Establishment of standards for the referral of large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: an international expert consensus using a modified Delphi process.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Resection of colorectal polyps has been shown to decrease the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer. Large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps are often referred to expert centers for endoscopic resection, which requires relevant information to be conveyed to the therapeutic endoscopist to allow for triage and planning of resection technique. The primary objective of this study was to establish minimum expected standards for the referral of large non-pedunculated colonic polyps for potential endoscopic resection. METHODS: A Delphi method was used to establish consensus on minimum expected standards for the referral of large colorectal polyps among a panel of international endoscopy experts. The expert panel was recruited through purposive sampling, and 3 rounds of surveys were conducted to achieve consensus. Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed for each round. RESULTS: A total of 24 international experts from diverse continents participated in the Delphi study, resulting in consensus on 19 statements related to the referral of large colorectal polyps. The identified factors, including patient demographic characteristics, relevant medications, lesion factors, photodocumentation, and the presence of a tattoo, were deemed important for conveying the necessary information to therapeutic endoscopists. The mean scores for the statements, which were scored on a scale of 1 to 10, ranged from 7.04 to 9.29, with high percentages of experts considering most statements as a very high priority. Subgroup analysis according to continent revealed some variations in consensus rates among experts from different regions. CONCLUSIONS: The identified consensus statements can aid in improving the triage and planning of resection techniques for large colorectal polyps, ultimately contributing to the reduction of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy for benign gastric outlet obstruction (GOO): a retrospective analysis of patients and outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy (EUS-GJ) has been well utilized in treating malignant gastric outlet obstructions (GOO) given its efficacy and lower risk profile compared to surgery. However, its efficacy and potential for use in patients with benign GOO who are poor surgical candidates is not well documented. The aim of this study was to examine the role of EUS-GJ in treatment of benign GOO in select patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a single-center, open-label, retrospective descriptive study that included all consecutive patients undergoing EUS-GJ to treat benign causes of GOO. Direct antegrade and direct retrograde methods were utilized. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients were included, 38.9% female with an average age of 63.3 years. Extrinsic GOO was present in (10 of 18) 55.5% of patients and intrinsic etiology was present in (8 of 18) 45.5% of patients. Technical success was achieved in 100% (18 of 18) patients and clinical success was achieved in 94% (17 of 18) patients. In total, 13 patients had follow-up endoscopy, 2 patients were treated relatively recently in time, 1 patient was lost to follow-up, and 2 patients died of other chronic illnesses. Stents remained in place for a median of 286 days (range 88-1444 days). In patients whose stents were removed, 75% (3 of 4) had extrinsic etiologies of GOO. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports a favorable long-term patency with excellent technical and clinical success of EUS-GJ in patients with benign GOO. Despite the limitations of sample size and retrospective nature, it adds to the extremely limited literature of EUS-GJ in management of patients with benign GOO.

Endosonographic and ERCP findings in COVID-19 critical illness cholangiopathy.

A 56-year-old female developed deep jaundice months after struggling with critical illness due to COVID-19, requiring hemodialysis and tracheostomy. Lab tests included alkaline phosphatase 1,574 U/l, total bilirubin 11 mg/dl, alanine transaminase (ALT) 88 U/l and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 101 U/l. Baseline liver tests were normal before illness. Anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA), IgG4 level and viral hepatitis were negaCritical illness cholangiopathy resulted in secondary sclerosing cholangitis. In this case, it is unclear whether the patient suffered these changes as a direct cause of COVID-19 or as a result of critical illness cholangiopathy. The overall prognosis is guarded given its progressive nature and likely need for liver transplantation.tive.

Tube-in-tube endoscopic vacuum therapy for the closure of upper gastrointestinal fistulas, leaks, and perforations.

