Learning effects in speech-in-noise tasks: Effect of masker modulation and masking release.

Previous research has shown that learning effects are present for speech intelligibility in temporally modulated (TM) noise, but not in stationary noise. The present study aimed to gain more insight into the factors that might affect the time course (the number of trials required to reach stable performance) and size [the improvement in the speech reception threshold (SRT)] of the learning effect. Two hypotheses were addressed: (1) learning effects are present in both TM and spectrally modulated (SM) noise and (2) the time course and size of the learning effect depend on the amount of masking release caused by either TM or SM noise. Eighteen normal-hearing adults (23-62 years) participated in SRT measurements, in which they listened to sentences in six masker conditions, including stationary, TM, and SM noise conditions. The results showed learning effects in all TM and SM noise conditions, but not for the stationary noise condition. The learning effect was related to the size of masking release: a larger masking release was accompanied by an increased time course of the learning effect and a larger learning effect. The results also indicate that speech is processed differently in SM noise than in TM noise.

Informational masking with speech-on-speech intelligibility: Pupil response and time-course of learning.

Previous research has shown a learning effect on speech perception in nonstationary maskers. The present study addressed the time-course of this learning effect and the role of informational masking. To that end, speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured for speech in either a stationary noise masker, an interrupted noise masker, or a single-talker masker. The utterance of the single talker was either time-forward (intelligible) or time-reversed (unintelligible), and the sample of the utterance was either frozen (same utterance at each presentation) or random (different utterance at each presentation but from the same speaker). Simultaneously, the pupil dilation response was measured to assess differences in the listening effort between conditions and to track changes in the listening effort over time within each condition. The results showed a learning effect for all conditions but the stationary noise condition-that is, improvement in SRT over time while maintaining equal pupil responses. There were no significant differences in pupil responses between conditions despite large differences in the SRT. Time reversal of the frozen speech affected neither the SRT nor pupil responses.