Cotrimoxazole Prophylaxis Increases Resistance Gene Prevalence and α-Diversity but Decreases ß-Diversity in the Gut Microbiome of Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Exposed, Uninfected Infants.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic cotrimoxazole treatment is recommended in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-exposed, uninfected (HEU) infants, but the effects of this treatment on developing HEU infant gut microbiotas and resistomes are largely undefined. METHODS: We analyzed whole-metagenome sequencing data from 163 longitudinally collected stool samples from 63 HEU infants randomized to receive (n = 34; CTX-T) or to not receive (n = 29; CTX-N) prophylactic cotrimoxazole treatment. We generated taxonomic, functional pathway, and resistance gene profiles for each sample and compared microbiome signatures between the CTX-T and CTX-N infants. RESULTS: Metagenomic analysis did not reveal significant differences in taxonomic or functional pathway α-diversity between CTX-T and CTX-N infants. In contrast, resistance gene prevalence (P = .00719) and α-diversity (P = .0045) increased in CTX-T infants. These differences increased over time for both resistance gene prevalence measured by log-normalized abundance (4-month mean, 0.71 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .2-1.2] and 6-month mean, 0.85 [95% CI, .1-1.7]) and α-diversity (P = .0045). Unlike α-diversity, interindividual gut microbiome taxonomic (mean, -0.11 [95% CI, -.15 to -.077]), functional taxonomic (mean, -0.050 [95% CI, -.084 to -.017]), and resistance gene (mean, -0.13 [95% CI, -.17 to -.099]) ß-diversity decreased in CTX-T infants compared with CTX-N infants. These results are consistent with persistent antibiotic selection pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Cotrimoxazole prophylaxis in HEU infants decreased gut microbiome ß-diversity and increased antibiotic resistance gene α-diversity and prevalence. Antibiotic resistance is a growing threat, especially in low- and middle-income countries where the higher perinatal HIV exposure rates result in cotrimoxazole prophylaxis. Understanding effects from current HEU infant antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines will inform guideline revisions and efforts to reduce increasing antibiotic resistance.

Cervical Cancer Screening and Treatment algorithms using Human Papillomavirus testing - lessons learnt from a South African pilot randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: To report quantitative and qualitative results on cervical cancer (CC) HPV-based screening and treatment algorithms, with/out triage with visual inspection after acetic acid (VIA), followed by ablative treatment (AT). METHODS: Women 30-54 years-old from Durban, South Africa were recruited, regardless of HIV status, randomized into one of two study arms and screened for HPV. VIA-triage arm: HPV-positive women were triaged using VIA, biopsied and received AT if VIA-positive and eligible; no-triage arm: eligible HPV-positive women received AT. Women ineligible for AT were referred to colposcopy. Women were asked about side effects immediately and one week after AT. Retention to screening and treatment algorithms was compared between arms. RESULTS: 350 women (275 HIV-uninfected and 75 women living with HIV, (WLWH)) were allocated to receive HPV testing with VIA-triage (n=175) or no-triage (n=175). HPV prevalence was 28% (95%CI=23-33); WLWH: 52% (95%CI=40-64) vs HIV-uninfected: 21% (95%CI=17-27) (p<0.05). Among women who underwent VIA triage with histological diagnosis, 3/17 were VIA negative with CIN2+; 14/18 were VIA positive with

Effect of co-trimoxazole prophylaxis on morbidity and mortality of HIV-exposed, HIV-uninfected infants in South Africa: a randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: WHO guidelines recommend co-trimoxazole prophylaxis for HIV-exposed, HIV-uninfected infants. These guidelines date back to an era in which HIV testing of infants was impossible and mothers had poor access to antiretroviral treatment. To determine whether this guideline requires revision in the current era of effective prevention of mother-to-child transmission and early infant diagnosis programmes, we aimed to investigate whether receiving no co-trimoxazole prophylaxis is inferior to receiving co-trimoxazole prophylaxis in the resulting incidence of grade 3 or 4 common childhood illnesses or mortality in breastfed HIV-exposed, HIV-uninfected infants. METHODS: We investigated our aim in a randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial. We enrolled the HIV-negative infants of mothers living with HIV who were actively involved in transmission prevention programmes in two clinics in Durban, South Africa. Infants were included in the study if they were breastfeeding at the screening and enrolment visits, and their mother was planning to breastfeed for at least 6 months; were a singleton birth and had a birthweight of 2 kg or more; had no clinically observed genetic disorders; and had no serious illnesses and had not received antibiotics or traditional medications (such as herbal remedies). Infants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive co-trimoxazole or no co-trimoxazole. In the co-trimoxazole group, infants received the drug until all exposure to HIV had ceased (ie, 6 weeks after last exposure to breastmilk) and the infant was confirmed to be uninfected with HIV. The drug was administered by mothers in once-daily regimens of 20 mg trimethoprim and 100 mg sulfamethoxazole orally (age <6 months or bodyweight <5 kg), or 40 mg trimethoprim and 200 mg sulfamethoxazole orally (age >6 months or bodyweight >5 kg). Clinical and laboratory staff always remained masked to group assignment, but mothers and study counsellors were not. Infants and their mothers attended study visits at ages 6 weeks (for enrolment and randomisation), 10 weeks, 14 weeks, and then monthly from 4 to 12 months. Our primary outcome was the incidence of grade 3 or 4 common childhood illnesses (pneumonia or diarrhoea) or mortality in breastfed HIV-exposed, HIV-uninfected infants by age 12 months. A non-inferiority bound of 5% was used. The study is registered with the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry, number PACTR201311000621110, and the South African National Clinical Trials Registry, number DOH-27-0614-4728. FINDINGS: We screened 1570 mother-child pairs for study enrolment, from whom (78%) eligible infants were enrolled into the study between Oct 16, 2013, and May 23, 2018. Of the infants enrolled, 611 (50%) were randomly assigned to the co-trimoxazole group and 609 (50%) were randomly assigned to the no co-trimoxazole group. One (<1%) infant in the no co-trimoxazole group was excluded from the analysis of the final outcomes for having received traditional medicine (which only became apparent after randomisation); therefore, 611 (50%) infants in the co-trimoxazole group and 608 (50%) infants in the no co-trimoxazole group were included in the final intention-to-treat analysis. 136 (22%) infants in the co-trimoxazole group and 139 (23%) infants in the no co-trimoxazole group did not complete the 12-month study visit, predominantly because of loss to follow-up (93 [15%] infants in the co-trimoxazole group; 90 [15%] infants in the no co-trimoxazole group). The cumulative probability of the composite primary outcome was 0·114 (95% CI 0·076 to 0·147; 49 events) in the co-trimoxazole group versus 0·0795 (0·044 to 0·115; 39 events) in the no co-trimoxazole group. The risk difference (no co-trimoxazole group minus co-trimoxazole group) was -0·0319 (-0·075 to 0·011), meaning that the risk was around 3 percentage points lower in the no co-trimoxazole group on the additive scale. INTERPRETATION: We can conclude that no co-trimoxazole is not inferior to daily co-trimoxazole among breastfed HIV-exposed, HIV-uninfected infants whose mothers are accessing a prevention of mother-to-child transmission programme in an area unaffected by malaria. We therefore believe that WHO should revise the co-trimoxazole guidelines for HIV-exposed, HIV-uninfected infants in areas unaffected by malaria. FUNDING: HIV Prevention Research Unit of the South African Medical Research Council and the Family Larsson-Rosenquist Foundation.

