Location and motion of vaginal pessaries in situ in women with successful and unsuccessful pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to compare the location and motion of pessaries between women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) with a successful (fitting) and unsuccessful (non-fitting) pessary treatment on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI). METHODS: A cross-sectional exploratory study of 15 women who underwent a mid-sagittal dMRI of the pelvic floor at rest, during contraction and during Valsalva with three different types of pessaries. The coordinates of the pessaries cross section, inferior pubic point (IPP) and sacrococcygeal junction (SCJ) were obtained and the location (position, orientation) and the motion (translation and rotation) were calculated. Differences between the groups and between the pessaries within the groups were compared. RESULTS: Nine women with a fitting pessary and 6 women with a non-fitting pessary were selected. In the non-fitting group, the pessaries were positioned more caudally and rotated more in clockwise direction and descended more, but not significantly, during Valsalva compared with the fitting group. The Falk pessary was positioned more anteriorly in the fitting group and more cranially in the non-fitting group compared with the ring and ring with support pessary. CONCLUSIONS: A non-fitting pessary was positioned more caudally at rest; on Valsalva, it rotated more clockwise and moved more caudally, suggesting that the dynamic characteristics of the pessary might play an important role in its effectiveness. Findings of this study serve as a basis for the development of new pessary designs.

Automatic grading of patients with a unilateral facial paralysis based on the Sunnybrook Facial Grading System - A deep learning study based on a convolutional neural network.

PURPOSE: In order to assess the severity and the progression of a unilateral peripheral facial palsy the Sunnybrook Facial Grading System (SFGS) is a well-established grading system due to its clinical relevance, sensitivity, and robust measuring method. However, training is required in order to achieve a high inter-rater reliability. This study investigated the automated grading of facial palsy patients based on the SFGS using a convolutional neural network. METHODS: A total of 116 patients with a unilateral peripheral facial palsy and 9 healthy subjects were recorded performing the Sunnybrook poses. A separate model was trained for each of the 13 elements of the SFGS and then used to calculate the Sunnybrook subscores and composite score. The performance of the automated grading system was compared to three clinicians experienced in the grading of a facial palsy. RESULTS: The inter-rater reliability of the convolutional neural network was within the range of human observers, with an average intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.87 for the composite Sunnybrook score, 0.45 for the resting symmetry subscore, 0.89 for the symmetry of voluntary movement subscore, and 0.77 for the synkinesis subscore. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed the potential of the automated SFGS to be implemented in a clinical setting. The automated grading system adhered to the original SFGS, which makes the implementation and interpretation of the automated grading more straightforward. The automated system can be implemented in numerous settings such as online consults in an e-Health environment, since the model used 2D images captured from a video recording.

A learning curve in 3D virtual surgical planned orthognathic surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the surgical accuracy of 3D virtual surgical planned orthognathic surgery and the influence of posterior impaction and magnitude of the planned movements on a possible learning curve. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective cohort study included subjects who underwent bimaxillary surgery between 2016 and 2020 at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of the Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen. 3D virtual surgical planning (VSP) was performed with CBCT data and digitalized dentition data. By using voxel-based matching with pre- and postoperative CBCT data the maxillary movements were quantified in six degrees of freedom. The primary outcome variable, surgical accuracy, was defined as the difference between the planned and achieved maxillary movement. RESULTS: Based on 124 subjects, the surgical accuracy increased annually from 2016 to 2020 in terms of vertical translations (0.82 ± 0.28 mm; p = 0.038) and yaw rotations (0.68 ± 0.22°; p = 0.028). An increase in surgical accuracy was observed when combining all six degrees of freedom (p = 0.021) and specifically between 2016 and 2020 (p = 0.004). An unfavorable learning curve was seen with posterior impaction and with a greater magnitude of movements. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated a significant increase in surgical accuracy annually and therefore supports the presence of a learning curve. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Cases with planned maxillary posterior impaction and/or a great magnitude of jaw movements should be transferred from the 3D VSP with extra care to obtain a satisfactory surgical accuracy.

Views on Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, and 3D Printing in Modern Medicine and Education: A Qualitative Exploration of Expert Opinion.

