STereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation (STAR): the Standardized Treatment and Outcome Platform for Stereotactic Therapy Of Re-entrant tachycardia by a Multidisciplinary consortium (STOPSTORM.eu) and review of current patterns of STAR practice in Europe.

The EU Horizon 2020 Framework-funded Standardized Treatment and Outcome Platform for Stereotactic Therapy Of Re-entrant tachycardia by a Multidisciplinary (STOPSTORM) consortium has been established as a large research network for investigating STereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation (STAR) for ventricular tachycardia (VT). The aim is to provide a pooled treatment database to evaluate patterns of practice and outcomes of STAR and finally to harmonize STAR within Europe. The consortium comprises 31 clinical and research institutions. The project is divided into nine work packages (WPs): (i) observational cohort; (ii) standardization and harmonization of target delineation; (iii) harmonized prospective cohort; (iv) quality assurance (QA); (v) analysis and evaluation; (vi, ix) ethics and regulations; and (vii, viii) project coordination and dissemination. To provide a review of current clinical STAR practice in Europe, a comprehensive questionnaire was performed at project start. The STOPSTORM Institutions' experience in VT catheter ablation (83% ≥ 20 ann.) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (59% > 200 ann.) was adequate, and 84 STAR treatments were performed until project launch, while 8/22 centres already recruited VT patients in national clinical trials. The majority currently base their target definition on mapping during VT (96%) and/or pace mapping (75%), reduced voltage areas (63%), or late ventricular potentials (75%) during sinus rhythm. The majority currently apply a single-fraction dose of 25 Gy while planning techniques and dose prescription methods vary greatly. The current clinical STAR practice in the STOPSTORM consortium highlights potential areas of optimization and harmonization for substrate mapping, target delineation, motion management, dosimetry, and QA, which will be addressed in the various WPs.

Bone versus soft-tissue setup in proton therapy for patients with oesophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of patient positioning based on either bone or soft-tissue matching for PT in oesophageal cancer and its impact on plan adaptation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two retrospective patient cohorts treated with radiotherapy were included in the study. Cohort A consisted of 26 consecutive patients with a planning 4DCT scan (CT1) and a surveillance 4DCT scan (CT2) at fraction ten. Cohort B consisted of 17 patients selected based on large anatomical changes identified during treatment resulting in a rescan (CT2). Mean dose to the iCTV (sum of the CTVs in all respiratory phases) was 50.4 Gy (RBE) in 28 fractions or 41.4 Gy (RBE) in 23 fractions. A nominal pencil beam scanning plan was created using two posterior beams and robust optimization (5 mm setup, 3.5% range). For each patient, two rigid registrations were made between average (avg) CT1 and CT2: a match on the vertebral column (bone match) and a match on the iCTV (soft-tissue match). Robustness towards setup (5 mm) and range (3.5%) errors was evaluated at CT2. Robustness towards respiration was evaluated by recalculation of the plan on all phases of the CT2 scan. Dose coverage <96% would trigger adaptation. The statistical significance (p-value <0.05) between dose coverage for the two registration methods was assessed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: All plans fulfilled V95%iCTV>99% for the nominal plan and V95%iCTV>97% for all respiratory phases and robustness scenarios at CT1. In two (8%) and three (18%) patients, V95%iCTV<96% on CT2 for Cohort A and B, respectively when bone match was used. For soft-tissue match, V95%iCTV >96% for all patients. V95%iCTV was significantly higher (p-value = 0.0001) for soft-tissue match than bone match. CONCLUSION: Anatomical changes during the treatment course led to target dose deterioration and a need for plan adaptation when using a bone match.

