RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score evaluates liver dysfunction severity. However, this score had prognostic effects in patients with hepatocellular, pancreatic, and gastric carcinomas. We aimed to assess the predictive value of the ALBI score in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: Data from 154 patients with ESCC who consecutively underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and subtotal esophagectomy were retrospectively investigated. The ALBI score was calculated as pre-NAC ALBI and categorized into grades 1, 2a, 2b, and 3; low-ALBI group (n = 134) was assigned with ALBI grade 1 and the other grades were assigned to the high-ALBI group (n = 20). RESULTS: The pre-NAC ALBI was significantly associated with relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (P = 0.003 and P = 0.014, respectively). Based on multivariate analysis, pre-NAC ALBI, pathological T factor, and N factor were identified as independent prognostic factors for poor RFS. Multivariate and univariate analyses limited to factors were obtained before treatment, indicating high pre-NAC ALBI as an independent prognostic factor of poor overall survival (P = 0.039) and RFS (P = 0.008). With respect to pathological response to NAC, patients in the high pre-NAC ALBI group had a significantly lower response than patients in the low pre-NAC ALBI group (P = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested that the pre-NAC ALBI marker predicts the long-term outcome and pathological response to NAC in patients with ESCC consecutively undergoing NAC and a subtotal esophagectomy.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/terapia , Bilirrubina/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Albumina Sérica/análise , Relevância Clínica , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Prognóstico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirurgia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Detecting pathological complete response (pCR) before surgery would facilitate nonsurgical approach after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). We developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-guided pCR evaluation using a deep neural network to identify pCR before surgery. METHODS: This study examined resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients who underwent esophagectomy after NAC. The same number of histological responders without pCR and non-responders were randomly selected based on the number of pCR patients. Endoscopic images were analyzed using a deep neural network. A test dataset consisting of 20 photos was used for validation. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of AI and four experienced endoscopists' pCR evaluations were calculated. For pathological response evaluation, Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer was used. RESULTS: The study enrolled 123 patients, including 41 patients with pCR, the same number of histological responders without pCR, and non-responders [grade 0, 5 (4%); grade 1a, 36 (30%); grade 1b, 21 (17%); grade 2, 20 (16%); grade 3, 41 (33%)]. In 20 models, the median values of sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy for endoscopic response (ER) detection were 60%, 81%, 77%, 67%, and 70%, respectively. Similarly, the endoscopists' median of these was 43%, 90%, 85%, 65%, and 66%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This proof-of-concept study demonstrated that the AI-guided endoscopic response evaluation after NAC could identify pCR with moderate accuracy. The current AI algorithm might guide an individualized treatment strategy including nonsurgical approach in ESCC patients through prospective studies with careful external validation to demonstrate the clinical value of this diagnostic approach including primary tumor and lymph node.
RESUMO
AIM: We investigated whether or not postoperative complications (POCs) themselves have a negative survival impact or indirectly worsen the survival due to insufficient adjuvant chemotherapy in a pooled analysis of two large phase III studies performed in Japan PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study examined the patients who enrolled in 1304, phase III study comparing the efficacy of 6 and 12 months of capecitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer patients and in 882, a phase III study to confirm the tolerability of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and l-leucovorin in Japanese stage II/III colon cancer patients. In our study, POCs were defined as the following major surgical complications: anastomotic leakage, pneumonia, bowel obstruction/ileus, surgical site infection, postoperative bleeding, urinary tract infection, and fistula. Patients were classified as those with POCs (C group) and those without POCs (NC group). RESULTS: A total of 2095 patients were examined in the present study. POCs were observed in 169 patients (8.1%). The overall survival (OS) rates