Pilot robotic mastectomy in Singapore (PRoMiSing I) study: first safety and feasibility prospective cohort trial in South East Asia.

BACKGROUND: Robotic mastectomy has been performed worldwide since 2015. The advantages of the robotic approach in nipple-sparing mastectomy have been proven with better visualization and preservation of blood supply to the nipple-areolar complex, with a lower incidence of necrosis. It also allows smaller incisions for both mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. To date, no centers in Singapore and Southeast Asia offer robotic mastectomy. We believe that robotic mastectomy is a feasible and safe technique that our population can utilize. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to ascertain the surgical outcomes and perform a learning curve analysis in patients undergoing robotic mastectomy in a multi-ethnic South East Asian population. METHODS: A single-arm prospective pilot study of eligible patients aged 21-70 years old with early breast cancer or high-risk patients indicated for risk-reducing mastectomy who were eligible and consented to robotic mastectomy were enrolled in this trial from December 22, 2022 to December 15, 2023. RESULTS: A total of 29 consecutive robotic mastectomies were performed. The mean total operative time was 95±10.2 min. The average blood loss was 5.7±1.9 ml, and the average length of stay was 1.05 days. The mean mastectomy specimen weight was 251 g, and there was no conversion to conventional mastectomy in any case. Furthermore, there were no 30-day morbidity or complications in terms of wound infection requiring intervention, flap, and nipple-areolar complex necrosis, and postoperative hematoma/bleeding requiring intervention. CONCLUSION: This study contributes to the current evidence that robotic mastectomy is a safe and feasible option and could prove to be a great alternative to conventional mastectomy. Further prospective trials examining the long-term oncological outcomes of robotic mastectomy will be performed to establish the oncologic safety of this technique in breast cancer treatment.

Assessment of surgical trainees' quality of knot-tying.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess surgical trainees' knot tying technique and determine the type and security of knots created. METHODS: Twenty-five participants were requested to tie 40 knots each, using Vicryl 2-0 and Prolene 2-0 sutures. With each suture material, the participants tied: in series 1, 4 knots as they would normally do during surgery; in series 2, 4 knots with 3 throws, 4 knots with 4 throws, 4 knots with 5 throws, and 4 knots with 6 throws. All knots were tested for tensile strength using a tensiometer. Knots with tensile strength of less than 5 N were considered dangerous. RESULTS: Of the 25 participants, 2 created square knots consistently, 2 created a mixture of square and slip knots, and 21 created only slip knots. Square knots accounted for only 12.8% of all the knots. The incidence of knot slipping under tension was significantly lower with square knots (p < 0.001). Square knots had significantly higher tensile strength than slip knots (p < 0.001). For Vicryl, 4-throw square knots were superior to 6-throw slip knots (p < 0.001). For Prolene, 3-throw square knots were superior to 6-throw slip knots (p = 0.035). Some 12.6% of Vicryl knots and 5.6% of Prolene knots were dangerous and all of these were slip knots with up to 6 throws. Three out of 12 participants who thought they had created square knots actually created square knots and the rest produced slip knots. The participants' surgical experience did not have any correlation with their knot security (r = -0.044, p = 0.833). CONCLUSIONS: Knot tying is often executed with technical errors resulting in slip knots with less than optimal security and high incidence of dangerous knots. Tensiometry testing could be used as an objective assessment tool for knot-tying competency for surgical trainees.