Although an increased usage and development of 3D technologies is observed in healthcare over the last decades, full integration of these technologies remains challenging. The goal of this project is to qualitatively explore challenges, pearls, and pitfalls of AR/VR/3D printing applications usage in the medical field of a university medical center. Two rounds of face-to-face interviews were conducted using a semi-structured protocol. First an explorative round was held, interviewing medical specialists (8), PhD students (7), 3D technology specialists (5), and university teachers (3). In the second round, twenty employees in high executive functions of relevant departments were interviewed on seven statements that resulted from the first interviewing round. Data analysis was performed using direct content analyses. The first interviewing round resulted in challenges and opportunities in 3D technology usage that were grouped in 5 themes: aims of using AR/VR/3D printing (1), data acquisition (2), data management plans (3), software packages and segmentation tools (4), and output data and reaching end-user (5). The second interviewing round resulted in an overview of ideas and insights on centralization of knowledge, improving implementation of 3D technology in daily healthcare, reimbursement of 3D technologies, recommendations for further studies, and requirement of using certified software. An overview of challenges and opportunities of 3D technologies in healthcare was provided. Well-designed studies on clinical effectiveness, implementation and cost-effectiveness are warranted for further implementation into the clinical setting.

Reproducibility of Manual Transfer of the Clinical Natural Head Position: Influence on the Soft Tissue and Hard Tissue Position of 3-Dimensional Virtual Surgical Planning.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the reproducibility of manually transferring the clinical natural head position (NHP) to the 3-dimensional (3D) virtual surgical planning and its subsequent influence on the soft tissue and maxillary hard tissue position. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was set up. The study population consisted of subjects who underwent bimaxillary osteotomies between 2016 and 2020 at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in Radboud University Medical Centre (Nijmegen, the Netherlands). Cone beam computed tomography scans, dentition data, and clinical photographs were acquired 4 weeks before surgery. Two attempts (NHP1 and NHP2) were performed by a single examiner to manually transfer the NHP. 3D transformation matrices were used to quantify the transferred NHP in 3 degrees of freedom (pitch, roll, and yaw). Landmarks and surface-based matching were used to quantify the influence on the soft tissue and hard tissue positions in 6 degrees of freedom. The primary outcome variable was the reproducibility of manually aligning the NHP. The secondary and tertiary outcome variables were the effect of the reproducibility of the manually aligned NHP on the soft tissue and hard tissue displacements in the 3D virtual surgical planning. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 109 subjects: 37 males (33.9%) and 72 females (66.1%) with a mean age of 29.1 ± 10.3 years (range, 17.0 to 59.0). The manual transfer of pitch alignment (2.24 ± 1.64°; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.93 to 2.55) was significantly less reproducible than the roll (0.56 ± 0.44°; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.64; P < .001) and yaw (0.67 ± 0.92°; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.85; P < .001). Subsequently, this alignment error influenced the position of the maxilla (incisal point) and soft tissue menton by 0.85 ± 0.86 mm and 1.01 ± 1.00 mm vertically and 0.78 ± 1.10 mm and 0.80 ± 1.18 mm sagittally. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that the manual transfer of the NHP from the clinical situation to the virtual environment influenced the soft tissue and hard tissue position and that a more reproducible method of transferring the clinical NHP is recommended.

Is the pattern of mandibular asymmetry in mild craniofacial microsomia comparable to non-syndromic class II asymmetry?

OBJECTIVES: To compare the characteristics of mandibular asymmetry in patients with unilateral craniofacial microsomia (CFM) and class II asymmetry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pretreatment cone-beam computed tomography of consecutive adults with Pruzansky-Kaban type I and IIA CFM (CFM group) was analyzed by 3D cephalometry. Fourteen mandibular landmarks and two dental landmarks were identified. The mandibular size and positional asymmetry were calculated by using landmark-based linear and volumetric measurements, in terms of asymmetry ratios (affected/non-affected side) and absolute differences (affected - non-affected side). Results were compared with non-syndromic class II with matched severity of chin deviation (Class II group). Statistical analyses included independent t test, paired t test, chi-square test, and ANOVA. RESULTS: CFM group (n, 21; mean age, 20.4 ± 2.5 years) showed significantly larger size asymmetry in regions of mandibular body, ramus, and condyle compared to Class II group (n, 21; mean age, 27.8 ± 5.9 years) (p < 0.05). The curvature of mandibular body was asymmetric in CFM. Regarding the positional asymmetry of mandibular body, while a comparable transverse shift and a negligible yaw rotation were found among the two groups, the roll rotation in CFM was significantly greater as well as the occlusal (6.06° vs. 4.17°) and mandibular (7.84° vs. 2.80°) plane cants (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Mild CFM showed significantly more severe size asymmetry and roll rotation in mandible than non-CFM class II asymmetry. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To improve the mandibular size and positional asymmetry in CFM, adjunct hard tissue augmentation or reduction in addition to OGS orthodontics with a meticulous roll and yaw planning is compulsory, which is expected to be distinct from treating non-CFM class II asymmetry.

