Evaluation of doses to pelvic lymph node regions from image-guided high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Purpose: Interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) is indicated for intact cervical carcinoma (IN-CC) if intracavitary brachytherapy (ICRT) is not feasible and also in vault carcinoma (VA-C). We aimed to evaluate the doses to pelvic lymph node regions in IN-CC and VA-C treated with ISBT. Material and methods: Ten patients (6 IN-CC, 4 VA-C) were chosen for this dosimetric study. IN-CC had a central tandem in addition to the needles. External iliac (EI-N), internal iliac (II-N), obturator (OB-N) and sacral (SA-N) groups of lymph nodes were delineated. A dose of 10 grays (Gy) and 8 Gy each × 2 fractions was prescribed to the target in IN-CC and VA-C respectively. Doses received by 100%, 90% and 50% volume (D100, D90, D50) and D2cc, D1cc, D0.1cc were evaluated. Doses to lymph nodal groups in IN-CC vs. VA-C were compared using Student's t-test. Results: For 20 implants, the median number of needles was 18 (range, 16-20). Mean D90 and D2cc of the combined bilateral OB-N, II-N, EI-N and SA-N groups were 33.62 ±3.46% and 102.94 ±10.71%, 6.98 ±0.65% and 39.69 ±3.64%, 5.1 ±0.51% and 15.4 ±0.8%, 7.76 ±0.95% and 15.36 ±1.09% of the prescribed doses respectively. Patients with a central tandem (IN-CC) received significantly higher doses to external, internal iliac and sacral group of lymph nodes (p < 0.001) as compared to VA-C. Conclusions: In patients with cervical carcinoma treated with ISBT, pelvic lymph node groups received significant doses. The dose contribution to pelvic lymph nodes is higher in patients with intact cervical cancer where a central tandem is used as compared to post-operative patients.

Combination of image-guided IMRT and IGBT in locally advanced carcinoma cervix: Prospective evaluation of toxicities and clinical outcomes from a tertiary cancer center in India.

Purpose: We aimed to assess the toxicity profile and clinical outcome in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) treated with a combination of image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IG-IMRT) and image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT). Material and methods: 25 LACC patients were recruited in this single-arm prospective study. Whole pelvis IG-IMRT was delivered (45 Gy with simultaneously integrated nodal boost of 55 Gy in 25 fractions), with concurrent weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m2). Patients received IGBT of 7 Gy each in 4 fractions to high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV). First fraction was done under MRI, and subsequent fractions were performed under CT guidance. Primary endpoint was acute toxicity, and secondary endpoints were 2-year loco-regional control and late toxicity. Results: The median age was 52 years, and FIGO 2018 stage distribution was IIA2, IIB, IIIB, and IIIC1 in 12%, 40%, 20%, and 28% patients, respectively. All patients received concurrent chemotherapy with median number of 5 cycles (range, 4-5 cycles). Grade 1 and 2 diarrhea, and grade 1 cystitis was reported in 4 (16%), 3 (12%), and 2 (8%) patients, respectively. Grade 1 and 2 anemia, and grade 1 and 2 dermatitis were observed in 3 (12%) and 2 (8%), and 3 (12%) and 3 (12%) patients, respectively. No patient reported grade 3-4 acute toxicity. At median follow-up of 29.5 months (range, 25-37 months), late grade 1 bladder toxicity was observed in 1 (4%) patient. Loco-regional control at 1 and 2 years were 96% and 92%, respectively. Conclusions: The combination of IG-IMRT and IGBT yielded excellent outcomes in terms of acute toxicity and loco-regional control.

Retrospective analysis of clinical outcome of 100 inoperable oral cavity carcinoma treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without induction chemotherapy.

