[DRESS as a rare differential diagnosis in eosinophilia, skin rash and acute hepatitis]. / DRESS als seltene Differentialdiagnose bei Eosinophilie, Hautexanthem und akuter Hepatitis.

A 21-year-old female patient presented with fever, pharyngitis, lymphadenopathy and generalized exanthema that had started 2 weeks prior. Allergies were not known, the family and travel history were negative. Due to depression, Duloxetine had been taken for 1.5 years, and due to bipolar disorder, a treatment with Lamotrigine was started four weeks prior but was stopped because of increased transaminase levels. Laboratory findings on admission showed eosinophilia (1.327 /nl), lymphocytosis and acute hepatitis (GOT 428 U/l, GPT 438 U/l) with deranged coagulation. Inflammatory parameters were increased. Ultrasound revealed hepatosplenomegaly with ascites. Acute viral or parasitic infection was excluded serologically. A skin biopsy showed a perivascular inflammatory infiltrate, compatible with a drug reaction. An inflammatory infiltrate was found in the liver biopsy, consistent with drug-induced hepatitis. Cough, dyspnea and pleural effusion occurred. In summary of the findings and with the help of the RegiSCAR-Score, the diagnosis of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) could be made. Under high-dose prednisolone therapy, a gradual decrease of transaminases and reconstitution of liver synthesis could be observed.In patients with eosinophilia, lymphadenopathy, acute hepatitis and generalized exanthema, DRESS is a rare but-due to its potentially life-threatening consequences-important differential diagnosis. The most important measure is to stop the suspected inducing medication immediately. Severe cases should be treated with high-dose systemic corticosteroids.

Updates on the immunopathology and genomics of severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions.

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN), and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS)/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS) cause significant morbidity and mortality and impede new drug development. HLA class I associations with SJS/TEN and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome have aided preventive efforts and provided insights into immunopathogenesis. In SJS/TEN, HLA class I-restricted oligoclonal CD8+ T-cell responses occur at the tissue level. However, specific HLA risk allele(s) and antigens driving this response have not been identified for most drugs. HLA risk alleles also have incomplete positive and negative predictive values, making truly comprehensive screening currently challenging. Although, there have been key paradigm shifts in knowledge regarding drug hypersensitivity, there are still many open and unanswered questions about SCAR immunopathogenesis, as well as genetic and environmental risk. In addition to understanding the cellular and molecular basis of SCAR at the single-cell level, identification of the MHC-restricted drug-reactive self- or viral peptides driving the hypersensitivity reaction will also be critical to advancing premarketing strategies to predict risk at an individual and drug level. This will also enable identification of biologic markers for earlier diagnosis and accurate prognosis, as well as drug causality and targeted therapeutics.

Loss-of-Function Myeloperoxidase Mutations Are Associated with Increased Neutrophil Counts and Pustular Skin Disease.

The identification of disease alleles underlying human autoinflammatory diseases can provide important insights into the mechanisms that maintain neutrophil homeostasis. Here, we focused our attention on generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP), a potentially life-threatening disorder presenting with cutaneous and systemic neutrophilia. Following the whole-exome sequencing of 19 unrelated affected individuals, we identified a subject harboring a homozygous splice-site mutation (c.2031-2A>C) in MPO. This encodes myeloperoxidase, an essential component of neutrophil azurophil granules. MPO screening in conditions phenotypically related to GPP uncovered further disease alleles in one subject with acral pustular psoriasis (c.2031-2A>C;c.2031-2A>C) and in two individuals with acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (c.1705C>T;c.2031-2A>C and c.1552_1565del;c.1552_1565del). A subsequent analysis of UK Biobank data demonstrated that the c.2031-2A>C and c.1705C>T (p.Arg569Trp) disease alleles were also associated with increased neutrophil abundance in the general population (p = 5.1 × 10-6 and p = 3.6 × 10-5, respectively). The same applied to three further deleterious variants that had been genotyped in the cohort, with two alleles (c.995C>T [p.Ala332Val] and c.752T>C [p.Met251Thr]) yielding p values < 10-10. Finally, treatment of healthy neutrophils with an MPO inhibitor (4-Aminobenzoic acid hydrazide) increased cell viability and delayed apoptosis, highlighting a mechanism whereby MPO mutations affect granulocyte numbers. These findings identify MPO as a genetic determinant of pustular skin disease and neutrophil abundance. Given the recent interest in the development of MPO antagonists for the treatment of neurodegenerative disease, our results also suggest that the pro-inflammatory effects of these agents should be closely monitored.