Three-Dimensional Imaging of the Chest Wall: A Comparison Between Three Different Imaging Systems.

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) imaging is being used progressively to create models of patients with anterior chest wall deformities. Resulting models are used for clinical decision-making, surgical planning, and analysis. However, given the broad range of 3D imaging systems available and the fact that planning and analysis techniques are often only validated for a single system, it is important to analyze potential intrasystem and intersystem differences. The objective of this study was to investigate the accuracy and reproducibility of three commercially available 3D imaging systems that are used to obtain images of the anterior chest wall. METHODS: Among 15 healthy volunteers, 3D images of the anterior chest wall were acquired twice per imaging device. Reproducibility was determined by comparison of consecutive images acquired per device while the true accuracy was calculated by comparison of 3D image derived and calipered anthropometric measurements. A maximum difference of 1.00 mm. was considered clinically acceptable. RESULTS: All devices demonstrated statistically comparable (P = 0.21) reproducibility with a mean absolute difference of 0.59 mm. (SD: 1.05), 0.54 mm. (SD: 2.08), and 0.48 mm. (SD: 0.60) for the 3dMD, EinScan Pro 2X Plus, and Artec Leo, respectively. The true accuracy was, respectively, 0.89 mm. (SD: 0.66), 1.27 mm. (SD: 0.94), and 0.81 mm. (SD: 0.71) for the 3dMD, EinScan, and Artec device and did not statistically differ (P = 0.085). CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional imaging of the anterior chest wall utilizing the 3dMD and Artec Leo is feasible with comparable reproducibility and accuracy, whereas the EinScan Pro 2X Plus is reproducible but not clinically accurate.

Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Condylar Hypoplasia and Facial Asymmetry in Craniofacial Microsomia Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.

PURPOSE: To assess the condylar hypoplasia and its correlation with craniofacial deformities in adults with unilateral craniofacial microsomia (CFM). METHODS: Pretreatment cone-beam computed tomography scans of consecutive adults (mean age: 20.4 ± 3.0 years; range: 17.3 to 31.4 years) with Pruzansky-Kaban type I and IIA CFM were reconstructed in 3D. Both condyles were segmented. Asymmetry ratios (affected side/contralateral side) of condylar volume were calculated to indicate the extent of condylar hypoplasia. 3D cephalometry was performed to quantify the maxillomandibular morphology and facial asymmetry. The correlations in between were assessed by using Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Thirty-six subjects were enrolled, consisting of 22 subjects with Pruzansky-Kaban type I and 14 subjects with type IIA. The condyles in type IIA group were significantly more hypoplastic in height (asymmetry ratio: 40.69 vs 59.95%, P = .006) and volume (18.16 vs 47.84%, P < .001) compared to type I group. Type IIA group had a significantly smaller SNB value than type I group (72.94° vs 77.41°, P = .012), and a significantly greater facial asymmetry (P < .05). The hypoplastic extent of condylar volume and Pruzansky-Kaban types were significantly correlated with SNB (r = 0.457 and ρ = -0.411, respectively), upper incisor deviation (r = -0.446 and ρ = 0.362), chin deviation (r = -0.477 and ρ = 0.527), upper occlusal plane cant (r = -0.672 and ρ = 0.631), and mandibular plane cant (r = -0.557 and ρ = 0.357, P < .05). CONCLUSION: For unilateral CFM adults, greater condylar hypoplasia in volume along with more severe mandibular retrusion and facial asymmetry objectively indicated a higher scale of Pruzansky-Kaban classification (type IIA). These quantitative distinctions are expected to enhance the diagnostic reliability of CFM.

Landmark-Based Versus Voxel-Based 3-Dimensional Quantitative Analysis of Bimaxillary Osteotomies: A Comparative Study.

