Impact of Academia-Government Collaboration on Laboratory Medicine Standardization in South Korea: analysis of eight years creatinine proficiency testing experience.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of the Academia-Government Collaboration for Laboratory Medicine Standardization in Korea (KR-STDZN) based on data from KR-STDZN proficiency testing (KR-STDZN-PT) for creatinine over eight years (2015-2022). METHODS: We used KR-STDZN-PT data of creatinine tests from 2015 to 2022. Acceptance of the participating institutions' test results was assessed by calculating the acceptance performance as absolute bias (absBias%), total coefficient of variance (tCV%), and total error (TE%) for each sample using six measurements from each institution and true values of each reference material. The test result was considered acceptable when absBias%, tCV%, and TE% were <5.10, <3.20, and <11.40 %, respectively. The proportion of acceptable institutions among all participating institutions in each round was defined as the acceptance rate. Improvements in absBias%, tCV%, and TE% were analyzed using creatinine concentration ranges in samples. RESULTS: The number of participating institutions increased from 2015 to 2017 but remained consistent since 2018. The acceptance rates for absBias% and TE% increased from 52.2 and 77.6 %, in 2015 and to 90.7 and 96.3 %, in 2022, respectively. The acceptance rate for tCV% remained in the 90 % range for eight years. When creatinine <3 mg/dL, mean absBias%, and mean TE% improved significantly in 2021-2022 compared to 2015-2016 (p<0.05). When creatinine >3 mg/dL, acceptance performance did not improve. Mean tCV% remained consistent annually regardless of creatinine concentration. No significant variations in test methods were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The collaboration between academia and the government improved creatinine testing quality. Nevertheless, KR-STDZN must be expanded and refined.

Total PSA Test Performance Evaluation on Cobas Pure and Measurement System Comparison with Different Calibrators.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the performance evaluation of total prostate specific antigen (tPSA) testing using Cobas Pure integrated solutions system (calibrated against WHO IS 96/670) and the comparison with established measurement systems with different traceability. METHODS: The evaluation was performed in terms of imprecision, linearity, detection limit, and correlation with Alinity i (calibrated against WHO IS 96/670) and Unicel DxI 800 (calibrated against the manufacturer's working calibrators). RESULTS: Within-laboratory reproducibility and repeatability were observed less than 1.2%. Linearity was achieved within the claimed analytical measurement range. The claimed LoB and LoD were experimentally verified. All the correlation coefficients among the assays indicated good correlation, but the significant mean bias with Unicel DxI 800 using a different calibrator were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Since the tPSA calibrators against different traceability is still commercially available, our research could convey the impact of calibration on tPSA results as well as the performance information of a new assay for tPSA.

Association between measured or calculated small dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and oxidized low-density lipoprotein in subjects with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Small dense low-density lipoprotein (sdLDL) possesses atherogenic potential and is predicted to be susceptible to atherogenic modifications, which further increases its atherogenicity. However, studies on the association between measured or estimated sdLDL cholesterol (sdLDL-C) levels and atherogenic modification in diverse population groups are lacking. METHODS: Surplus serum samples were collected from male subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) under treatment (n = 300) and without DM (non-DM; n = 150). sdLDL and oxidized LDL (oxLDL) levels were measured using the Lipoprint LDL subfractions kit (Quantimetrix Corporation) and the Mercodia oxidized LDL competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (Mercodia), respectively. The estimated sdLDL-Cs were calculated from two relevant equations. The effects of sdLDL-C on oxLDL were assessed using multiple linear regression (MLR) models. RESULTS: The mean (±SD) of measured sdLDL-C and oxLDL concentrations were 11.8 ± 10.0 mg/dl and 53.4 ± 14.2 U/L in the non-DM group and 0.20 ± 0.81 mg/dl and 46.0 ± 15.3 U/L in the DM group, respectively. The effects of measured sdLDL-Cs were significant (p = 0.031), whereas those of estimated sdLDL-Cs were not (p = 0.060, p = 0.116) in the non-DM group in the MLR models. The effects of sdLDL-Cs in the DM group were not significant. CONCLUSION: In the general population, high level of sdLDL-C appeared to be associated with high level of oxLDL. The equation for estimating sdLDL-C developed from a general population should be applied with caution to a special population, such as patients with DM on treatment.

