How do I reduce variation in red blood cell transfusion practices in a large integrated health care system?

BACKGROUND: Reducing variation in transfusion practices can prevent unwarranted transfusions, an outcome that improves quality of care and patient safety, while lowering costs and eliminating waste of blood. We developed and assessed a system-wide initiative to reduce variation in red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in terms of both transfusion utilization and the number of units transfused. INTERVENTION DESIGN AND METHODS: Our initiative combined a single-unit default order for RBC transfusion in hemodynamically stable, non-bleeding patients with a "Why Give 2 When 1 Will Do?" Choosing Wisely campaign, while also promoting a restrictive hemoglobin threshold (Hb <7 g/dl). This multimodal intervention was implemented across an academic medical center (AMC) with over 950 beds and 10 community hospitals. RESULTS: Between our baseline (CY 2020) and intervention period (CY 2021), single-unit orders increased from 57% to 70% of all RBC transfusion orders (p < .001). The greatest change in ordering practices was at community hospitals, where single-unit orders increased from 46% to 65% (p < .001). Over the same time period, the system-wide mean (SD) Hb result prior to transfusion fell from 7.3 (0.05) to 7.2 g/dl (0.04) (p < .05). We estimate this effort saved over 4000 units of blood and over $4 million in direct and indirect costs in its first year. DISCUSSION: By combining a single-unit default setting in the RBC order with a restrictive hemoglobin threshold, we significantly reduced variation in ordering practices. This effort demonstrates the value of single-unit policies and "nudges" in system-wide patient blood management initiatives.

Perceived Barriers to the De-implementation of Routine Preoperative History & Physicals Preceding Low-Risk Ambulatory Procedures: A Qualitative Study of Surgeon Perspectives.

BACKGROUND: For patients undergoing surgery at an Ambulatory Surgical Center, recent changes to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services policy allow for the omission of a 30-day preoperative History and Physical (H&P). Preoperative H&Ps for low-risk surgery may contribute to health care waste and lead to unnecessary preoperative testing and treatment cascades. METHODS: In this qualitative study, we conducted 30 semi-structured interviews with surgeons who frequently perform low-risk surgeries. We aimed to evaluate surgeon perspectives on the continued use of the 30-day preoperative H&P and specifically the potential risks and benefits associated with the elimination of a preoperative H&P requirement from institutional practice. We used an interpretive description approach to generate a thematic description. RESULTS: Most participants felt that the 30-day preoperative H&P was low value and frequently described it as "unnecessary," "redundant," or "just checking a box." Many viewed the 30-day requirement as arbitrary and felt that new H&P findings were rare and unlikely to influence surgical care. The participants who favored the preoperative H&P felt it was a safeguard to ensure "nothing was missed" and were less likely to be burdened by the requirement than participants who felt it was low value. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons performing low-risk procedures question the utility and value of conducting a preoperative H&P within 30 days of surgery. De-implementation of the 30-day preoperative H&P for low-risk patients may increase convenience for patients and providers. Furthermore, it may improve value in surgery by increasing access to services for patients with greater need for preoperative assessment.

Patient Preferences in Cases of Inter-system Medical Error Discovery (IMED).

OBJECTIVE: This study analyzes patients' preferences around disclosure in cases of IMED. BACKGROUND: Patients prefer that physicians disclose their self-discovered medical errors, and disclosure expectations and practices have changed accordingly. Patient preferences about disclosure when physicians discover another provider's error are unknown. METHODS: We conducted telephone interviews beyond thematic saturation (N = 30) from January to March 2018 with patient volunteers in Michigan. Participants responded to 2 medical error vignettes, the first involving a single physician discovering their own error, and the second involving an IMED scenario. Interviews were conducted concurrently with thematic coding, coded independently by 2 investigators, and discussed until consensus was reached. Analysis proceeded after the inductive and comparative approach of interpretive description. RESULTS: Patients considered IMED essentially equivalent to self-discovered errors, and strongly preferred disclosure in both scenarios. Patients preferred disclosure for a variety of reasons, most commonly describing an inherent value in knowing about their own health, a belief that physicians should practice honesty and transparency, and a desire to participate in future care in an informed manner. Patients said they would likely take certain actions after disclosure of another physician's error, ranging from confronting the responsible physician to changing providers to pursuing legal action, with the latter being only in cases of irreversible and debilitating errors. CONCLUSIONS: This study explores a new domain within the field of error disclosure, concluding that patients preferred disclosure of errors in cases of IMED. Overall, these findings provide motivation to devise systems-level solutions to enable and facilitate IMED disclosure.