PURPOSE: We compared the accuracy of landmark-based and voxel-based 3-dimensional (3D) analysis to quantify the osseous movements of the maxilla and mandible after bimaxillary osteotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of 15 patients who had undergone bimaxillary osteotomy were randomly selected from the database. Before surgery, CBCT scanning was performed and an individualized 3D virtual surgical plan made for all patients. During surgery, the mandibular and maxillary segments were positioned as planned using 3D-milled interocclusal splints. At 1 week after surgery, a postoperative CBCT scan was acquired. All pre- and postoperative CBCT data were rendered in 3 dimensions. The 3D virtual head models were superimposed on the cranial base. The 3D surgical movements of the maxilla and mandible were quantified using conventional landmark-based 3D cephalometric analyses and voxel-based 3D analyses (OrthoGnathicAnalyser). This process was performed by the same observer 3 times. The intraclass correlations and Bland-Altman plots were computed to quantify the measurement errors and reproducibility of both methods. RESULTS: High intraclass correlation coefficients were found for both methods. The voxel-based analyses yielded a higher correlation concerning the maxilla and distal mandible (r = 0.98) compared with the landmark-based cephalometric analyses (r = 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: The use of voxel-based 3D analyses in the quantification of osseous movements was more reliable and reproducible than the use of conventional landmark-based 3D analyses.

Photographic documentation and severity quantification of pectus excavatum through three-dimensional optical surface imaging.

Conventional photography is commonly used to visually document pectus excavatum and objectively assess chest wall changes over time without repeated exposure to ionising radiation, as in our centre since 2008. However, as conventional photography is labour-intensive and lacks three-dimensional (3D) information that is essential in 3D deformities like pectus excavatum, we developed a novel imaging and processing protocol based on 3D optical surface imaging. The objective of this study was to report our developed protocol to visually document pectus excavatum through 3D imaging. We also investigated the absolute agreement of the 3D image- and conventional photography-derived pectus excavatum depth to investigate whether both techniques could be used interchangeably to measure pectus excavatum depth and assess its evolution. The protocol consisted of three consecutive steps: patient positioning and instructions, data acquisition, and data processing. Three-dimensional imaging through the developed protocol was feasible for all 19 participants. The 3D image- and photography-derived pectus excavatum depth demonstrated good to excellent agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.97; 95%-confidence interval: 0.88 to 0.99; p < 0.001). In conclusion, 3D imaging through the developed protocol is a feasible and attractive alternative to document the surface geometry of pectus excavatum and can be used interchangeably with conventional photography to determine pectus severity. Clinical registration number: NCT04185870.

What is the value of 3D virtual reality in understanding acetabular fractures?

BACKGROUND: Acetabular fractures are difficult to classify owing to the complex three-dimensional (3D) anatomy of the pelvis. 3D printing helps to understand and reliably classify acetabular fracture types. 3D-virtual reality (VR) may have comparable benefits. Our hypothesis is that 3D-VR is equivalent to 3D printing in understanding acetabular fracture patterns. METHODS: A total of 27 observers of various experience levels from several hospitals were requested to classify twenty 3D printed and VR models according to the Judet-Letournel classification. Additionally, surgeons were asked to state their preferred surgical approach and patient positioning. Time to classify each fracture type was recorded. The cases were randomized to rule out a learning curve. Inter-observer agreement was analyzed using Fleiss' kappa statistics (κ). RESULTS: Inter-observer agreements varied by observer group and type of model used to classify the fracture: medical students: 3D print (κ = 0.61), VR (κ = 0.41); junior surgical residents: 3D print (0.51) VR (0.54); senior surgical residents: 3D print (0.66) VR (0.52); junior surgeons: 3D print (0.56), VR (0.43); senior surgeons: 3D print (κ = 0.59), VR (κ = 0.42). Using 3D printed models, there was more agreement on the surgical approach (junior surgeons κ = 0.23, senior surgeons κ = 0.31) when compared with VR (junior surgeons κ = 0.17, senior surgeons 0.25). No difference was found in time used to classify these fractures between 3D printing and VR for all groups (P = 1.000). CONCLUSIONS: The Judet-Letournel acetabular classification stays difficult to interpret; only moderate kappa agreements were found. We found 3D-VR inferior to 3D printing in classifying acetabular fractures. Furthermore, the current 3D-VR technology is still not practical for intra-operative use.

Does Mandible-First Sequencing Increase Maxillary Surgical Accuracy in Bimaxillary Procedures?