Personal innovative approach in radiation therapy of lung cancer- functional lung avoidance SPECT-guided (ASPECT) radiation therapy: a study protocol for phase II randomised double-blind clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Radiation therapy (RT) plays a key role in curative-intent treatment for locally advanced lung cancer. Radiation induced pulmonary toxicity can be significant for some patients and becomes a limiting factor for radiation dose, suitability for treatment, as well as post treatment quality of life and suitability for the newly introduced adjuvant immunotherapy. Modern RT techniques aim to minimise the radiation dose to the lungs, without accounting for regional distribution of lung function. Many lung cancer patients have significant regional differences in pulmonary function due to smoking and chronic lung co-morbidity. Even though reduction of dose to functional lung has shown to be feasible, the method of preferential functional lung avoidance has not been investigated in a randomised clinical trial. METHODS: In this study, single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT/CT) imaging technique is used for functional lung definition, in conjunction with advanced radiation dose delivery method in randomised, double-blind trial. The study aims to assess the impact of functional lung avoidance technique on pulmonary toxicity and quality of life in patients receiving chemo-RT for lung cancer. Eligibility criteria are biopsy verified lung cancer, scheduled to receive (chemo)-RT with curative intent. Every patient will undergo a pre-treatment perfusion SPECT/CT to identify functional lung. At radiation dose planning, two plans will be produced for all patients on trial. Standard reference plan, without the use of SPECT imaging data, and functional avoidance plan, will be optimised to reduce the dose to functional lung within the predefined constraints. Both plans will be clinically approved. Patients will then be randomised in a 2:1 ratio to be treated according to either the functional avoidance or the standard plan. This study aims to accrue a total of 200 patients within 3 years. The primary endpoint is symptomatic radiation-induced lung toxicity, measured serially 1-12 months after RT. Secondary endpoints include: a quality of life and patient reported lung symptoms assessment, overall survival, progression-free survival, and loco-regional disease control. DISCUSSION: ASPECT trial will investigate functional avoidance method of radiation delivery in clinical practice, and will establish toxicity outcomes for patients with lung cancer undergoing curative chemo-RT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT04676828 . Registered 1 December 2020.

Early radiologic and metabolic tumour response assessment during combined chemo-radiotherapy for locally advanced NSCLC.

Background: The role of early treatment response for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) treated with concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (cCRT) is unclear. The study aims to investigate the predictive value of response to induction chemotherapy (iCX) and the correlation with pattern of failure (PoF). Materials and methods: Patients with LA-NSCLC treated with cCRT were included for analyses (n = 276). Target delineations were registered from radiotherapy planning PET/CT to diagnostic PET/CT, in between which patients received iCX. Volume, sphericity, and SUVpeak were extracted from each scan. First site of failure was categorised as loco-regional (LR), distant (DM), or simultaneous LR+M (LR+M). Fine and Gray models for PoF were performed: a baseline model (including performance status (PS), stage, and histology), an image model for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and an image model for non-SCC. Parameters included PS, volume (VOL) of tumour, VOL of lymph nodes, ΔVOL, sphericity, SUVpeak, ΔSUVpeak, and oligometastatic disease. Results: Median follow-up was 7.6 years. SCC had higher sub-distribution hazard ratio (sHR) for LRF (sHR = 2.771 [1.577:4.87], p < 0.01) and decreased sHR for DM (sHR = 0.247 [0.125:0.485], p  <  0.01). For both image models, high diagnostic SUVpeak increased risk of LRF (sHR = 1.059 [1.05:1.106], p < 0.01 for SCC, sHR = 1.12 [1.03:1.21], p < 0.01 for non-SCC). Patients with SCC and less decrease in VOL had higher sHR for DM (sHR = 1.025[1.001:1.048] pr. % increase, p = 0.038). Conclusion: Poor response in disease volume was correlated with higher sHR of DM for SCC, no other clear correlation of response and PoF was observed. Histology significantly correlated with PoF with SCC prone to LRF and non-SCC prone to DM as first site of failure. High SUVpeak at diagnosis increased the risk of LRF for both histologies.

Heart and Lung Dose as Predictors of Overall Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Lung Cancer. A National Multicenter Study.