at 5 years after surgery were 75.3% in the C group and 86.5% in the NC group (p = 0.0017). The hazard ratio of POCs for the OS in multivariate analysis was 1.70 (95% confidence interval, 1.19 to 2.45; p = 0.0040). The time to adjuvant treatment failure (TTF) of adjuvant chemotherapy was similar between the groups, being 68.6% in the C group and 67.1% in the NC group for the 6-month continuation rate of adjuvant chemotherapy. The dose reduction rate of adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant treatment suspension rate were also similar between the groups (C vs. NC groups: 45.0% vs. 48.7%, p = 0.3520; and 52.7% vs. 55.0%, p = 0.5522, respectively). CONCLUSION: POCs were associated with a poor prognosis but did not affect the intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy. These results suggested that POCs themselves negatively influence the survival.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias do Colo , Humanos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Leucovorina , Neoplasias do Colo/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Fluoruracila , Capecitabina , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Progressão da Doença , Intervalo Livre de DoençaRESUMO
PURPOSE: In patients with esophageal cancer, skeletal muscle mass has been reported to decrease progressively after surgery and be independently associated with a poor prognosis. The purpose of this study was to investigate perioperative changes in dysphagia, oral intake status, and nutritional status and identify factors related to sarcopenia 6 months after esophagectomy. METHODS: A total of 134 patients who underwent radical resection for thoracic esophageal cancer between March 2016 and July 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. The diagnosis of sarcopenia was made by CT taken 6 months postoperatively using the cut-off criteria of skeletal muscle index (SMI) < 52.4 cm2/m2 for male and SMI < 38.5 cm2/m2 for female patients. As factors related to postoperative sarcopenia, dysphagia, oral intake status, nutritional status, and physical function were extracted from the medical records. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify perioperative risk factors related to sarcopenia 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: Of the 134 patients, 34.3% were judged to be unable to start oral intake on swallowing assessment. At discharge, 30.6% received tube feeding with or without oral intake. In the non-oral intake group on swallowing assessment, a significantly higher proportion of patients received tube feeding at discharge (p = 0.014). Preoperative BMI, postoperative handgrip strength, and tube feeding at discharge were independent risk factors for sarcopenia 6 months after esophagectomy in male patients. CONCLUSION: Tube feeding at discharge is significantly related to postoperative sarcopenia in patients with esophageal cancer. Identifying high-risk groups might allow early detection of malnutrition and provision of appropriate care.
Assuntos
Transtornos de Deglutição , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Sarcopenia , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Sarcopenia/complicações , Força da Mão , Transtornos de Deglutição/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/complicações , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is no clear evidence on the prevention of postoperative delirium with pharmacotherapy in elderly patients with esophageal cancer. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ramelteon and suvorexant in preventing postoperative delirium in this patient group. METHODS: Data on 251 patients who received radical esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer were collected from January 2010 to September 2021. In total, 74 patients did not receive preventive intervention, and 177 received ramelteon and suvorexant. After propensity score matching, the rate of postoperative delirium was compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Seventy-two well-balanced patients in each group demonstrated similar clinical and pathological characteristics. The mean ages of the intervention and control groups were 70.8 and 70.3 years, respectively. All the patients underwent McKeown esophagectomy, and in the volume of intraoperative blood loss or operative time did not significantly differ between the two groups. The incidence rates of postoperative hyperactive delirium were 7% (5/72) in the intervention group and 32% (23/72) in the control group (p < 0.001). No severe adverse event potentially attributable to the intervention drug was observed. The multivariate analysis showed that the use of ramelteon and suvorexant was the only independent protective factor against postoperative delirium (hazard ratio 0.157, 95% CI 0.055-0.448, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ramelteon and suvorexant may play an important role in reducing postoperative delirium in elderly patients with esophageal cancer.