PURPOSE: In bimaxillary procedures, it is important to know how the chosen sequence affects the surgical outcome. The purpose of this study was to explore whether the theoretical advantages of using the mandible-first procedure were supported by clinical data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective investigation on a cohort compiled from 3 published retrospective studies. The sample was composed of patients treated at the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre (Nijmegen, the Netherlands) from 2010 to 2014 and the Odense University Hospital (Odense, Denmark) from 2011 to 2015. The inclusion criterion was bimaxillary surgery without maxillary segmentation. The exclusion criterion was lack of a virtual surgical plan. The primary outcome variable was surgical accuracy, defined as the mean difference between the obtained outcome and the virtual surgical plan. The primary predictor variable was the comparison between mandible-first and maxilla-first sequencing. Secondary predictors were inferior maxillary repositioning and counterclockwise (CCW) rotation. The confounding variable was the virtually planned reposition. Results were analyzed by mixed-model regression encompassing all variables, followed by a detailed analysis of positive results using 2-sample t tests. RESULTS: Overall, 145 patients were included for analysis (98 women; mean age, 28 years). Operating on the mandible first notably influenced maxillary positioning and placed the maxilla 1.5 mm posterior and with 1.4° of CCW rotation compared with virtual surgical planning. The interaction of surgical sequence with maxillary rotation showed similar surgical accuracy between maxilla-first surgery with clockwise rotation and mandible-first surgery with CCW rotation. Inferior maxillary repositioning resulted in the maxilla being placed 1.7 mm (maxilla-first sequence) and 2.0 mm (mandible-first sequence) posterior to the planned position. CONCLUSION: Surgical accuracy was considerably influenced by sequencing in bimaxillary procedures. It remains important to know how the chosen sequence affects the surgical outcome so that the virtual surgical plan can be adjusted accordingly.

Influence of involuntary facial expressions on reproducibility of 3D stereophotogrammetry in children with and without complete unilateral cleft lip and palate from 3 to 18 months of age.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the influence of involuntary facial expressions on 3D facial stereophotogrammetry reproducibility in children with and without unilateral cleft lip, alveolus and palate (UCLP) aged 3-18 months. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three to eight 3D facial images per time point were acquired within 10 min of 31 children with UCLP and 50 controls at 3, 12 and 18 months of age. 3D mapping of two 3D facial images per subject per age was performed. Distance kits of the full face and nasolabial area were calculated. RESULTS: In the total subject pool, mean variation between two 3D facial images ranged from 0.38-0.88 mm. There were no significant differences within groups for the various ages. Variation between controls and UCLP subjects did not differ significantly. Variation was higher in the nasolabial area than in the full face. CONCLUSIONS: The influence of involuntary facial expressions on the estimation of facial growth should not be underestimated, especially in the nasolabial region of UCLP subjects aged 3 months. To improve 3D facial imaging reliability, image capturing should be performed by a trained photographer following a meticulous image capturing protocol, including thorough review after capture. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Facial 3D stereophotogrammetry is a useful tool for monitoring facial growth longitudinally in young children with facial deformities, as no radiation is involved and image capture is easy and fast. It can be performed reliably in children with and without UCLP aged 3-18 months by an experienced photographer utilising a meticulous image capturing protocol.

Toward Holographic-Guided Surgery.

The implementation of augmented reality (AR) in image-guided surgery (IGS) can improve surgical interventions by presenting the image data directly on the patient at the correct position and in the actual orientation. This approach can resolve the switching focus problem, which occurs in conventional IGS systems when the surgeon has to look away from the operation field to consult the image data on a 2-dimensional screen. The Microsoft HoloLens, a head-mounted AR display, was combined with an optical navigation system to create an AR-based IGS system. Experiments were performed on a phantom model to determine the accuracy of the complete system and to evaluate the effect of adding AR. The results demonstrated a mean Euclidean distance of 2.3 mm with a maximum error of 3.5 mm for the complete system. Adding AR visualization to a conventional system increased the mean error by 1.6 mm. The introduction of AR in IGS was promising. The presented system provided a solution for the switching focus problem and created a more intuitive guidance system. With a further reduction in the error and more research to optimize the visualization, many surgical applications could benefit from the advantages of AR guidance.

Should Virtual Mirroring Be Used in the Preoperative Planning of an Orbital Reconstruction?

