Prognostic value of ventricular arrhythmia in early post-infarction left ventricular dysfunction: the French nationwide WICD-MI study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are not recommended until left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) has been reassessed 40 to 90 days after an acute myocardial infarction. In the current therapeutic era, the prognosis of sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) occurring during this early post-infarction phase (i.e. within 3 months of hospital discharge) has not yet been specifically evaluated in post-myocardial infarction patients with impaired LVEF. Such was the aim of this retrospective study. METHODS: Data analysis was based on a nationwide registry of 1032 consecutive patients with LVEF ≤ 35% after acute myocardial infarction who were implanted with an ICD after being prescribed a wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) for a period of 3 months upon discharge from hospital after the index infarction. RESULTS: ICDs were implanted either because a sustained VA occurred while on WCD (VA+/WCD, n = 72) or because LVEF remained ≤35% at the end of the early post-infarction phase (VA-/WCD, n = 960). The median follow-up was 30.9 months. Sustained VAs occurred within 1 year after ICD implantation in 22.2% and 3.5% of VA+/WCD and VA-/WCD patients, respectively (P < .0001). The adjusted multivariable analysis showed that sustained VAs while on WCD independently predicted recurrence of sustained VAs at 1 year (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 6.91; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.73-12.81; P < .0001) and at the end of follow-up (adjusted HR 3.86; 95% CI 2.37-6.30; P < .0001) as well as 1-year mortality (adjusted HR 2.86; 95% CI 1.28-6.39; P = .012). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with LVEF ≤ 35%, sustained VA during the early post-infarction phase is predictive of recurrent sustained VAs and 1-year mortality.

Implantation of a leadless pacemaker in young adults.

AIMS: Leadless pacing has emerged as an alternative to conventional transvenous pacemakers to mitigate the risks of pocket- and lead-related complications but its use remains controversial in young adults mostly because experience in this patient population is limited. We sought to examine the feasibility and safety of implanting leadless single chamber pacemakers in young adults. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective, observational study sought to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and electrical performance of the Micra VR Transcatheter Pacemaker System (Medtronic) in patients between 18 and 40 years who underwent implantation of a leadless pacemaker for any indication at the university medical centers of Bordeaux, Clermont-Ferrand, Toulouse, and Tours (France), between 2015 and 2021. The primary safety endpoint was freedom from system-related or procedure-related major complications at 6 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was the combination of a low (≤2 V) and stable (increase within 1.5 V) pacing capture threshold at 6 months. RESULTS: Leadless pacemaker implantation was successful in all 35 patients. At 6 months, safety endpoint was met for 35 (100%) and efficacy endpoint for 34 (97%) patients. During a follow-up of 26 ± 15 months (range: 6-60 months), Safety endpoint remained 100% and efficacy endpoint was 94%. Leadless pacemaker retrieval was not required in any patient. Approximately one-third of patients (n = 13, 37%) had >40% ventricular pacing burdens at 1 year, including all 10 patients with a complete AV block but also 3 patients with normal AV conduction during implantation. One patient reported symptoms of pacemaker syndrome which was confirmed using Holter recording and successfully treated using reprogramming. CONCLUSION: In this observational study, leadless pacemakers demonstrated favorable short- and intermediate-term safety and effectiveness in young adults.

Systematic use of half normal saline during ablation of ventricular tachycardia in structural heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Efficiency and safety of ablation using half normal saline (HNS) has been shown in refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT), but no evaluation in unselected larger populations has been made. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficiency and safety of systematic HNS ablation in VT ablation. METHODS: All successive VT ablations in patients with structural heart disease from 2018 to 2021 used HNS in our center and were retrospectively included. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-seven successive VT ablation procedures using HNS have been performed in 148 patients (91% males, mean 64 ± 12 years, ischemic cardiomyopathy 64%, left ventricular ejection fraction 38 ± 13%). A mean of 19 ± 7.5 min of RF was delivered, with a mean power of 44 ± 7 W. Relevant complications happened in 9% (strokes 2%, tamponades 3%, atrioventricular block during septal ablations 5%). Over a mean follow-up of 15 ± 9 months, VT recurred in 46%. Final recurrence rate after one or several procedures was 36% (18 months follow-up). Number of VT episodes decreased from 14 ± 35 before to 2.5 ± 10 after ablation (p < .0001) and number of ICD shocks decreased from 4.8 ± 6.8 to 1.5 ± 0.8 (p = .027). CONCLUSION: Systematic use of HNS during VT ablations in patients with structural heart disease leads to long-term recurrences rates and complications in the range of what is reported using normal saline. Although controlled studies are needed for demonstrating the superiority of such attitude, the use of HNS in every scar-related VT ablation seems safe for standard cases and may be furthermore useful in case of refractory arrhythmias due to difficult-to-ablate substrates.

