Anti-EGFR-resistant clones decay exponentially after progression: implications for anti-EGFR re-challenge.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) has been shown to acquire RAS and EGFR ectodomain mutations as mechanisms of resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibition (anti-EGFR). After anti-EGFR withdrawal, RAS and EGFR mutant clones lack a growth advantage relative to other clones and decay; however, the kinetics of decay remain unclear. We sought to determine the kinetics of acquired RAS/EGFR mutations after discontinuation of anti-EGFR therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We present the post-progression circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) profiles of 135 patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic CRC treated with anti-EGFR who acquired RAS and/or EGFR mutations during therapy. Our validation cohort consisted of an external dataset of 73 patients with a ctDNA profile suggestive of prior anti-EGFR exposure and serial sampling. A separate retrospective cohort of 80 patients was used to evaluate overall response rate and progression free survival during re-challenge therapies. RESULTS: Our analysis showed that RAS and EGFR relative mutant allele frequency decays exponentially (r2=0.93 for RAS; r2=0.94 for EGFR) with a cumulative half-life of 4.4 months. We validated our findings using an external dataset of 73 patients with a ctDNA profile suggestive of prior anti-EGFR exposure and serial sampling, confirming exponential decay with an estimated half-life of 4.3 months. A separate retrospective cohort of 80 patients showed that patients had a higher overall response rate during re-challenge therapies after increasing time intervals, as predicted by our model. CONCLUSION: These results provide scientific support for anti-EGFR re-challenge and guide the optimal timing of re-challenge initiation.

Sequence of therapy and survival in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.

Background: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pnets) often present as advanced disease. The optimal sequence of therapy is unknown. Methods: Sequential patients with advanced pnets referred to BC Cancer between 2000 and 2013 who received 1 or more treatment modalities were reviewed, and treatment patterns, progression-free survival (pfs), and overall survival (os) were characterized. Systemic treatments included chemotherapy, small-molecule therapy, and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Results: In 66 cases of advanced pnets, median patient age was 61.2 years (25%-75% interquartile range: 50.8-66.2 years), and men constituted 47% of the group. First-line therapies were surgery (36%), chemotherapy (33%), and somatostatin analogues (32%). Compared with first-line systemic therapy, surgery in the first line was associated with increased pfs and os (20.6 months vs. 6.3 months and 100.3 months vs. 30.5 months respectively, p < 0.05). In 42 patients (64%) who received more than 1 line of therapy, no difference in os or pfs between second-line therapies was observed. Conclusions: Our results confirm the primary role of surgery for advanced pnets. New systemic treatments will further increase options.

Erratum: Current and emerging biomarkers in metastatic colorectal cancer.

[This corrects the article on p. S7 in vol. 26, PMID: 31819705.].

Current and emerging biomarkers in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Background: The incorporation of novel biomarkers into therapy selection for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mcrc) has significantly improved outcomes. Optimal treatment planning now takes into account diverse characteristics of patients and their tumours to create personalized therapeutic plans. Discussion: This review is split into two sections. In the first section, we review the prognostic and predictive significance of expanded RAS mutation testing, BRAF mutations, ERBB2 (her2) amplification, microsatellite instability (msi) and deficient mismatch repair (dmmr) protein, NTRK fusions, PIK3CA mutations, and met amplifications. The therapeutic implication of each of those biomarkers for personalizing therapies for each patient with mcrc is discussed. In the second section, we touch on testing methods and considerations of relevance to clinicians when they interpret companion diagnostics meant to guide therapy selection. The advantages and pitfalls of various methods are evaluated, and we also look at the potential of liquid biopsies and circulating tumour dna (ctdna) to change the landscape of therapeutic choice and biologic understanding of the disease. Summary: Routine testing for extended RAS, BRAF, dmmr or high msi, and NTRK fusions is necessary to determine the best sequencing of chemotherapy and biologic agents for patients with mcrc. Although next-generation sequencing and ctdna are increasingly being adopted, other techniques such as immunohistochemistry retain their relevance in detection of her2 amplification, NTRK fusions, and dmmr.

