RESUMO
Rationale: Effective interventions to prevent burnout among intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians are urgently needed. Death cafés, group discussions about death, build a sense of community and create a space for reflection on distressing events. Objective: To assess whether participation in regular death cafés can prevent burnout in ICU clinicians (physicians, nurses, pharmacists, therapists). Methods: A randomized clinical trial was conducted from July 2020 to December 2022 in 10 ICUs in Louisiana. Subjects were randomized to attend four psychotherapist-facilitated virtual death cafés or to a control arm. The primary outcome was burnout defined by the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey at 6 months. Depression and anxiety scores were measured, as were qualitative data on stressors, coping, and death café experience. Results: Among 340 clinicians who were screened and gave consent (171 physicians, 169 nonphysicians), 251 participated (mean age, 31.0 ± 6.8 years; 63% female; 72% White; 37% nurses, 27% residents, 25% interns, 11% other). Burnout prevalence was 19% at baseline. Of 136 participants who completed the 6-month follow-up, no significant differences were found between intervention and control for the primary outcome (18% vs. 25%; unadjusted odds ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-1.57; P = 0.33). There were no differences in anxiety or depression. Notably, the study was limited by an inability to achieve target enrollment and a high attrition rate (46%). Conclusions: Virtual death cafés were unable to reduce burnout, although the study was underpowered to detect differences between groups. Clinical trial registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04347811).
Assuntos
Esgotamento Profissional , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Humanos , Feminino , Esgotamento Profissional/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Adulto , Louisiana , Depressão/prevenção & controle , Adaptação Psicológica , MorteRESUMO
Poor patients in developing countries may not receive permanent pacemakers (PPMs) even as lifesaving measures because of their high cost. In this report we examined whether PPMs that were explanted and donated by funeral homes in the United States could be safely and effectively reused in indigent patients in India. With permission from the deceased patients' families, 121 PPMs were explanted and donated by funeral homes for reuse. These PPMs were sterilized and sent for implantation in needy and indigent patients at a charity hospital in Mumbai, India. From the pool of donated 121 PPMs, 53 (88%, 11 single-chamber PPMs, 21%, and 42 dual-chamber PPMs, 79%) were acceptable for reuse and implanted (37 new implants, 70%, and 16 for battery/generator replacement, 30%) in 53 patients (mean ± SD 64 ± 10 years old, 28 women, 53%). Indications for PPM implantation were complete heart block (n = 27, 51%) and sick sinus syndrome (n = 26, 49%). All patients were alive and well postoperatively. No significant complications including infections or device failures occurred over 19 to 1,827 days (mean 661) of follow-up. Of 40 patients (75%) who were followed locally, 4 (10%) died because of nonpacemaker-related causes; time to death was 121 to 750 days (mean 430) after PPM implantation. All except 2 patients (5%) reported marked improvement in their symptoms. There were only 4 patients (8%) who were previously employed, and all were able to resume their manual labor work. Also, of the women, 27 patients (96%) reported improvement in symptoms enabling them to resume regular household chores as housewives after PPM implantation. In conclusion, with proper device sterilization and handling protocols, reuse of explanted PPMs in poor patients in developing countries is safe and effective. Implantation of donated PPMs can not only save lives but also improve quality of life of needy poor patients.