Effects of dosage in new users of lamotrigine inducing epidermal necrolysis: Results of the German Registry of Severe Skin Reactions.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine the impact of dosage in new users of lamotrigine (LTG) and the concomitant intake of valproic acid (VPA) on epidermal necrolysis (EN). METHODS: A total of 102 EN cases with exposure to LTG were identified (1992-2018) in the German Registry of Severe Skin Reactions. All cases are validated by an independent expert committee. Six cases were excluded due to lack of exposure in the relevant time frame. Causality assessment was performed with ALDEN (Algorithm for Assessment of Drug Causality in EN) on definite/probable cases (≥12 years; n = 84). Evaluation of dosing regimen was restricted to cases with complete LTG dosing history (n = 74). RESULTS: Demography showed a mean age of 42.4 years, female predominance (69%), and low mortality (7.3%). Epilepsy was the indication for use in 87.5%. LTG was the very probable cause in 71.4% and probable cause in 28.6%. On average, one additional antiseizure medication was taken, most frequently VPA (43/84). Combined LTG/VPA treatment showed no statistically significant difference in morbidity or mortality. Mean time latency from initiation of LTG to reaction onset was 24.2 days, varying between 21 days with high initial dose and 29.2 days with low initial dose. Low initial LTG dose (n = 9) revealed higher mortality (22.2%) and higher severity (5/9) than high initial dose (n = 35, mortality = 14.3%, 14/35 higher severity). No patient died when the starting dose was as recommended. The highest mortality (25%) was found in patients with no dose increase (n = 8), which correlated with higher age. Despite the recommended or low initial dose, 52.7% of patients developed EN, in contrast to 39.2% with a slow, recommended, or no dose escalation. SIGNIFICANCE: Neither the initial dose, dose escalation, nor the combination with VPA seems to influence the general occurrence of EN. However, EN patients with the recommended starting dose and the recommended dose escalation had the best outcome in terms of clinical severity and mortality.

Skin manifestations after immunisation with an adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine, Germany, 2020.

BackgroundShortly after the launch of a novel adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV), Shingrix, cases of suspected herpes zoster (HZ) or zoster-like skin reactions following immunisation were reported.AimWe aimed to investigate if these skin manifestations after administration of RZV could be HZ.MethodsBetween April and October 2020, general practitioners (GP) reporting a suspected case of HZ or zoster-like skin manifestation after RZV vaccination to the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, the German national competent authority, were invited to participate in the study. The GP took a sample of the skin manifestation, photographed it and collected patient information on RZV vaccination and the suspected adverse event. We analysed all samples by PCR for varicella-zoster virus (VZV) and herpes-simplex virus (HSV) and genotyped VZV-positive samples. In addition, cases were independently assessed by two dermatologists.ResultsEighty eligible cases were enrolled and 72 could be included in the analysis. Of the 72 cases, 45 were female, 33 were 60-69 years old, 32 had skin symptoms in the thoracic and 27 in the cervical dermatomes. Twenty-seven samples tested PCR positive for VZV (all genotyped as wild-type, WT), three for HSV-1 and five for HSV-2.ConclusionIt may be difficult to distinguish HZ, without a PCR result, from other zoster-like manifestations. In this study, VZV-PCR positive dermatomal eruptions occurring in the first weeks after immunisation with RZV were due to WT VZV, which is not unexpected as HZ is a common disease against which the vaccine is unlikely to provide full protection at this time.

Drug Allergy and Cutaneous Adverse Reactions.

Allergy or hypersensitivity to drugs often affects the skin and sometimes also mucosa. While immediate type reactions show a rather homogeneous pattern, delayed type reactions reveal a high variability. In both cases it may not always be easy to differentiate drug reactions from non-drug-induced skin conditions. Furthermore, the different types of cutaneous adverse reactions may be difficult to distinguish in the beginning. This accounts predominately for delayed hypersensitivity reactions that can occur after a variety of medications and present with manifold lesions. Most of these cutaneous adverse reactions are mild, but some are severe with high morbidity and mortality. In the clinical setting, it is important to recognize the signs that point to a more severe condition early on in order to initiate appropriate management. In addition, it is crucial to identify the potentially culprit medication on the basis of a detailed medication history and by evaluating the relevant exposure times of certain drugs that differ substantially between the various reaction types. After the acute stage of the adverse reaction is managed successfully, further allergologic testing may be undertaken to confirm the offending drug.