Introduction: It is an ongoing debate how much lung and heart irradiation impact overall survival (OS) after definitive radiotherapy for lung cancer. This study uses a large national cohort of patients with locally advanced NSCLC to investigate the association between OS and irradiation of lung and heart. Methods: Treatment plans were acquired from six Danish radiotherapy centers, and patient characteristics were obtained from national registries. A hybrid segmentation tool automatically delineated the heart and substructures. Dose-volume histograms for all structures were extracted and analyzed using principal component analyses (PCAs). Parameter selection for a multivariable Cox model for OS prediction was performed using cross-validation based on bootstrapping. Results: The population consisted of 644 patients with a median survival of 26 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 24-29). The cross-validation selected two PCA variables to be included in the multivariable model. PCA1 represented irradiation of the heart and affected OS negatively (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% CI: 1.04-1.26). PCA2 characterized the left-right balance (right atrium and left ventricle) irradiation, showing better survival for tumors near the right side (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI: 0.84-1.00). Besides the two PCA variables, the multivariable model included age, sex, body-mass index, performance status, tumor dose, and tumor volume. Conclusions: Besides the classic noncardiac risk factors, lung and heart doses had a negative impact on survival, while it is suggested that the left side of the heart is a more radiation dose-sensitive region. The data indicate that overall heart irradiation should be reduced to improve the OS if possible.

An open source auto-segmentation algorithm for delineating heart and substructures - Development and validation within a multicenter lung cancer cohort.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Irradiation of the heart in thoracic cancers raises toxicity concerns. For accurate dose estimation, automated heart and substructure segmentation is potentially useful. In this study, a hybrid automatic segmentation is developed. The accuracy of delineation and dose predictions were evaluated, testing the method's potential within heart toxicity studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The hybrid segmentation method delineated the heart, four chambers, three large vessels, and the coronary arteries. The method consisted of a nnU-net heart segmentation and partly atlas- and model-based segmentation of the substructures. The nnU-net training and atlas segmentation was based on lung cancer patients and was validated against a national consensus dataset of 12 patients with breast cancer. The accuracy of dose predictions between manual and auto-segmented heart and substructures was evaluated by transferring the dose distribution of 240 previously treated lung cancer patients to the consensus data set. RESULTS: The hybrid auto-segmentation method performed well with a heart dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.95, with no statistically significant difference between the automatic and manual delineations. The DSC for the chambers varied from 0.78-0.86 for the automatic segmentation and was comparable with the inter-observer variability. Most importantly, the automatic segmentation was as precise as the clinical experts in predicting the dose distribution to the heart and all substructures. CONCLUSION: The hybrid segmentation method performed well in delineating the heart and substructures. The prediction of dose by the automatic segmentation was aligned with the manual delineations, enabling measurement of heart and substructure dose in large cohorts. The delineation algorithm will be available for download.

Expanded HILUS Trial: A Pooled Analysis of Risk Factors for Toxicity From Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy of Central and Ultracentral Lung Tumors.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiation therapy for tumors near the central airways implies high-grade toxic effects, as concluded from the HILUS trial. However, the small sample size and relatively few events limited the statistical power of the study. We therefore pooled data from the prospective HILUS trial with retrospective data from patients in the Nordic countries treated outside the prospective study to evaluate toxicity and risk factors for high-grade toxic effects. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All patients were treated with 56 Gy in 8 fractions. Tumors within 2 cm of the trachea, the mainstem bronchi, the intermediate bronchus, or the lobar bronchi were included. The primary endpoint was toxicity, and the secondary endpoints were local control and overall survival. Clinical and dosimetric risk factors were analyzed for treatment-related fatal toxicity in univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: Of 230 patients evaluated, grade 5 toxicity developed in 30 patients (13%), of whom 20 patients had fatal bronchopulmonary bleeding. The multivariable analysis revealed tumor compression of the tracheobronchial tree and maximum dose to the mainstem or intermediate bronchus as significant risk factors for grade 5 bleeding and grade 5 toxicity. The 3-year local control and overall survival rates were 84% (95% CI, 80%-90%) and 40% (95% CI, 34%-47%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor compression of the tracheobronchial tree and high maximum dose to the mainstem or intermediate bronchus increase the risk of fatal toxicity after stereotactic body radiation therapy in 8 fractions for central lung tumors. Similar dose constraints should be applied to the intermediate bronchus as to the mainstem bronchi.