Strategies to shorten turnaround time in outpatient laboratory.

BACKGROUND: Turnaround time (TAT) is one of the most important indicators of laboratory quality. For the outpatient routine chemistry tests whose results are checked by clinicians on the same day, we set a quality goal that >90% of these samples should be reported within 60 min. As more than 20% of the samples failed to achieve this goal in 2020, we introduced an additional autoanalyzer and a real-time monitoring system to improve this rate. METHODS: As the TAT of the pre-analytical phase is the greatest contributor to TAT, we divided it into sampling, sample transport, and sample preparation times. An additional autoanalyzer was introduced, and its effect on TAT improvement was evaluated with the TAT data of June and July 2020. A real-time monitoring system was introduced to sort delayed samples, and its effect was assessed with the TAT data of June and July 2021. TAT data from December 2019 to January 2020 were set as baseline controls. RESULTS: The preparation time comprised the largest proportion of TAT. Although there was a slight decrease in overall TAT after the introduction of the above two strategies, the target TAT achievement rate increased significantly from 78.5% to 88.7% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We checked the cause of TAT prolongation and introduced new strategies to improve it. The addition of an autoanalyzer per se was not so effective but was better when combined with the real-time monitoring system. Such strategies would increase the quality of the laboratory services.

A New Trial to Measure ABO Antibodies Using Complement-Dependent Cytotoxicity.

Background and objectives: The ABO antibody (Ab) titration tests are used in monitoring in ABO-incompatible (ABOi) solid organ transplantation (SOT). However, currently developed ABO Ab tests show Ab binding reactions. This study attempted to measure ABO Ab level using complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). Materials and methods: We studied 93 blood group O serum samples from patients who underwent ABOi SOT from January 2019 to May 2021. Patients' sera were incubated with A1 or B cells and added to a human complement solution. Supernatants were collected after centrifugation, and free hemoglobin (Hb) was measured by spectrophotometry. We converted plasma Hb value to hemolysis (%), which were compared with ABO Ab titer. Results: We found a mild correlation between hemolysis and ABO Ab titers. In simple regression analysis, the correlation coefficients were within 0.3660−0.4968 (p < 0.0001) before transplantation. In multiple linear regression analysis, anti-A hemolysis (%) was higher in immunoglobulin M (IgM) (ß = 12.9) than in immunoglobulin G (IgG) (ß = −3.4) (R2 = 0.5216). Anti-B hemolysis was higher in IgM (ß = 8.7) than in IgG (ß = 0.0) (R2 = 0.5114). There was a large variation in hemolysis within the same Ab titer. Conclusions: CDC can be used in a new trial for ABO Ab measurement. Furthermore, IgM rather than IgG seems to play a significant role in vivo activity, consistent with previous knowledge. Thus, this study may help in the development of the ABO Ab titration supplement test for post-transplant treatment policy establishment and pre-transplant desensitization.

Semiquantitative Analysis of the Results of an Image-Based Urine Sediment Analyzer Considering the Preanalytical Factors.