Epidermal necrolysis in the context of immuno-oncologic medication as well as kinase inhibitors and biologics.

BACKGROUND: Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis are severe, primarily drug-induced reactions of skin and mucosa. Since they differ in the extent of skin detachment but not in etiology, they are grouped together as epidermal necrolysis (EN). Due to nationwide registration, representative data are available at the German Center for the Documentation of Severe Skin Reactions (dZh). Here, an increasing number of case notifications in the context with new immuno-oncologic drugs, kinase inhibitors and biologics have been observed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Of 4,150 cases notifications between January 2003 and February 2019, 102 cases with exposure to these drug groups underwent systematic analysis, validation and causality assessment. RESULTS: Two cases of EN to vemurafenib were confirmed and one case to afatinib and pembrolizumab, respectively. In 14 EN cases other drugs - predominantly allopurinol or cotrimoxazole - were the causative agent. Fourteen cases were EN-like reactions: six bullous lichenoid drug eruptions (DE) to pembrolizumab (2), obinutuzumab, nivolumab, rituximab, infliximab/nivolumab, and eight multiforme-like DE to rituximab (2), adalimumab, ramucirumab, bevacizumab, vemurafenib, sorafenib (2). Lichenoid DE were differentiated from EN through histopathology and by the protracted course of EN, multiforme-like DE by variable skin manifestations with only sparse epidermolysis or mucosal involvement. CONCLUSIONS: A correct diagnosis is highly relevant in terms of prognosis and use of these drugs in malignoma treatment. Re-exposure is contraindicated in EN, but possible in other DE after rigorous risk-benefit evaluation.

Bullous Drug Reactions.

Bullous drug eruptions are infrequent, but because they pose a challenge both to affected patients and to treating physicians they are considered to be the most severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR). It is important to recognize these conditions and to differentiate them from other clinical entities involving blister formation. There may be early signs and symptoms that indicate a severe bullous drug eruption even before blisters and erosions of the skin and mucous membranes become obvious. Once the diagnosis is suspected, appropriate diagnostic procedures and adequate management must be initiated. The latter includes identification of the potentially inducing drug, although it should be taken into account that not all cases of bullous eruptions are drug-induced. In cases with drug causality the potentially culprit agent must be withdrawn, while in cases with other aetiology the underlying condition, e.g. an infection, must be treated appropriately. In addition to best supportive care, immunomodulating therapy may be considered.

Controversies in drug allergy: Testing for delayed reactions.

Controversies exist with regard to in vivo approaches to delayed immunologically mediated adverse drug reactions, such as exanthem (maculopapular eruption), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis, and fixed drug eruptions. In particular, widespread differences exist between regions and practice on the availability and use of intradermal and patch testing, the standard drug concentrations used, the use of additional drugs in intradermal and patch testing to help determine cross-reactivity, the timing of testing in relation to the occurrence of the adverse drug reaction, the use of testing in specific phenotypes, and the use of oral challenge in conjunction with delayed intradermal and patch testing to ascertain drug tolerance. It was noted that there have been advances in the science of delayed T cell-mediated reactions that have shed light on immunopathogenesis and provided a mechanism of preprescription screening in the case of HLA-B*57:01 and abacavir hypersensitivity and HLA-B*15:02 and carbamazepine Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis in Southeast Asian subjects. Future directions should include the collaboration of large international networks to develop and standardize in vivo diagnostic approaches, such as skin testing and patch testing, combined with ex vivo and in vitro laboratory approaches.

Erythema multiforme, Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis - diagnosis and treatment.

