A randomized, pilot trial comparing vaginal hyaluronic acid to vaginal estrogen for the treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of a non-hormone alternative, vaginal hyaluronic acid (HLA), to a standard-of-care therapy, vaginal estrogen, for the treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM). METHODS: This was a randomized, parallel arm pilot trial. Women with GSM were randomized to an HLA vaginal suppository or vaginal estrogen cream for 12 wk to compare the primary outcome, the vulvovaginal symptom questionnaire (VSQ) score. Secondary outcomes included the following: the female sexual function index (FSFI), the vaginal symptom index (VSI), visual analog scale (VAS) for dyspareunia, vaginal itching, and vaginal dryness, patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I) at follow-up, vaginal maturation index, and vaginal pH. Differences between treatment groups were estimated using the two-sided, two-sample t -test and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Forty-nine women were randomized and 45 participants (vaginal estrogen = 23, vaginal HLA = 22) provided data at week 12. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. On the VSQ, there was no observed difference in overall scores between the HLA and vaginal estrogen groups at 12 wk ( P = 0.81). Improvement was seen within both treatment groups on the VSQ after 12 wk. The VAS score, total VSI score, total FSFI score, and vaginal pH improved over time; however, improvement did not differ between study arms. Over 90% participants noted improvement on the PGI-I in both groups ( P = 0.61). No treatment-related serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: There were no clinically meaningful differences between vaginal HLA and vaginal estrogen for the treatment of GSM after 12 wk. Vaginal HLA may be a promising non-hormone therapy for GSM.

Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome.

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) is a hereditary tissue and collagen synthesis disorder that can predispose patients to gynecologic and obstetric complications. Female patients often suffer from bothersome pelvic floor disorders, but due to the medical complexity of EDS, special considerations are needed for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and associated incontinence. In this paper, we present three unique cases of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in EDS patients and delve deeper into the multidisciplinary approach involving urogynecology, rheumatology, physiatry, gastroenterology, and anesthesiology required to appropriately manage this condition.

Incidence of Benign Renal Masses in a Contemporary Cohort of Patients Receiving Partial Nephrectomy for Presumed Renal Cell Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Over the past decade and a half, advances in diagnostic imaging as well as an increased utilization of active surveillance (AS) and renal mass biopsy (RMB) have led to an improved ability to identify benign lesions prior to partial nephrectomy (PN). We seek to examine the incidence of benign pathology at the time of PN in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing PN for presumed renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a chart review on a prospectively maintained database on a series of patients who underwent PN between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2021 for solid renal masses concerning for RCC. RESULTS: One thousand two hundred twenty-nine patients were included in the analysis, with 240 patients (19.2%) identified to have benign disease on final pathology. Of patients with benign disease, (23%) of patients had angiomyolipoma (AML) and 64% had oncocytoma. Between 2006 and 2021, there was a significant increase in the incidence of benign pathology after PN. When examining 3-year rolling averages over this same time period, the incidence of oncocytoma appeared to increase while the incidence of AML decreased. CONCLUSION: Despite improvements in diagnostic tools and increased utilization of active surveillance, the overall incidence of benign pathology, particularly oncocytoma, did not decrease over time in this contemporary cohort of patients undergoing PN.

The Influence of Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) On Parkinson's Disease: An Updated Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has affected global communities with multiple neurological complications in addition to other critical medical issues. COVID-19 binds to the host's angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors, which are expressed in the neurons and glial cells, acting as an entry port to the central nervous system (CNS). ACE2 receptors are abundantly expressed on dopamine neurons, which may worsen the prognosis of motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD). SARS-CoV-2 may lead to an indirect response via immune-mediated cytokine storms and propagate through the CNS leading to damage. In this systematic review, we aim to provide thorough analyses of associations between COVID-19 and neurological outcomes for patients with PD. METHODS: Using PRISMA statement 2020, a systematic review was conducted to isolate confirmed COVID-19 patients and analyze the PD-associated neurological outcomes using the following databases: PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. The following keywords were used "COVID19, SARS-CoV-2, Parkinson's disease, Pandemic, Mortality." A modified Delphi process was employed. RESULTS: Of the 355 studies located during the initial round of screening, 16 were included in the final synthesis. Of PD patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, worsening motor symptoms and other viral-associated symptoms were reported. These symptoms included bradykinesia, tremors, gait disturbances, delirium and dementia, and severe spasms of arms and legs. Encephalopathy was presented in 2 of the included studies. Increased mortality rates were identified for hospitalized patients due to COVID-19 and PD as compared to other patient groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with PD may experience substantial worsening of symptoms due to COVID 19. Given the novelty of neurological-viral associations, clinical studies in the future ought to explore the disease severity and neurological outcomes in COVID-19 positive patients with PD as compared to non-PD patients, in addition to understanding the role of ACE2 in increased vulnerability to contracting the infection and as a treatment modality.