Enhanced Survival of Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia-Dysplastic over Proliferative Subtype after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant: A Tertiary Center Experience and Literature Review.

INTRODUCTION: CMML is a rare neoplasm with overlapping myelodysplastic and myeloproliferative features whose only potential cure is allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). METHODS: This retrospective study examined 27 CMML patients with high-risk clinical features who underwent first allo-HCT at our institution between 2004 and 2022. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were diagnosed with the proliferative subtype (CMML-MPN) and 8 with the dysplastic subtype (CMML-MDS). Median OS was 15 months post-HCT (95% CI: 5-71); OS at 1, 3, and 5 years was 52%, 35%, and 35%, respectively. Compared to those with CMML-MPN, patients with CMML-MDS had longer OS (median, 8.6 vs. 0.9 years; p = 0.025), RFS (4.4 vs. 0.5 years; p = 0.021), and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS, 9.4 vs. 3.4 months; p = 0.033) as well as lower 1-year NRM (13 vs. 47%; p = 0.043), with the statistical significance of this CMML subtype effect maintained in multivariable models. High-risk cytogenetics were associated with shorter GRFS in the univariable (median, 3.1 vs. 6.2 months; p = 0.013) and multivariable (HR = 4.88; p = 0.006) settings. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent transplant for CMML-MDS experienced substantially better outcomes than those transplanted for CMML-MPN. Future studies are needed for transplantation optimization in CMML, especially CMML-MPN.

The rationale behind grafting haploidentical hematopoietic stem cells.

The ability to perform hematopoietic cell transplant across major histocompatibility complex barriers can dramatically increase the availability of donors and allow more patients across the world to pursue curative transplant procedures for underlying hematologic disorders. Early attempts at haploidentical transplantation using broadly reactive T-cell depletion approaches were compromised by graft rejection, graft-versus-host disease and prolonged immune deficiency. The evolution of haploidentical transplantation focused on expanding transplanted hematopoietic progenitors as well as using less broadly reactive T-cell depletion. Significant outcome improvements were identified with technology advances allowing selective depletion of donor allospecific T cells, initially ex-vivo with evolution to its current in-vivo approach with the infusion of the highly immunosuppressive chemotherapy agent, cyclophosphamide after transplantation procedure. Current approaches are facile and portable, allowing expansion of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients across the world, including previously underserved populations.

The impact of omidubicel on immune reconstitution and infections in cord blood transplant patients.

INTRODUCTION: The success of an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) is measured by cure from the underlying malignancy, immune reconstitution (IR), and freedom from graft-versus-host disease, without the continued need for immunosuppressive therapy. AREAS COVERED: Effective IR is critical to the success of alloHCT wherein poor IR can potentially increase the risk of infection and disease relapse. Different stem cell sources give rise to varying patterns of IR. Particularly with umbilical cord blood transplant, delayed IR is commonly seen with associated increased infection rates and non-relapse mortality, attributable to low CD34+ cell doses and predominance of naïve T cells in the graft. Recent FDA approval of omidubicel, an expanded cord blood graft, was granted due to rapid hematologic recovery and a reduced incidence of high-grade infections associated with improved IR. This review focuses on IR and infections seen with omidubicel and compares those to IR after alloHCT with other graft sources. EXPERT OPINION: Characteristics of omidubicel, such as ready availability, high infused CD34+ cell dose, and rapid hematologic and immune recovery improve upon the shortcomings of standard umbilical cord blood transplantation. We feel that the data support the emergence of omidubicel as an alternative donor product.

"Don't keep me waiting": estimating the impact of reduced vein-to-vein time on lifetime US 3L+ LBCL patient outcomes.

ABSTRACT: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR T) has revolutionized the treatment of hematological cancers. Its production requires a complex logistical process, and the time from leukapheresis to patient infusion (known as the vein-to-vein time [V2VT]) can be long during which a patients clinical condition may deteriorate. This study was designed to estimate the benefits of reduced V2VT for third-line or later (3L+) relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (R/R LBCL) patients treated with CAR T. A mathematical model was developed to estimate the lifetime outcomes of a hypothetical cohort of patients who had either a long or short V2VT. Life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), and costs were estimated. Scenario analyses were performed to assess the robustness of results to key assumptions. The results of the model show that reducing V2VT from 54 days (tisa-cel median V2VT; JULIET) to 24 days (axi-cel median V2VT; ZUMA-1) led to a 3.2-year gain in life expectancy (4.2 vs 7.7 LYs), and 2.4 additional QALYs (3.2 vs 5.6) per patient. Furthermore, a shorter V2VT was shown to be cost-effective under conventional willingness-to-pay thresholds in the United States. Results are driven by a higher infusion rate and a better efficacy of CAR T for those infused. Scenario analyses using a smaller difference in V2VT (24 vs 36 days) produced consistent results. Our study is the first to quantify lifetime V2VT-related outcomes for 3L+ R/R LBCL patients treated with CAR T utilizing currently available evidence. Shorter V2VTs led to improved outcomes, demonstrating the importance of timely infusion achievable by faster manufacturing times and optimization of hospital delivery.

