Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 29(8)2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37486155

RESUMO

Mycolicibacterium neoaurum is a rapidly growing mycobacterium and an emerging cause of human infections. M. neoaurum infections are uncommon but likely underreported, and our understanding of the disease spectrum and optimum management is incomplete. We summarize demographic and clinical characteristics of a case of catheter-related M. neoaurum bacteremia in a child with leukemia and those of 36 previously reported episodes of M. neoaurum infection. Most infections occurred in young to middle-aged adults with serious underlying medical conditions and commonly involved medical devices. Overall, infections were not associated with severe illness or death. In contrast to other mycobacteria species, M. neoaurum was generally susceptible to multiple antimicrobial drugs and responded promptly to treatment, and infections were associated with good outcomes after relatively short therapy duration and device removal. Delays in identification and susceptibility testing were common. We recommend using combination antimicrobial drug therapy and removal of infected devices to eradicate infection.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar , Mycobacteriaceae , Infecções por Mycobacterium , Mycobacterium , Criança , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Atenção à Saúde , Infecções por Mycobacterium/microbiologia , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Pediatr ; 229: 33-40, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33075369

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the similarities and differences in the evaluation and treatment of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) at hospitals in the US. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional survey from June 16 to July 16, 2020, of US children's hospitals regarding protocols for management of patients with MIS-C. Elements included characteristics of the hospital, clinical definition of MIS-C, evaluation, treatment, and follow-up. We summarized key findings and compared results from centers in which >5 patients had been treated vs those in which ≤5 patients had been treated. RESULTS: In all, 40 centers of varying size and experience with MIS-C participated in this protocol survey. Overall, 21 of 40 centers required only 1 day of fever for MIS-C to be considered. In the evaluation of patients, there was often a tiered approach. Intravenous immunoglobulin was the most widely recommended medication to treat MIS-C (98% of centers). Corticosteroids were listed in 93% of protocols primarily for moderate or severe cases. Aspirin was commonly recommended for mild cases, whereas heparin or low molecular weight heparin were to be used primarily in severe cases. In severe cases, anakinra and vasopressors frequently were recommended; 39 of 40 centers recommended follow-up with cardiology. There were similar findings between centers in which >5 patients vs ≤5 patients had been managed. Supplemental materials containing hospital protocols are provided. CONCLUSIONS: There are many similarities yet key differences between hospital protocols for MIS-C. These findings can help healthcare providers learn from others regarding options for managing MIS-C.


Assuntos
COVID-19/terapia , Protocolos Clínicos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/terapia , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Heparina/uso terapêutico , Hospitais , Humanos , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas , Proteína Antagonista do Receptor de Interleucina 1/uso terapêutico , Inquéritos e Questionários , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/diagnóstico , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Vasoconstritores/uso terapêutico
3.
Cancer Med ; 12(2): 1552-1555, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35837830

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Allergic reactions to pegaspargase during ALL therapy are typically due to antibodies against polyethylene glycol (PEG), which is also used as a stabilizing agent in mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. To evaluate the safety of these vaccines in patients with anti-pegaspargase antibodies. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients treated for ALL who had received SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations. All patients had antibodies against pegaspargase assayed during ALL therapy prospectively and in response to clinical allergies. Symptoms of intolerance to vaccination were gathered retrospectively from chart abstraction. RESULTS: SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was well tolerated in all 78 patients with prior exposure to pegaspargase as part of their leukemia therapy. No reactions were observed in the 54 patients without a history of anti-pegaspargase antibodies or in 19 patients with antibodies who received mRNA vaccination. 1 patient who received the polysorbate containing Janssen vaccine experienced mild symptoms after vaccination not meeting the criteria of clinical allergy which spontaneously resolved within 25 minutes. CONCLUSION: SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is safe in this population.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Vacinas , Humanos , Anticorpos , Anticorpos Antivirais , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Polietilenoglicóis/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , RNA Mensageiro , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Front Oncol ; 13: 1229655, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37601666

RESUMO

From 8 December 2021 to 26 January 2023, tixagevimab-cilgavimab (T-C) was authorized for pre-exposure prophylaxis of COVID-19. During this period, we used a multidisciplinary team to communicate, screen, approach, and administer T-C to eligible patients. Twenty-seven patients were eligible. Of these, 24 (88.9%) received at least one dose of T-C and three patients received two doses. Majority of patients were White, non-Hispanic, and women. Only two patients had COVID-19 prior to receiving T-C. Seventeen (70.8%) had received two or more doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. No serious adverse events were noted. Seven patients developed SARS-CoV-2 infection within 180 days of receiving T-C (median 102 days; range 28-135), and only one patient developed severe COVID-19 requiring intensive mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA