Concurrent Alcohol Use and Waterpipe Tobacco Smoking: Smoking Topography, Toxicant Exposure, and Abuse Liability.

INTRODUCTION: Relative to non-waterpipe (WP) smokers, WP smokers are more than twice as likely to use alcohol and frequently consume alcohol before or during smoking sessions. Co-use of alcohol and WP may result in greater toxicant exposure compared to WP smoking alone. To date, no study systematically has investigated the impact of acute alcohol intoxication on WP smoking topography, exposure to tobacco-related toxicants, or abuse liability. METHODS: Dyads of current WP smokers and drinkers (N = 42; age = 21-32 years) completed two in-laboratory ad libitum smoking sessions (≤2 hours) following 12-hour nicotine abstinence in a double-blind, randomized crossover design in which they consumed a placebo versus active drink (sustained breath alcohol concentration = .08). Exhaled carbon monoxide (eCO) and plasma nicotine concentration were assessed. Questionnaires assessed smoking experience and smoking urge. Smoking topography was measured continuously throughout each smoking session. RESULTS: The alcohol session was associated with increased inhaled volume, flow rate, and WP session duration compared to placebo. Compared to placebo, participants reported a more positive overall smoking experience following the alcohol session and greater smoking urges pre- and post-smoking session. Although both sessions resulted in significant increases in eCO and plasma nicotine, no significant differences emerged in eCO or nicotine exposure between the active and placebo sessions. CONCLUSIONS: Co-use of alcohol and WP may contribute to the maintenance of WP smoking through enhanced smoking experiences, increased urge to smoke, and significant exposure to addictive nicotine. Regulations may be necessary to limit the sale of alcohol in WP smoking lounges and reduce exposure to secondhand smoke. IMPLICATIONS: The findings suggest co-use of alcohol and WP tobacco likely maintain WP use and dependence by enhancing the smoking experience and increasing urges to smoke. These findings have implications for regulations aimed at limiting co-use of alcohol and WP tobacco in WP lounges and limiting exposure to secondhand smoke. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03096860.

Perceptions of participating in family-centered fertility research among adolescent and young adult males newly diagnosed with cancer: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Over half of male childhood cancer survivors experience infertility after treatment, which is known to cause distress and impact future quality of life. Sperm banking rates remain low, and little is known about how adolescent and young adult (AYA) males and their families make fertility preservation (FP) decisions. This study examined AYA and parent perceptions of participating in a research study focused on testing a new FP decision tool at the time of cancer diagnosis. METHODS: Forty-four participants (19 mothers, 11 fathers, 14 male AYAs 12-25 years old) from 20 families completed brief assessments at diagnosis and approximately one month later, including a qualitative interview exploring the impact of study participation. Verbatim transcripts were coded through thematic content analysis using the constant comparison method. RESULTS: Two major themes emerged: (1) a positive effect of participating in the study and (2) a neutral effect (no positive/negative effect of participation). Subthemes that emerged for participants who noted a positive effect included (a) participation prompted deeper thinking, (b) participation influenced family conversations, and (c) participation resulted in altruism/helping others. No participant reported a negative effect. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that participation in family-centered research focused on FP among AYA males, before treatment begins, is perceived as beneficial or neutral at the time of a new cancer diagnosis. These findings provide support for future family-centered FP interventions for this population.

Conducting reproductive research during a new childhood cancer diagnosis: ethical considerations and impact on participants.

PURPOSE: Research among adults shows benefits and low perceived burden of engaging in behavioral research. However, questions remain regarding the ethics of conducting behavioral research in pediatric populations during sensitive situations, including during a new life-threatening diagnosis or at end-of-life. We examined reactions to participating in a behavioral reproductive research study among male adolescents newly diagnosed with cancer and their parents, as a step towards optimizing fertility preservation utilization in a population where future infertility is common. METHODS: Pediatric literature regarding the ethics of behavioral research was reviewed. In our pilot, forty-four participants (19 mothers, 11 fathers, 14 male adolescents newly diagnosed with cancer) from 20 families completed demographic questionnaires and a fertility preservation decision tool developed by the study team. Qualitative interviews exploring the impact of study participation were subsequently conducted. Verbatim transcripts were coded for thematic content using the constant comparison method. RESULTS: Literature review showed positive reactions to research participation among youth/caregivers. In our pilot study, 89% (n = 17) of mothers, 64% (n = 7) of fathers, and 71% (n = 10) of adolescents reported at least one benefit of participating. Eleven percent (n = 2) of mothers, 36% (n = 4) of fathers, and 29% (n = 4) of adolescents said they were not affected; none of the participants reported a negative effect. CONCLUSION: Consistent with prior literature, our study suggests behavioral reproductive research prior to cancer treatment can offer direct benefits to participants and society, without increasing burden. These findings will inform future interventions to improve long-term psychosocial and reproductive outcomes for youth with cancer.