BACKGROUND: Automated microscopic platforms are increasingly used in clinical laboratories for rapid analysis of samples. However, it is important to present the results quantitatively or semiquantitatively because automated platforms use various technologies for analysis as well as different sediment preparation methods. The results of cell counting using an on screen image review program for the cobas u 701 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics Interna-tional, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) differed from those obtained by manual microscopic examination (MME). This study was performed to investigate the difference of results among analyzer, on-screen image review and MME. METHODS: Freshly collected urine specimens from outpatients were used. We calculated the mean, standard deviation, and 95% confidence interval for red and white blood cell (RBC/WBC) quantitative results obtained using the cobas u 701 analyzer. These results were compared to those obtained by manual counting. RBC and WBC counts determined with the cobas u 701 analyzer were compared to those obtained by MME per unit field. RESULTS: The semiquantitative results of MME were graded as 0 - 2, 3 - 5, 6 - 10, 11 - 20, 21 - 30, and many or numerous cells/high power field (HPF). The RBC and WBC counts determined by image analyses showed the tendency to be one grade higher than those from MME in the range of 3 to 5/HPF to many/HPF. The results of nearly all samples with 0 - 2/HPF and numerous/HPF for RBC and WBC counts were consistent with the grade found by MME. CONCLUSIONS: The one-grade difference may have been caused by the differences of preanalytical factors in the sample volume, centrifugal force, urine concentration ratio, or sediment volume/area of the slide. When reporting the results of image analyses, RBC and WBC counts should be raised by one grade to compensate for MME. Each laboratory needs to verify the on-screen review of images corresponding to the microscopic field of view according to the clinical laboratory's specific preanalytical practices.

Status of Four Trace Elements in Elderly Patients with Online Hemodiafiltration.

BACKGROUND: Essential trace elements play key roles in multiple biological systems, and hemodialysis patients are at risk for deficiency of essential trace elements. The aim of the study was to assess the essential element status in end stage renal disease patients undergoing online hemodiafiltration (online HDF) in outpatient dialysis clinic. METHODS: A total of 28 Korean patients with regular online HDF were included. Blood samples were collected before and after one HDF session, and serum concentrations of zinc, copper, selenium, and manganese were simulta-neously measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Selenium, zinc, copper deficiencies were observed in 71.4%, 35.8%, and 21.4%, compared with the reference range. No patients revealed manganese deficiency. After the HDF, the post-HDF level significantly increased in all trace elements, compared with the pre-HDF (11.2% for selenium, 10.7% for copper, and 6.6% for zinc). However, 50% patients were still deficient for selenium at the post-HDF. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the patients undergoing online HDF are at an increased risk of trace element deficiency, especially for selenium.

Nationwide External Quality Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Testing, South Korea.

External quality assessment (EQA) is essential for ensuring reliable test results, especially when laboratories are using assays authorized for emergency use for newly emerging pathogens. We developed an EQA panel to assess the quality of real-time reverse transcription PCR assays being used in South Korea to detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). With the participation of 23 public health organization laboratories and 95 nongovernmental laboratories involved in SARS-CoV-2 testing, we conducted qualitative and semiquantitative performance assessments by using pooled respiratory samples containing different viral loads of SARS-CoV-2 or human coronavirus OC43. A total of 110 (93.2%) laboratories reported correct results for all qualitative tests; 29 (24.6%) laboratories had >1 outliers according to cycle threshold values. Our EQA panel identified the potential weaknesses of currently available commercial reagent kits. The methodology we used can provide practical experience for those planning to conduct evaluations for testing of SARS-CoV-2 and other emerging pathogens in the future.

Impact of proactive high-throughput functional assay data on BRCA1 variant interpretation in 3684 patients with breast or ovarian cancer.

The clinical utility of BRCA1/2 genotyping was recently extended from the selection of subjects at high risk for hereditary breast and ovary cancer to the identification of candidates for poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor treatment. This underscores the importance of accurate interpretation of BRCA1/2 genetic variants and of reducing the number of variants of uncertain significance (VUSs). Two recent studies by Findlay et al. and Starita et al. introduced high-throughput functional assays, and proactively analyzed variants in specific regions regardless of whether they had been previously observed. We retrospectively reviewed all BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline genetic test reports from patients with breast or ovarian cancer examined at Asan Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) between September 2011 and December 2018. Variants were assigned pathogenic or benign strong evidence codes according to the functional classification and were reclassified according to the ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines. Among 3684 patients with available BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline genetic test reports, 429 unique variants (181 from BRCA1) were identified. Of 34 BRCA1 variants intersecting with the data reported by Findlay et al., three missense single-nucleotide variants from four patients (0.11%, 4/3684) were reclassified from VUSs to likely pathogenic variants. Four variants scored as functional were reclassified into benign or likely benign variants. Three variants that overlapped with the data reported by Starita et al. could not be reclassified. In conclusion, proactive high-throughput functional study data are useful for the reclassification of clinically observed VUSs. Integrating additional evidence, including functional assay results, may help reduce the number of VUSs.

