Treatment of Iron Deficiency in Heart Failure.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Heart failure (HF) is commonly associated with iron deficiency (ID), defined as insufficient levels of iron to meet physiological demands. ID's association with anaemia is well understood but it is increasingly recognised as an important comorbidity in HF, even in the absence of anaemia. This review summarises contemporary evidence for the measurement and treatment of ID, in both HFrEF and HFpEF, and specific HF aetiologies, and highlights important gaps in the evidence-base. RECENT FINDINGS: ID is common among patients with HF and associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Correcting ID in patients with HF can impact upon functional status, exercise tolerance, symptoms, and overall quality of life, irrespective of anaemia status. ID is a modifiable comorbidity in HF. Therefore, recognising and treating ID has emerging therapeutic potential and is important for all clinicians who care for patients with HF to understand the rationale and approach to treatment.

Implementation of the Mental Capacity Act: a national observational study comparing resultant trends in place of death for older heart failure decedents with or without comorbid dementia.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is increasingly prevalent in the growing elderly population and commonly associated with cognitive impairment. We compared trends in place of death (PoD) of HF patients with/without comorbid dementia around the implementation period of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) in October 2007, this legislation supporting patient-centred decision making for those with reduced agency. METHODS: Analyses of death certification data for England between January 2001 and December 2018, describing the PoD and sociodemographic characteristics of all people ≥ 65 years registered with HF as the underlying cause of death, with/without a mention of comorbid dementia. We used modified Poisson regression with robust error variance to determine the prevalence ratio (PR) of the outcome in dying at home, in care homes or hospices compared to dying in hospital. Covariates included year of death, age, gender, marital status, comorbidity burden, index of multiple deprivation and urban/rural settings. RESULTS: One hundred twenty thousand sixty-eight HF-related death records were included of which 8199 mentioned dementia as a contributory cause. The overall prevalence proportion of dementia was 6.8%, the trend significantly increasing from 5.6 to 8.0% pre- and post-MCA (Cochran-Armitage trend test p < 0.0001). Dementia was coded as unspecified (78.2%), Alzheimer's disease (13.5%) and vascular (8.3%). Demented decedents were commonly older, female, and with more comorbidities. Pre-MCA, PoD for non-demented HF patients was hospital 68.2%, care homes 20.2% and 10.7% dying at home. Corresponding figures for those with comorbid dementia were 47.6%, 48.0% and 4.2%, respectively. Following MCA enforcement, PoD for those without dementia shifted from hospital to home, 62.5% and 17.2%, respectively; PR: 1.026 [95%CI: 1.024-1.029]. While home deaths also rose to 10.0% for those with dementia, with hospital deaths increasing to 50.4%, this trend was insignificant, PR: 1.001 [0.988-1.015]. Care home deaths reduced for all, with/without dementia, PR: 0.959 [0.949-0.969] and PR: 0.996 [0.993-0.998], respectively. Hospice as PoD was rare for both groups with no appreciable change over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses suggest the MCA did not materially affect the PoD of HF decedents with comorbid dementia, likely reflecting difficulties implementing this legislation in real-life clinical practice.

Exploring the prevalence, impact and experience of cardiac cachexia in patients with advanced heart failure and their caregivers: A sequential phased study.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac Cachexia is a wasting syndrome that has a significant impact on patient mortality and quality of life world-wide, although it is poorly understood in clinical practice. AIM: Identify the prevalence of cardiac cachexia in patients with advanced New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class and explore its impact on patients and caregivers. DESIGN: An exploratory cross-sectional study. The sequential approach had two phases, with phase 1 including 200 patients with NYHA III-IV heart failure assessed for characteristics of cardiac cachexia. Phase 2 focussed on semi-structured interviews with eight cachectic patients and five caregivers to ascertain the impact of the syndrome. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Two healthcare trusts within the United Kingdom. RESULTS: Cardiac Cachexia was identified in 30 out of 200 participants, giving a prevalence rate of 15%. People with cachexia had a significantly reduced average weight and anthropometric measures (p < 0.05). Furthermore, individuals with cachexia experienced significantly more fatigue, had greater issues with diet and appetite, reduced physical wellbeing and overall reduced quality of life. C-reactive protein was significantly increased, whilst albumin and red blood cell count were significantly decreased in the cachectic group (p < 0.05). From qualitative data, four key themes were identified: (1) 'Changed relationship with food and eating', (2) 'Not me in the mirror', (3) 'Lack of understanding regarding cachexia' and (4) 'Uncertainty regarding the future'. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac cachexia has a debilitating effect on patients and caregivers. Future work should focus on establishing a specific definition and clinical pathway to enhance patient and caregiver support.