Romantic Relationships and Physical Intimacy Among Survivors of Childhood Cancer.

Purpose: Childhood cancer survivors are at risk for impaired psychosocial functioning, but limited research has focused on psychosexual outcomes in young adulthood. This qualitative study examined the perceived impact of childhood cancer on adult survivors' romantic relationships and sexual/physical intimacy. Methods: Phone interviews were completed with adult survivors of childhood cancer, exploring the impact of cancer on (1) romantic relationships and (2) sexual/physical intimacy. Verbatim transcripts were coded using thematic content analysis until saturation was confirmed (n = 40). Results: Survivors in this study (n = 40) were 23-42 years old (M = 29.8; 63% female) and 10-37 years postdiagnosis (M = 18.4). Regarding romantic relationships, 60% of participants reported a negative impact, while 55% of participants reported positive effects; ∼25% of participants reported no impact of childhood cancer on adult romantic relationships. Negative themes included fertility-related concerns, physical effects (e.g., self-consciousness), feeling emotionally guarded, and delayed dating. Positive themes were creating new perspectives, increased maturity, and stronger bonds with partners. Forty percent of survivors in this study perceived having fewer partners than peers. Regarding sexual/physical intimacy, 68% of participants reported a negative impact (themes: body image, fertility-related concerns, sexual/physical dysfunction), while 33% of participants reported no effects. Conclusions: This study demonstrates both positive and negative effects of childhood cancer on adult survivors' romantic relationships, whereas effects on physical intimacy were predominantly negative. Further research is needed to inform effective psychosexual interventions, and health care providers should routinely address these topics in survivorship care.

"We Can Always Adopt": Perspectives of Adolescent and Young Adult Males with Cancer and Their Family on Alternatives to Biological Parenthood.

Purpose: Approximately half of male childhood cancer survivors experience impaired fertility, which is known to cause psychological distress. Yet, less than 50% of at-risk adolescent and young adult (AYA) males pursue fertility preservation (FP) at diagnosis. Alternatives to biological parenthood (e.g., adoption/sperm donation) may be considered, but little is known about perspectives regarding these alternatives among AYA males and their families. Methods: Families of AYAs were recruited for a mixed-method study examining FP decisions at cancer diagnosis. One month later, 48 participants from 20 families (18 male AYAs, 12-22 years of age, 19 mothers, 11 fathers) completed semistructured interviews, including two questions about: (a) alternative routes to biological parenthood, and (b) their knowledge about the processes involved and/or challenges associated with such alternatives. Verbatim transcripts were coded for thematic content using the constant comparison method. Results: Three main themes were identified, of which two represent both ends of considering alternative parenthood: (a) Willingness to consider alternatives to biological parenthood, primarily adoption; (b) No consideration/discussion of alternative family building options; and (c) Variable knowledge of alternatives and/or associated challenges. Notably, more AYAs than parents mentioned a specific preference for biological children. Conclusions: One-month postcancer diagnosis, most parents reported willingness to consider alternatives to biological parenthood for their sons, while AYA males were less knowledgeable or open to these options. Future research should prospectively examine how these attitudes affect FP decisions before treatment. Medical and psychosocial providers should counsel patients and survivors accordingly to optimize reproductive outcomes and prevent psychosocial distress if parenthood goals are unfulfilled.

Fertility counseling and preservation discussions for females with Turner syndrome in pediatric centers: practice patterns and predictors.

OBJECTIVE: To examine fertility counseling and fertility preservation (FP) referrals for young women with Turner syndrome (TS) at pediatric centers and identify possible associations with patient demographic and medical characteristics. DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review. SETTING: Pediatric academic medical centers. PATIENT(S): Four hundred and sixty-nine young women with TS (mean age = 14 years, standard deviation 8.5 years; 77% white) who received care between March 2013 and March 2018. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Standardized form to abstract demographics, medical (karyotype; menarchal status; developmental, neuropsychological, and psychological concerns), and treatment characteristics (duration of care, receipt of multidisciplinary care, documentation of fertility/pregnancy counseling, FP specialist referrals) from medical records. RESULT(S): We found that 67% of families had documented fertility counseling, although only 27% of charts documented counseling with patients specifically. Only 10% of patients were referred to a FP specialist; 59% of patients with spontaneous menarche had no referral. Pregnancy risk counseling was documented in 38% of charts. In multivariate analyses, families were more likely to receive counseling if the patients had multidisciplinary care (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.82). Greater duration of care (AOR 1.16); mosaic (AOR 47.94), complex (AOR 14.59), or partial deletions karyotypes (AOR 35.69); spontaneous menarche (AOR 4.65); and multidisciplinary care (AOR 4.02) had increased odds of FP specialist referrals. Patients with developmental concerns (AOR 0.08) had decreased odds of referrals. CONCLUSION(S): Fertility and pregnancy counseling are not routinely documented among patients with TS, and even patients with a limited window of reproductive potential were infrequently referred to FP specialists. Patients seen in multidisciplinary clinics were more likely to receive recommended counseling.

