Cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection as a salvage technique for challenging colorectal laterally spreading tumors.

BACKGROUND: Cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR-c) has emerged as a potential alternative to standard piecemeal wide-field EMR (WF-EMR) for the resection of laterally spreading tumors (LSTs). However, clear indications for this technique are still lacking. Our objective was to investigate the performance of salvage EMR-c after WF-EMR failure in the resection of large colorectal LSTs. METHODS: The data of consecutive patients undergoing WF-EMR for large colorectal LSTs (2015-2021) were analyzed in this single-center, retrospective, observational study. In the event of a WF-EMR failure, the procedure was switched to EMR-c in the same session. The efficacy of the two techniques was evaluated in terms of complete endoscopic resection, R0 resection, and recurrence rate. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: Overall, the data from 81 WF-EMRs were collected. Eighteen cases of WF-EMR failure were switched to EMR-c in the same session and complete endoscopic resection was achieved in 17/18 patients (94.4%). No statistically significant difference was observed between WF-EMR and salvage EMR-c in terms of macroscopic radicality (P = 0.40) and R0 resection (P = 0.12). However, recurrence was more common with EMR-c (44.4% vs. 23.5%; P = 0.05), as were adverse events, particularly intraprocedural bleeding (27.8% vs. 7.9%; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: EMR-c is an effective salvage technique for challenging colorectal LSTs following WF-EMR failure. Due to the elevated risk of adverse events associated with this procedure, careful patient selection, endoscopic expertise, and close follow-up are strongly recommended.

Evaluation of multidisciplinary team decisions in neuroendocrine neoplasms: Impact of expert centres.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings on the management of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). METHODS: All newly referred gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP)-NEN patients discussed from 1 April to 1 October 2017 in the MDT of seven European expert centres were prospectively included. The impact on patients' management was defined as a change in diagnosis, grade, stage or treatment. RESULTS: A total of 292 patients were included, mainly small intestinal (siNENs) (32%) and pancreatic NENs (28%), with distant metastases in 51%. Patients had received prior surgery in 43% of cases and prior medical treatment in 32%. A significant change occurred in 61% of NENs: 7% changes in diagnosis, 8% in grade and 16% in stage. The MDT recommended a new treatment for 51% of patients, mainly surgery (9%) or somatostatin analogues (20%). A significant change was most frequently observed in patients with Stage IV disease (hazard ratio [HR] 3.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9-6.9 vs. Stage I) and G2 NENs (vs. G1, HR 2.1 95% CI: 1.2-3.8). CONCLUSION: NEN-dedicated MDT discussion in expert centres yields significant management changes in over 60% of patients and thus represents the gold standard for the management of these patients.

Somatostatin Analogs for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Any Benefit When Ki-67 Is ≥10%?

BACKGROUND: Long-acting somatostatin analogs (SSAs) are the primary first-line treatment of well-differentiated advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), but data about their efficacy in pancreatic NETs (panNETs) with Ki-67 ≥10% are still limited. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To assess the clinical outcomes of advanced, nonfunctioning, well-differentiated panNETs with Ki-67 ≥10% receiving first-line long-acting SSAs in a real-world setting, we carried out a retrospective, multicenter study including patients treated between 2014-2018 across 10 centers of the NET CONNECT Network. The primary endpoints were time to next treatment (TNT) and progression-free survival (PFS), whereas overall survival (OS) and treatment safety were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: A total of 73 patients were included (68 grade [G]2, 5 G3), with liver metastases in 61 cases (84%). After a median follow-up of 36.4 months (range, 6-173), the median TNT and PFS were 14.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.6-16.2) and 11.9 months (95% CI, 8.6-14.1) respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed according to the somatostatin analog used (octreotide vs. lanreotide), whereas increased tumor grade (hazard ratio [HR], 4.4; 95% CI, 1.2-16.6; p = .04) and hepatic tumor load (HR, 2; 95% CI, 1-4; p = .03) were independently associated with shortened PFS. The median OS recorded was 86 months (95% CI, 56.8-86 months), with poor outcomes observed when the hepatic tumor burden was >25% (HR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.2-10; p = .01). Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 14 patients, most frequently diarrhea. CONCLUSION: SSAs exert antiproliferative activity in panNETs with Ki-67 ≥10%, particularly in G2 tumors, as well as when hepatic tumor load is ≤25%. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The results of the study call into question the antiproliferative activity of somatostatin analogs (SSAs) in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with Ki-67 ≥10%. Patients with grade 2 tumors and with hepatic tumor load ≤25% appear to derive higher benefit from SSAs. Prospective studies are needed to validate these results to optimize tailored therapeutic strategies for this specific patient population.