Survival benefits for non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with adaptive radiotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Tumor match and adaptive radiotherapy based on on-treatment imaging increases the precision of RT. This allows a reduction of treatment volume and, consequently, of the dose to organs at risk. We investigate the clinical benefits of tumor match and adaptive radiotherapy for a cohort of non-small cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC). METHODS: In 2013, tumor match and adaptive radiotherapy based on daily cone-beam CT scans was introduced to ensure adaption of the radiotherapy treatment plan for all patients with significant anatomical changes during radiotherapy. Before 2013, the daily cone-beam CT scans were matched on the vertebra and anatomical changes were not evaluated systematically. To estimate the effect of tumor match and adaptive radiotherapy, 439 consecutive NSCLC patients treated with definitive chemo-radiotherapy (50-66 Gy/25-33 fractions, 2010-2018) were investigated retrospectively. They were split in two groups, pre-ART (before tumor match and adaptive radiotherapy, 184 patients), and ART (after tumor match and adaptive radiotherapy, 255 patients) and compared with respect to clinical, treatment-specific and dosimetric variables (χ2 tests, Mann Whitney U tests), progression, survival and radiation pneumonits (CTCAEv3). Progression-free and overall survival as well as radiation pneumonitis were compared with log-rank tests. Hazard ratios were estimated from Cox proportional hazard regression. RESULTS: No significant differences in stage (p = 0.36), histology (p = 0.35), PS (p = 0.12) and GTV volumes (p = 0.24) were observed. Concomitant chemotherapy was administered more frequently in the ART group (78%) compared to preART (64%), p < 0.001. Median[range] PTV volumes decreased from 456 [71;1262] cm3 (preART) to 270 [31;1166] cm3 (ART), p < 0.001, thereby significantly reducing mean doses to lungs (median, preART 16.4 [1.9;24.7] Gy, ART 12.1 [1.7;19.4] Gy, p < 0.001) and heart (median, preART 8.0 [0.1;32.1] Gy, ART 4.4 [0.1;33.9] Gy, p < 0.001). The incidence of RP at nine months decreased significantly with ART (50% to 20% for symptomatic RP (≥G2), 21% to 7% for severe RP (≥G3), 6% to 0.4% for lethal RP (G5), all p < 0.001). The two-year progression free survival increased from 22% (preART) to 30% (ART), while the overall survival increased from 43% (preART) to 56% (ART). The median overall survival time increased from 20 (preART) to 28 months (ART). CONCLUSION: Tumor match and adaptive radiotherapy significantly decreased radiation pneumonitis, while maintaining loco-regional control. Further, we observed a significantly improved progression-free and overall survival.

Treatment planning comparison in the PROTECT-trial randomising proton versus photon beam therapy in oesophageal cancer: Results from eight European centres.