Prior to the first international consensus classification published in 1993, the clinical distinction between erythema multiforme (EM), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) had been subject to uncertainty and controversy for more than a century. Based on this classification, the three conditions are defined by the morphology of the individual lesions and their pattern of distribution. Etiopathogenetically, the majority of EM cases is caused by infections (primarily herpes simplex virus and Mycoplasma pneumoniae), whereas SJS/TEN are predominantly triggered by drugs. The SCORTEN (score of toxic epidermal necrolysis) can and should be used to assess disease prognosis in patients with SJS/TEN. While supportive treatment is generally considered sufficient for EM, there is still uncertainty as to the type of systemic therapy required for SJS/TEN. Given the lack of high-quality therapeutic trials and (in some cases) conflicting results, it is currently impossible to issue definitive recommendations for any given immunomodulatory therapy. While there is always a trade-off between rapid onset of treatment-induced immunosuppression and an uptick in infection risk, there has been increasing evidence that cyclosporine in particular may be able to halt disease progression (i.e. skin detachment) and lower mortality rates. Assistance in diagnosis and management of the aforementioned conditions may be obtained from the Center for the Documentation of Severe Skin Reactions (dZh) at the Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.

EAACI position paper on how to classify cutaneous manifestations of drug hypersensitivity.

Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) are common, and the skin is by far the most frequently involved organ with a broad spectrum of reaction types. The diagnosis of cutaneous DHRs (CDHR) may be difficult because of multiple differential diagnoses. A correct classification is important for the correct diagnosis and management. With these guidelines, we aim to give precise definitions and provide the background needed for doctors to correctly classify CDHR.

The case-crossover design via penalized regression.

BACKGROUND: The case-crossover design is an attractive alternative to the classical case-control design which can be used to study the onset of acute events if the risk factors of interest vary in time. By comparing exposures within cases at different time periods, the case-crossover design does not rely on control subjects which can be difficult to acquire. However, using the standard method of maximum likelihood, resulting risk estimates can be heavily biased when the prevalence to risk factors is very low (or very high). METHODS: To overcome the problem of low risk factor prevalences, penalized conditional logistic regression via the lasso (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) has been proposed in the literature as well as related methods such as the Firth correction. We apply and compare several penalized regression approaches in the context of a case-crossover analysis of the European Study of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions (EuroSCAR; 1997-2001). RESULTS: Out of 30 drugs, standard methods only correctly classified 17 drugs (including some highly implausible risk estimates), while penalized methods correctly classified 22 drugs. CONCLUSION: Penalized methods generally yield better risk classifications and much more plausible risk estimates for the EuroSCAR study than standard methods. As these novel techniques can be easily implemented using available R packages, we encourage routine use of penalized conditional logistic regression for case-crossover data.

Severe drug-induced skin reactions: clinical features, diagnosis, etiology, and therapy.

Drugs can induce severe skin reactions that differ in clinical presentation, prognosis, and therapy. The spectrum of these reactions not only includes bullous reactions such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), and generalized bullous fixed drug eruption (GBFDE) but also acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS). If AGEP or DRESS is suspected, the diagnosis should be confirmed by thorough clinical examination, a skin biopsy, and specific laboratory tests. Crucial for the patient's prognosis, the causative agent should be rapidly identified and discontinued. It is therefore important to know the most frequent triggers of severe drug reactions, some of which may induce various reaction patterns. Depending on the clinical diagnosis, symptomatic and adequate supportive therapy, as well as systemic immunomodulatory treatments are used. The prognosis in SJS/TEN is often poor and depends on the patient's age and underlying conditions as well as the extent of skin detachment. The prognosis of GBFDE is somewhat better, but recurrences may lead to more severe disease manifestations. In DRESS, protracted and recurrent courses have been described, whereas AGEP usually resolves without problems.

Assessment of the "case-chaos" design as an adjunct to the case-control design.

In 2012, a novel case series method dubbed the "case-chaos" design was proposed as an alternative to case-control studies, whereby controls are artificially created by permutating the exposure information of the cases. Our aim in the current work was to further evaluate the case-chaos method. Using a theoretical example of 2 risk factors, we demonstrated that the case-chaos design yields risk estimations for which the odds ratios obtained for every risk factor are in the same ascending order as the risk factors' exposure prevalences in the case group. Applying the method to data from the European Study of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions (EuroSCAR; 1997-2001), we were not able to obtain sensible results but instead produced results as predicted by our theoretical assessment. We therefore claim that the method is equivalent to declaring risk solely on the basis of prevalences obtained in cases. While the proposers of the case-chaos method view it as a useful adjunct, we show that it cannot produce sensible estimates.