RESUMO
BACKGROUND: We prospectively evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of ocular ultrasonography (OUS) to distinguish papilledema from pseudopapilledema. METHODS: Forty-nine study participants, with optic disc elevation, underwent neuro-ophthalmic evaluation, OUS, fundus photography, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the optic nerve head at the initial and follow-up visits (≤6 months apart). Participants were classified as having papilledema if there was a change in optic nerve appearance on fundus photographs, as determined by a masked observer, between initial and follow-up visits ≤6 months apart. OUS was considered positive when the optic nerve sheath width was >3.3 mm and the 30° test was positive. Ocular ultrasonographic findings were correlated in patients who had papilledema vs patients who had pseudopapilledema. In a subanalysis, OUS findings were also correlated with change in peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness on OCT of the optic nerve head between initial and follow-up visits. RESULTS: OUS was 68% (17/25) sensitive for papilledema and 54% (13/24) specific for pseudopapilledema. When using OCT parameters to define papilledema, the sensitivity of OUS to diagnose papilledema decreased to 62%. Positive OUS correlated with elevated opening pressure on lumbar puncture and with signs of increased intracranial pressure on MRI. CONCLUSION: OUS alone was less sensitive in diagnosing papilledema than previously thought. Therefore, OUS may not be helpful in distinguishing between papilledema and pseudopapilledema.