RESUMO
A variation of the longitudinal relaxation time T 1 in brain regions that differ in their main fiber direction has been occasionally reported, however, with inconsistent results. Goal of the present study was to clarify such inconsistencies, and the origin of potential T 1 orientation dependence, by applying direct sample rotation and comparing the results from different approaches to measure T 1 . A section of fixed porcine spinal cord white matter was investigated at 3 T with variation of the fiber-to-field angle θ FB . The experiments included one-dimensional inversion-recovery, MP2RAGE, and variable flip-angle T 1 measurements at 22 °C and 36 °C as well as magnetization-transfer (MT) and diffusion-weighted acquisitions. Depending on the technique, different degrees of T 1 anisotropy (between 2 and 10%) were observed as well as different dependencies on θ FB (monotonic variation or T 1 maximum at 30-40°). More pronounced anisotropy was obtained with techniques that are more sensitive to MT effects. Furthermore, strong correlations of θ FB -dependent MT saturation and T 1 were found. A comprehensive analysis based on the binary spin-bath model for MT revealed an interplay of several orientation-dependent parameters, including the transverse relaxation times of the macromolecular and the water pool as well as the longitudinal relaxation time of the macromolecular pool.
Assuntos
Medula Espinal , Água , Substância Branca , Animais , Substância Branca/diagnóstico por imagem , Substância Branca/fisiologia , Suínos , Anisotropia , Medula Espinal/fisiologia , Prótons , RotaçãoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Field-to-susceptibility inversion in quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is ill-posed and needs numerical stabilization through either regularization or oversampling by acquiring data at three or more object orientations. Calculation Of Susceptibility through Multiple Orientations Sampling (COSMOS) is an established oversampling approach and regarded as QSM gold standard. It achieves a well-conditioned inverse problem, requiring rotations by 0°, 60° and 120° in the yz-plane. However, this is impractical in vivo, where head rotations are typically restricted to a range of ±25°. Non-ideal sampling degrades the conditioning with residual streaking artifacts whose mitigation needs further regularization. Moreover, susceptibility anisotropy in white matter is not considered in the COSMOS model, which may introduce additional bias. The current work presents a thorough investigation of these effects in primate brain. METHODS: Gradient-recalled echo (GRE) data of an entire fixed chimpanzee brain were acquired at 7 T (350 µm resolution, 10 orientations) including ideal COSMOS sampling and realistic rotations in vivo. Comparisons of the results included ideal COSMOS, in-vivo feasible acquisitions with 3-8 orientations and single-orientation iLSQR QSM. RESULTS: In-vivo feasible and optimal COSMOS yielded high-quality susceptibility maps with increased SNR resulting from averaging multiple acquisitions. COSMOS reconstructions from non-ideal rotations about a single axis required additional L2-regularization to mitigate residual streaking artifacts. CONCLUSION: In view of unconsidered anisotropy effects, added complexity of the reconstruction, and the general challenge of multi-orientation acquisitions, advantages of sub-optimal COSMOS schemes over regularized single-orientation QSM appear limited in in-vivo settings.