Application and optimization of reference change values for Delta Checks in clinical laboratory.

BACKGROUND: Delta check is a patient-based QC tool for detecting errors by comparing current and previous test results of patient. Reference change value (RCV) is adopted in guidelines as method for delta check, but the performance is not verified. We applied RCV-based delta check method to patients' data and modified for application. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Reference change value were calculated using results of internal QC materials and biological variation data. Test results of 17 analytes in inpatients, outpatients, and health examination recipients were collected. The detection rates of currently used delta check method and those of RCV-based method were compared, and the methods were modified. RESULTS: Reference change value-based method had higher detection rates compared to conventional method. Applied modifications reduced detection rates. Removing the pairs of results within reference interval reduced detection rates (0.42% ~ 10.92%). When RCV was divided by time interval, the detection rates were similar to prior rates in outpatients (0.19% ~ 1.34%). Using RCV multiplied by twice the upper limit of reference value as cutoff reduced the detection rate (0.07% ~ 1.58%). CONCLUSIONS: Reference change value is a robust criterion for delta check and included in clinical laboratory practice guideline. However, RCV-based method generates high detection rates which increase workload. It needs modification for use in clinical laboratories.

Performance evaluation of an amplicon-based next-generation sequencing panel for BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant detection.

BACKGROUND: As next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology matures, various amplicon-based NGS tests for BRCA1/2 genotyping have been introduced. This study was designed to evaluate an NGS test using a newly released amplicon-based panel, AmpliSeq for Illumina BRCA Panel (AmpliSeq panel), for detection of clinically significant BRCA variants, and to compare it to another amplicon-based NGS test confirmed by Sanger sequencing. METHODS: We reviewed BRCA test results done by NGS using the TruSeq Custom Amplicon kit from patients suspected of hereditary breast/ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC) in 2018. Of those, 96 residual samples with 100 clinically significant variants were included in this study using predefined criteria: 100 variants were distributed throughout the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. All target variants were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Duplicate NGS testing of these samples was performed using the AmpliSeq panel, and the concordance of results from the two amplicon-based NGS tests was assessed. RESULTS: Ninety-nine of 100 variants were detected in duplicate BRCA1/2 genotyping using the AmpliSeq panel (sensitivity, 99%; specificity, 100%). In the discordant case, one variant (BRCA1 c.3627dupA) was found only in repeat 1, but not in repeat 2. Automated nomenclature of all variants, except for two indel variants, was in consensus with Human Genome Variation Society nomenclature. CONCLUSION: Our findings confirm that the analytic performance of the AmpliSeq panel is satisfactory, with high sensitivity and specificity.

Accuracy evaluation of automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay for everolimus and sirolimus compared to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the analytical performance of a newly developed electrochemiluminescence immunoassay for everolimus and sirolimus compared to that of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). METHODS: According to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines, the analytical performance including precision, recovery, linearity, and carryover was evaluated. For correlation evaluation, the results of Elecsys® analysis of everolimus and sirolimus were compared with those of LC-MS/MS using 120 samples from patients treated with everolimus or sirolimus. RESULTS: The within-run and total imprecision values were as follows: 2.3%-4.5% and 4.5%-6.4% for the everolimus assay; 3.3%-4.8% and 4.7%-8.1% for the sirolimus assay, respectively. The measured concentration was linear over the range of 0.718-27.585 ng/mL for everolimus analysis and 0.789-26.880 ng/mL for sirolimus analysis (all R2  > 0.99). Recovery was 93.5%-105.5% for the everolimus assay and 99.2%-109.1% for the sirolimus assay (except lowest levels). Carryover was -1.09% for the everolimus assay and -0.12% for the sirolimus assay. The results of the two chemiluminescence immunoassays showed acceptable correlations with those of LC-MS/MS (R = 0.9585 and R = 0.9799, respectively). The two immunoassays showed slightly proportional biases compared to LC-MS/MS. CONCLUSION: Elecsys® Everolimus and Sirolimus assays showed acceptable analytical performance in precision, linearity, and correlation compared to LC-MS/MS These methods can be adopted in the clinical laboratory for rapid therapeutic drug monitoring of patients who require treatment with immunosuppressants.