A content analysis of JUUL discussions on social media: Using Reddit to understand patterns and perceptions of JUUL use.

BACKGROUND: JUUL, an electronic cigarette, is estimated to occupy 50% of the e-cigarette market and appears to be particularly common among youth. However, there is little research on perceptions of JUUL. The aim of the current study was to examine posts on Reddit specific to JUUL and youth to better understand the context and perceptions of JUUL use. METHODS: This content analysis utilized social media discussions posted between January 2015-May 2017. Public posts on Reddit, a social media platform, were gathered and coded. Posters of discussions relevant to both JUUL and youth were included for analysis. RESULTS: 364 posts were included for quantitative content analysis. Posts were mixed in terms of polarity with many (41.1%) including positive and negative language regarding JUUL. In terms of polarity of youth use, 60% of posts showed negative perceptions of youth use. Among posts by youth, only 37% showed negative perceptions of youth use. Posts included a variety of reasons for using JUUL with the most frequent reason being the popularity of JUUL (34.2%) followed by using it to quit smoking (23.3%) and to feel a buzz (20.2%). Age restrictions were the most common barrier to use. CONCLUSIONS: Posters generally had a nuanced perception of JUUL and identified both positive and negative aspects. Interestingly, while primary reasons for youth use indicate the strong influence of social norms, barriers to use suggest that public health interventions such as age restrictions may curb youth use. Findings can inform prevention efforts and important factors for JUUL initiation.

Congruence of Reproductive Goals and Fertility-Related Attitudes of Adolescent and Young Adult Males and Their Parents After Cancer Treatment.

Purpose: Approximately half of all males experience fertility impairment after cancer treatment, which can diminish quality of life. Parents are often responsible for sharing health-related information, and parental recommendation strongly impacts fertility-related decisions; yet it remains unclear whether adolescents and young adults' (AYAs) and their parents' fertility-related goals/attitudes align. This study examined parent-AYAs congruence on fertility-related attitudes and (grand) parenthood goals during survivorship, and if parents were aware of their sons' parenthood goals and reproductive concerns. Methods: Males (15-25 years) and their parents were recruited within 1-8 years of completing cancer treatment. Based on the Health Belief Model, AYAs (N = 38), mothers (N = 33), and fathers (N = 24) reported on parenthood goals, perceived benefits/barriers of fertility testing/preservation, perceived susceptibility/severity of infertility, and fertility knowledge. Analyses included Pearson's correlations and paired-sample t-tests. Results: More than 80% of mothers, fathers, and AYAs desired future (grand) children. Mother-son dyads had differences in fertility knowledge (p = 0.037), and father-son dyads differed in parenthood goals (p = 0.024). AYAs perceived more fertility-related barriers than their mothers (p = 0.014) and fathers (p = 0.006). AYA survivors were less likely to report they could accept a life without a biological child compared with their mothers (p = 0.009) and fathers (p = 0.024). Conclusions: These findings suggest some similarities, yet important differences between male AYA survivors' and their parents' attitudes toward fertility and parenthood. As infertility is common in this population, and is associated with uncertainty and distress, these findings underscore the need for family-centered fertility-related interventions at the time of cancer diagnosis and throughout survivorship.

Descriptive and injunctive norms of waterpipe smoking among college students.

INTRODUCTION: Smoking tobacco via a waterpipe (WP) is on the rise, particularly among college students. One reason for this may be normative perceptions of WP tobacco smoking (WTS) among this population. The current study examined the perceived and actual descriptive and injunctive norms of WTS among a college student sample. METHODS: Participants were 894 college students enrolled at a large, Midwestern university. Participants completed measures of WTS frequency and quantity and perceived/actual descriptive and injunctive norms of WTS. RESULTS: Over one-third of the sample reported ever trying WTS, while only 2% reported current (past month) use. When comparing ever and never WP smokers, ever smokers reported greater perceived peer approval of WTS. Both males and females overestimated WTS frequency of same-sex students at their university. DISCUSSION: The current study is one of the first to investigate descriptive and injunctive norms of WTS among college students. Students who report WTS are more likely to overestimate descriptive norms of WTS among their peers, suggesting corrective normative feedback regarding actual use by peers may be an important target for WTS intervention among college students. Future research should investigate the temporal association between normative perceptions and WTS behaviors among college students.