Assuntos
Delírio , Delírio do Despertar , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Humanos , Idoso , Estudos Retrospectivos , Delírio/epidemiologia , Delírio/etiologia , Delírio/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Esofágicas/complicações , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The clinical effectiveness of tumor markers for estimating prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unclear. We assessed the clinical impact of changes in perioperative serum p53 antibodies (s-p53-Abs) titers in ESCC. METHODS: From January 2011 to March 2021, 249 patients were enrolled in this study. Titers of s-p53-Abs were measured before the initial treatment and 3 months after esophagectomy. Patients were divided into a s-p53-Abs decreased or unchanged group (Group D, n = 217) and an increased group (Group I, n = 32). Short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the groups. RESULTS: There was no correlation between the changes in squamous cell carcinoma antigen and carcinoembryonic antigen titers and recurrence site, number of recurrent lesions, and prognosis. However, the recurrence rate was significantly higher in Group I than in Group D (53.1% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.008), especially for distant organ recurrence (37.5% vs. 18.4%, p = 0.019). Furthermore, the rate of polyrecurrence was higher in Group I than in Group D (34.4% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.009). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was significantly worse in Group I than in Group D (median survival time, 21.2 months vs. 36.7 months, p = 0.015). Multivariate analysis revealed that lymphatic vessel infiltration (hazard ratio [HR], 1.721; 95% CI 1.069-2.772; p = 0.026), blood vessel infiltration (HR, 2.348; 95% CI 1.385-3.982; p = 0.002), advanced pathological stage (≥ III) (HR, 3.937; 95% CI 2.295-6.754; p < 0.001), and increased s-p53-Abs titers (HR, 2.635; 95% CI 1.488-4.667; p = 0.001) were independent predictors of poor RFS. CONCLUSIONS: Elevation of s-p53-Abs titers after esophagectomy can predict polyrecurrence in distant organs and poor prognosis.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/cirurgia , Prognóstico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Proteína Supressora de Tumor p53RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to elucidate the residual disease distribution and recurrence patterns in patients with ESCC responding to NAC. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: To appropriately plan a prospective trial for the organ preservation approach which includes additional chemoradiotherapy in patients who responded to NAC, the distribution of residual disease needs to be elucidated. Given that the residual tumor is located in the regional field, chemoradiotherapy can be safely added to eliminate the residual disease. METHODS: Overall, 483 patients with resectable ESCC who received NAC followed by transthoracic esophagectomy at 2 high-volume centers were reviewed. The recurrence-free survival, overall survival (OS), and residual and recurrent tumor patterns were compared among the pathological responses. RESULTS: Compared with nonpathological responders, pathological responders exhibited significantly longer recurrence-free survival [hazard ratio of Grade 1b/2/3 compared with Grade 0; 0.25 ( P < 0.001)/0.17 ( P < 0.001)/0.16 ( P = 0.003)] and OS [hazard ratio of Grade 1b/2/3 compared with Grade 0; 0.26 ( P < 0.001)/0.12 ( P < 0.001)/0.11 ( P = 0.003)]. In terms of the distribution of recurrence, the percentages of solitary recurrence in the regional field out of all recurrence was significantly higher in patients with Grade 1b (60%)/2 (67%)/3 (67%) whereas less than 25% in Grade 0 or 1a. CONCLUSIONS: It was found that postoperative recurrence in responders occurred in the regional field mostly as a solitary lesion without the distant failure, indicating that the residual tumor cells can be eliminated by additional chemoradiotherapy.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Quimiorradioterapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/cirurgia , Esofagectomia , Humanos , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Neoplasia Residual , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Extensive lymph node dissection increases the risk of postoperative complications, especially in salvage surgery, after definitive chemoradiotherapy (≥ 50 Gy) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The purpose of this retrospective study is to compare the outcomes of salvage esophagectomy with selective lymphadenectomy of only clinically positive lymph nodes. METHODS: Clinically positive lymph nodes, diagnosed as metastases using computed and positron emission tomography performed before chemoradiotherapy or salvage surgery, were targeted for dissection in selective lymphadenectomy. We compared postoperative complications between 52 patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy with selective lymphadenectomy and 207 controls who underwent nonsalvage esophagectomy with 3-field lymphadenectomy. We also analyzed postoperative recurrence pattern and survival in salvage group. RESULTS: The mean number of dissected lymph nodes was 12.9 in the salvage esophagectomy group compared with 48.1 in the 3-field lymphadenectomy group (p < 0.001). Differences in the number of postoperative complications, comparing Clavien-Dindo all-grade and ≥ grade 3, were not significant between the groups. Both 30- and 90-day mortality were 0% (0/52) in the salvage group. Five cases had recurrence only in the locoregional area without distant metastasis. Of these five cases, only one had recurrence in the subcarinal lymph node without prophylactic mediastinal lymphadenectomy. A 3-year recurrence-free survival and 3-year overall survival from salvage esophagectomy were 43.3% and 46.