Updates in the use of targeted therapies for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Many patients with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) are not surgical candidates, and the survival benefit of chemotherapy is less than 12 months. Several mutations and mutational clusters have recently been identified in CCA, some of which are pharmacologically targetable. The emergence of targeted therapies has significantly altered the treatment landscape of CCA and improved the prognosis for advanced or metastatic CCA. The purpose of this review is to describe past and current treatment strategies of CCA with a focus on FDA-approved targeted therapies. DATA SOURCES: A systematic evaluation of all FDA-approved targeted treatments for CCA through October 2022 was conducted. Information related to pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and safety was gathered from the package insert, and clinical trial data. DATA SUMMARY: As of the writing of this review, four targeted agents are FDA approved for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic CCA. These agents include the IDH1 inhibitor ivosidenib and the FGFR2 inhibitors pemigatinib, infigratinib, and futibatinib. Collectively, these agents have provided additional treatment options for select patients with previously treated locally advanced or unresectable CCA. These agents have also contributed to the development of other targeted therapies for the treatment of CCA and have opened the door for the exploration of novel treatment combinations such as chemotherapy and immunotherapy, which have recently become a front-line treatment option. CONCLUSIONS: Four targeted small molecule agents have emerged as effective therapies in the second-line setting for CCA, which has immensely changed the treatment landscape and directly led to further investigation of targeted agents and immunotherapy as treatment for CCA.

Utilization of cefepime therapeutic drug monitoring in febrile neutropenia patients with hematologic malignancies.

INTRODUCTION: Cefepime is a fourth-generation cephalosporin and is a workhorse for the empiric treatment of febrile neutropenia (FN). Beta-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has emerged as a dose optimization strategy in patient populations with altered kinetics. Prior literature has demonstrated that patients with FN exhibit augmented renal clearance which may lead to subtherapeutic drug concentrations with standard dosing regimens. The aim of this study was to evaluate pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment and clinical outcomes in patients with hematologic malignancies and FN who were treated empirically with cefepime. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center study of adults with hematologic malignancies and FN admitted to the inpatient unit. The primary outcome was PK/PD target attainment (defined as 100% free time greater than minimum inhibitory concentration (100% fT > MIC)). Secondary clinical outcomes were time to defervescence, time to ANC recovery, in-hospital mortality, and cefepime failure. RESULTS: There were 55 patients in our study. Forty-three (78%) patients achieved the primary outcome of PK/PD target attainment. The mean time to defervescence was similar between those that achieved PK/PD target attainment and those that did not (95% CI -0.75 to 1.25, p = 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that standard cefepime dosing in patients with hematologic malignancies and FN does not result in achievement of 100% fT > MIC in all patients. Patients in the group that did not achieve PK/PD target attainment were younger with increased creatinine clearance, indicating that cefepime TDM may be especially beneficial in these patients.

Profile of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir in the treatment of hepatitis C.

The treatment of chronic hepatitis C has been revolutionized with the introduction of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). However, some patients are not cured with first-line treatment. Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir is a fixed-dose combination of a polymerase inhibitor, an NS5A inhibitor, and a protease inhibitor with activity against strains of the hepatitis C virus that show resistance to other first-line antiviral regimens. Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir has been studied in four Phase III randomized trials: POLARIS-1, -2, -3, and -4, which enrolled both treatment naïve and experienced patients with and without compensated cirrhosis. In these trials, at least 95% of patients treated with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir achieved sustained virological response (SVR). This includes favorable treatment outcomes in patients who had previously failed a regimen containing sofosbuvir or an NS5A inhibitor. Patient-reported outcomes also improved during and after treatment with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir. Treatment with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir is well tolerated, with the most commonly reported adverse events being headache, fatigue, diarrhea, and nausea. The approval of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir allows a treatment option for patients who have failed treatment with certain DAA regimens.