BACKGROUND : Although endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) has been successfully used to treat postoperative upper gastrointestinal (UGI) wall defects, its use demands special materials and several endoscopic treatment sessions. Herein, we propose a technical modification of EVT using a double tube (tube-in-tube drain) without polyurethane sponges for the drainage element. The tube-in-tube drainage device enables irrigation and application of suction. A flowchart for standardizing the management of postoperative UGI wall defects with this device is presented. METHODS : An EVT modification was made to achieve frequent fistula cleansing, with 3 % hydrogen peroxide rinsing, and the application of negative pressure. A tube-in-tube drain without polyurethane sponges can be inserted like a nasogastric tube or passed through a previously positioned surgical drain. This was a retrospective two-center observational study, with data collected from 30 consecutive patients. Technical success, clinical success, adverse events, time under therapy, interval time from procedure to fistula diagnosis and treatment start, size of transmural defect, volume of cavity, number of endoscopic treatment sessions, and mortality were reviewed. RESULTS : 30 patients with UGI wall defects were treated. The technical and clinical success rates were 100 % and 86.7 %, respectively. Three patients (10 %) had adverse events and three patients (10 %) died. The median time under therapy was of 19 days (range 1-70) and the median number of endoscopic sessions was 3 (range 1-9). CONCLUSIONS : This standardized approach and EVT modification using a tube-in-tube drain, with frequent fistula cleansing, were successful and safe in a wide variety of UGI wall defects.

COVID-19, coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2 and the small bowel.

Although SARS-CoV-2 may primarily enter the cells of the lungs, the small bowel may also be an important entry or interaction site, as the enterocytes are rich in angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE)-2 receptors. The initial gastrointestinal symptoms that appear early during the course of Covid-19 support this hypothesis. Furthermore, SARS-CoV virions are preferentially released apically and not at the basement of the airway cells. Thus, in the setting of a productive infection of conducting airway epithelia, the apically released SARS-CoV may be removed by mucociliary clearance and gain access to the GI tract via a luminal exposure. In addition, post-mortem studies of mice infected by SARS-CoV have demonstrated diffuse damage to the GI tract, with the small bowel showing signs of enterocyte desquamation, edema, small vessel dilation and lymphocyte infiltration, as well as mesenteric nodes with severe hemorrhage and necrosis. Finally, the small bowel is rich in furin, a serine protease which can separate the S-spike of the coronavirus into two "pinchers" (S1 and 2). The separation of the S-spike into S1 and S2 is essential for the attachment of the virion to both the ACE receptor and the cell membrane. In this special review, we describe the interaction of SARS-CoV-2 with the cell and enterocyte and its potential clinical implications.

Systemic inflammatory response and thrombosis due to alterations in the gut microbiota in COVID-19.

We thank Dr. Cienfuegos and colleagues for their comments on our recent publication "COVID-19, Coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2 and the small bowel". Cienfuegos et al. have treated several COVID-19 patients with thromboembolic complications, including bowel ischemia. The authors correctly highlight the importance of this complication in COVID-19 patients, which has also been documented in autopsy studies.

Feasibility Trial of the Newly Introduced Optical Enhancement Technology in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

BACKGROUND: Optical Enhancement technology (OE) combines bandwidth-limited light and image enhancement processing technology to enhance subtle mucosal and vascular details. This is the first study assessing the new technology for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with GERD and controls were prospectively included. The distal esophagus was examined in all quadrants with high definition white-light endoscopy (HD-WLE) followed by OE and biopsies for histopathological analysis. Features observed only by OE were compared between controls and patients with GERD. RESULTS: A total of 100 areas were evaluated. About 56% of patients had a diagnosis of GERD. The mean age of patients was 53 years (range 27-89 years), 60% were female. Compared to controls, patients with diagnosis of GERD showed significantly more often tortuosity (p = 0.042), dilation (p = 0.0003), and increased number (p = 0.001) of intrapapillary capillary loops (IPCLs). In addition, increased vascularity and mucosal breaks were significantly more often found in patients with GERD as compared to controls (p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, increased number and dilation of IPCL were the best predictors of GERD. CONCLUSIONS: The newly introduced OE technology significantly improves the diagnosis of GERD compared to HD-WLE. The results should be confirmed in a multicenter trial.