Histopathological Revision for Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in Expert Centers: Does It Make the Difference?

BACKGROUND: The correct histopathological diagnosis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) is crucial for treatment selection and prognostication. It is also very challenging due to limited experience in nonexpert centers. Revision of pathology is standard of care for most patients who are referred to NEN expert centers. OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinical impact of histopathological revision for GEP-NEN patients referred to an expert center. METHODS: Retrospective multicenter analysis of all GEP-NENs receiving a histopathological revision in 6 European NEN expert centers (January 2016 to December 2016) to evaluate the impact on patient management. RESULTS: 175 patients were included and 14.7% referred for a second opinion. Histological samples were 69.1% biopsies, 23.4% surgical specimens, and 7.5% endoscopic resections. Histopathological changes due to revision included first assessment of Ki67 in 8.6% of cases, change in grading in 11.4% (3.4% G1 to G2; 5.7% G2 to G1; 0.6% G2 to G3; 1.7% G3 to G2), definition of tumor invasion in 10.8%, additional immunohistochemical staining in 2.3%, diagnosis of mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma in 3.4%, exclusion of NEN in 3.4%, first diagnosis of NEN in 2.3%, and tumor differentiation for G3 in 1.7%. The revision had a clinical impact in 36.0% of patients, leading to a new therapeutic indication in 26.3%. The indication to then perform a new imaging test occurred in 21.1% and recommendation to follow-up with no further treatment in 6.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Histopathological revision in expert centers for NENs can change the diagnosis, with a significant clinical impact in about one third of patients.

Surgery with Radical Intent: Is There an Indication for G3 Neuroendocrine Neoplasms?

BACKGROUND: While platinum-based chemotherapy represents the standard treatment for advanced grade 3 (G3) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) according to the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society guidelines, the role of radical-intended surgery in these patients, as well as the use of adjuvant chemotherapy, are still controversial. The aim of the present work is to describe, in a retrospective series of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) G3, the overall survival (OS) rate and risk factors for death after radical surgery. Secondary aims are the description of median recurrence-free survival (RFS) and of the role of adjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Multicenter analysis of a series of stage I-III GEP-NEN G3 patients receiving radical surgery (R0/R1) with/without adjuvant chemotherapy was performed. RESULTS: Sixty patients from eight neuroendocrine tumor (NET) referral centers, with median follow-up of 23 months (5-187 months) were evaluated. While 28.6% of cases had NET G3, 71.4% had neuroendocrine carcinoma G3 (NEC G3). The 2-year OS rate after radical surgery was 64.5%, with a statistically significant difference in terms of Ki67 threshold (cut-off 55%, P = 0.03) and tumor differentiation (NEC G3 vs. NET G3, P = 0.03). Median RFS after radical surgery was 14 months, and 2-year RFS rate was 44.9%. Use of adjuvant chemotherapy provided no benefit in terms of either OS or RFS in this series. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery with radical intent might represent a valid option for GEP-NEN G3 patients with locoregional disease, especially with Ki67 value ≤ 55%.

Peritoneal Carcinomatosis in Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Clinical Impact and Effectiveness of the Available Therapeutic Options.

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) can affect the quality of life of patients with gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs). Peritoneal disease control by medical therapies in these patients has been poorly investigated Objectives: To describe, in a consecutive series of GEP-NENs, the clinical impact of PC and to report the effectiveness of available treatments in PC control. METHODS: A retrospective, monocenter analysis was performed of 135 GEP-NENs (1993-2016) with at least a 12-month follow-up. Peritoneal disease progression was defined as detection of a significant increase in size or appearance of new implants by imaging. RESULTS: A total of 62.9% of cases had diffuse PC (involving at least 2 abdominal quadrants). According to WHO 2017 classification, cases were 42.3% neuroendocrine tumors NET-G1, 45.5% NET-G2, 6.5% NET-G3, 4.9% neuroendocrine carcinomas NEC-G3, and 0.8% mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine neoplasms. Bowel obstruction occurred in 30 (22.2%) patients mainly depending on size of peritoneal implants (HR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.02-1.20; p = 0.01). Patients with diffuse PC treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) showed peritoneal progression in 37.5% of cases, and bowel obstruction or ascites in 28.1%. Better peritoneal disease control was observed in cases receiving somatostatin analogs at first-line therapy, probably due to a less aggressive disease behavior for these patients. CONCLUSIONS: Bowel obstruction is not uncommon in GEP-NENs with PC. PRRT should be adopted with caution in GEP-NENs with diffuse PC, but larger series are needed to confirm these data.