Efficacy and Survival Outcome Associated with the Use of Novel Agents and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Cases of Immunoglobulin D Multiple Myeloma in Korea.

BACKGROUND: Immunoglobulin D multiple myeloma (IgD MM) is characterized by a poor prognosis. Data are lacking on the survival benefits associated with the use of novel agents followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in IgD MM patients. We evaluated the clinical outcomes of induction treatment with novel agents followed by ASCT. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective study of 22 IgD MM patients who underwent ASCT between 1995 and 2016. Of these, 10 (45.4%) received novel agents and 12 (54.6%) received nonnovel agents. Clinical features and survival outcomes were examined. RESULTS: Median overall survival (OS) was 37.7 months in the 22 patients. Those in the novel-agents group received bortezomib or thalidomide-based regimens, whereas 91.7% of the nonnovel-agents group received a vincristine-based regimen. The median progression-free survival and OS in the novel-agent/nonnovel-agent groups were 8.3/7.4 and 38.6/12.5 months, respectively. The median OS of patients receiving maintenance therapy was not reached. CONCLUSION: This study showed improved survival outcomes compared to our previous study (37.7 vs. 12 months), suggesting that the use of a novel agent as induction and maintenance therapy may be beneficial in patients with IgD MM who undergo ASCT.

Accuracy evaluation of Roche and Siemens tacrolimus and cyclosporine assays in comparison with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus and cyclosporine is crucial to the success of organ transplantation. We evaluated the analytical performances and accuracy of two commercially available tacrolimus and cyclosporine assays (Roche ISD and Siemens) in comparison with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). A total of 342 leftover whole blood samples requested for tacrolimus or cyclosporine assays were stored at -20 °C until analysis. Repeatability and between-run imprecision were evaluated using quality control materials provided by the manufacturer. Ring trial samples were used for the assessment of recovery. The results of the Roche ISD assay were compared with those of Siemens tacrolimus and cyclosporine assays and LC-MS/MS. Repeatability and between-run imprecision were 2.1-5.3% and 2.6-7.5%, respectively. Recovery of Roche ISD was 85.7 - 90.6% for cyclosporine and 96.2-98.5% for tacrolimus. The two immunoassays showed slight positive biases relative to LC-MS/MS for cyclosporine. For tacrolimus, Roche ISD produced virtually identical results to those of LC-MS/MS, whereas Siemens showed proportional differences, especially in patients receiving kidney transplantation. The analytical performances of Roche ISD were generally acceptable, especially regarding accuracy. Clinical laboratory staff should be aware of the strengths and weaknesses of commercial immunoassays in order to ensure accurate results.