Medical Maximizing-Minimizing Preferences in Relation to Low-Value Services for Older Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have demonstrated the safety of omitting therapies in older women with breast cancer. Despite de-implementation guidelines, up to 65% of older women continue to receive one or more of these low-value services. Previous work has investigated the role of both provider and patient attitudes as barriers to de-implementation; however, the importance of the patient's maximizing-minimizing preferences within this context remains unclear. METHODS: In this qualitative study, we conducted 30 semi-structured interviews with women ≥ 70 years of age without a previous diagnosis of breast cancer to elicit perspectives on breast cancer treatment in relation to their medical maximizing-minimizing preferences, as determined by the single-item maximizer-minimizer elicitation question (MM1). We used an interpretive description approach in analysis to produce a thematic survey. RESULTS: Participants were relatively evenly distributed across the MM1 (minimizer, n = 8; neutral, n = 13; maximizer, n = 9). Despite being told of recommendations allowing for the safe omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy and post-lumpectomy radiotherapy, maximizers consistently stated preferences for more medical intervention and aggressive therapies over minimizers and neutral individuals. CONCLUSION: Medical maximizing-minimizing preferences in older women correspond with preferences for breast cancer treatment options that guidelines identify as potentially unnecessary. Increased awareness of patient-level variability in maximizing-minimizing preferences may be valuable in developing optimal intervention strategies to reduce utilization of low-value care.

Trends in Breast Cancer Treatment De-Implementation in Older Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A Mixed Methods Study.

INTRODUCTION: Guidelines allow for the omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and post-lumpectomy radiotherapy in women ≥ 70 years of age with hormone receptor-positive (HR +) breast cancer. Despite this, national data suggest these procedures have not been widely de-implemented. OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to evaluate trends in SLNB and post-lumpectomy radiotherapy utilization in patients who are eligible for omission, and evaluate patient preferences as a target for de-implementation of low-value care. METHODS: We performed a sequential explanatory mixed-methods study by first analyzing an institutional database of patients ≥ 70 years of age with HR + breast cancer who received surgical treatment from 2014 to 2018. Based on the quantitative data, we conducted semi-structured interviews with women identified as high or low utilizers of breast cancer treatments to elicit patient perspectives on de-implementation. RESULTS: SLNB and post-lumpectomy radiotherapy were performed in 68% and 43% of patients, respectively, who met the criteria for omission. There was a significant decrease in SLNB rates from 2014 to 2018. Forty-nine percent of patients were classified as high utilizers and 26% were classified as low utilizers. Qualitative analysis found that the most important factors influencing decision making regarding SLNB and post-lumpectomy radiotherapy omission for both high and low utilizers were trust in their provider and a desire for peace of mind. CONCLUSIONS: Despite efforts to de-implement low-value care, older women with HR + breast cancer remain at risk of overtreatment. Patient perspectives suggest that multi-level de-implementation strategies will need to target provider practice patterns and patient-provider communication to promote high-quality decision making and reduction in breast cancer overtreatment.

A Health Systems Ethical Framework for De-implementation in Health Care.

