Pelvic organ prolapse after 3 modes of hysterectomy: long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: There are various indications and approaches for hysterectomy; yet, the difference in long-term risk of subsequent prolapse after surgery is not well studied. OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of prolapse after abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy for up to 17 years from surgery. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review study of women undergoing hysterectomy across all indications (benign and malignant) between 2001 and 2008 was conducted. An equivalent random sample of hysterectomy patients was selected each year. We compared demographic and other surgical characteristics data including age, race, parity, body mass index, indication and year of hysterectomy, blood loss, cervix removal, cuff suspension, and complications using chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Fisher's exact across the 3 groups. Presence and treatment of subsequent prolapse (based on patient symptoms, pelvic exam, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis, and current procedural terminology pessary or surgical codes) were compared with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Of the 2158 patients, 1459, 375, and 324 underwent open, vaginal, and laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy, respectively. The vaginal group (56) was older than the abdominal (52) or laparoscopic or robotic (49) groups, with a P value of <.05. Most patients were White with a mean body mass index of 30 kg/m2. The main indication was cancer for abdominal (33%) and laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy (25%) and prolapse for vaginal hysterectomy (60%). Time to prolapse was shortest after vaginal surgery (27 months) and longest after laparoscopic or robotic surgery (71 months). After controlling for confounders, including surgery indication, the hazard ratio for subsequent prolapse was no different among vaginal (hazard ratio=1.36 [0.77-2.45]), laparoscopic or robotic (hazard ratio=1.47 [0.80-2.69]), or open (reference) hysterectomy. Prolapse grade was similar across the 3 groups. About 50% of women with recurrent prolapse received physical therapy, pessary, or surgical treatment. CONCLUSION: At the 17-year follow-up, the route of hysterectomy is not associated with a difference in recurrence, grade, or subsequent treatment of prolapse when the indication for hysterectomy is considered. Prolapse, as an indication for hysterectomy, increases risk for recurrence. Women planning a hysterectomy should be counseled appropriately about the risk of subsequent prolapse.

The Impact of Bariatric Surgery on Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of bariatric surgery (BS) on the prevalence of pelvic floor dysfunctions (PFD), specifically on urinary incontinence (UI), pelvic organ prolapse (POP), and fecal incontinence (FI). DATA SOURCES: A systematic review (PROSPERO registration no. CRD42017068452) with a literature search was performed using the PubMed, Scopus, and SciELO databases for all publications related to BS and PFD, with no language restrictions, from inception to September 2018. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Two authors screened for study eligibility and extracted data. Only prospective cohorts assessing women with morbid obesity and the prevalence of PFD before and after BS in multiple academic and private centers were included. UI, POP, and FI were defined according to the International Urogynecological Association/International Continence Society joint consensus, and diagnosis was made based on self-report or questionnaires. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Our search strategy retrieved 957 results. Of those, 28 studies were included for full analysis, and 20 studies (n = 3684 patients) were selected for final analysis. The main reasons for exclusion were missing data before and after BS (n = 7) and combined data of men and women who underwent BS (n = 1). Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was the most common surgical technique. Pooled analysis (16 studies) showed that women had a mean body mass index reduction of 12.90 kg/m2 after treatment (95% confidence interval [CI], -14.82 to -10.97; p < .0001). The relative risk reduction was 67% (n = 19; odds ratio [OR], 0.33; 95% CI, 0.26-0.41; p < .0001) for UI, 52% (n = 5; OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.22-1.07; p = .07) for POP, and 20% (n = 9; OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.53-1.21; p = .29) for FI. Funnel plots for UI and FI did not suggest any publication bias. With regard to the standardized questionnaires for PFD, the International Consultation on Incontinence-Short Form, Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 and its subscale Colorectal-Anal Impact Questionnaire-7, Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20, and its subscale Urinary Distress Inventory-6 showed statistically significantly lower scores. Sexual function, represented by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-12, showed no statistically significant improvement after surgery. CONCLUSION: BS has a significant impact on reducing UI, but FI and POP, in obese women.