Report from the 20th annual Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference; Saskatoon, Saskatchewan; 28-29 September 2018.

The 20th annual Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference was held in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, 28-29 September 2018. This interactive multidisciplinary conference is attended by health care professionals from across Western Canada (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba) who are involved in the care of patients with gastrointestinal cancers. In addition, invited speakers from other provinces participate. Surgical, medical, and radiation oncologists, and allied health care professionals participated in presentations and discussion sessions for the purpose of developing the recommendations presented here. This consensus statement addresses current issues in the management of colorectal cancers.

Report from the 19th annual Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference; Winnipeg, Manitoba; 29-30 September 2017.

The 19th annual Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference (wcgccc) was held in Winnipeg, Manitoba, 29-30 September 2017. The wcgccc is an interactive multidisciplinary conference attended by health care professionals from across Western Canada (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba) who are involved in the care of patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Surgical, medical, and radiation oncologists; pathologists; radiologists; and allied health care professionals participated in presentation and discussion sessions for the purpose of developing the recommendations presented here. This consensus statement addresses current issues in the management of colorectal cancer.

Irradiation induces DNA damage and modulates epigenetic effectors in distant bystander tissue in vivo.

Irradiated cells induce chromosomal instability in unirradiated bystander cells in vitro. Although bystander effects are thought to be linked to radiation-induced secondary cancers, almost no studies have evaluated bystander effects in vivo. Furthermore, it has been proposed that epigenetic changes mediate bystander effects, but few studies have evaluated epigenetic factors in bystander tissues in vivo. Here, we describe studies in which mice were unilaterally exposed to X-irradiation and the levels of DNA damage, DNA methylation and protein expression were evaluated in irradiated and bystander cutaneous tissue. The data show that X-ray exposure to one side of the animal body induces DNA strand breaks and causes an increase in the levels of Rad51 in unexposed bystander tissue. In terms of epigenetic changes, unilateral radiation suppresses global methylation in directly irradiated tissue, but not in bystander tissue at given time-points studied. Intriguingly, however, we observed a significant reduction in the levels of the de novo DNA methyltransferases DNMT3a and 3b and a concurrent increase in the levels of the maintenance DNA methyltransferase DNMT1 in bystander tissues. Furthermore, the levels of two methyl-binding proteins known to be involved in transcriptional silencing, MeCP2 and MBD2, were also increased in bystander tissue. Together, these results show that irradiation induces DNA damage in bystander tissue more than a centimeter away from directly irradiated tissues, and suggests that epigenetic transcriptional regulation may be involved in the etiology of radiation-induced bystander effects.

The C-terminal region of human NFATc2 binds cJun to synergistically activate interleukin-2 transcription.

At eukaryotic promoters, multi-faceted protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions can result in synergistic transcriptional activation. NFAT and AP-1 proteins induce interleukin-2 (IL-2) transcription in stimulated T cells, but the contributions of individual members of these activator families to synergistically activating IL-2 transcription is not known. To investigate the combinatorial regulation of IL-2 transcription we tested the ability of different combinations of NFATc2, NFATc1, cJun, and cFos to synergistically activate transcription from the IL-2 promoter. We found that NFATc2 and cJun are exclusive in their ability to synergistically activate human IL-2 transcription. Protein-protein interaction assays revealed that in the absence of DNA, NFATc2, but not NFATc1, bound directly to cJun/cJun dimers, but not to cFos/cJun heterodimers. A region of NFATc2 C-terminal of the DNA binding domain was necessary and sufficient for interaction with cJun in the absence of DNA, and this same region of NFATc2 was required for the synergistic activation of IL-2 transcription in T cells. Moreover, expression of this C-terminal region of NFATc2 specifically repressed the synergistic activation of IL-2 transcription. These studies show that a previously unidentified interaction between human NFATc2 and cJun is necessary for synergistic activation of IL-2 transcription in T cells.