Medicare Utilization and Cost Trends for CAR T Cell Therapies Across Settings of Care in the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapies have transformed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treatment. It is important to better understand their use in Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) patients, who often differ from commercially insured populations in important ways. METHODS: We analyzed Medicare FFS claims data, focusing on the utilization patterns across three CAR T products-lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel), tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), and axicabtagene autoleucel (axi-cel)-which are indicated for the treatment of DLBCL. Our investigation covered the period from 2021 through 2022. This analysis spanned a 180-day period prior to CAR T procedure and extended to a 90-day post-CAR T. Utilization of healthcare services, healthcare spending, and comorbidities were assessed in the pre- and post-periods. Clinical trial and PPS-exempt center claims were removed from the analysis. Statistical comparisons between inpatient and outpatient cohorts were made using Wilcoxon's rank-sum tests for continuous variables and Chi-square tests or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables. RESULTS: Among the total 391 CAR T claims assessed, most of the CAR T therapies were administered in the inpatient setting (79%) compared to outpatient (21%). CAR T therapy in the inpatient setting received an average Medicare cost of US$498,723 ($276,138-$1,066,524), while the average Medicare cost for outpatient CAR T claims was $414,393 ($276,980-$849,878). There was a higher 3-month average post-period cost for those hospitals utilizing CAR T in the outpatient setting than the inpatient setting ($15,794 vs. $10,244). Despite the higher post-period cost, when looking at the CAR T procedure and pre- and post-periods as a single episode, beneficiaries receiving outpatient CAR T had less cost for the total episode of care ($587,908 vs. $529,188). Follow-up inpatient claims were also assessed post-CAR T procedure for 30 days. The rate of post-CAR T inpatient re-admission was significantly lower for beneficiaries receiving the index CAR T in the inpatient setting (21%) compared to outpatient CAR T (59%). Days between index CAR T discharge and IP admission were also significantly shorter for OP CAR T compared to IP CAR T (8.0 vs. 14.1 days, p < 0.0001). Additionally, IP CAR T had a longer ALOS on the admission claim (6.9 vs. 6.2 days). CONCLUSION: CAR T therapy for the treatment of LBCL has become more common within the Medicare population, primarily in the inpatient setting. This study helps understand providers' cost and associated patient care around CAR T administration. The data show that the average cost received by hospitals encompasses the expenses related to both the CAR T drug and the medical services delivered to patients.

Cost-Effectiveness of Reduced-Intensity Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Older Patients With High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Analysis of BMT CTN 1102.

PURPOSE: BMT CTN 1102 was a phase III trial comparing reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (RIC alloHCT) to standard of care for persons with intermediate- or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). We report results of a cost-effectiveness analysis conducted alongside the clinical trial. METHODS: Three hundred eighty-four patients received HCT (n = 260) or standard of care (n = 124) according to availability of a human leukocyte antigen-matched donor. Cost-effectiveness was calculated from US commercial and Medicare perspectives over a 20-year time horizon. Health care utilization and costs were estimated using propensity score-matched cohorts of HCT recipients in the OptumLabs Data Warehouse (age 50-64 years) and Medicare (age 65 years and older). EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) surveys of trial participants were used to derive health state utilities. RESULTS: Extrapolated 20-year overall survival for those age 50-64 years was 29% for HCT (n = 105) versus 13% for usual care (n = 44) and 31% for HCT (n = 155) versus 12% for non-HCT (n = 80) for those age 65 years and older. HCT was more effective (+2.36 quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs] for age 50-64 years and +2.92 QALYs for age 65 years and older) and more costly (+$452,242 in US dollars (USD) for age 50-64 years and +$233,214 USD for age 65 years and older) than usual care, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $191,487 (USD)/QALY and $79,834 (USD)/QALY, respectively. For persons age 50-64 years, there was a 29% chance that HCT was cost-effective using a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150K (USD)/QALY and 51% at a $200K (USD)/QALY. For persons age 65 years and older, the probability was 100% at a WTP >$150K (USD)/QALY. CONCLUSION: Among patients age 65 years and older with high-risk MDS, RIC HCT is a high-value strategy. For those age 50-64 years, HCT is a lower-value strategy but has similar cost-effectiveness to other therapies commonly used in oncology.

Optimizing the Post-CAR T Monitoring Period for Axicabtagene Ciloleucel, Tisagenlecleucel, and Lisocabtagene Maraleucel.

CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapies, including axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), and lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel), have transformed the treatment landscape for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), showcasing significant efficacy but also highlighting toxicity risks such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). The FDA has mandated patients remain close to the treatment center for four weeks as part of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy to monitor and manage these toxicities, which, while cautious, may add to cost of care, be burdensome for patients and their families, and present challenges related to patient access and socioeconomic disparities. This retrospective study across 9 centers involving 475 patients infused with axi-cel, tisa-cel, and liso-cel from 2018 to 2023, aims to assess CRS and ICANS onset and duration, as well as causes of non-relapse mortality (NRM) in real-world CAR T recipients. While differences were noted in the incidence and duration of CRS and ICANS between CAR T products, new-onset CRS and ICANS are exceedingly rare after two weeks following infusion (0% and 0.7% of patients, respectively). No new cases of CRS occurred after two weeks and a single case of new-onset ICANS occurred in the third week following infusion. NRM is driven by ICANS in the early follow-up period (1.1% until day 28), then by infection through three months post-infusion (1.2%). This study provides valuable insights into optimizing CAR T therapy monitoring and our findings may provide a framework to reduce physical and financial constraints for patients.

Galectin-3 predicts acute GvHD and overall mortality post reduced intensity allo-HCT: a BMT-CTN biorepository study.

Identifying plasma biomarkers early after allo-HCT may become crucial to prevent and treat severe aGvHD. We utilized samples from 203 allo-HCT patients selected from the Blood & Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) to identify new biomarker models to predict aGvHD and overall mortality. Two new biomarkers (Gal-3 and LAG-3), and previously identified biomarkers (ST2/IL33R, IL6, Reg3A, PD-1, TIM-3, TNFR1) were screened. Increased Gal-3 levels measured at Day +7 post-transplant predicted the development of aGvHD (grade 2-4) in the total population [AUC: 0.602; P = 0.045] while higher Day +14 levels predicted overall mortality due to toxicity among patients receiving reduced intensity conditioning [P = 0.028] but not myeloablative conditioning. Elevated LAG-3 levels (Day +21) were associated with less severe aGvHD [159.1 ng/mL vs 222.0 ng/mL; P = 0.046]. We developed a model utilizing Gal-3, LAG-3, and PD-1 levels at Days +14 and +21 with an improved performance to predict aGvHD and overall non-relapse mortality. We confirmed four informative biomarkers (Reg3A, ST2, TIM-3, and TNFR1) predict severe aGvHD at day +14 and day +21 (grade 3-4). In conclusion, the combination of Gal-3 alone or in combination with LAG-3, and PD-1 is a new informative model to predict aGvHD development and overall non-relapse mortality after allo-HCT.

Clinical Practice Recommendations for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies in Follicular Lymphoma: A Collaborative Effort on Behalf of the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy and the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), accounting for nearly one-third of all NHL. The therapeutic landscape for patients with FL has significantly expanded over the past decade, but the disease continues to be considered incurable. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is potentially curative in some cases. Recently, the emergence of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) FL has yielded impressive response rates and long-term remissions, but definitive statement on the curative potential of CAR-T is currently not possible due to limited patient numbers and relatively short follow up. A consensus on the contemporary role, optimal timing, and sequencing of HCT (autologous or allogeneic) and cellular therapies in FL is needed. As a result, the American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) Committee on Practice Guidelines endorsed this effort to formulate consensus recommendations to address this unmet need. The RAND-modified Delphi method was used to generate 15 consensus statements/recommendations. These clinical practice recommendations will help guide clinicians managing patients with FL. Of note, the use of bispecific antibodies in R/R FL was not in the scope of this project.

CAR T-Cell Immunotherapy in Minority Patients with Lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Administration of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART19) immunotherapy for large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs), a subset of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), involves high costs and access to specialized tertiary care centers. We investigated whether minority health populations (MHPs) have equal access to CART19 and whether their outcomes are similar to those of non-MHPs. METHODS: We analyzed the prevalence and clinical outcomes of patients treated with commercial CART19 at two geographically and socioeconomically different institutions: the Abramson Cancer Center (ACC, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) and the Knight Cancer Institute (KCI, Portland, Oregon). RESULTS: In the ACC catchment area, 8956 patients were diagnosed with NHL between 2015 and 2019 (latest available data from the state registry), including 17.9% MHPs. In the ACC, between 2018 and 2022 (CART became available in 2018), 1492 patients with LBCL were treated, and 194 received CART19. The proportion of MHPs was 15.7% for the entire LBCL cohort but only 6.7% for the CART19 cohort. During the same time, in the KCI catchment area, 4568 patients were diagnosed with NHL, including 4.2% MHPs. In the KCI, 396 patients with LBCL were treated, and 47 received CART19. The proportion of MHPs was 6.6% for the entire LBCL cohort and 4.2% for the CART19 cohort. The 3-month response, survival, and toxicities after CART19 infusion showed similar results, although the number of patients who were treated was limited. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the access of MHPs to tertiary centers for LBCL care was preserved but appeared reduced for commercial CART19 immunotherapy. Although clinical outcomes of MHPs seemed similar to those of non-MHPs, the small sample size precludes drawing firm conclusions. Further studies are needed. (Funded by the Laffey McHugh Foundation and others.).