Understanding the Treatment Algorithm of Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Single-Institution Retrospective Analysis Comparing Outcomes of Chemotherapy, Molecular Targeted Therapy, and Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in 255 Patients.

BACKGROUND: The number of therapeutic options for patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNEN) has increased, but the optimal therapeutic algorithm has not been defined due to lack of randomised trials comparing different modalities. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study in patients with metastatic PNEN treated with ≥1 line of systemic therapy. The relationship between baseline characteristics, treatment type, and time to treatment failure (TTF), time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS) was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-five patients with metastatic PNEN had 491 evaluable lines of therapy. Independent predictors of TTF included treatment type, Ki-67, tumour grade, and chromogranin A. To reduce selection bias, a subgroup of 114 patients with grade 2 (G2) metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PNET) was analysed separately. These patients had received 234 lines of treatment (105 chemotherapy, 82 molecular targeted therapy, and 47 peptide receptor radionuclide therapy [PRRT]). In the G2 cohort, TTF and TTP were superior for PRRT compared with both chemotherapy and molecular targeted therapy. OS in the G2 cohort was also superior for those that had received PRRT compared with those that had not (median 84 vs. 56 months; HR 0.55, 95% CI: 0.31-0.98, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that PRRT is associated with superior clinical outcomes relative to other systemic therapies for G2 metastatic PNET. Prospective studies are required to confirm these observations.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy as a Novel Treatment for Metastatic and Invasive Phaeochromocytoma and Paraganglioma.

At present there is no clinical guideline or standardised protocol for the treatment of metastatic or invasive phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma (collectively known as PPGL) due to the rarity of the disease and the lack of prospective studies or extended national databases. Prognosis is mainly determined by genetic predisposition, tumour burden, rate of disease progression, and location of metastases. For patients with progressive or symptomatic disease that is not amenable to surgery, there are various palliative treatment options available. These include localised therapies including radiotherapy, radiofrequency, or cryoablation, as well as liver-directed therapies for those patients with hepatic metastases (e.g., transarterial chemoembolisation) and systemic therapies including chemotherapy or molecular targeted therapies. There is currently intense research interest in the value of radionuclide therapy for neuroendocrine tumours, including phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma, with either iodine-131 (131I)-radiolabelled metaiodobenzylguanidine or very recently peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), and the most important contemporary clinical studies will be highlighted in this review. The studies to date suggest that PRRT may induce major clinical, biochemical, and radiological changes, with 177Lu-DOTATATE being most efficacious and presenting less toxicity than 90Y-DOTATATE. Newer combination therapies with combined radioisotopes, or combinations with chemotherapeutic agents, also look promising. Given the favourable efficacy, logistic, and safety profiles, we believe that PRRT will probably become the standard treatment for inoperable metastatic PPGL in the near future, but we await data from definitive randomised controlled trials to understand its role.