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: It may contribute to obtaining good short- and long-term outcomes by dissecting only clinically positive lymph nodes in salvage esophagectomy.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/cirurgia , Esofagectomia , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo , Linfonodos/patologia , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Metástase Linfática/patologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of circumferential resection margin (CRM) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unclear. Optimal CRM for predicting the recurrence of pathological T3 ESCC was investigated. METHODS: Seventy-three patients were retrospectively investigated in the development cohort. Patients were divided into CRM-negative and CRM-positive groups, and clinicopathological factors and survival outcomes were compared between the groups. The cutoff value was validated in another validation cohort (n = 99). RESULTS: Receiver operating characteristic analysis in the development cohort showed the cutoff value of CRM was 600 µm. In the validation cohort, patients in the CRM-positive group showed a significantly higher rate of locoregional recurrence (p = 0.006) and worse recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p < 0.001) than those in the CRM-negative group. Multivariate analysis identified positive CRM as an independent predictive factor for poor RFS (hazard ratio, 2.695; 95% confidence interval, 1.492-4.867; p = 0.001). The predictive value of our criteria of positive CRM for RFS was higher than that of the Royal College of Pathologists (RCP) and the College of American Pathologists (CAP) criteria. Stratified analysis in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy groups also revealed that the rate of locoregional recurrence was higher in the CRM-positive group than in the CRM-negative group both in the pathological N0 and N1-3 subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: CRM of 600 µm can be the optimal cutoff value rather than the RCP and CAP criteria for predicting locoregional recurrence after esophagectomy. These results may support the impact of perioperative locoregional control of locally advanced ESCC.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To appropriately adopt the organ preservation approach, including subsequent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients who respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), the distribution of residual disease, including pathological lymph nodes (LNs) and recurrence site, needs to be recognized preoperatively. This study was designed to evaluate whether endoscopic response evaluation can predict residual tumor distribution. METHODS: Patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE) were retrospectively reviewed. Endoscopic responder (ER) to NAC was defined according to primary tumor endoscopic findings. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and residual tumor patterns were compared between groups. RESULTS: Of 193 patients, 40 (20%) were classified as ER. ERs showed significantly better RFS and OS. The pN location was found within the primary tumor and cN field in 88% of ERs, which was significantly higher than non-ERs at 63% (p = 0.004). Furthermore, the postoperative recurrence incidence in the distant organ was significantly lower in the ERs than the non-ERs (8%, 32%, respectively, p = 0.002). Residual disease, including postoperative initial recurrence, existed within the same field as the primary tumor and cN in 88% of ERs, significantly higher than 42% in the non-ERs (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic response evaluation can preoperatively predict distribution of residual tumors after NAC, which could help radiation field selection in subsequent definitive CRT when patients prefer to omit TTE. Along with improvements in NAC response rate, this could facilitate organ preservation in patients who respond to NAC.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/patologia , Esofagectomia , Humanos , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasia Residual/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Sarcopenia, which involves two important aspects, namely skeletal muscle loss and decreased physical function, was suggested as a poor prognostic factor in esophageal cancer surgery. The purpose of this study was to clarify the perioperative change in daily physical activity and propose effective preventive strategies. We prospectively enrolled patients with esophageal cancer who were scheduled to undergo radical esophagectomy. Their daily physical activities were recorded using an accelerometer before surgery, immediately after discharge, and 6 months after surgery. The relationships of physical activity level and the perioperative factors, especially skeletal muscle change, with the risk factors of low daily activity level were investigated. The data of 20/28 enrolled patients were analyzed. The mean activity level of the 20 patients decreased after discharge and subsequently recovered on postoperative month 6. The percentage of activity levels >1.5 metabolic equivalents/day after discharge significantly correlated to the change rate in total muscle cross-sectional area from baseline to POM 6 (r = 0.452, P = 0.045). In a stepwise multiple regression analysis, age, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and anastomotic leakage were identified as negative associated factors of activity time at >1.5 metabolic equivalents at postoperative month 6. Activity level immediately after discharge was significantly associated with skeletal muscle loss at postoperative month 6 in patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy. Elderly patients and patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and had an anastomotic leakage might require intensive prevention. Prospective interventions aimed at increasing daily activity can prevent sarcopenia.