INTRODUCTION: Unnecessary health care not only drive up costs, but also contribute to avoidable patient harms, underscoring an ethical obligation to eliminate practices which are harmful, lack evidence, and prevent spending on more beneficial services. To date, de-implementation ethics discussions have been limited and focused on clinical ethics principles. An analysis of de-implementation ethics in the broader context of the health care system is lacking. METHODS: To better understand the ethical considerations of de-implementation, recognizing it as a health care systems issue, we applied Krubiner and Hyder's bioethical framework for health systems activity. We examine ethics principles relevant to de-implementation, which either call for or facilitate the reduction of low value surgery. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: From 11 health systems principles proposed by Krubiner and Hyder, we identified the 5 principles most pertinent to the topic of de-implementation: evidence and effectiveness, transparency and public engagement, efficiency, responsiveness, and collaboration. An analysis of de-implementation through the lens of these principles not only supports de-implementation but proves an obligation at the health system level to eliminate low value care. Recognizing the challenge of defining "value," the proposed framework may increase the legitimacy and objectivity of de-implementation. CONCLUSIONS: While there is no single ideal ethical framework from which to approach de-implementation, a health systems framework allows for consideration of the systems-level factors impacting de-implementation. Framing de-implementation as a health systems issue with systems-wide ethical implications empowers providers to think about new ways to approach potential roadblocks to reducing low-value care.

Parents' pandemic NICU experience in the United States: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, parents of infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) frequently reported high levels of stress, uncertainty, and decreased parenting confidence. Early research has demonstrated that parents have had less access to their infants in the hospital due to restrictions on parental presence secondary to the pandemic. It is unknown how parents have perceived their experiences in the NICU since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of this study was to describe the lived experience of parents who had an infant in the NICU in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic to inform healthcare providers and policy makers for future development of policies and care planning. METHODS: The study design was a qualitative description of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on parents' experiences of having an infant in the NICU. Free-text responses to open-ended questions were collected as part of a multi-method study of parents' experiences of the NICU during the first six months of the pandemic. Participants from the United States were recruited using social media platforms between the months of May and July of 2020. Data were analyzed using a reflexive thematic approach. FINDINGS: Free-text responses came from 169 parents from 38 different states in the United States. Three broad themes emerged from the analysis: (1) parents' NICU experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic were emotionally isolating and overwhelming, (2) policy changes restricting parental presence created disruptions to the family unit and limited family-centered care, and (3) interactions with NICU providers intensified or alleviated emotional distress felt by parents. A unifying theme of experiences of emotional distress attributed to COVID-19 circumstances ran through all three themes. CONCLUSIONS: Parents of infants in the NICU during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic experienced emotional struggles, feelings of isolation, lack of family-centered care, and deep disappointment with system-level decisions. Moving forward, parents need to be considered essential partners in the development of policies concerning care of and access to their infants.

Sleep Patterns and Quality Among Inpatients Recovering From Elective Surgery: A Mixed-Method Study.

BACKGROUND: Sleep is necessary for recovery from physiological insults such as surgery. Although previous research has focused on sleep in the intensive care unit and medical setting, little is known about sleep quality among inpatients recovering from elective surgery. Therefore, we examined sleep quality and barriers to sleep among postsurgical inpatients. METHODS: We conducted an explanatory sequential mixed-method study among adult general-care surgical inpatients who underwent elective surgery. We used a quantitative survey to examine sleep quality and interruptions followed by a qualitative phone interview with a subsample of participants to examine barriers and aids to sleep in the hospital. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics of survey data and descriptive coding of interview transcripts. RESULTS: Of 113, 102 (90%) eligible patients completed the survey. Less than half (n = 48, 47%) of patients reported sleeping well the previous night and 93% reported less sleep in the hospital compared with at home. Patients reported a median of 5 (4-7) interruptions each night. Patients with >3 sleep interruptions were more likely to report poor sleep than those with ≤3 interruptions (P < 0.001). Phone interview responses cited barriers to sleep including staff interruptions and roommate noise when sharing a room but not pain. Patients suggested that improved timing and knowledge of interruptions or noise-reduction aids would facilitate sleep. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients do not sleep well while recovering from elective surgery in the hospital, and most sleep disruptions are modifiable. Minimizing interruptions at night by clustering care, informing patients of scheduled interruptions, and increasing access to noise-reduction aids may improve sleep quality. Optimal efforts to improve sleep quantity and quality will ultimately require a multilevel, multicomponent strategy.

