RESUMO
Avatrombopag is the newest thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) approved to treat immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Real-world evidence regarding effectiveness/safety is limited. The Spanish ITP Group (GEPTI) performed a retrospective study with patients starting avatrombopag for the first time. A total of 268 ITP patients were recruited. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up time was 47.5 (30.4-58.9) weeks. Among the 193 patients with baseline platelet counts <50 × 109/L, 174 (90.1%) of them achieved response (PC ≥50 × 109/L), and 113 (87.6%) of the 129 who persisted on avatrombopag at last visit had platelet levels above such threshold. Results were similar when only those patients switching to avatrombopag due to previous treatment failure were considered (n = 104). Patients reached response in 13 (7-21) days. Among patients with baseline levels ≥50 × 109/L, 73/75 (97.3%) reported response, which was maintained by 53 (94.6%) of the 56 who continued on avatrombopag at the end of the study. Loss-of-response was always <10%. ITP duration did not influence response. Approximately 79% (34/43) of heavily pretreated (≥4 lines) patients with baseline platelet counts <50 × 109/L switching after previous failure achieved PC ≥50 × 109/L. Previous use of eltrombopag and/or romiplostim did not influence response, regardless of whether previous TPO-RA(s) succeeded or failed. Avatrombopag allowed dose-reduction/suspension of corticosteroids in 40/50 (80.0%) patients with baseline platelet counts <50 × 109/L. Overall, 40/268 (14.9%) thrombocytosis and 12/268 (4.5%) thromboembolic events were reported. Our real-world cohort supports the use of avatrombopag to manage ITP, regardless of disease severity and treatment history.
RESUMO
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has favored the expansion of telemedicine. Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (Ph-MPN) might be good candidates for virtual follow-up. In this study, we aimed to analyze the follow-up of patients with Ph-MPN in Spain during COVID-19, its effectiveness, and acceptance among patients. We present a multicenter retrospective study from 30 centers. Five hundred forty-one patients were included with a median age of 67 years (yr). With a median follow-up of 19 months, 4410 appointments were recorded. The median of visits per patient was 7 and median periodicity was 2.7 months; significantly more visits and a higher frequency of them were registered in myelofibrosis (MF) patients. 60.1% of visits were in-person, 39.5% were by telephone, and 0.3% were videocall visits, with a predominance of telephone visits for essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV) patients over MF, as well as for younger patients (< 50 yr). The proportion of phone visits significantly decreased after the first semester of the pandemic. Pharmacological modifications were performed only in 25.7% of the visits, and, considering overall management, ET patients needed fewer global treatment changes. Telephone contact effectiveness reached 90% and only 5.4% required a complementary in-person appointment. Although 56.2% of the cohort preferred in-person visits, 90.5% of our patients claimed to be satisfied with follow-up during the pandemic, with an 83% of positive comments. In view of our results, telemedicine has proven effective and efficient, and might continue to play a complementary role in Ph-MPN patients' follow-up.