Cardiovascular Damage in COVID-19: What We Know Two Years Later.

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has profoundly influenced cardiological clinical and basic research in the past two years. In the present review, we summarize the current knowledge on myocardial involvement in COVID-19, providing an overview on the incidence, the pathogenetic mechanisms, and the clinical implications of cardiac injury in this setting. RECENT FINDINGS: The possibility of heart involvement in patients with COVID-19 has received great attention since the beginning of the pandemic. After more than two years, several steps have been taken in understanding the mechanisms and the incidence of cardiac injury during COVID-19 infection. Similarly, studies globally have clarified the implications of co-existing heart disease and COVID-19. Severe COVID-19 infection may be complicated by myocardial injury. To date, a direct damage from the virus has not been demonstrated. The presence of myocardial injury should be systematically assessed for a prognostication purpose and for possible therapeutic implications.

Clozapine-induced myocarditis: electronic health register analysis of incidence, timing, clinical markers and diagnostic accuracy.

BACKGROUND: Clozapine is associated with increased risk of myocarditis. However, many common side-effects of clozapine overlap with the clinical manifestations of myocarditis. As a result, there is uncertainty about which signs, symptoms and investigations are important in distinguishing myocarditis from benign adverse effects of clozapine. Clarity on this issue is important, since missing a diagnosis of myocarditis or discontinuing clozapine unnecessarily may both have devastating consequences. AIMS: To examine the clinical characteristics of clozapine-induced myocarditis and to identify which signs and symptoms distinguish true myocarditis from other clozapine adverse effects. METHOD: A retrospective analysis of the record database for 247 621 patients was performed. A natural language processing algorithm identified the instances of patients in which myocarditis was suspected. The anonymised case notes for the patients of each suspected instance were then manually examined, and those whose instances were ambiguous were referred for an independent assessment by up to three cardiologists. Patients with suspected instances were classified as having confirmed myocarditis, myocarditis ruled out or undetermined. RESULTS: Of 254 instances in 228 patients with suspected myocarditis, 11.4% (n = 29 instances) were confirmed as probable myocarditis. Troponin and C-reactive protein (CRP) had excellent diagnostic value (area under the curve 0.975 and 0.896, respectively), whereas tachycardia was of little diagnostic value. All confirmed instances occurred within 42 days of clozapine initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Suspicion of myocarditis can lead to unnecessary discontinuation of clozapine. The 'critical period' for myocarditis emergence is the first 6 weeks, and clinical signs including tachycardia are of low specificity. Elevated CRP and troponin are the best markers for the need for further evaluation.

Palliative Care in Acute Heart Failure.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Palliative care is increasingly acknowledged as beneficial in supporting patients and families affected by heart failure, but policy documents have generally focused on the chronic form of this disease. We examined palliative care provision for those with acute heart failure, based on the recently updated National Consensus Project Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care. RECENT FINDINGS: The commonest reason for hospitalization in those > 65 years, acute heart failure admissions delineate crisis points on the unpredictable disease trajectory. Palliative care is underutilized, often perceived as limited to end-of-life care rather than determined by regular systematic needs assessment. No dominant paradigm of palliative care provision has emerged from the nascent evidence base related to this clinical cohort, underscoring the need for further research. Embedding palliative support as mainstream to heart failure care from the point of diagnosis may better ensure treatment strategies for those admitted with acute heart failure remain consistent with patients' preferences and values.