Radical S-adenosylmethionine maquette chemistry: Cx3Cx2C peptide coordinated redox active [4Fe-4S] clusters.

The synthesis and characterization of short peptide-based maquettes of metalloprotein active sites facilitate an inquiry into their structure/function relationships and evolution. The [4Fe-4S]-maquettes of bacterial ferredoxin metalloproteins (Fd) have been used in the past to engineer redox active centers into artificial metalloenzymes. The novelty of our study is the application of maquettes to the superfamily of [4Fe-4S] cluster and S-adenosylmethionine-dependent radical metalloenzymes (radical SAM). The radical SAM superfamily enzymes contain site-differentiated, redox active [4Fe-4S] clusters coordinated to Cx3Cx2C or related motifs, which is in contrast to the Cx2Cx2C motif found in bacterial ferredoxins (Fd). Under an optimized set of experimental conditions, a high degree of reconstitution (80-100%) was achieved for both radical SAM- and Fd-maquettes. Negligible chemical speciation was observed for all sequences, with predominantly [4Fe-4S]2+ for the 'as-reconstituted' state. However, the reduction of [4Fe-4S]2+-maquettes provides low conversion (7-17%) to the paramagnetic [4Fe-4S]+ state, independent of either the spacing of the cysteine residues (Cx3Cx2C vs. Cx2Cx2C), the nature of intervening amino acids, or the length of the cluster binding motif. In the absence of the stabilizing protein environment, the reduction process is proposed to proceed via [4Fe-4S]2+ cluster disassembly and reassembly in a more reduced state. UV-Vis and EPR spectroscopic techniques are employed as analytical tools to quantitate the as-reconstituted (or oxidized) and one-electron reduced states of the [4Fe-4S] clusters, respectively. We demonstrate that short Fd and radical SAM derived 7- to 9-mer peptides containing appropriate cysteine motifs function equally well in coordinating redox active [4Fe-4S] clusters.

Opioid Prescribing After Curative-Intent Surgery: A Qualitative Study Using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

BACKGROUND: Excessive opioid prescribing is common after curative-intent surgery, but little is known about what factors influence prescribing behaviors among surgeons. To identify targets for intervention, we performed a qualitative study of opioid prescribing after curative-intent surgery using the Theoretical Domains Framework, a well-established implementation science method for identifying factors influencing healthcare provider behavior. METHODS: Prior to data collection, we constructed a semi-structured interview guide to explore decision making for opioid prescribing. We then conducted interviews with surgical oncology providers at a single comprehensive cancer center. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, then independently coded by two investigators using the Theoretical Domains Framework to identify theoretical domains relevant to opioid prescribing. Relevant domains were then linked to behavior models to select targeted interventions likely to improve opioid prescribing. RESULTS: Twenty-one subjects were interviewed from November 2016 to May 2017, including attending surgeons, resident surgeons, physician assistants, and nurses. Five theoretical domains emerged as relevant to opioid prescribing: environmental context and resources; social influences; beliefs about consequences; social/professional role and identity; and goals. Using these domains, three interventions were identified as likely to change opioid prescribing behavior: (1) enablement (deploy nurses during preoperative visits to counsel patients on opioid use); (2) environmental restructuring (provide on-screen prompts with normative data on the quantity of opioid prescribed); and (3) education (provide prescribing guidelines). CONCLUSIONS: Key determinants of opioid prescribing behavior after curative-intent surgery include environmental and social factors. Interventions targeting these factors are likely to improve opioid prescribing in surgical oncology.

The Challenges of Providing Feedback to Referring Physicians After Discovering Their Medical Errors.

