Results of cementless total elbow arthroplasty using the Discovery elbow system at a mean follow-up of 61.8 months.

BACKGROUND: The available literature on the use of a cementless total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) design and its results are limited. This clinical study reports the outcome of the cementless Discovery elbow system. METHODS: Patients were operated on by a single surgeon between 2007 and 2014. Nineteen patients (20 elbows) were available for review, 2 women (1 bilateral TEA) and 17 men. The age of the patients ranged from 27 to 75 years (mean, 48 years). The mean follow-up was 61.8 months (range, 12-156 months). Patients were assessed for range of motion, pain, and satisfaction level. Outcome scores included the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, the Liverpool Elbow Score, and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (version 1). Radiographs were reviewed to evaluate for loosening. RESULTS: The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 77.25, and the mean Liverpool Elbow Score was 6.76. The mean flexion range was 123°, and the mean extension lag was 35°. The mean pronation was 59°, and the mean supination was 58°. On radiologic evaluation, there were no signs of loosening; however, in 2 cases, nonprogressive radiolucent lines were observed. No signs of infection were detected at final follow-up, and no elbows were revised. More than 90% of patients were satisfied with the overall outcome. CONCLUSION: The cementless TEA seems to be a reliable option for treatment of varying elbow diseases. Long-term results are needed to assess the survivorship of this design.

Sternoclavicular joint replacement case report.

INTRODUCTION: This report describes the first known sternoclavicular joint (SCJ) replacement with a custom-made prosthesis. HISTORY: A 42-year-old male who presented post left medial clavicular excision with significant pain and limited range of motion impeding his daily activities and ability to work. The patient subsequently underwent a left SCJ arthroplasty with a custom-made prosthesis. Postoperatively, the patient suffered an anterior dislocation of the prosthetic joint which was successfully rectified and stabilized with soft tissue reconstruction, creating a pseudo-capsule from adjacent tissues of the joint. Thereafter, the patient required a final procedure to remove prominent sutures. RESULTS: Currently, the patient has regained full range of motion and is pain free during most activities and has now returned to work, with a plan to review his progress in 1 year. These initial promising results post SCJ replacement with the custom-made prosthesis could potentially lead SCJ reconstruction in an exciting new direction. DISCUSSION: More research should be encouraged regarding this nascent operative option, in order to identify the indications, parameters, and effectiveness of SCJ arthroplasty.

Intramedullary humeral replacement: an evolving design.

INTRODUCTION: Total humeral replacement is used to reconstruct the upper limb after tumour resection, while in cases of complex revisions for non-oncological reasons, using tumour prosthesis implants will lead to an otherwise avoidable further bone resection and violation of the surrounding tissues. This report describes a design evolution in three non-oncological cases, where a total humeral resection to perform a total humeral replacement is avoided and instead the simultaneous shoulder and elbow replacements were connected via custom-made intramedullary linkages. METHODS: Three cases of simultaneous shoulder and elbow replacement were performed for complex revision situations over a period of 42 months. They were performed while preserving as much humeral bone stock as possible, with the design changing from a big intramedullary connecting stem to a smaller component when performing an Intramedullary Humeral Replacement (IMHR), allowing preservation of more bone and soft tissue attachment than if a total humeral replacement were performed. RESULTS: None had any neurovascular complication or any further revision for the humeral replacement, or the shoulder and elbow components. DISCUSSION: We have showed three examples of an evolving design aiming to preserve as much of the anatomy as possible to help in decreasing the surgical impact and invasiveness of this procedure, while doing less bone resection and sacrificing less of the soft tissue attachments.

Linked shoulder replacement: current design problems and a new design proposal.

BACKGROUND: Totally constrained shoulder replacement with linked components is one of the surgical options in post-tumor resection shoulder reconstruction or in complex shoulder revision operations. In this paper, we intend to shed light on such an implant design, which provides a linked constrained connection between the humeral head and the glenoid, and to show some immediate postoperative complications, implant progression to decrease the chances of implant mechanical postinsertion failure, and a new design proposal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In our center, we use the linked prosthesis in complex revision situations; however, there have been some complications, which could be attributed mainly to the engineering and the implant design, and hence potentially avoidable by making a different design to cover for those mechanical issues. Two such complications are described in this paper. RESULTS: Early revisions after linked shoulder replacement implantation were needed in two occasions due to implant disconnection: one of them was due to dislodgement from the native glenoid, and the second one was due to the disengagement of the ringlet which secures the linkage mechanism between the humeral head and the implanted glenoid shell. CONCLUSION: There is a need for a more stable design construct to avoid the reported complications that needed early revision surgeries. The new design proposed is an attempt to help providing a better and more stable implant to decrease the chances of revision in those complex situations where the patient already had many major operations, and working to increase the durability of the implant is crucial.