Determining Effectiveness of "Off-Label Therapies" for Multiple Sclerosis in a Real-World Setting.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the factors, if any, that are associated with the efficacy of "off-label therapies" (OLTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: Consecutive patients (N = 174) with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) or secondary progressive MS (SPMS) with relapses, on OLTs with a generic formulation of azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, or rituximab biosimilar for ≥2 years were included. Annualized relapse rate (ARR) and expanded disability status score (EDSS) 1 year before and ≥2 years after starting OLTs were recorded. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was done at baseline and at the end of the study. RESULTS: During a median period of 4.1 years (2.4-24), ARR reduced in all (P < 0.0001) and EDSS improved in RRMS (P < 0.0001) patients but not in SPMS (P < 0.31) patients. Good responders were those who had RRMS (P = 0.001, odds ratio [OR] 0.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01-0.15), female gender (P 0.008, OR 6.67, 95% CI 1.7-26.8), and had early access to OLT (P = 0.006, OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.05-1.40). Baseline peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness identified the risk of conversion to SPMS (P < 0.01, OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.06). CONCLUSIONS: This limited prospective study suggests that early identification of patients who could potentially respond to unconventional but accessible therapies may be valuable in the treatment of MS, particularly in resource-poor regions.

Incidence and Prevalence of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders in the Background of International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria - A Systematic Review.

Introduction of international consensus criteria (2015 IPND criteria) for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSDs) has improved diagnostic accuracy for aquaporin 4 (AQP4)-IgG-associated and seronegative NMOSDs. This study aimed to review relevant publications related to the incidence and prevalence of NMOSDs and provide an updated review of the global epidemiology of NMOSDs in the light of new diagnostic criteria. A comprehensive literature search was performed from January 2015 to June 2021 by using appropriate keywords in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Relevant papers that fulfilled inclusion criteria were shortlisted and reviewed. Twenty-one papers were selected for this review. Incidence of NMOSDs was 0.04-0.25/100,000 in predominantly white and 0.34-1.31/100,000 in nonwhite populations. Prevalence was 0.70-1.91/100,000 in white and 0.86-4.52/100,000 in nonwhite populations. The 2015 IPND criteria significantly improved the incidence and prevalence rates for NMOSDs when compared to the Wingerchuk 2006 criteria. Incidence of MOG-IgG-associated NMOSDs was 0.12-0.13/100,000, with prevalence in children 0.03-1.4/100,000 and in adults 0.65-2/100,000. In this systematic review, studies that used uniform diagnostic criteria and confirmed cases after testing for AQP4-IgG were included. The prevalence of NMOSDs was estimated to be <5/100,000 globally. A clear bias was seen in favor of nonwhite and indigenous populations. This review highlights the need for prospective population-based epidemiological studies and the importance of surveys in nonwhite populations around the globe.

Cost of Illness of Major Neurocognitive Disorders in India.

BACKGROUND: Major neurocognitive disorders (major NCD) predominantly affect the elderly. Major NCD results in significant morbidity and socioeconomic burden. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the individual cost of care of a person with major NCD according to disease severity and component costs. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Fifty patients of major NCD with primary caregivers attending memory clinic of tertiary care center were included. A detailed questionnaire administered after inclusion provided demographic and clinical information. Caregivers were interviewed about details of care provided. Cognitive function was assessed by Hindi mental state examination (HMSE), and major NCD severity was determined by clinical dementia rating scale (CDR). RESULTS: The annual cost of care per patient with mild to moderate and severe major MCD was INR 78288 and INR 167808, respectively. Costs increased with increasing severity of the disease. Direct nonmedical costs were significantly higher than direct medical costs in severe major NCD group and vice versa was found in mild to moderate major NCD group. CONCLUSION: Increasing population of elderly and prevalence of major NCD suggest an economic burden on caring families and hence the government. Comprehensive health policy toward providing affordable care to people with major NCD is the need of the hour.