PURPOSE: To compare dose distributions and robustness in treatment plans from eight European centres in preparation for the European randomized phase-III PROTECT-trial investigating the effect of proton therapy (PT) versus photon therapy (XT) for oesophageal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All centres optimized one PT and one XT nominal plan using delineated 4DCT scans for four patients receiving 50.4 Gy (RBE) in 28 fractions. Target volume receiving 95% of prescribed dose (V95%iCTVtotal) should be >99%. Robustness towards setup, range, and respiration was evaluated. The plans were recalculated on a surveillance 4DCT (sCT) acquired at fraction ten and robustness evaluation was performed to evaluate the effect of respiration and inter-fractional anatomical changes. RESULTS: All PT and XT plans complied with V95%iCTVtotal >99% for the nominal plan and V95%iCTVtotal >97% for all respiratory and robustness scenarios. Lung and heart dose varied considerably between centres for both modalities. The difference in mean lung dose and mean heart dose between each pair of XT and PT plans was in median [range] 4.8 Gy [1.1;7.6] and 8.4 Gy [1.9;24.5], respectively. Patients B and C showed large inter-fractional anatomical changes on sCT. For patient B, the minimum V95%iCTVtotal in the worst-case robustness scenario was 45% and 94% for XT and PT, respectively. For patient C, the minimum V95%iCTVtotal was 57% and 72% for XT and PT, respectively. Patient A and D showed minor inter-fractional changes and the minimum V95%iCTVtotal was >85%. CONCLUSION: Large variability in dose to the lungs and heart was observed for both modalities. Inter-fractional anatomical changes led to larger target dose deterioration for XT than PT plans.

A planning study of radiotherapy dose escalation of PET-active tumour volumes in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have poor prognosis partly because of high local failure rates. Escalating the dose to the tumour may decrease the local failure rates and thereby, improve overall survival, but the risk of complications will limit the possibility to dose-escalate a broad range of patients. Escalating only PET-active areas of the tumour may increase the potential for reaching high doses for a variety of tumour sizes and locations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten patients were randomly chosen for a dose escalation planning study. A planning target volume (PTV) was defined on the mid-ventilation scan of a four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) scan and a boost planning target volume (PTV-boost) was defined based on a positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET-CT) scan. Treatment plans were created aiming to reach the highest achievable of 74 Gy, 78 Gy or 82 Gy in 2 Gy per fraction prescribed to the PTV-boost without compromising normal tissue constraints and with the PTV prescribed in all cases a biological equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions of 66 Gy. RESULTS: Nine of ten patients could be escalated to the highest dose level (82 Gy), while one patient was limited by the oesophagus dose constraint and could only reach 74 Gy. Four patients could be dose-escalated above 82 Gy without compromising normal tissue constraints. CONCLUSION: Dose-escalating only the PET-active areas of lung tumours to doses of 82 Gy while respecting normal tissue constraints is feasible, also in a series of unselected patients including cases with relatively large tumours.

Strategies for Motion Robust Proton Therapy With Pencil Beam Scanning for Esophageal Cancer.

PURPOSE: Proton therapy of esophageal cancer is superior to photon radiation therapy in terms of normal tissue sparing. However, respiratory motion and anatomical changes may compromise target dose coverage owing to density changes, geometric misses, and interplay effects. Here we investigate the combined effect on clinical target volume (CTV) coverage and compare proton therapy with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study includes 26 patients with esophageal cancer previously treated with IMRT planned on 4-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT). For each patient, 7 proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) plans were created with different field configurations and optimization strategies. The effect of respiration was investigated by calculating the phase doses, 4D dose, and 4D dynamic dose (including interplay effects). The effect of anatomical changes was investigated by recalculating all plans on all phases of a 4D-CT surveillance scan. RESULTS: The most robust PBS plans were achieved using 2 posterior beams requiring coverage of planning target volume (PTV) and simultaneously using robust optimization (RO) of CTV (2PAPTVRO), resulting in only 1 patient showing V95%CTV <97% in 1 or more phases of the planning CT. For the least robust PBS plans obtained using lateral + posterior beams and CTV-RO, but not requiring PTV coverage (2LPRO), 10 patients showed underdosage. For IMRT, 2 patients showed underdosage. Interplay effects reduced V95%CTV significantly when delivering only 1 fraction, but the effects generally averaged out after 10 fractions. The effect of interplay was significantly larger for RO-only plans compared with plans optimized with RO combined with PTV coverage. Combining the effect of anatomical changes and respiration on the 4D-CT surveillance scan resulted in V95%CTV <97% for 3 2PAPTVRO, 16 2LPRO, and 8 IMRT patients. CONCLUSIONS: PBS using posterior beam angles was more robust to anatomical changes and respiration than IMRT. The effect of respiration was enhanced when anatomical changes were present. Single fraction interplay effects deteriorated the dose distribution but were averaged out after 10 fractions.