BACKGROUND: Physicians are encouraged through formalized systems to discuss their own errors with peers for the purposes of quality improvement. However, no clear professional norms exist regarding peer review when physicians discover errors that occurred at other institutions before referral. Our objective was to determine specialist physicians' attitudes and practices regarding providing feedback to referring physicians when prereferral errors are discovered. METHODS: We conducted semistructured interviews of specialists from two National Cancer Institute-designated Cancer Centers. Thematic analysis of transcripts was performed to determine physicians' attitudes toward the delivery of negative feedback regarding prereferral errors, whether and how they communicate these errors to referring physicians, and perceived barriers to doing so. RESULTS: We purposively sampled specialists by discipline, gender, and experience level, who described greater than 50% reliance on external referrals (n = 30). Specialists believed regular, explicit feedback was ideal, but the majority of participants reported practices that did not meet this standard. While there were some structural barriers to providing feedback (lack of time or contact information), the majority of barriers were internal psychological concerns (general discomfort with providing negative feedback, fear of conflict, or defensive reactions) or fears about implications for future referrals or medicolegal risk. CONCLUSIONS: Policies and interventions that structure the approach to this sometimes difficult, yet critically important, opportunity for reducing medical errors warrant investigation as potential mechanisms by which to improve consistency and quality of care while maintaining positive professional relationships.

The Electron Bifurcating FixABCX Protein Complex from Azotobacter vinelandii: Generation of Low-Potential Reducing Equivalents for Nitrogenase Catalysis.

The biological reduction of dinitrogen (N2) to ammonia (NH3) by nitrogenase is an energetically demanding reaction that requires low-potential electrons and ATP; however, pathways used to deliver the electrons from central metabolism to the reductants of nitrogenase, ferredoxin or flavodoxin, remain unknown for many diazotrophic microbes. The FixABCX protein complex has been proposed to reduce flavodoxin or ferredoxin using NADH as the electron donor in a process known as electron bifurcation. Herein, the FixABCX complex from Azotobacter vinelandii was purified and demonstrated to catalyze an electron bifurcation reaction: oxidation of NADH (Em = -320 mV) coupled to reduction of flavodoxin semiquinone (Em = -460 mV) and reduction of coenzyme Q (Em = 10 mV). Knocking out fix genes rendered Δrnf A. vinelandii cells unable to fix dinitrogen, confirming that the FixABCX system provides another route for delivery of electrons to nitrogenase. Characterization of the purified FixABCX complex revealed the presence of flavin and iron-sulfur cofactors confirmed by native mass spectrometry, electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy, and transient absorption spectroscopy. Transient absorption spectroscopy further established the presence of a short-lived flavin semiquinone radical, suggesting that a thermodynamically unstable flavin semiquinone may participate as an intermediate in the transfer of an electron to flavodoxin. A structural model of FixABCX, generated using chemical cross-linking in conjunction with homology modeling, revealed plausible electron transfer pathways to both high- and low-potential acceptors. Overall, this study informs a mechanism for electron bifurcation, offering insight into a unique method for delivery of low-potential electrons required for energy-intensive biochemical conversions.

Factors Affecting Psychological Distress in Family Caregivers of Critically Ill Patients: A Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: Family caregivers often experience psychological distress during a critical care hospitalization, potentially compromising their ability to function effectively in a supportive role. A better understanding of the sources of family caregiver distress is needed to inform strategies to mitigate its development and impact. OBJECTIVE: To explore sources of family caregiver psychological distress during a critical care hospitalization and how caregivers' experiences may differ by their anxiety level. METHODS: Forty adult family members of patients receiving mechanical ventilation for more than 72 hours in 2 intensive care units at an academic medical center were interviewed. A qualitative directed content analysis was done. Experiences were compared by anxiety level group, defined using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: anxiety (n = 15), borderline anxiety (n = 11), and low anxiety (n=14). RESULTS: Most family members (32%) were adult children; no major demographic differences were noted across anxiety groups. Among caregivers in the anxiety group, salient factors included early unknowns around critical illness, health care team processes, care decisions made, financial and housing concerns, family dysfunction, and new responsibilities. In general, low-anxiety family caregivers did not express their concerns using language of distress but rather expressed emotion and disappointment and often took action to process their concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Factors influencing family caregiver distress during the critical care stay were wide-ranging and varied by level of anxiety. The findings highlight several key areas and potential interventions to reduce psychological distress, especially among caregivers with anxiety.