Objectives: The management of inoperable oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OC-SCC) is onerous. We aimed to retrospectively analyse the outcome of our cohort of inoperable OC-SCC treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) with or without induction chemotherapy (IC). Methods: Data of 100 patients (January 2017 to May 2022) of histopathologically proven inoperable OC-SCC treated with definitive CTRT with weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 were retrieved from our departmental archives. Radiotherapy (RT) was delivered with three-dimensional conformal plan (66-70 Gy). Toxicities were evaluated using acute morbidity scoring criteria of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. The response was evaluated as per WHO criteria. Progression free survival (PFS) was calculated from the date of the start of treatment (IC/CTRT) using Kaplan Meier method. Results: Median age was 45 years (range 30-80 years). The primary site was oral tongue (59%), retro-molar trigon (15%), buccal mucosa (15%) and others (11%). The stage was III: IVA: IVB in 16:70:14 patients respectively. 72% patients received IC (platinum ± 5 FU ± taxane). Grade 3 skin toxicity, oral mucositis and dysphagia was noted in 13 (13%), 19 (19%) and 13 (13%) patients respectively. The median follow-up duration was 30.5 months (range 6-62 months). Complete response (CR), partial response, progressive disease and death at the time of the last follow-up were 49%, 25%, 15% and 11% respectively. 2-year PFS rate was 49.5%. Stage III patients had a higher CR rate (81.2% versus 42.8%; p = 0.0051) and higher 2-year PFS (81.2% versus 46.4%; p = 0.0056) in comparison to stage IV patients. Conclusion: Inoperable patients of OC-SCC treated with definitive CTRT with or without IC yielded CR in approximately half of patients with acceptable toxicity profiles.

Toxicities and clinical outcome of adjuvant dysphagia optimized versus standard intensity-modulated radiotherapy for post-operative oral cavity cancers: A prospective comparative study.

BACKGROUND: We prospectively assessed acute and late toxicity in post-operative oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (PO-OCSCC) treated with adjuvant dysphagia optimized intensity-modulated radiotherapy (Do-IMRT) versus standard IMRT (S-IMRT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-six patients of PO-SCC without indications of concurrent chemotherapy were alternatively allocated to adjuvant Do-IMRT (n = 28) versus S-IMRT (n = 28) arms. High- and low-risk planning target volume received 60 and 54 Gy, respectively, in 30 fractions over 6 weeks. Dysphagia aspiration-related structures (DARS) were contoured in both arms. While dosimetric constraints were given in Do-IMRT arm, doses to DARS were only observed without dose constraints in S-IMRT arm. Acute and late toxicity were assessed by common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) v5.0 and RTOG criteria, respectively. RESULTS: The primary site of disease was buccal mucosa (64% vs. 53%) and oral tongue (21% vs. 32%), in Do-IMRT and S-IMRT, respectively. The mean doses to DARS was significantly less with Do-IMRT (all p < 0.001) as compared to S-IMRT. Median follow-up was 24.2 months. Grade ≥2 oral pain was less in the Do-IMRT arm (50% vs. 78.6%, p = 0.05). Grade ≥2 late dysphagia at 2 years were significantly less in Do-IMRT arm (0% vs. 17.9%, p = 0.016). Two-year locoregional control was 89.2% in Do-IMRT and 78.5% in S-IMRT (p = 0.261). CONCLUSION: DARS can be spared in PO-OCSCC patients treated with Do-IMRT without compromising coverage of the target volumes. Limiting doses to DARS leads to lesser acute and late toxicity without compromising locoregional control.

Prospective evaluation of dose-escalated preoperative concurrent chemo-radiation with image guided-IMRT in locally advanced rectal cancers.

Purpose: To analyse the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACRT) with dose-escalated image-guided intensity modulated radiation therapy (IG-IMRT) in locally advanced (T3/4; T1-4N1-2) rectal cancers (LARCs). Materials and methods: Twenty patients with the diagnosis of LARC were recruited in this prospective interventional single-arm study treated by IG-IMRT with 45 Gray (Gy) in 25 fractions to elective nodal volumes and 55 Gy in 25 fractions to the gross primary and nodal disease with concurrent capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily on radiotherapy days. Patients underwent total mesorectal excision 6-8 weeks post completion of NACRT followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (Capecitabine and oxaliplatin every 3 weekly for 6-8 cycles). Primary end point was acute toxicity assessment and secondary end points were pathological complete response (pCR) and loco-regional control (LRC). Results: Clinical T stage was T3:T4 in 19:1 and clinical N0:N1: N2 in 2:7:11 patients, respectively. With a median follow up of 21.2 months (13.8-25.6 months), 18 of 20 (90%) patients received the full course of treatment. Tumour and nodal downstaging was achieved in 78% and 84% of patients, respectively. pCR and overall complete response (defined as pCR and near CR) was achieved in 22.2% and 44.4% of patients, respectively. 2 (10%) patients completed NACRT, and achieved complete clinical response but refused surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy course was completed by 17/18 (94.5%) patients. Grade 3 toxicities were observed in 2 (10%) patients during NACRT. All patients were disease-free at the time of the last follow up. Conclusion: Dose-escalation of NACRT therapy with IG-IMRT in LARC patients offers decent rates of pCR and overall response with excellent LRC and acceptable toxicities.