PURPOSE: Mirroring has been used as a diagnostic tool in orbital wall fractures for many years, but limited research is available proving the assumed symmetry of orbits. The purpose of this study was to evaluate volume and contour differences between orbital cavities in healthy humans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, the left and right orbital cavities of a consecutive sample of patients' computed tomograms were measured. Inclusion criteria were patients with no sign of orbital or sinus pathology or fracture. Outcome variables were differences in volume and contour. Descriptive statistics and Student paired t test were used for data analysis of orbital volume and distance maps were used for analysis of orbital contour. RESULTS: The sample was composed of 100 patients with a mean age of 57; 50% were men. The total mean orbital volume was 27.53 ± 3.11 mL. Mean difference between cavities was 0.44 ± 0.31 mL or 1.59% (standard deviation [SD], 1.10%). The orbital contour showed high similarity, with an absolute mean left-versus-right difference of 0.82 mm (SD, 0.23 mm). CONCLUSION: The authors hypothesize that the measured differences between right and left orbital volumes and contours are clinically minor. In consequence, the use of mirroring tools as part of preoperative planning in orbital reconstruction is legitimate with the aim of simulating the pre-traumatized anatomy.

Integration of digital dental casts in cone beam computed tomography scans-a clinical validation study.

OBJECTIVES: Images derived from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans lack detailed information on the dentition and interocclusal relationships needed for proper surgical planning and production of surgical splints. To get a proper representation of the dentition, integration of a digital dental model into the CBCT scan is necessary. The aim of this study was to validate a simplified protocol to integrate digital dental models into CBCT scans using only one scan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Conventional protocol A used one combined upper and lower impression and two CBCT scans. The new protocol B included placement of ten markers on the gingiva, one CBCT scan, and two separate impressions of the upper and lower dentition. Twenty consecutive patients, scheduled for mandibular advancement surgery, were included. To validate protocol B, 3-dimensional reconstructions were made, which were compared by calculating the mean intersurface distances obtained with both protocols. RESULTS: The mean distance for all patients for the upper jaw is 0.39 mm and for the lower jaw is 0.30 mm. For ten out of 20 patients, all distances were less than 1 mm. For the other ten patients, all distances were less than 2 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Mean distances of 0.39 and 0.30 mm are clinically acceptable and comparable to other studies; therefore, this new protocol is clinically accurate. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This new protocol seems to be clinically accurate. It is less time consuming, gives less radiation exposure for the patient, and has a lower risk for positional errors of the impressions compared to other integration protocols.

Validation of 3D documentation of palatal soft tissue shape, color, and irregularity with intraoral scanning.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of 3D intraoral scanning for documentation of palatal soft tissue by evaluating the accuracy of shape, color, and curvature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intraoral scans of ten participants' upper dentition and palate were acquired with the TRIOS® 3D intraoral scanner by two observers. Conventional impressions were taken and digitized as a gold standard. The resulting surface models were aligned using an Iterative Closest Point approach. The absolute distance measurements between the intraoral models and the digitized impression were used to quantify the trueness and precision of intraoral scanning. The mean color of the palatal soft tissue was extracted in HSV (hue, saturation, value) format to establish the color precision. Finally, the mean curvature of the surface models was calculated and used for surface irregularity. RESULTS: Mean average distance error between the conventional impression models and the intraoral models was 0.02 ± 0.07 mm (p = 0.30). Mean interobserver color difference was - 0.08 ± 1.49° (p = 0.864), 0.28 ± 0.78% (p = 0.286), and 0.30 ± 1.14% (p = 0.426) for respectively hue, saturation, and value. The interobserver differences for overall and maximum surface irregularity were 0.01 ± 0.03 and 0.00 ± 0.05 mm. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the hypothesis that the intraoral scan can perform a 3D documentation of palatal soft tissue in terms of shape, color, and curvature. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: An intraoral scanner can be an objective tool, adjunctive to the clinical examination of the palatal tissue.

Maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation: A survey on the quality of life.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Maxillofacial prostheses, especially those supported by endosseous implants, are regarded as a viable, secure treatment for the reconstruction of facial defects to restore quality of life. The long-term quality of life of patients treated with facial prostheses with different retentive systems is unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this clinical study was to assess the long-term quality of life of patients treated with facial prostheses with different retentive systems over a 14-year period at a Dutch oral and maxillofacial surgery unit. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 66 patients with facial prostheses were inventoried and categorized based on anatomic location and type of retention. A 62-item questionnaire was designed to survey the daily prosthetic use, care, quality, durability, longevity, and reliability of retention. Furthermore, issues relating to general satisfaction, self-image, and socialization frequency were addressed. RESULTS: Completed validated questionnaires were returned by 52 patients. Of the prosthetic replacements, 23% (n=12) were orbital, 33% (n=17) nasal, and 44% (n=23) auricular prostheses. The survey showed that a prosthetic reconstruction led to high satisfaction scores with regard to wearing comfort, anatomic fit, color, and anatomic form. A significant difference was shown for implant-retained facial prostheses, which provided enhanced retention and increased ease of placement and removal (Fisher exact test P=.01 and P=.04). Patients with nasal prostheses were less satisfied with the junction of their prostheses to the surrounding soft tissue and more aware of others noticing their prosthetic rehabilitation. Patients with auricular defects were less embarrassed (P=.01) by their prostheses. Although auricular prostheses were less frequently cleaned (P=.01), no significant difference was found in minor soft tissue complications between different anatomic locations and the various retentive systems. CONCLUSIONS: Implant-retained prostheses have advantages over adhesive-retained prostheses in terms of ease of handling. However, improvements in prosthetic material properties, including color stability and durability, are needed to increase the longevity of facial prostheses.

Rating Nasolabial Aesthetics in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: Cropped Versus Full-Face Images.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if cropping facial images affects nasolabial aesthetics assessments in unilateral cleft lip patients and to evaluate the effect of facial attractiveness on nasolabial evaluation. DESIGN: Two cleft surgeons and one cleft orthodontist assessed standardized frontal photographs 4 times; nasolabial aesthetics were rated on cropped and full-face images using the Cleft Aesthetic Rating Scale, and total facial attractiveness was rated on full-face images with and without the nasolabial area blurred using a 5-point Likert scale. SETTING: Cleft Palate Craniofacial Unit of a University Medical Center. PATIENTS: Inclusion criteria: nonsyndromic unilateral cleft lip and an available frontal view photograph around 10 years of age. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: a history of facial trauma and an incomplete cleft. Eighty-one photographs were available for assessment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Differences in mean CARS scores between cropped versus full-face photographs and attractive versus unattractive rated patients were evaluated by paired t test. RESULTS: Nasolabial aesthetics are scored more negatively on full-face photographs compared to cropped photographs, regardless of facial attractiveness. (Mean CARS score, nose: cropped = 2.8, full-face = 3.0, P < .001; lip: cropped = 2.4, full-face = 2.7, P < .001; nose and lip: cropped = 2.6, full-face = 2.8, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Aesthetic outcomes of the nasolabial area are assessed significantly more positively when using cropped images compared to full-face images. For this reason, cropping images, revealing the nasolabial area only, is recommended for aesthetical assessments.

Three-Dimensional Imaging of the Face: A Comparison Between Three Different Imaging Modalities.

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) imaging of the face is being used extensively in medicine for clinical decision making, surgical planning, and research. Nowadays, several companies are offering a broad range of 3D imaging systems, varying in price, method, and mobility. However, most planning and evaluation methods are created and validated solely with one imaging system. Therefore, it is important to analyze possible differences in the 3D surface reconstruction between different systems. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to analyze differences in the 3D surface reconstruction between three systems: 3dMDface system, Vectra XT, and Artec Eva. METHODS: Three-dimensional images of the face were acquired from 15 healthy patients with each imaging system. Reproducibility of each device was calculated and a comparison of the Vectra XT and Artec Eva with the 3dMDface was made. RESULTS: All 3D imaging devices showed high reproducibility, with a mean difference of 0.18 ± 0.15 mm (3dMDface system), 0.15 ± 0.15 mm (Vectra XT), and 0.26 ± 0.24 mm (Artec Eva). No significant difference in reproducibility was found between the Vectra XT and 3dMDface, while a significant difference was found between 3dMDface and Artec Eva, and between Vectra XT and Artec Eva. The mean difference between 3dMDface and Vectra XT was 0.32 ± 0.26 mm. The mean difference between 3dMDface and Artec Eva was 0.44 ± 1.09 mm. CONCLUSIONS: All three imaging devices showed high reproducibility and accuracy. Although the Artec Eva showed a significant lower reproducibility, the difference found was not clinically relevant. Therefore, using these different systems alongside each other in clinical and research settings is possible.