Randomised controlled trial testing the effect of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis on morbidity and mortality outcomes in breastfed HIV-exposed uninfected infants: study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: No randomised controlled trial (RCT) has examined the efficacy of cotrimoxazole (CTX) prophylaxis in HIV-exposed uninfected (HEU) infants during the breastfeeding period, in this new era of effective prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) prophylaxis. The efficacy of CTX prophylaxis has presently been demonstrated only in HIV-infected children. The absence of proven benefits in HEU breastfed infants associated with infectious diseases justifies an RCT as proposed. Herewith lies the rationale for conducting the proposed study. METHODS: A partially blinded RCT is proposed to evaluate the efficacy of CTX prophylaxis administered from 6 weeks of age to HEU infants receiving a PMTCT regimen. A non-inferiority design will be used, randomising 1298 infants to receive CTX or not to receive CTX. Participants will be reviewed at the following time points: 6 weeks (enrolment and randomisation), 10 weeks, 14 weeks, 4 months and monthly thereafter until 12 months of age. They will be evaluated for anthropometric growth, interval illness, CTX adherence, signs and symptoms of study drug toxicity, concomitant medication use, breastfeeding status and HIV infection status. The study will compare the incidence of grade 3 and grade 4 common childhood illnesses (focusing on pneumonia and diarrhoea) and all-cause mortality until 12 months of age. In a subset of participants, we will compare grade 3 and grade 4 haemoglobin and alanine aminotransferase results as well as investigate gut integrity. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has ethical approval from the University of KwaZulu-Natal Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (BFC212/13). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: PACTR201311000621110 and DOH-27-0614-4728; Pre-results.

Increased Exclusivity of Breastfeeding Associated with Reduced Gut Inflammation in Infants.

INTRODUCTION: The development of the intestinal gut is largely influenced by early nutrition. Infant immunity is challenged by the exposure of the gut to foreign bodies, which mediate inflammation of the gut. This study assessed the levels of gut inflammation in relation to the percentage of breastmilk consumed/the exclusivity of breastfeeding in South African infants. This is the first study to examine markers of gut inflammation in infants in relation to exclusivity of breastfeeding measured by a gold standard method. METHODOLOGY: Twenty-four black South African infants were included in this study. The categorization of different degrees of exclusivity of breastfeeding was made using an objective gold standard method developed by the International Atomic Energy Agency (deuterium dilution method). Markers of gut inflammation were measured noninvasively by sampling stool from the infants averaging 6 months of age. Gut inflammation was investigated by running multiple Droplet Digital™ (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) polymerization chain reaction tests profiling a panel of five mRNA probes (interleukin-8 [IL-8], S100 calcium-binding protein A8 [S100A8], Toll-like receptor-4, human leukocyte antigen on chromosome 6 region 6p21.31, and defensin alpha 8). These mRNA biomarkers expressions were tested in proportion to number of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) copies as GAPDH is constitutively expressed in most cells. RESULTS: Two previously described robust mRNA markers of gut inflammation (S100A8 and IL-8) were found to correlate significantly to the percentage of breastmilk intake (r(2) = 0.4302, p = 0.0004 and r(2) = 0.3633, p = 0.002, respectively) in the range of 75-100% in 22 samples analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: This study using objective methodology has shown that higher percentages of breastmilk intake are associated with significantly lower levels of gut inflammation. This further supports the health benefits observed in exclusively breastfed infants.