival (RFS) were identified using a cox proportional hazards model (CPH). A log-rank test was used to compare RFS between groups if a significant predictor was identified. RESULTS: 304 patients were included with a median follow-up of 43.3 months (Q1-Q3 28.7-61.1) and a mean age of 49.7 years (SD 10.9). Quantitative ER was inversely associated with tumor size reduction and pCR (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.99-1.00, p = 0.027 and 0.98 95% CI 0.97-0.99, p < 0.0001, respectively). A cut-off of 60 and 80% predicted best the association with tumor size reduction and pCR, respectively. pCR was shown to be an independent predictor of RFS (HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.07-0.43, p = 0.0002) in all patients. At 5 years, 93% of patients with pCR and 72% of patients with residual tumor were recurrence-free, respectively (p = 0.0012). CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative ER status is inversely associated with tumor response in BC patients treated with NCT. A cut-off of 60 and 80% predicts best the association with tumor size reduction and pCR, respectively. Therefore, patients with an ER status higher than the cut-off might benefit from a neoadjuvant endocrine therapy approach. Patients with pCR had better survival outcomes independently of their tumor phenotype. Further prospective studies are needed to validate the clinical utility of quantitative ER as a predictive marker of tumor response.

Symptom Burden Associated With Radiation Dermatitis in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Radiation dermatitis (RD) is a side effect experienced by many patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) for breast cancer. In the present study, the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), a validated patient-reported symptom screening tool, was used to determine the impacts of RT-induced skin outcomes on ESAS items. Patient- and treatment-related factors and skin treatments to manage RD symptoms, were assessed for association with ESAS scores. METHODS: Patient and treatment characteristics were collected retrospectively for breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant RT between December 2013 and November 2015. Prospective data was collected through clinician-reported surveys. Linear regression analyses were performed to detect the relationship between patient-reported ESAS scores and clinician-reported RD symptoms. RESULTS: A total of 857 patients were included in the analysis. Moderate to severe scores were commonly reported for fatigue (n = 412, 48%), wellbeing (n = 386, 45%) and anxiety (n = 266, 31%). Oral analgesic use was associated with ESAS fatigue, drowsiness, pain, nausea, lack of appetite, shortness of breath, and wellbeing (P < .05), while dressings were only associated with anxiety (P = .02). No RD symptoms were found to be significantly associated with any ESAS items. CONCLUSIONS: The ESAS accurately reflects symptoms of fatigue, anxiety, and wellbeing for breast cancer patients undergoing RT. Our study, however, found no association between ESAS scores and RD severity, which may reflect the shortcomings of the ESAS in assessing symptom burden. Further research is necessary to warrant the development of a new site-specific symptom screening tool for use in RT for breast cancer.

Predictive factors associated with radiation dermatitis in breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Radiation dermatitis (RD) is a side effect that frequently arises during radiotherapy (RT) in breast cancer patients. The present study investigates possible predictive factors of RD, as well as the use of skin treatments to manage symptoms. METHODS: Demographic and treatment characteristics were collected retrospectively, while skin symptoms and treatments were collected prospectively for patients who received adjuvant RT between December 2013 and November 2015. Patients were seen weekly by clinicians throughout treatment, during which a clinician-reported survey was completed on RD symptoms and skin treatments. Possible predictive factors were correlated with skin outcomes through a univariate ordinal logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1093 patients were included in this analysis. Predictive factors for erythema included dose fractionation (p<0.0001), tissue volume irradiated by tangential fields (p = 0.01), and administration of a boost (p = 0.005). High BMI (≥30 kg/m2) (p = 0.0004) and boost (p = 0.02) were predictive of edema. A dose of 50 Gy/25 (p<0.0001) and a high irradiated tissue volume (p = 0.0001) were predictive of desquamation. A dose of 50 Gy/25 (p = 0.0005) and high BMI (p = 0.02) were predictors of pain. Bolus use was the only factor associated with bleeding (p = 0.02). Patients who developed desquamation were likely to receive corticosteroids/antihistamines (p<0.0001), topical antibiotics/antifungals (p<0.001), and dressings (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study provide evidence of potential predictors of RD and methods of symptom management based on symptom severity. Prevention of RD is needed among high-risk groups, such as patients with a high BMI or receiving a standard fractionation, boost, or bolus.

Prospective Study of Breast Radiation Dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Despite clear benefits of radiotherapy (RT) for breast cancer, there are numerous side effects. Radiation dermatitis has a significant impact on quality of life and can result in treatment interruptions or cessation. The purpose of this study was to prospectively follow breast radiation dermatitis and determine trends including peak toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Upon initiation of RT treatment, to assess skin reaction, each patient was seen weekly by the healthcare team, or contacted via telephone to assess patient-reported symptoms. Weekly progression of radiation dermatitis was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.03. Patients were stratified for analysis of radiation dermatitis based on RT technique and dosage. RESULTS: A total of 148 patients with 2 or more skin assessments were analyzed. The majority of patients received 2-field tangential RT (64.2%) with a dose of 5000 cGy in 25 fractions. Overall, patients experienced the most Grade 2 CTCAE toxicity (61.9%) 2 weeks after completion of RT; Grade 3 toxicity also peaked at this time (8.3%). Regardless of stratification by RT technique or by dosage of RT, Grade 2 and 3 toxicities consistently peaked at 1 or 2 weeks after RT. CONCLUSIONS: Breast radiation dermatitis appears to peak approximately 2 weeks after RT. Treatment factors such as technique or dosing regimen do not appear to have a substantial effect on radiation dermatitis, but our study was limited by small sample size. This study provides additional evidence that radiation dermatitis should continue to be followed closely, especially in the 2 weeks following RT.

Comprehensive Clinicopathologic and Updated Immunohistochemical Characterization of Primary Ovarian Mucinous Carcinoma.

The distinction of primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma (PMOC) from other primaries or secondaries is essential for selecting therapeutic options and prognostication. We aimed to characterize the immunohistochemical profile of 36 PMOCs using an extended immunohistochemical panel, with clinicopathologic features and outcome. PAX8 was negative in 30 (83.3%), and SATB2 was negative in 32/35. HNF1B, AMACR, and napsin-A were detected in 33 (91.7%), 35 (97.2%), and 0 (0%), respectively. MMR proteins and ARID1A were retained in 100%; PTEN was lost in 4 (11.1%). P53 was aberrant in 10 (27.8%); none overexpressed p16. HER2 was positive in 6/35 (17.1%). Most PMOCs had a favorable outcome. However, recurrence is usually fatal. The typical tumor profile was CK7+, CK20+/-, CDX2+/-, PAX8-, ER-, PgR-, and SATB2-. HER2 positivity suggests a possible target for therapy in advanced disease.