Phase analysis for ventricular arrhythmia prediction: A retrospective monocentric cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Prediction of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) mostly relies on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), but with limited performance. New echocardiographic parameters such as mechanical dispersion have emerged, but acoustic window sometimes precludes this measurement. Nuclear imaging may be an alternative. We aimed to assess the ability of mechanical dispersion, measured with phase standard deviation (PSD) on radionuclide angiocardiography (RNA), to predict VAs. METHODS: This retrospective monocentric observational study included all patients who underwent a tomographic RNA from 2015 to 2019. Phase analysis yielded PSD and follow-up was examined to identify VAs, heart transplantation, and death. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 937 patients, mainly with LVEF ≤ 35% (425, 45%). Most had ischemic (334, 36%) or dilated cardiomyopathies (245, 26%). We identified 86 (9%) VAs. PSD was strongly associated with the occurrence of VA [hazard ratio per 10 ms increase (HR10) 1.12 (1.09-1.16)], heart transplantation [HR10 1.09 (1.06-1.12)], and death [HR10 1.03 (1.00-1.05)]. The association between PSD and VA persisted after adjustment for age, sex, QRS duration, LVEF, global longitudinal strain (GLS), and echocardiography-assessed mechanical dispersion. CONCLUSION: The occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias was predicted by mechanical dispersion assessed by RNA, even after adjustment for LVEF and GLS.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients With Tetralogy of Fallot and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: The DAI-T4F Nationwide Registry.

BACKGROUND: Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) is the most common cyanotic congenital heart disease, and sudden cardiac death represents an important mode of death in these patients. Data evaluating the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in this patient population remain scarce. METHODS: A Nationwide French Registry including all patients with tetralogy of Fallot with an ICD was initiated in 2010 by the French Institute of Health and Medical Research. The primary time to event end point was the time from ICD implantation to first appropriate ICD therapy. Secondary outcomes included ICD-related complications, heart transplantation, and death. Clinical events were centrally adjudicated by a blinded committee. RESULTS: A total of 165 patients (mean age, 42.2±13.3 years, 70.1% males) were included from 40 centers, including 104 (63.0%) in secondary prevention. During a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 6.8 (2.5-11.4) years, 78 (47.3%) patients received at least 1 appropriate ICD therapy. The annual incidence of the primary outcome was 10.5% (7.1% and 12.5% in primary and secondary prevention, respectively; P=0.03). Overall, 71 (43.0%) patients presented with at least 1 ICD complication, including inappropriate shocks in 42 (25.5%) patients and lead dysfunction in 36 (21.8%) patients. Among 61 (37.0%) patients in primary prevention, the annual rate of appropriate ICD therapies was 4.1%, 5.3%, 9.5%, and 13.3% in patients with, respectively, 0, 1, 2, or ≥3 guidelines-recommended risk factors. QRS fragmentation was the only independent predictor of appropriate ICD therapies (hazard ratio, 3.47 [95% CI, 1.19-10.11]), and its integration in a model with current criteria increased the 5-year time-dependent area under the curve from 0.68 to 0.81 (P=0.006). Patients with congestive heart failure or reduced left ventricular ejection fraction had a higher risk of nonarrhythmic death or heart transplantation (hazard ratio, 11.01 [95% CI, 2.96-40.95]). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with tetralogy of Fallot and an ICD experience high rates of appropriate therapies, including those implanted in primary prevention. The considerable long-term burden of ICD-related complications, however, underlines the need for careful candidate selection. A combination of easy-to-use criteria including QRS fragmentation might improve risk stratification. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03837574.

FRAGILE: FRench Attitude reGistry in case of ICD LEad replacement.

AIMS: FRench Attitude reGistry in case of ICD LEad replacement (FRAGILE) registry was set-up to describe the attitude in different French institutions in case of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead replacement, extraction, or abandonment and to compare outcomes in both groups. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective observational study comparing two attitudes in case of ICD lead replacement, extraction, or abandonment. Primary endpoint describes the attitude in different French centres, collect parameters that may influence the decision. Secondary endpoint compares early and mid-term (2 years) complications in both groups.Between April 2013 and April 2017, 552 patients were included in 32 centres. 434 (78.6%) were male, mean patient's age was 60.3 ± 14.4 years. In 56.9% of the cases, the decision was to explant the lead. Patients in the extraction group were younger than in the abandonment group (56.7 ± 14.5 vs. 65 ± 12.7 P < 0.0001) and less likely to have comorbidities (46.5% vs. 58.3% of the patients P = 0.022). The mean lead dwelling time was significantly longer in the abandonment group as compared with the extraction group (7.6 ± 3.9 vs. 5.2 ± 3.1 years, P < 0.0001). There was no statistical difference between both groups concerning early and 2 years complications. CONCLUSION: In this registry, the strategy in case of non-infected ICD lead replacement was mainly influenced by patient's age and comorbidities and lead dwelling time. No difference was observed in outcomes in both strategies.