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Esofagectomia , Idoso , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Esofagectomia/efeitos adversos , Exercício Físico , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Esophagectomy is a highly invasive procedure, associated with several postoperative complications including pneumonia, anastomotic leakage, and sepsis, which may result in multiorgan failure. Pneumonia is considered a major predictor of poor long-term prognosis, so its prevention is important for patients undergoing surgery for esophageal cancer. METHODS: The subjects of this study were 137 patients who underwent esophagectomy at Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, between January, 2012 and December, 2016. Patients who underwent R0 or R1 resection or esophagectomy with organ excision were included. Patients who underwent salvage surgery or resection of recurrent laryngeal nerve, and those with preoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, were excluded. We investigated the effect of the maximum phonation time on the development of postoperative pneumonia. RESULTS: Pneumonia developed more frequently in patients with a long operative time, clinically left recurrent nerve lymph node metastasis, and a short preoperative maximum phonation time (p = 0.074, 0.046, and 0.080, respectively). Pneumonia was also more common in men with an abnormal maximum phonation time (p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: The maximum phonation time is a significant predictor of postoperative pneumonia after esophagectomy in men.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Pneumonia , Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Esofagectomia/efeitos adversos , Esofagectomia/métodos , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Masculino , Fonação , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Pneumonia/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although radical esophagectomy with multifield lymph node dissection is a promising treatment to achieve long-term survival for resectable esophageal cancer, survival after postoperative recurrence remains poor. To select the optimal treatment for patients with recurrent esophageal cancer, simple, objective indicators for predicting of long-term outcomes are needed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-institution, retrospective cohort study between 2004 and 2019, wherein 586 patients underwent transthoracic esophagectomy for primary esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Of these, 133 patients with postoperative recurrence were included in this analysis. Several predictors of survival after recurrence were investigated. RESULTS: Among all patients, the 1- and 3-year survival rates after recurrence were 48.0% and 23.1%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at recurrence was identified as a significant predictor of death after recurrence (hazard ratio 1.061; 95% confidence interval 1.002-1.125; p = 0.043). Time-dependent receiver operating characteristics curves showed that the area under the curve value of the NLR at recurrence was superior to the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score at recurrence in all terms. To simulate the clinical decision process, we set the cut-off NLR at recurrence for survival using survival classification and regression tree (CART) and defined the optimal cut-off value as 3.374. CONCLUSIONS: NLR at recurrence was a significant indicator of survival after recurrence in patients with recurrent esophageal cancer. CART analysis was used to determine the optimal cut-off value for the prediction of survival, allowing the NLR to be used clinically to facilitate decision making.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/patologia , Humanos , Contagem de Linfócitos , Linfócitos/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neutrófilos/patologia , Prognóstico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Postoperative sarcopenia following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer has become a severe problem due to the increasing number of elderly patients undergoing surgery. This study aimed to clarify the relationship between early postoperative skeletal muscle change and cancer prognosis, and propose effective interventions to prevent sarcopenia. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed 152 patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Total psoas muscle area (TPA) was measured before surgery as baseline and on postoperative day 7 (± 2). The effect of early postoperative skeletal muscle loss on 5-year survival was investigated. Moreover, 5-year survival in patients with postoperative complications and a high inflammatory status, which were previously reported as poor prognostic factors of esophageal cancer, was also investigated. RESULTS: Among the 152 patients, 52 (34.2%) showed a decrease in TPA, while 100 (65.8%) maintained their TPA. The TPA decreasing group exhibited poor 5-year overall survival (OS) (p = 0.003) and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p < 0.001). The TPA decreasing group also showed a poor 5-year OS in patients who developed severe postoperative complications (p = 0.015). Multivariate analyses showed that decreased TPA was found to be independently associated with OS (p = 0.017) as well as RFS (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggested a relationship between decreased TPA within 1 week after esophagectomy and long-term prognosis among patients with esophageal cancer. If TPA can be maintained, the prognosis was better even in cases with serious complications.