Clinical Usefulness of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in the Diagnostic Algorithm of Advanced Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

BACKGROUND: The role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) in the diagnostic algorithm of entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (EP NENs) is unclear because most available data derive from heterogeneous populations in terms of tumor biology and disease status at time of examination. The aim of this study was to determine the ability of 18F-FDG PET to identify patients with more aggressive disease among those with advanced EP NENs. Subjects, Materials, and Methods . Patients with advanced EP NENs and known disease status (progressive disease [PD] or stable disease [SD]) according to imaging procedures, who received 18F-FDG PET and computed tomography scans during a time frame of 1 month, were included. RESULTS: A total of 93 patients, including 69 patients with pancreatic NENs and 24 patients with small-intestine NENs, were included. At the time of study entry, 64 patients (68.8%) had PD, and the remaining 29 patients (31.2%) had SD. A total of 62 patients (66.7%) had positive 18F-FDG PET, whereas 18F-FDG PET was negative in the remaining 31 patients (33.3%). Overall, 18F-FDG PET sensitivity and specificity to detect PD were 90.6% and 86.2%, respectively, resulting in a diagnostic accuracy of 89.2%. A positive 18F-FDG PET was significantly associated with PD at the time of study entry (p < .0001 at multivariate analysis). Although a higher proportion of 18F-FDG PET-positive examinations were observed in patients with higher tumor grade (p = .01), 53.8% of patients with grade 1 neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) had positive 18F-FDG PET, and 37.5% of patients with grade 2 NETs had negative 18F-FDG PET. Overall survival was significantly shorter in 18F-FDG PET-positive patients (median: 60 months) in comparison with 18F-FDG PET-negative patients (median not reached; p = .008). CONCLUSION: 18F-FDG PET has a high diagnostic accuracy to identify progression of disease with unfavorable clinical outcome in patients with advanced EP NENs. Knowledge of disease status and G grading are key factors for physicians to better select patients for whom 18F-FDG PET is clinically useful. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The findings of the present study may help physicians dealing with advanced neuroendocrine neoplasms to select patients for whom 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography is useful to predict poor clinical outcome.

Stage IV Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Risk Score to Predict Clinical Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Several risk factors predict clinical outcome in gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs); however, the impact of their combination has not been investigated so far. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of stage IV GEP-NENs was performed. Multivariate analysis for progression of disease (PD) was performed by Cox proportional hazards method to obtain a risk score. Area under the curve obtained by receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to assess the score performance. Progression-free survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-three stage IV GEP-NENs were evaluated, including 93 grade 1 neuroendocrine tumors (32.9%), 153 grade 2 neuroendocrine tumors (54%), and 37 grade 3 neuroendocrine carcinomas (13.1%). Independent risk factors for PD were Ki67, proportion of metastatic liver involvement, and presence of extra-abdominal metastases. The risk score was calculated as follows: (0.025 × Ki67) + [(0 if no liver metastases or liver involvement <25%) OR (0.405 if liver involvement 25%-50%) OR (0.462 if liver involvement >50%)] + [(0 if no extra-abdominal metastases) OR (0.528 if extra-abdominal metastases present)]. The risk score accuracy to predict PD was superior compared with the G grading system (area under the curve: 0.705 and 0.622, respectively). Three subgroups of patients with low, intermediate, and high risk of PD according to risk score were identified, median progression-free survival being 26 months, 19 months, and 12 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: In stage IV GEP-NENs, a risk score able to predict PD was obtained by combining Ki67, proportion of metastatic liver involvement, and presence of extra-abdominal metastases. The score may help to discriminate patients with different progression risk level to plan tailored therapeutic approaches and follow-up programs. The Oncologist 2017;22:409-415Implications for Practice: Clinical outcome of patients with advanced gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms is affected by several risk factors, including the proliferative index Ki67, extension of liver metastases, and the presence of distant extra-abdominal lesions. A risk score that combines these variables may help physicians dealing with these diseases to plan the optimal therapeutic approach and follow-up program.

Device-assisted enteroscopy: Are we ready to dismiss the spiral?