Managing the Cerebrovascular Complications of Sickle Cell Disease: Current Perspectives.

The importance of protecting brain function for people with sickle cell disease (SCD) cannot be overstated. SCD is associated with multiple cerebrovascular complications that threaten neurocognitive function and life. Without screening and preventive management, 11% of children at 24% of adults with SCD have ischemic or hemorrhagic strokes. Stroke screening in children with SCD is well-established using transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD). TCD velocities above 200 cm/s significantly increase the risk of stroke, which can be prevented using chronic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. RBC transfusion is also the cornerstone of acute stroke management and secondary stroke prevention. Chronic transfusion requires long-term management of complications like iron overload. Hydroxyurea can replace chronic transfusions for primary stroke prevention in a select group of patients or in populations where chronic transfusions are not feasible. Silent cerebral infarction (SCI) is even more common than stroke, affecting 39% of children and more than 50% of adults with SCD; management of SCI is individualized and includes careful neurocognitive evaluation. Hematopoietic stem cell transplant prevents cerebrovascular complications, despite the short- and long-term risks. Newer disease-modifying agents like voxelotor and crizanlizumab, as well as gene therapy, may treat cerebrovascular complications, but these approaches are investigational.

Hospital factors that influence ICU admission decision-making: a qualitative study of eight hospitals.

PURPOSE: Some hospitals in the United States (US) use intensive care 20 times more than others. Since intensive care is lifesaving for some but potentially harmful for others, there is a need to understand factors that influence how intensive care unit (ICU) admission decisions are made. METHODS: A qualitative analysis of eight US hospitals was conducted with semi-structured, one-on-one interviews supplemented by site visits and clinical observations. RESULTS: A total of 87 participants (24 nurses, 52 physicians, and 11 other staff) were interviewed, and 40 h were spent observing ICU operations across the eight hospitals. Four hospital-level factors were identified that influenced ICU admission decision-making. First, availability of intermediate care led to reallocation of patients who might otherwise be sent to an ICU. Second, participants stressed the importance of ICU nurse availability as a key modifier of ICU capacity. Patients cared for by experienced general care physicians and nurses were less likely to receive ICU care. Third, smaller or rural hospitals opted for longer emergency department patient-stays over ICU admission to expedite interhospital transfer of critically ill patients. Fourth, lack of clarity in ICU admission policies led clinicians to feel pressured to use ICU care for patients who might otherwise not have received it. CONCLUSION: Health care systems should evaluate their use of ICU care and establish institutional patterns that ensure ICU admission decisions are patient-centered but also account for resources and constraints particular to each hospital.

Patient risk screening to improve transitions of care in surgical opioid prescribing: a qualitative study of provider perspectives.

INTRODUCTION: In patients undergoing surgical procedures, transitions in opioid prescribing occur across multiple providers during the months before and after surgery. These transitions often result in high-risk and uncoordinated prescribing practices, especially for surgical patients with prior opioid exposure. However, perspectives of relevant providers about screening and care coordination to address these risks are unknown. METHODS: We conducted qualitative interviews with 24 surgery, primary care, and anesthesia providers in Michigan regarding behaviors and attitudes about screening surgical patients to inform perioperative opioid prescribing in relation to transitions of care. We used an interpretive description framework to topically code interview transcripts and synthesize underlying themes in analytical memos. RESULTS: Providers believed that coordinated, multidisciplinary approaches to identify patients at risk of poor pain and opioid-related outcomes could improve transitions of care for surgical opioid prescribing. Anesthesia and primary care providers saw value in knowing patients' preoperative risk related to opioid use, while surgeons' perceptions varied widely. Across specialties, most providers favored a screening tool if coupled with actionable recommendations, sufficient resources, and facilitated coordination between specialties. Providers identified a lack of pain specialists and a dearth of actionable guidelines to direct interventions for patients at high opioid-related risk as major limitations to the value of patient screening. DISCUSSION: These findings provide context to address risk from prescription opioids in surgical transitions of care, which should include identifying high-risk patients, implementing a coordinated plan, and emphasizing actionable recommendations.