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Sarcopenia , Idoso , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Esofagectomia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/patologia , Prognóstico , Músculos Psoas/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Sarcopenia/etiologia , Sarcopenia/patologia , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Risk stratification to select appropriate candidates for adjuvant therapy is required for esophageal cancer patients based on adjuvant therapy advancement including immunotherapy. The current study aims to develop a novel staging system using pathological stage (pStage) and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: ESCC patients who received NAC and underwent transthoracic esophagectomy at two Japanese high-volume esophageal centers were retrospectively reviewed. The prognostic value of NAC response was evaluated within the same pStage, and a novel risk stratification to predict cancer-specific survival (CSS) was developed. RESULTS: The HR (95% CI) of pathological responders in pStage 0-I, II, III, and IV was 0.29 (0.07-1.17), 0.37 (0.12-1.10), 0.37 (0.15-0.92), and 0.24 (0.06-0.98), respectively. Responders in pStage 0-II were classified to be in the same class and those in pStage III/IV in another group, because the 5-year CSS (5y-CSS) rate of responders in pStage 0-I, II, III, and IV was 94%, 92%, 76%, and 71%, respectively. Combining nonresponders in pStage 0-II as the same group, all patients were subdivided into five groups. Intriguingly, the 5y-CSS in pStage III-IV responders was 75%, almost identical to that of nonresponders in pStage 0-II (78%). CONCLUSIONS: The histological response influenced the long-term outcomes of patients who underwent esophagectomy after NAC, even within groups stratified by pathologic stage. The current risk stratification system will contribute to selecting appropriate candidates for adjuvant therapy.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Esofagectomia , Humanos , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) is a tumor marker widely used to estimate the progression of esophageal SCC (ESCC), only a few studies have focused on the relationship between serum SCC-Ag levels and the therapeutic effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to elucidate the clinical significance of pretherapeutic serum SCC-Ag levels in patients who underwent NAC followed by esophagectomy. METHODS: Data of 453 patients who underwent NAC followed by esophagectomy were collected from the esophageal cancer database of two high-volume Japanese centers. Serum SCC-Ag levels were measured prior to NAC, and the pathological therapeutic effect of NAC and patient survival were evaluated. Patients were classified according to the tertiles of the serum SCC-Ag value (low, middle, and high groups), and the outcomes among the groups were compared. RESULTS: The levels of serum SCC-Ag were significantly associated with tumor stage (p < 0.01). With regard to the pathological therapeutic effect, the levels of serum SCC-Ag were negatively correlated with the therapeutic effect (p = 0.02). Moreover, increased levels of serum SCC-Ag negatively influenced relapse-free survival (p < 0.01). Multivariate analyses revealed the 'high' group as the independent factor for both the unfavorable therapeutic effect (p = 0.01) and the increased risk of disease recurrence (p < 0.01) when compared with the 'low' group. CONCLUSION: Elevated levels of pretherapeutic serum SCC-Ag are significantly associated with advanced tumor stage, poor response to NAC, and increased risk of disease recurrence.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Serpinas , Antígenos de Neoplasias , Biomarcadores Tumorais , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , PrognósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The tumor, node, metastasis staging system of the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) has been used worldwide for esophageal cancer, and, in Japan, the Japan Esophageal Society Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer (JES) has also been used; however, there is a big difference between the two classifications with regard to node staging. We hypothesized that these two node staging systems may lead to different outcome predictions in terms of tumor location. METHODS: This study enrolled 409 patients who underwent esophagectomy at Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, between January 2005 and December 2017. We included those who underwent R0 or R1 resection or esophagectomy with additional organ excision, and excluded those who underwent salvage surgery. Thereafter, we investigated how the number or spread of metastatic lymph nodes affected the prognosis. RESULTS: For all 409 patients, the 5-year overall survival rate was 64.1% and the 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was 58.4%. The concordance indices were 0.756 for UICC 8th edition pathological node staging and 0.732 for JES 11th edition pathological node staging (p = 0.06). Based on tumor location, the difference in the concordance indices between these two classifications was greatest for lower thoracic esophageal tumors (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: For all patients, the UICC 8th edition node staging system tended to reflect survival more precisely than that of the JES 11th edition. For lower thoracic esophageal tumors in particular, the former node staging system could be more useful.