Motorized spiral enteroscopy (MSE) is the latest advance in device-assisted enteroscopy. Adverse events related to MSE were discussed in a recent large systematic review and meta-analysis and were directly compared with those of balloon enteroscopy in a case-matched study and a randomized controlled trial. Following the real-life application of MSE, an unexpected safety issue emerged regarding esophageal injury and the technique has been withdrawn from the global market, despite encouraging results in terms of diagnostic and therapeutic yield. We conducted an Italian multicenter real-life prospective study, which was prematurely terminated after the withdrawal of MSE from the market. The primary goals were the evaluation of MSE performance (both diagnostic and therapeutic) and its safety in routine endoscopic practice, particularly in the early phase of introduction in the endoscopic unit. A subanalysis, which involved patients who underwent MSE after unsuccessful balloon enteroscopy, demonstrated, for the first time, the promising performance of MSE as a rescue procedure. Given its remarkable performance in clinical practice and its potential role as a backup technique following a previously failed enteroscopy, it may be more appropriate to refine and enhance MSE in the future rather than completely abandoning it.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT): Innovations and Improvements.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are tumors originating from neuroendocrine cells distributed throughout the human body. With an increasing incidence over the past few decades, they represent a highly heterogeneous group of neoplasms, mostly expressing somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) on their cell surface. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has emerged as a crucial strategy for treating advanced, unresectable neuroendocrine tumors by administering radiolabeled somatostatin analogs intravenously to target SSTRs. This article will focus on the multidisciplinary theranostic approach, treatment effectiveness (such as response rates and symptom relief), patient outcomes, and toxicity profile of PRRT for NEN patients. We will review the most significant studies, such as the phase III NETTER-1 trial, and discuss promising new radiopharmaceuticals, including alpha-emitting radionuclide-labeled somatostatin analogs and SSTR antagonists.

Adverse events in gastrointestinal endoscopy: Validation of the AGREE classification in a real-life 5-year setting.

BACKGROUND: The novel AGREE classification for adverse events (AEs) in gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy has not yet been validated in a real-world setting. AIMS: Our study aims to evaluate the correlation between the grades of AEs in the ASGE and AGREE classifications and to assess the interobserver agreement of the two classification systems. METHODS: The correlation and association between the AE grades of the ASGE and AGREE classifications were analyzed using the Spearman rank correlation test and the chi-squared analysis, respectively. A weighted Cohen's kappa coefficient analysis was performed to determine the interobserver agreement of both classification systems. RESULTS: We prospectively collected the AEs that occurred in our endoscopy unit over the past five years. A total of 226 AEs (226/84,863, 0.3%) occurred. There was a correlation between the ASGE and AGREE classifications (ρ = 0.61) and a moderately significant association (p < 0.01, Cramer's V = 0.7). The interobserver agreement for the ASGE classification was fair (kappa 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54, 0.67), whereas it was good for the AGREE classification (kappa 0.80, 95% CI: 0.62, 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: The AGREE classification was validated for the first time in a real-world setting and showed a positive correlation and higher interobserver agreement than the ASGE classification.

Recurrence rates after piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal laterally spreading tumors.

Background: Piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (pEMR) is routinely employed for large laterally spreading tumors (LSTs). Recurrence rates following pEMR are still unclear, especially when cap-assisted EMR (EMR-c) is performed. We assessed the recurrence rates and recurrence risk factors post-pEMR for large colorectal LSTs, including both wide-field EMR (WF-EMR) and EMR-c. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent pEMR for colorectal LSTs ≥20 mm at our institution between 2012 and 2020. Patients had a post-resection follow-up period of at least 3 months. A risk factor analysis was carried out using the Cox regression model. Results: The analysis included 155 pEMR: 51 WF-EMR and 104 EMR-c, with a median lesion size of 30 (range: 20-80) mm and a median endoscopic follow up of 15 (range: 3-76) months. Overall, disease recurrence occurred in 29.0% of cases; there was no significant difference in recurrence rates between WF-EMR and EMR-c. Recurrent lesions were safely managed by endoscopic removal, and at risk analysis lesion size was the only significant risk factor for recurrence (mm; hazard ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.06, P=0.02). Conclusions: Recurrence of large colorectal LSTs after pEMR occurs in 29% of cases. This rate is mainly dependent on lesion size, and the use of a cap during pEMR has no effect on recurrence. Prospective controlled trials are needed to validate these results.

Appendiceal collision tumors: case reports, management and literature review.

