Influence of the Rh (D) blood group system on graft survival in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The Rh (D) blood group system has not traditionally been considered to be a clinically relevant histocompatibility barrier in transplantation since conflicting results of its clinical importance have been reported. METHODS: We analyzed 786 consecutive primary cadaveric renal transplants performed by transplant centers in our Organ Procurement Organization (OPO) between 1990 and 1997. We also analyzed United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data on 26,469 kidney transplants done from April 1994 to June 1996. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis revealed that Rh identity between the recipient and donor was significantly related to better graft outcome (risk ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.30 to 0.61; P=0.0001). Multivariate analysis of the UNOS data revealed that the Rh -/- group may have a positive influence on graft survival with a risk ratio of 0.43 (P=0.14). CONCLUSION: Multivariate analysis of primary cadaveric renal allografts performed within the Midwest Organ Bank OPO indicates that Rh (D) is a clinically relevant histocompatibility barrier that influences 7-year graft survival.

Successful cadaveric renal transplantation of patients highly sensitized to HLA Class I antigens.

The purpose of our investigation was to evaluate long-term graft survival and the role of histocompatibility in patients who were highly sensitized to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) Class I antigens and received a cadaveric renal transplant. Our multi-institutional study evaluated 7-yr graft outcomes and the histocompatibility requirements of 61 (6.1%) highly sensitized (anti-human globulin panel reactive antibody [AHG PRA], > or = 80%) cadaveric renal transplantation patients, transplanted between 1988 and 1997, among 999 consecutive cadaveric renal transplants. One- and 7-yr graft survival in the high PRA group (n = 61) was 76 and 59%, and was not significantly different from that in the low PRA group (n = 938), 86 and 59% (Wilcoxon = 0.11; log-rank = 0.45) (died with a functioning graft [DWFG] not censored). When those data were divided into primary and regrafts, 1- and 7-yr graft outcomes for high and low PRA groups were not significantly different [(primary, 1- and 7-yr survival: high PRA = 83 and 74%, n = 30, and low PRA = 87 and 61%, n = 825; log-rank = 0.37 for DWFG not censored) (regrafts, 1- and 7-yr survival: high PRA = 70 and 42%, n = 31, and low PRA = 80 and 43%, n = 113; log-rank = 0.36 for DWFG not censored)]. We did observe a subgroup of the high PRA patient group that had inferior graft outcomes. Graft outcome at 1 and 6 yr in the high PRA group for patients who had one to two DR mismatches (65 and 50%, n = 41) was significantly worse than for high PRA patients who had zero DR mismatches with their donors (100 and 78%, n = 20) (log-rank = 0.01 for DWFG not censored). Furthermore, the mean number of HLA-A and -B mismatches was significantly greater in the high PRA/DR-mismatched group (1.7 +/- 1.2, n = 41) compared with the high PRA/zero DR-mismatched group (0.5 +/- 1.1, n = 19) (p < 0.001). Overall, these data suggest that the patient who is highly sensitized to HLA Class I antigens has a long-term graft outcome that is equivalent to less sensitized patients, but that HLA-DR mismatching and a higher degree of Class I mismatching may be poor prognostic indicators in such patients.