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Esofagectomia , Humanos , Japão/epidemiologia , Excisão de Linfonodo , Linfonodos/patologia , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To arrange multidisciplinary treatment for esophageal cancer, a simple and accurate predictive marker for prognosis is required. The current multicenter prospective study aims to validate the prognostic significance of fibrinogen and albumin score (FA score) for esophageal cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who were planned to undergo surgical resection for esophageal cancer at four participating institutions were enrolled in this study. Patient background, clinicopathological factors, and blood concentration of plasma fibrinogen and albumin were collected. Patients with elevated fibrinogen and decreased albumin levels were allocated a score of 2; those with only one of these abnormalities were allocated a score of 1; and those with neither of these abnormalities were allocated a score of 0. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated as a primary endpoint. RESULTS: From four participating institutions, 133 patients were registered for the current analysis. The distribution of FA score of 0/1/2 was 84 (63%)/34 (26%)/15 (11%), respectively. In the analysis of primary endpoint, the preoperative FA score significantly classified RFS (FA score 1/2: HR 2.546, p = 0.013/6.989, p < 0.001) and OS (FA score 1/2: HR 2.756, p = 0.010/6.970, p < 0.001). We further evaluated the prognostic significance of FA score under stratification by pStage. As a result, with increasing FA score, RFS and OS were significantly worse in both pStage 0-I and II-IV groups. CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic impact of preoperative FA score was confirmed for esophageal cancer patients in the current multicenter prospective trial. FA score can be considered to predict postoperative survival and rearrange the treatment strategy before esophagectomy.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Esofagectomia , Biomarcadores Tumorais , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Fibrinogênio , Humanos , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Albumina SéricaRESUMO
This prospective multicenter non-randomized phase III study aims to evaluate the long-term outcome of sentinel node navigation surgery for early gastric cancer compared with conventional distal or total gastrectomy. Clinically diagnosed primary T1N0M0 gastric cancer patients with a single lesion (≤40 mm) and without previous endoscopic treatment will be enrolled in this study. Sentinel nodes are identified by dye and radioisotope tracers and are subjected to intraoperative rapid pathology. For patients with negative sentinel node metastasis, individualized surgery consisting of limited stomach resection and sentinel node basin dissection is performed, while standard gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection is employed for the positive sentinel node patients. A total of 225 patients will be accrued from 13 hospitals that have experience in sentinel node mapping. The primary endpoint is 5-year relapse-free survival. The secondary endpoints are overall survival, sentinel node detection rate, diagnostic accuracy for sentinel node, distribution of sentinel nodes and metastatic sentinel node/non-sentinel node, and postoperative quality of life.
Assuntos
Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela , Linfonodo Sentinela/cirurgia , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Determinação de Ponto Final , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo , Masculino , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Linfonodo Sentinela/patologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer has a poor prognosis because of its rapid progression and early and extensive lymph node metastasis. Simple, objective indicators for predicting long-term outcomes are needed to select optimal perioperative treatment and appropriate follow-up for patients with esophageal cancer. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between the lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio (LCR) and the survival of patients with esophageal cancer, by performing time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The results were compared to those of traditional inflammation-based markers. METHODS: This study enrolled 495 patients who underwent thoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer as the primary treatment between 2000 and 2019 in our department. We investigated the predictability of the LCR for oncological outcomes compared to that of other traditional inflammatory markers. RESULTS: The 3-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were 72.6% and 57.5%, respectively. Low LCR was significantly associated with higher cancer stage, included depth of invasion (p < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (p < 0.001) and cStage (p < 0.001). The LCR had the highest AUC value (0.675) for predicting OS compared to the other examined inflammatory markers. In multivariate analysis, the LCR (optimal cutoff threshold = 19,000) was identified as a significant predictor of death (hazard ratio, 2.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.61-3.12; p < 0.001) and recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.97; 95%CI, 1.48-2.63; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The LCR is novel indicator for oncological outcomes for patients with esophageal cancer and may assist to facilitate personalized multidisciplinary treatments.