Appendiceal tumors are incidentally detected in 0.5% cases of appendectomy for acute appendicitis and occur in approximately 1% of all appendectomies. Here, we report two cases of appendiceal collision tumors in two asymptomatic women. In both cases, imaging revealed right-lower-quadrant abdominal masses, which were laparoscopically resected. In both cases, histological examinations revealed an appendiceal collision tumor comprising a low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm and well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN). For complete oncological control, right hemicolectomy was performed in one patient for the aggressive behavior of NEN; however, histology revealed no metastasis. The other patient only underwent appendectomy. No further treatment was recommended. According to the latest guidelines, exact pathology needs to be defined. Proper management indicated by a multidisciplinary team is fundamental.

Type I gastric carcinoids: a prospective study on endoscopic management and recurrence rate.

BACKGROUND: Type I gastric carcinoids (TIGCs) are neuroendocrine neoplasms arising from enterochromaffin-like cells in atrophic body gastritis. Data regarding their evolution in prospective series are scarce, thus treatment and follow-up are not codified. Our aim was to evaluate clinical outcome and recurrence in TIGCs managed by endoscopic approach. METHODS: 33 patients (24 females; median age 65 years, range 23-81) were included and managed through endoscopic follow-up every 6-12 months, with lesion removal and multiple gastric biopsies. Baseline clinical and histological features were analyzed as risk factors by Cox regression. RESULTS: At diagnosis, 7 tumors were intramucosal carcinoids and 26 were polyps (median diameter 5 mm, range 2-20), multiple in 17 patients. Associated severe atrophy was present in 21 cases (63.6%), while mild atrophy was found in 6 cases (18.2%). During a 46-month median follow-up, survival was 100% and no metastases occurred. One patient developed a less-differentiated carcinoid that was radically treated by surgery. 21 patients (63.6%) had recurrence after a median of 8 months, 14 of these (66.6%) had a second recurrence after a median of 8 months following the previous carcinoid removal. Median recurrence-free survival was 24 months. Neither clinical nor biochemical recurrence-predicting factors were found. CONCLUSIONS: Although about 60% of TIGCs had recurrence after endoscopic resection, endoscopic management may be considered safe and effective.

Therapeutic strategies for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: State-of-the-art and future perspectives.

Although gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) have always been considered rare tumors, their incidence has risen over the past few decades. They represent a highly heterogeneous group of neoplasms with several prognostic factors, including disease stage, proliferative index (Ki67), and tumor differentiation. Most of these neoplasms express somatostatin receptors on the cell surface, a feature that has important implications in terms of prognosis, diagnosis, and therapy. Although International Guidelines propose algorithms aimed at guiding therapeutic strategies, GEP-NEN patients are still very different from one another, and the need for personalized treatment continues to increase. Radical surgery is always the best option when feasible; however, up to 80% of cases are metastatic upon diagnosis. Regarding medical treatments, as GEP-NENs are characterized by relatively long overall survival, multiple therapy lines are adopted during the lifetime of these patients, but the optimum sequence to be followed has never been clearly defined. Furthermore, although new molecular markers aimed at predicting the response to therapy, as well as prognostic scores, are currently being studied, their application is still far from being part of daily clinical practice. As they represent a complex disease, with therapeutic protocols that are not completely standardized, GEP-NENs require a multidisciplinary approach. This review will provide an overview of the available therapeutic options for GEP-NENs and attempts to clarify the possible approaches for the management of these patients and to discuss future perspectives in this field.

High rate of Ki-67 increase in entero-pancreatic NET relapses after surgery with curative intent.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) present with advanced disease at diagnosis in up to 28% of cases, precluding the possibility of curative-intent surgery. Histopathological heterogeneity of this disease can be observed inter-individually as well as intra-individually during disease course. The present study aimed to assess the frequency of Ki-67 change after radical surgery, in a series of patients with radically resected entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (EP-NETs). We present the analysis of a multicenter, retrospective, series of EP-NETs G1-G2 recurring after radical resection and with histological re-evaluation at disease recurrence (DR). The primary endpoint was the description of Ki-67 change at DR compared to time of surgery. The secondary endpoint was assessment of recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates. In total, 47 patients had a second histological evaluation and could be included in the present study. Median Ki-67 at surgery was 3% (range 1-15%) but, at DR, a significant increase in the value was observed (7%, range 1-30%; p < .01) and involved 66.0% of cases, with a corresponding increase in tumor grading in 34.0% (p = .05). Median RFS of the overall population was 40 months, and was worse when Ki-67 increased at DR vs. stable Ki-67 value (36 vs. 61 months, respectively; p = .02). In conclusion, in more than half of the cases with relapse after radical surgery, a higher proliferative index with a potentially more aggressive potential was observed. Therefore, histological reassessment should be considered on DR because tailored therapeutic strategies may be required for these patients.