Variation in current prescription practice of stereotactic body radiotherapy for peripherally located early stage non-small cell lung cancer: Recommendations for prescribing and recording according to the ACROP guideline and ICRU report 91.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In 2017 the ACROP guideline on SBRT for peripherally located early stage NSCLC was published. Later that year ICRU-91 about prescribing, recording and reporting was published. The purpose of this study is to quantify the current variation in prescription practice in the institutions that contributed to the ACROP guideline and to establish the link between the ACROP and ICRU-91 recommendations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From each of the eight participating centres, 15 SBRT plans for stage I NSCLC were analyzed. Plans were generated following the institutional protocol, centres prescribed 3 × 13.5 Gy, 3 × 15 Gy, 3 × 17 Gy or 3 × 18 Gy. Dose parameters of the target volumes were reported as recommended by ICRU-91 and also converted to BED10Gy. RESULTS: The intra-institutional variance in D98%, Dmean and D2% of the PTV and GTV/ITV is substantially smaller than the inter-institutional spread, indicating well protocollised planning procedures are followed. The median values per centre ranged from 56.1 Gy to 73.1 Gy (D2%), 50.4 Gy to 63.3 Gy (Dmean) and 40.5 Gy to 53.6 Gy (D98%) for the PTV and from 57.1 Gy to 73.6 Gy (D2%), 53.7 Gy to 68.7 Gy (Dmean) and 48.5 Gy to 62.3 Gy (D98%) for the GTV/ITV. Comparing the variance in PTV D98% with the variance in GTV Dmean per centre, using an F-test, shows that four centres have a larger variance in GTV Dmean, while one centre has a larger variance in PTV D98% (p values <0.01). This shows some centres focus on achieving a constant PTV coverage while others aim at a constant GTV coverage. CONCLUSION: More detailed recommendations for dose planning and reporting of lung SBRT in line with ICRU-91 were formulated, including a minimum PTV D98% of 100 Gy BED10Gy and minimum GTV/ITV mean dose of 150 Gy BED10Gy and a D2% in the range of 60-70 Gy.

Validation of a robust strategy for proton spot scanning for oesophageal cancer in the presence of anatomical changes.

SFUD strategies with one or two posterior proton beams and three target coverage strategies are compared with IMRT and tested for robustness towards anatomical changes by recalculation on surveillance CTs during treatment. We find posterior beam SFUD combining PTV coverage with robust optimization increases robustness towards anatomical changes compared to IMRT.

Cone beam CT based dose calculation in the thorax region.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The limited image quality in Cone Beam CT (CBCT) stemming primarily from scattered radiation hinders accurate CBCT based dose calculation in radiotherapy. We investigated the use of a stoichiometric calibration for dose calculation on CBCT images of lung cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CBCT calibrations were performed with thorax scan protocols, using a phantom with approximately the diameter of an average human thorax and a central cavity simulating the thoracic cavity. Thus scatter conditions resembling those in clinical thorax CBCT scans were simulated. A published stoichiometric parametrization was used. A treatment plan was simulated on CBCT and CT scans of an anthropomorphic phantom, the dose distributions were calculated, and clinically relevant DVH parameters were compared. Twelve lung cancer patients had surveillance CT scans (s-CT) taken twice during their treatment course in addition to daily setup CBCTs. Dose calculations were performed on the s-CTs and the corresponding CBCTs taken on the same day, and DVH parameters were compared. RESULTS: Eighty percent of CBCT DVH parameters found for the phantom were within ±1% of CT doses, and 98% were within ±3%. For patients, the median CT/CBCT dose difference was within ±2%, and 98% of DVH parameters were within ±4%. Minimum dose to the tumor was underestimated (median 1.9%) on CBCT, while maximum doses to most organs at risk were slightly overestimated. CONCLUSION: Direct dose calculations on CBCTs of lung cancer patients were feasible within ∼4% accuracy using a simple calibration method, which is easily implemented in a clinical setting.