Electrogram morphology discriminators in implantable cardioverter defibrillators: A comparative evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Morphology algorithms are currently recommended as a standalone discriminator in single-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). However, these proprietary algorithms differ in both design and nominal programming. OBJECTIVE: To compare three different algorithms with nominal versus advanced programming in their ability to discriminate between ventricular (VT) and supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). METHODS: In nine European centers, VT and SVTs were collected from Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic dual- and triple-chamber ICDs via their respective remote monitoring portals. Percentage morphology matches were recorded for selected episodes which were classified as VT or SVT by means of atrioventricular comparison. The sensitivity and related specificity of each manufacturer discriminator was determined at various values of template match percentage from receiving operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: A total of 534 episodes were retained for the analysis. In ROC analyses, Abbott Far Field MD (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.91; P < .001) and Boston Scientific RhythmID (AUC: 0.95; P < .001) show higher AUC than Medtronic Wavelet (AUC: 0.81; P < .001) when tested for their ability to discriminate VT from SVT. At nominal % match threshold all devices provided high sensitivity in VT identification, (91%, 100%, and 90%, respectively, for Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic) but contrasted specificities in SVT discrimination (85%, 41%, and 62%, respectively). Abbott and Medtronic's nominal thresholds were similar to the optimal thresholds. Optimization of the % match threshold improved the Boston Scientific specificity to 79% without compromising the sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Proprietary morphology discriminators show important differences in their ability to discriminate SVT. How much this impact the overall discrimination process remains to be investigated.

Chest pain in Brugada syndrome: Prevalence, correlations, and prognosis role.

BACKGROUND: Brugada syndrome (BrS) is sometimes diagnosed because of chest pain. Prevalence and characteristics of such BrS patients are unknown. METHODS: A total of 200 BrS probands were retrospectively included. BrS diagnosis made because of chest pain (n = 34, 17%) was compared to the other ones. RESULTS: BrS probands with diagnosis because of chest pain had significantly more often smoker habits, increased body mass index, and familial history of coronary artery disease but less frequently previous resuscitated sudden death/syncope or atrial fibrillation. Presence of coronary spasm and familial coronary artery disease were independently associated with BrS diagnosed because of chest pain. They presented more often with spontaneous type 1 ST elevation (59% vs 26%, P = .0004) and higher ST elevation during the episode of chest pain compared to other patients or compared to baseline electrocardiogram after chest pain resumption. ST elevation during chest pain was lower compared to ajmaline test. A total of 20% of them had significant coronary artery disease and four (11%) had coronary spasm, and they experienced more often recurrent chest pain episodes (24% vs 5%, P = .0002). Presence of chest pain at BrS diagnosis was not correlated to future arrhythmic events in univariate analysis. Only previous sudden cardiac death (SD)/syncope and familial SD were still significantly associated with outcome in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Chest pain is a common cause for BrS diagnosis, although major part is not apparently explained by ischemic heart disease. Mechanisms leading to chest main remain unknown in the other ones. ST elevation is higher in this situation but does not seem to carry poor prognosis.

Implantable cardiac defibrillator leads dysfunction after LVAD implantation.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead dysfunction has been reported after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation in limited single-center studies. We aimed at describing and characterizing the incidence of ICD lead parameters dysfunction after LVAD implantation. METHODS: Among the 652 patients enrolled in the ASSIST-ICD study, only patients with an ICD prior to LVAD were included (n = 401). ICD lead parameters dysfunction following LVAD implantation is defined as follows: (a) >50% decrease in sensing threshold, (b) pacing lead impedance increase/decrease by >100Ω, and (c) >50% increase in pacing threshold. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-two patients with an ICD prior to LVAD had available ICD interrogation reports prior and after LVAD. A total of 67 (55%) patients exhibited at least one significant lead dysfunction: 17 (15%) exhibited >50% decrease in right ventricular (RV) sensing, 51 (42%) had >100 Ω increase/decrease in RV pacing impedance, and 24 (20%) experienced >50% increase in RV pacing threshold. A total of 52 patients experienced ventricular arrhythmia during follow-up and all were successfully detected and treated by the device. All lead dysfunction could be managed conservatively. CONCLUSION: More than 50% of LVAD-recipients may experience >1 significant change in lead parameters but none had severe clinical consequences.

Correlations between arrhythmogenic substrate and noninvasive risk stratification in ischemic heart disease patients modifications by radiofrequency ablation.

INTRODUCTION: Several noninvasive risk factors for ventricular arrhythmias have been described in postmyocardial infarction (MI) patients, whose relationships with scar characteristics and modifications by ablation are unknown. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with previous MI referred for ventricular tachycardia ablation were prospectively included. ECG, heart rate variability (HRV), signal-averaged ECG (SA-ECG), and T wave alternans (TWA) were performed before and after radiofrequency ablation. Scar areas were correlated to preablation parameters. Pre and postablation parameters were furthermore compared. RESULTS: Left ventricular ejection fraction and some spectral and time-domain HRV parameters were significantly correlated to the scar areas. QRS duration was larger after vs before ablation (120 ± 29 vs 105 ± 22 msec, P = .01). No significant modification in time or spectral domain of HRV was observed. There was no significant change in TWA and SA-ECG before and after ablation. Borderline decreases in quantitative TWA parameters were noted in patients with positive TWA and successful ablation procedure. CONCLUSION: Some noninvasive risk factors were linked to the scar areas, but few were significantly modified after ablation. Larger populations are needed to demonstrate significant differences or correlations.