Performance of the Dimension TAC assay and comparison of multiple platforms for the measurement of tacrolimus.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic monitoring of tacrolimus is essential for reducing organ rejection and adverse effects. The measurement of tacrolimus in whole blood is taken by many automated platforms. We evaluated the analytical performance of the Dimension TAC assay, which is an upgraded reagent from the previous Dimension TACR assay. METHODS: The evaluations involved determination of precision, linearity, detection capability, and reagent lot-to-lot variability between three lot numbers. Correlation studies were conducted using the Dimension TACR assay, Architect, Elecsys assay, and MassTrak LC-MS/MS. RESULTS: The total coefficient of variation was below 10%. Acceptable linearity was observed in their respective reportable ranges. The limit of blank, limit of detection, and limit of quantification were 0.29, 0.47, and 0.81 ng/mL, respectively. Correlation analysis indicated that the Dimension TAC assay results were comparable to that of the Dimension TACR assay, Architect, and Elecsys results in liver and heart transplant patients. In kidney transplant patients, the Dimension TAC assay showed the poor correlation with Architect and Elecsys. The results from these assays were slightly higher than that of MassTrak. We found little lot-to-lot reagent variation among the reagents evaluated. CONCLUSION: The overall analytical performance of the Dimension TAC assay is acceptable for therapeutic monitoring in clinical practice. Our study that compared different platforms may provide some useful information regarding which test method to use.

Efficient reporting of the estimated glomerular filtration rate without height in pediatric patients with cancer.

BACKGROUND: The updated bedside Schwartz equation requires constant, serum creatinine concentration and height measurements to calculate the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in pediatric patients. Unlike the serum creatinine levels, obtaining height information from the laboratory information system (LIS) is not always possible in a clinical laboratory. Recently, the height-independent eGFR equation, the full age spectrum (FAS) equation, has been introduced. We evaluated the performance of height-independent eGFR equation in Korean children with cancer. METHODS: A total of 250 children who underwent chromium-51-ethylenediamine tetra acetic-acid (51Cr-EDTA)-based glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurements were enrolled. The 51Cr-EDTA GFR was used as the reference GFR. The bias (eGFR - measured GFR), precision (root mean square error [RMSE]) and accuracy (P30) of the FAS equations were compared to those of the updated Schwartz equation. P30 was defined as the percentage of patients whose eGFR was within ±30% of the measured GFR. RESULTS: The FAS equation showed significantly lower bias (mL/min/1.73 m2) than the updated Schwartz equation (4.2 vs. 8.7, p<0.001). The RMSE and P30 were: updated Schwartz of 43.8 and 64.4%, respectively, and FAS of 42.7 and 66.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The height-independent eGFR-FAS equation was less biased and as accurate as the updated Schwartz equation in Korean children. The use of the height-independent eGFR equation will allow for efficient reporting of eGFR through the LIS in clinical laboratories.

A new strategy for calculating the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA).

BACKGROUND: Reliable quantitative measurements of HE4 and CA125 levels are required to calculate the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) value. We suggest a new reporting strategy for interpreting ROMA values based on analytical measurement range (AMR) and qualified-intervals of the HE4 and CA125 results. METHODS: HE4 and CA125 assays from Abbott and Roche were used. The AMRs and the qualified-intervals were as follows: Architect HE4 assay, 20-1500 and 17.2-2637.8 pmol/L; Architect CA125 II assay, 1-1000 and 3.9-14,163.0 U/mL; Elecsys HE4 assay, 15-1500 and 28.8-3847 pmol/L; Elecsys CA125 II assay, 0.6-5000 and 6.5-5000 U/mL. These values were used to simulate the ROMA values. RESULTS: Reporting algorithm for the ROMA value could be classified into three categories. (1) If quantitative HE4 and CA125 levels are reliable, the numerical ROMA value can be reported. (2) If HE4 value is <20 and <28.8 for Abbott and Roche in premenopausal woman, the ROMA value should be reported as "low risk" regardless of the CA125 result. In postmenopausal woman, however, it should be reported as "low risk" (CA125<203.0 and <165.8 for Abbott and Roche) or "undetermined" (vice-versa value). (3) If CA125 value is <3.9 and <6.5 for Abbott and Roche, it should be reported as "low risk" (premenopausal HE4<51.5 and <62.2, postmenopausal HE4<323.0 and <281.5 for Abbott and Roche) or "undetermined" (vice-versa value). CONCLUSIONS: New reporting strategy will provide more informative reporting of ROMA values in clinical practice.

Performance Evaluation of a Restored Dimension TACR Assay: An Automated Platform for Measuring the Whole Blood Tacrolimus Concentration.