Adaptation is mandatory for intensity modulated proton therapy of advanced lung cancer to ensure target coverage.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Large anatomical changes during radiotherapy are seen for a large proportion of lung cancer patients. We investigate the applicability of a decision support protocol for photon therapy in a proton therapy setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-three consecutive NSCLC patients treated with adaptive photon therapy were retrospectively planned using IMPT. The adaptive protocol was based on geometrical measures of target positioning and large anatomical changes as shown on daily CBCT scans. Two surveillance CT-scans were acquired during the treatment course. The consequences of anatomical changes were evaluated by recalculating the proton plans on the surveillance scans. The CTV receiving 95% of the prescribed dose was analysed. RESULTS: Fourteen (61%) patients needed adaptations when treated with protons, given that 95% of the CTV must be covered by 95% of the dose. In comparison, no patients needed adaptation when treated with photons using this criterion. The adaptive protocol was found to identify patients with large target under-dosage for proton therapy (six patients). Additionally, target under-dosage was observed for eight patients with non-rigid changes up to 15mm in the positioning of the bones. CONCLUSIONS: Proton therapy for loco-regional lung cancer demands daily imaging and therapy adaptation for a high proportion of patients.

Heterogeneous FDG-guided dose-escalation for locally advanced NSCLC (the NARLAL2 trial): Design and early dosimetric results of a randomized, multi-centre phase-III study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Local recurrence is frequent in locally advanced NSCLC and is primarily located in FDG-avid parts of tumour and lymph nodes. Aiming at improving local control without increasing toxicity, we designed a multi-centre phase-III trial delivering inhomogeneous dose-escalation driven by FDG-avid volumes, while respecting normal tissue constraints and requiring no increase in mean lung dose. Dose-escalation driven by FDG-avid volumes, delivering mean doses of 95Gy (tumour) and 74Gy (lymph nodes), was pursued and compared to standard 66Gy/33F plans. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Dose plans for the first thirty patients enroled were analysed. Standard and escalated plans were created for all patients, blinded to randomization, and compared for each patient in terms of the ability to escalate while protecting normal tissue. RESULTS: The median dose-escalation in FDG-avid areas was 93.9Gy (tumour) and 73.0Gy (lymph nodes). Escalation drove the GTV and CTV to mean doses for the tumour of 87.5Gy (GTV-T) and 81.3Gy (CTV-T) in median. No significant differences in mean dose to lung and heart between standard and escalated were found, but small volumes of e.g. the bronchi received doses between 66 and 74Gy due to escalation. CONCLUSIONS: FDG-driven inhomogeneous dose-escalation achieves large increment in tumour and lymph node dose, while delivering similar doses to normal tissue as homogenous standard plans.

Adaptive radiotherapy for advanced lung cancer ensures target coverage and decreases lung dose.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Advanced lung cancer patients experience anatomical changes during radiotherapy. Uncorrected, these may lead to lower tumor dose, but can be corrected for by adaptive radiotherapy (ART). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Anatomical changes in 233 patients were monitored online on cone-beam CT-scans used for daily soft-tissue matching. If systematic changes above the pre-defined trigger criteria were observed, a new CT-scan, delineations, and treatment plan were made, restoring the intended dose distribution. Dose distributions with and without adaptation were compared. The first fifty ART patients were given two surveillance CT-scans during radiotherapy. These were used to evaluate delivered dose for patients without adaptation. The first fifty-two patients treated with ART were also compared with 52 pre-ART patients to evaluate the reduction in normal tissue doses. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients (27%) were adapted. Seventy-five per cent of all adaptations correctly adjusted for a decrease in tumor dose. Eighty-seven surveillance CT-scans were obtained for the first fifty patients and in only 2% of the cases, a decrease in tumor coverage (ΔV95%CTV>1%) was observed. With ART we observed a significant decrease in lung dose (MLD reduced from 14.6Gy to 12.6Gy on average). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of soft-tissue match combined with ART decreased the lung dose. The trigger criteria used correctly identified all but one (98%) of the patients requiring adaptation with a false positive rate of 20%.