Clinician Attitudes and Beliefs About Deintensifying Head and Neck Cancer Surveillance.

Importance: Surveillance imaging and visits are costly and have not been shown to improve oncologic outcomes for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). However, the benefit of surveillance visits may extend beyond recurrence detection. To better understand surveillance and potentially develop protocols to tailor current surveillance paradigms, it is important to elicit the perspectives of the clinicians who care for patients with HNC. Objective: To characterize current surveillance practices and explore clinician attitudes and beliefs on deintensifying surveillance for patients with HNC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study was performed from January to March 2021. Guided by an interpretive description approach, interviews were analyzed to produce a thematic description. Data analysis was performed from March to April 2021. Otolaryngologists and radiation oncologists were recruited using purposive and snowball sampling strategies. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were current practice, attitudes, and beliefs about deintensifying surveillance and survivorship as well as patients' values and perspectives collected from interviews of participating physicians. Results: Twenty-one physicians (17 [81%] men) were interviewed, including 13 otolaryngologists and 8 radiation oncologists with a median of 8 years (IQR, 5-20 years) in practice. Twelve participants (57%) stated their practice comprised more than 75% of patients with HNC. Participants expressed that there was substantial variation in the interpretation of the surveillance guidelines. Participants were open to the potential for deintensification of surveillance or incorporating symptom-based surveillance protocols but had concerns that deintensification may increase patient anxiety and shift some of the burden of recurrence monitoring to patients. Patient and physician peace of mind, the importance of maintaining the patient-physician relationship, and the need for adequate survivorship and management of treatment-associated toxic effects were reported to be important barriers to deintensifying surveillance. Conclusions and Relevance: In this qualitative study, clinicians revealed a willingness to consider altering cancer surveillance but expressed a need to maintain patient and clinician peace of mind, maintain the patient-clinician relationship, and ensure adequate monitoring of treatment-associated toxic effects and other survivorship concerns. These findings may be useful in future research on the management of posttreatment surveillance.

Intersystem Medical Error Discovery: A Document Analysis of Ethical Guidelines.

OBJECTIVES: Patient safety programs aim to improve transparency regarding medical errors, and there is broad consensus on how providers should communicate about their own errors. How providers should respond to other providers' errors is less clear, especially when they occur outside the provider's facility or system (intersystem medical error discovery [IMED]). To understand what guidance is available to healthcare professionals in this scenario, we conducted a document analysis of ethical guidelines. METHODS: We searched for ethics codes primarily using databases and lists of professional associations. We used thematic analysis to examine documents in relation to our research questions: is there guidance on (a) what a provider should do after discovering another provider's error that occurred in a different health system, (b) interacting with other providers, or (c) other subjects relevant to IMED? RESULTS: Our search identified 150 documents from 120 organizations. These documents contained ambiguous terminology and guidance limiting practical application to IMED scenarios, with most guidance potentially applicable to IMED rendered irrelevant to most IMED scenarios by its restriction to incompetence. In addition, guidelines often sent conflicting signals about prioritizing honesty with and autonomy of patients versus not criticizing the care provided by a fellow practitioner. CONCLUSIONS: Ethics codes provide little guidance on communication regarding IMED scenarios, and in some cases, the guidance is internally conflicting. National professional and patient safety organizations should work to provide a framework for providers and facilities to communicate regarding these ethically and professionally challenging scenarios.