Hearts and Minds: Real-Life Cardiotoxicity With Clozapine in Psychosis.

BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia has a 1% prevalence in the population; 30% of these patients are treatment refractory. Clozapine is the only drug licensed to treat treatment refractory psychosis, but concerns about potential adverse effects result in only a proportion of eligible patients being treated. Although a well-documented neutropenia risk is mitigated by routine blood testing, cardiac toxicity is a commonly cited reason to discontinue clozapine treatment. However, there is little data on the real-life cardiac outcomes in those receiving clozapine treatment. METHODS: Retrospective review of electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, and clinical outcomes in 39 inpatients with treatment-refractory schizophrenia, treated with clozapine and other antipsychotic medication, referred for cardiology opinion. RESULTS: Commonest reasons for referral were development of left ventricular (LV) impairment or sinus tachycardia with normal LV function. Patients were reviewed by a range of cardiologists, receiving varied interventions.Median LV ejection fraction in the clozapine group was normal (52%). Serial echocardiograms demonstrated that clozapine-treated patients with LV impairment had no change in LV ejection fraction over a 4-month follow-up. Left ventricular ejection fraction did not differ between patients treated with clozapine and other antipsychotics. However, over an 11-year follow-up period, 48% of patients had discontinued clozapine treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This naturalistic study demonstrates that clozapine is not associated with significant cardiac mortality or morbidity. There is a real need for multidisciplinary working between specialist cardiologists and psychiatrists caring for these complex patients to facilitate optimal long-term physical and mental health outcomes.

Biomarkers in Persistent AF and Heart Failure: Impact of Catheter Ablation Compared with Rate Control.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the effects of catheter ablation and rate control strategies on cardiac and inflammatory biomarkers in patients with heart failure and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Patients were recruited from the ARC-HF trial (catheter Ablation vs Rate Control for management of persistent AF in Heart Failure, NCT00878384), which compared ablation with rate control for persistent AF in heart failure. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), midregional proatrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP), apelin, and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were assayed at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. The primary end point, analyzed per-protocol, was changed from baseline at 12 months. RESULTS: Of 52 recruited patients, 24 ablation and 25 rate control subjects were followed to 12 months. After 1.2 ± 0.5 procedures, sinus rhythm was present in 22 (92%) ablation patients; under rate control, rate criteria were achieved in 23 (96%) of 24 patients remaining in AF. At 12 months, MR-proANP fell significantly in the ablation arm (-106.0 pmol/L, interquartile range [IQR] -228.2 to -60.6) compared with rate control (-28.7 pmol/L, IQR -69 to +9.5, P = 0.028). BNP showed a similar trend toward reduction (P = 0.051), with no significant difference in apelin (P = 0.13) or IL-6 (P = 0.68). Changes in MR-proANP and BNP correlated with peak VO2 and ejection fraction, and MR-proANP additionally with quality-of-life score. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter ablation, compared with rate control, in patients with heart failure and persistent AF was associated with significant reduction in MR-proANP, which correlated with physiological and symptomatic improvement. Ablation-based rhythm control may induce beneficial cardiac remodeling, unrelated to changes in inflammatory state. This may have prognostic implications, which require confirmation by event end point studies.

A nationwide, population-based study on specialized care for acute heart failure throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.