Cardiac and respiration induced motion of mediastinal lymph node targets in lung cancer patients throughout the radiotherapy treatment course.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Involved mediastinal lymph nodes (LNs) are often included in the radiotherapy target for lung cancer patients. Their motion may differ from the primary tumor motion, possibly undermining the loco-regional control. This study determines the detailed differential target motion throughout the treatment course. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten lung cancer patients with 2-4 fiducial markers implanted in LN targets received IMRT with a daily pre-treatment cone-beam CT (CBCT) scan. Offline, the 3D trajectory of the markers was determined from their projected trajectory in the CBCT projections. Frequency analysis was performed to separate the intrafraction motion into a respiratory and cardiac component. The mean setup error of the markers and the motion range were used to calculate margins required for LN targets when setup is based on soft-tissue match. RESULTS: Respiration motion was largest in the CC direction and more prominent for more caudal LNs. Cardiac motion was often (73%) largest in the AP direction and tended to be largest for more cranial LNs. Margins for intrafraction motion and daily baseline shifts of LNs were 4.8mm (LR), 6.0mm (CC) and 6.7mm (AP). CONCLUSIONS: Detailed mapping showed that LN motion was in general governed by breathing, but some LNs had substantial cardiac induced motion.

Anatomical landmarks accurately determine interfractional lymph node shifts during radiotherapy of lung cancer patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Low contrast in the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans hampers fast online evaluation of interfractional changes in the lymph node position on a daily basis. In this study we have investigated whether high-contrast anatomical landmarks in the vicinity of the nodes may be used as surrogates for the lymph node positions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty lung cancer patients were treated with an online CBCT-based setup strategy involving soft-tissue match on the primary tumor. One hundred and sixteen lymph nodes were delineated separately on the planning-CT scans and categorized according to the lymph node stations. Five anatomical landmarks were selected as surrogate structures and assigned to the individual nodes. In addition, the carina was delineated. Registrations between the planning-CT and the daily CBCTs were performed retrospectively and positional deviations between the nodes and the surrogate structures or the carina were registered. RESULTS: The mean displacement between lymph nodes and surrogate structures was 1.6mm with systematic/random errors of 0.7/0.7mm, significantly smaller than the mean displacement between nodes and the carina. CONCLUSIONS: The position of the lymph nodes can be evaluated using selected anatomical landmarks on a daily basis using CBCT.

Adaptive radiotherapy of lung cancer patients with pleural effusion or atelectasis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Changes in lung density due to atelectasis, pleural effusion and pneumonia/pneumonitis are observed in lung cancer patients. These changes may be an indication for adaptive radiotherapy in order to maintain target coverage and avoid increased risk of normal tissue complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: CBCT scans of 163 patients were reviewed to score lung changes and find the incidence, the impact of geometric and dosimetric changes and the timing of appearance and disappearance of changes. RESULTS: 23% of the patients had changes in the lung related to pleural effusion, atelectasis or pneumonia/pneumonitis. In 9% of all patients, the appearance or disappearance of a change introduced a shift of the tumor or lymph nodes relative to the spine >5mm. Only major density changes affected the dose distribution, and 9% of all patients needed adaptive treatment planning due to density changes. In total, 12% of all patients did benefit from an adaptive treatment plan and in 85% of these patients, an atelectasis did change. CONCLUSIONS: An adaptive strategy was indicated for 12% of the patients due to atelectasis, pleural effusion or pneumonia/pneumonitis. The predominant cause for adaptation was atelectasis. No systematic pattern in the appearance and disappearance of the changes were observed and hence weekly evaluation is preferable.