BACKGROUND: Monitoring tacrolimus levels is essential for successful organ transplantation. The Dimension TACR (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, USA) is an automated platform used to measure tacrolimus concentrations. Recently, the manufacturer started shipping an assay reagent with improved functions. We evaluated the analytical performance of the improved Dimension TACR assay. METHODS: The precision was evaluated according to the CLSI EP5-A2 guideline. Two levels of control materials were analyzed twice a day in duplicate for 20 days in the precision study. The linearity was evaluated using five levels of mixed calibrators based on the CLSI EP6-A guideline. A comparison study was conducted based on the CLSI EP9-A3 guideline using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The limit of blank (LoB), limit of detection (LoD), and limit of quantitation (LoQ) were evaluated using CLSI EP17-A2. RESULTS: In the precision analyses, the within-run, between-run, and total coefficients of variation were 5.8%, 4.6%, and 8.1% for the low level control and 4.2%, 2.8%, and 5.9% for the high level, respectively. A linear range of 1.18-8.32 ng/mL was observed. In the comparison study, the correlation coefficient, slope, and intercept were 0.9768, 1.118, and -0.251, respectively. The results of the Dimension TACR assay were slightly higher than those of LC-MS/MS (mean bias 0.64 ng/mL). The LoB, LoD, and LoQ were 0.063 ng/mL, 0.408 ng/mL, and 1.15 ng/mL, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Dimension TACR assay showed good precision and linearity. Although the results using the Dimension TACR assay were higher than those using mass spectrometry, the differences were acceptable clinically.

An approach to standardization of urine sediment analysis via suggestion of a common manual protocol.

INTRODUCTION: The results of urine sediment analysis have been reported semiquantitatively. However, as recent guidelines recommend quantitative reporting of urine sediment, and with the development of automated urine sediment analyzers, there is an increasing need for quantitative analysis of urine sediment. Here, we developed a protocol for urine sediment analysis and quantified the results. METHODS: Based on questionnaires, various reports, guidelines, and experimental results, we developed a protocol for urine sediment analysis. The results of this new protocol were compared with those obtained with a standardized chamber and an automated sediment analyzer. Reference intervals were also estimated using new protocol. RESULTS: We developed a protocol with centrifugation at 400 g for 5 min, with the average concentration factor of 30. The correlation between quantitative results of urine sediment analysis, the standardized chamber, and the automated sediment analyzer were generally good. The conversion factor derived from the new protocol showed a better fit with the results of manual count than the default conversion factor in the automated sediment analyzer. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a protocol for manual urine sediment analysis to quantitatively report the results. This protocol may provide a mean for standardization of urine sediment analysis.

Large-scale performance evaluation of Accu-Chek inform II point-of-care glucose meters.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to report the experience of large-scale performance evaluation of 238 Accu-Chek Inform II point-of-care (POC) glucose meters in a single medical setting. METHODS: The repeatability of 238 POC devices, the within-site imprecision of 12 devices, and the linearity of 49 devices were evaluated using glucose control solutions. The glucose results of 24 POC devices and central laboratory were compared using patient samples. RESULTS: Mean concentration of control solutions was 2.39 mmol/L for Level 1 and 16.52 mmol/L for Level 2. The pooled repeatability coefficient of variation (CV) of the 238 devices was 2.0% for Level 1 and 1.6% for Level 2. The pooled within-site imprecision CV and reproducibility CV of the 12 devices were 2.7% and 2.7% for Level 1, and 1.9%, and 1.9% for Level 2, respectively. The test results of all 49 devices were linear within analytical measurement range from 1.55-31.02 mmol/L. The correlation coefficient for individual POC devices ranged from 0.9967-0.9985. The total correlation coefficient for the 24 devices was 0.998. CONCLUSIONS: The Accu-Chek Inform II POC blood glucose meters performed well in terms of precision, linearity, and correlation evaluations. Consensus guidelines for the large-scale performance evaluations of POC devices are required.