AIMS: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the delivery of care for patients with heart failure (HF), leading to fewer HF hospitalizations and increased mortality. However, nationwide data on quality of care and long-term outcomes across the pandemic are scarce. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used data from the National Heart Failure Audit (NHFA) linked to national records for hospitalization and deaths. We compared pre-COVID (2018-2019), COVID (2020), and late/post-COVID (2021-2022) periods. Data for 227 250 patients admitted to hospital with HF were analysed and grouped according to the admission year and the presence of HF with (HFrEF) or without reduced ejection fraction (non-HFrEF). The median age at admission was 81 years (interquartile range 72-88), 55% were men (n = 125 975), 87% were of white ethnicity (n = 102 805), and 51% had HFrEF (n = 116 990). In-hospital management and specialized cardiology care were maintained throughout the pandemic with an increasing percentage of patients discharged on disease-modifying medications over time (p < 0.001). Long-term outcomes improved over time (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-0.95, p < 0.001), mainly driven by a reduction in cardiovascular death. Receiving specialized cardiology care was associated with better long-term outcomes both for those who had HFrEF (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.77-0.82, p < 0.001) and for those who had non-HFrEF (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.85-0.90, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the disruption of healthcare systems, the clinical characteristics of patients admitted with HF were similar and the overall standard of care was maintained throughout the pandemic. Long-term survival of patients hospitalized with HF continued to improve after COVID-19, especially for HFrEF.

Heart Failure Specialist Care and Long-Term Outcomes for Patients Admitted With Acute Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: For patients with acute heart failure (HF), specialist HF care during admission improves diagnosis and treatments. OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to investigate the association of HF specialist care with in-hospital and longer term prognosis. METHODS: The authors used data from the National Heart Failure Audit from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2022, linked to electronic records for hospitalization and deaths. All-cause mortality was the primary outcome measure and in-hospital mortality the secondary outcome measure. RESULTS: Data for 227,170 patients admitted to hospital with HF (median age: 81 years; IQR: 72-88 years), were analyzed. Approximately 80% of acute HF admissions received support from HF specialists. Thirty-nine percent of patients (n = 70,720) were seen by a multidisciplinary team (HF physicians and HF specialist nurses [HFSNd]), 22% (n = 40,330) were seen by HFSNs alone, and the remaining 39% (n = 71,700) were seen exclusively by specialist HF physicians. At discharge, more patients who received HF specialist care were prescribed medical therapy for HF and had specialized follow-up. Conversely, diuretic agents were prescribed to fewer patients. HF specialist care was independently associated with a higher rate of prescribing HF therapies at discharge and a lower likelihood of receiving diuretic therapy (OR: 0.90 [95% CI: 0.86-0.95]; P < 0.001). HF specialist care was associated with better long-term survival (HR: 0.89 [95% CI: 0.87-0.90]; P < 0.001) and lower in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.92 [95% CI: 0.0.88-0.97]; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Receiving HF specialist care during admission for HF is associated with a higher rate of implementation of medical therapy, fewer discharges on diuretic therapy, and lower in-hospital and long-term mortality across the left ventricular ejection fraction spectrum, especially for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Race- and Ethnicity-Related Differences in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Using Natural Language Processing.

Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is the predominant form of HF in older adults. It represents a heterogenous clinical syndrome that is less well understood across different ethnicities. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the clinical presentation and assess the diagnostic performance of existing HFpEF diagnostic tools between ethnic groups. Methods: A validated Natural Language Processing (NLP) algorithm was applied to the electronic health records of a large London hospital to identify patients meeting the European Society of Cardiology criteria for a diagnosis of HFpEF. NLP extracted patient demographics (including self-reported ethnicity and socioeconomic status), comorbidities, investigation results (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, H2FPEF scores, and echocardiogram reports), and mortality. Analyses were stratified by ethnicity and adjusted for socioeconomic status. Results: Our cohort consisted of 1,261 (64%) White, 578 (29%) Black, and 134 (7%) Asian patients meeting the European Society of Cardiology HFpEF diagnostic criteria. Compared to White patients, Black patients were younger at diagnosis and more likely to have metabolic comorbidities (obesity, diabetes, and hypertension) but less likely to have atrial fibrillation (30% vs 13%; P < 0.001). Black patients had lower N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels and a lower frequency of H2FPEF scores ≥6, indicative of likely HFpEF (26% vs 44%; P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Leveraging an NLP-based artificial intelligence approach to quantify health inequities in HFpEF diagnosis, we discovered that established markers systematically underdiagnose HFpEF in Black patients, possibly due to differences in the underlying comorbidity patterns. Clinicians should be aware of these limitations and its implications for treatment and trial recruitment.